Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the role of recently introduced hybrid PET/MRI in the evaluation of lymphoma patients using PET/CT as a reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study 28 consecutive lymphoma patients (18 men, 10 women; mean age, 53.6 years) undergoing clinically indicated PET/ CT were subsequently imaged with PET/MRI using residual FDG activity from the PET/ CT study. Blinded readers evaluated PET/CT (reference standard), PET/MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) studies separately; for each study, they assessed nodal and extranodal involvement. Each FDG-avid nodal station was marked and compared on DWI, PET/MRI, and PET/CT. Modified Ann Arbor staging was performed and compared between PET/MRI and PET/CT. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on PET/MRI for FDG-avid nodal lesions was compared with the SUVmax on PET/CT. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for FDG-avid nodal lesions was compared to SUVmax on PET/MRI. RESULTS: Fifty-one FDG-avid nodal groups were identified on PET/CT in 13 patients. PET/MRI identified 51 of these nodal groups with a sensitivity of 100%. DWI identified 32 nodal groups for a sensitivity of 62.7%. PET/MRI staging and PET/CT staging were concordant in 96.4% of patients. For the one patient with discordant staging results, disease was correctly upstaged to stage IV on the basis of the PET/MRI finding of bone marrow involvement, which was missed on PET/CT. DWI staging was concordant with PET/CT staging in 64.3% of the patients. The increased staging accuracy of PET/MRI relative to DWI was significant (p = 0.004). SUVmax measured on PET/MRI and PET/CT showed excellent statistically significant correlation (r = 0.98, p < 0.001). There was a poor negative correlation between ADC and SUVmax (r = -0.036, p = 0.847). CONCLUSION: PET/MRI can be used to assess disease burden in lymphoma with sensitivity similar to PET/CT and can be a viable alternative for lymphoma staging and follow-up.

PURPOSE: Dynamic FDG imaging for prostate cancer characterization is limited by generally small size and low uptake in prostate tumors. Our aim in this pilot study was to explore feasibility of simultaneous PET/MRI to guide localization of prostate lesions for dynamic FDG analysis using a graphical approach. METHODS: Three patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent simultaneous FDG PET/MRI, incorporating dynamic prostate imaging. Histology and multiparametric MRI findings were used to localize tumors, which in turn guided identification of tumors on FDG images. Regions of interest were manually placed on tumor and benign prostate tissue. Blood activity was extracted from a region of interest placed on the femoral artery on PET images. FDG data were analyzed by graphical analysis using the influx constant Ki (Patlak analysis) when FDG binding seemed irreversible and distribution volume VT (reversible graphical analysis) when FDG binding seemed reversible given the presence of washout. RESULTS: Given inherent coregistration, simultaneous acquisition facilitated use of MRI data to localize small lesions on PET and subsequent graphical analysis in all cases. In 2 cases with irreversible binding, tumor had higher Ki than benign using Patlak analysis (0.023 vs 0.006 and 0.019 vs 0.008 mL/cm per minute). In 1 case appearing reversible, tumor had higher VT than benign using reversible graphical analysis (0.68 vs 0.52 mL/cm). CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous PET/MRI allows localization of small prostate tumors for dynamic PET analysis. By taking advantage of inclusion of the femoral arteries in the FOV, we applied advanced PET data analysis methods beyond conventional static measures and without blood sampling.

A 78-year-old man with metastatic malignant melanoma underwent a restaging 18F-FDG PET/CT after initiation of ipilimumab therapy, a Food and Drug Administration-approved human monoclonal antibody targeting CTLA-4. PET/CT demonstrated intense FDG uptake fusing to poorly circumscribed hypodensities throughout the liver. Patient was experiencing high-grade fever, chills, and generalized fatigue at the time of imaging, as well as mildly elevated liver function tests. Patient was subsequently treated with corticosteroids for suspected ipilimumab-induced hepatitis, and the patient rapidly improved clinically. Follow-up PET/CT 2 months later revealed complete resolution of abnormal FDG uptake in the liver, confirming the diagnosis of ipilimumab-induced hepatitis.

PURPOSE: Imaging is important to identify subclinical changes and for treatment planning in patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) exposed to antiresorptive therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the findings at radiography with those at fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT) for patients with ONJ related to antiresorptive therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of patients with clinically identified ONJ lesions of the mandible was performed. Two imaging modalities were evaluated for each patient: plain radiography (ie, panoramic or periapical) and FDG PET/CT with 1-mm sections. Outcome variables for the radiographic findings were osteolytic and osteosclerotic bone changes. Outcome variables for FDG PET/CT images were localization of FDG uptake. Maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax) of abnormal FDG jaw uptake were recorded, in addition to the mean SUV of the contralateral normal mandible, and used to calculate the target-to-background ratio. Radiographic changes and FDG uptake were classified as local (ie, corresponding to exposed cortical bone) or diffuse (ie, local changes and changes extending beyond the margins of exposed bone) for each imaging technique. Local and diffuse changes detected by each imaging modality were described and the difference in detection was compared with the McNemar test. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with 25 clinically identified ONJ lesions were analyzed using radiography and FDG PET/CT. Differences were found in how radiography and FDG PET/CT detect local and diffuse changes associated with ONJ. Radiography showed local changes in 17 patients (68%), diffuse changes in 3 patients (12%), and no changes in 5 patients (20%), whereas FDG PET/CT imaging showed local changes in 17 patients (68%) and diffuse changes in 8 patients (32%). The McNemar test indicated that FDG PET/CT imaging was less likely to miss a lesion (P < .001). Mean SUVmax was 6.59, and the mean target-to-background ratio was 5.37. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that FDG PET/CT detects local and diffuse metabolic changes that may not be represented by plain radiography for patients with ONJ related to antiresorptive therapy. The target-to-background ratio allowed the discrimination between ONJ lesions and background changes. Future studies are necessary to determine whether FDG PET/CT can determine risk and facilitate management of ONJ.

Simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a promising novel technology for oncology diagnosis and staging and neurologic and cardiac applications. Our institution's current research protocol results in a total imaging time of approximately 45 to 70 minutes with simultaneous PET/MR imaging, making this a feasible total body imaging protocol. Further development of MR-based attenuation correction will improve PET quantification. Quantitatively accurate multiparametric PET/MR data sets will likely improve diagnosis of disease and help guide and monitor the therapies for individualized patient care.

Integrated PET/MR with simultaneous acquisition may improve the identification of pathologic findings in patients. This pilot study evaluated metabolic activity differences between epilepsy patients and healthy controls and directly correlated FDG uptake with MR regional abnormality. Epilepsy patients (n=11) and controls (n=6) were imaged on a whole-body simultaneous PET/MR scanner. After FDG injection, simultaneous images were acquired for 60 minutes. Statistical analyses on SUV values (over 117 brain regions, including left and right, for 96 cortical and 21 subcortical regions) derived from three normalization methods, by individual subject's mean cortical, white matter or global brain, were compared between groups. The asymmetry was compared. T2, T1 and PET co-registered images were also used for lesion detection and correlation of PET and MR regional abnormality. Left and right postcentral gyri were found to be consistently hypermetabolic regions, while right temporal pole and planum polare were consistently hypometabolic regions by all three normalization methods. Using the asymmetry index (AI > 10% or SUV ratios > 1.2), more metabolic asymmetry regions were detected in patients than in controls, with 96.2% agreement. The presence of hippocampal abnormalities or cortical tubers detected via T2 FLAIR in patients correlated well with the hypometabolism detected via FDG-PET. Our results showed specific patterns of metabolic abnormality and asymmetry over 117 brain regions in epilepsy patients, as compared to controls, suggest that simultaneous PET/MR imaging provides a useful tool to help understand etiopathogenesis and localize seizure foci.