Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: The Occluded Artery Trial (OAT) showed no difference in outcomes between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus optimal medical therapy (MED) in patients with persistent total occlusion of the infarct-related artery 3 to 28 days post-myocardial infarction. Whether PCI may benefit a subset of patients with preservation of infarct zone (IZ) viability is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: The OAT nuclear ancillary study hypothesized that (1) IZ viability influences left ventricular (LV) remodeling and that (2) PCI as compared with MED attenuates adverse remodeling in post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved viability. Enrolled were 124 OAT patients who underwent resting nitroglycerin-enhanced technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) before OAT randomization, with repeat imaging at 1 year. All images were quantitatively analyzed for infarct size, IZ viability, LV volumes, and function in a core laboratory. At baseline, mean infarct size was 26% +/- 18 of the LV, mean IZ viability was 43% +/- 8 of peak uptake, and most patients (70%) had at least moderately retained IZ viability. There were no significant differences in 1-year end-diastolic or end-systolic volume change between those with severely reduced versus moderately retained IZ viability, or when compared by treatment assignment PCI versus MED. In multivariable models, increasing baseline viability independently predicted improvement in ejection fraction (P = .005). There was no interaction between IZ viability and treatment assignment for any measure of LV remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: In the contemporary era of MED, PCI of the infarct-related artery compared with MED alone does not impact LV remodeling irrespective of IZ viability

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a leading cause of morbidity in the United States and worldwide. In women, it is the leading cause of death in all age groups except young women who rarely have clinically evident disease. However, when young women less than age 50 develop IHD, they are at high risk for mortality. This may be due in part to delay in diagnosis or less aggressive treatment. Young women may be less aggressively treated with medical therapies and percutaneous or surgical interventions despite studies that have shown benefit in women as well as men. Young women are an especially important population to target for treatment and study since prevention of IHD during this stage of life can have great personal and societal health consequences. Epidemiological studies, including the INTERHEART study, have identified risk factors including hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, smoking, and sedentary lifestyle that explain much of IHD in women. Several factors, including diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and tobacco use, are stronger predictors of IHD in young women as compared with older women. Healthcare practitioners who encounter young women should aggressively treat risk factors, maintain an appropriate index of suspicion for IHD, and treat acute coronary syndromes promptly and intensively to reduce the burden of IHD in young women

BACKGROUND: the OAT found that routine late (3-28 days post-myocardial infarction) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of an occluded infarct-related artery did not reduce death, reinfarction, or heart failure relative to medical treatment (MED). Angina rates were lower in PCI early, but the advantage over MED was lost by 3 years. METHODS: angina and revascularization status were collected at 4 months, then annually. We assessed whether non-protocol revascularization procedures in MED accounted for loss of the early symptomatic advantage of PCI. RESULTS: seven per 100 more PCI patients were angina-free at 4 months (P < .001) and 5 per 100 at 12 months (P = .005) with the difference narrowing to 1 per 100 at 3 years (P = .34). Non-protocol revascularization was more frequent in MED (5-year rate 22% vs 19% PCI, P = .05). Indications for revascularization included acute coronary syndromes (39% PCI vs 38% MED), stable angina/inducible ischemia (39% in each group), and physician preference (17% PCI vs 15% MED). Revascularization rates among patients with angina at any time during follow-up (35% of cohort) did not differ by treatment group (5-year rates 26% PCI vs 28% MED). Most symptomatic patients were treated without revascularization during follow-up (77%). CONCLUSIONS: in a large randomized clinical trial of stable post-myocardial infarction patients, the modest benefit on angina from PCI of an occluded infarct-related artery was lost by 3 years. Revascularization was slightly more common in MED during follow-up but was not driven by acute ischemia, and almost 1 in 5 procedures were attributed to physician preference alone

Background: Prasugrel is effective at decreasing cardiovascular events compared to clopidogrel, but increases the risk of bleeding. In 2010, the FDA issued a black box warning to consider genetic testing in clopidogrel users. Our aims were to evaluate (1) the balance of potential benefits and harms and (2) the cost-effectiveness that would result from adopting a genotype-guided strategy of dual anti-platelet therapy following PCI for ACS vs. no testing strategies of prasugrel plus aspirin (prasugrel) or clopidogrel plus aspirin (clopidogrel). Methods: A Markov state transition model was used to conduct a decision analysis and compare strategies. Probabilities of adverse outcomes were derived from TRITON-TIMI 38 trial. Event rates on clopidogrel for carriers of CYP2C19*2 vs. wild-type were derived from the TRITON genetic substudy and a recent meta-analysis. Costs are expressed in January 2011 US dollars and estimated based on Medicare reimbursements for diagnosis-related group codes. Medication costs were used from the net wholesale price for prasugrel ($5.45/d) and a generic estimate for clopidogrel ($1/d). Results: In base case analyses, the genetic testing guided strategy yielded more benefits than harms, and was less costly compared to both 'no testing' strategies. Over 15 months, total costs were $83.8 ($1200.9 at 10 yrs) lower with a gain of 0.0007 QALY (0.0216 QALY at 10 yrs) in the genotype-guided strategy compared to prasugrel. Compared to clopidogrel, it was $0.38 ($2168.8 at 10 yrs) lower with a gain of 0.0036 QALY (0.112 QALY at 10 yrs). The strongest predictor of the preferred strategy was the relative risk (RR) of a thrombotic event occurring in CYP2C19*2 carriers versus wild-type. Below a RR of 1.5, a genotype-guided strategy is no longer more effective (but is less expensive) when compared to prasugrel. Compared to clopidogrel, below a RR of 1.3 a genotype-guided strategy is no longer cost effective (>$100,000/QALY). Clopidogrel costs ($1-$4/d) did not alter our results. Conclusions: Among ACS patients undergoing PCI, a genotype-guided strategy is economically favorable in determining which anti-platelet regimen is used, assuming that the risk of thrombotic events in CYP2C19*2 carriers is approximately 30-50% higher than wild type patients