Faculty Bibliography

Background: Cemiplimab-rwlc is the only US FDA-approved treatment for patients (pts) with advanced CSCC. The primary analysis of a weight-based regimen of cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV dosed every 2 weeks (Q2W) in mCSCC has been published; follow-up data are reported here. The primary analysis for the approved fixed-dosing regimen of cemiplimab 350 mg IV dosed every 3 weeks (Q3W) in mCSCC, which displays comparable pharmacokinetics to weight-based dosing, is also reported.
Method(s): In a phase II study (NCT02760498), pts with mCSCC received IV cemiplimab as a weight-based regimen for up to 96 weeks (Group [Gp] 1, n=59) or a fixed regimen for up to 54 weeks (Gp 3, n=56). The primary objective was objective response rate (ORR) per independent central review (ICR; RECIST 1.1 for scans, modifiedWHOcriteria for photos).
Result(s): Baseline characteristics were similar in both gps (Table). Median (range) duration of follow-up was 16.5 (1.1-26.6) months (mos) for the Gp 1 update and 8.1 (0.6-14.1) mos for the Gp 3 primary analysis. ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) by ICR was 49.2% (35.9-62.5%) in Gp 1, 39.3% (26.5-53.2%) in Gp 3, and 44.3% (35.1-53.9%) for both gps combined. ORR by investigator assessment was 49.2% (35.9-62.5%) in Gp 1, 51.8% (38.0-65.3%) in Gp 3, and 50.4% (41.0-59.9%) combined. Median duration of response (DOR) per ICR has not been reached (range: Gp 1, 2.8-21.6 mos; Gp 3, 2.1-11.1 mos). Estimated 12-month DOR (95% CI) per ICR was 88.9% (69.3-96.3%) in Gp 1 and not evaluable in Gp 3. Similar proportions of pts in both gps experienced an adverse event (AE), most commonly diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea (Table). Grade >=3 AEs were reported in 45.2% (52/115) of pts in both gps combined, most commonly anemia (6.1%, 7/115).
Conclusion(s): The primary analysis of Gp 3 confirms that the approved dose of cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W confers comparable efficacy and safety to the weight-based regimen (Gp 1) in mCSCC. Responses in both mCSCC cohorts were durable

Annexe A Declaration de liens d'interets: Le materiel complementaire (declaration de liens d'interets) accompagnant la version en ligne de cet article est disponible en ligne sur :. Annexe A Declaration de liens d'interets: [Figure presented] Annexe B Materiel complementaire: Le materiel complementaire accompagnant la version en ligne de cet article est disponible en ligne sur :. Annexe B Materiel complementaire: [Figure presented]
Copyright

Background Autoantibody landscapes are very specific to the individual, can remain stable for many years, and contain unique features reported in association with cancer, autoimmunity, infection, neurologic conditions, CD8+ T cell behavior, and checkpoint blockade adverse events [1-11]. The goal of this work was to determine whether pre-existing antigenspecific features in melanoma patient autoantibody landscapes would associate with clinical outcomes following checkpoint blockade. Methods Pre-treatment serum samples were collected from 117 melanoma patients prior to checkpoint blockade with anti-CTLA4 (N=60), anti-PD1 (N=38), or both in combination (N=16). All data was collected with approval of the NYU Institutional Review Board at the NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center with informed consent [11]. Serum samples were run on HuProt Human Proteome Microarrays containing >19,000 human proteins by CDI Laboratories. Raw serum IgG signal intensities were processed across staining cohorts via interquartile range normalization. Pre-existing antibody responses were defined as patient-specific IgG signals >3.5 median absolute deviations above cohort median IgG background (modified Z-score). Group statistics were computed (GraphPad Prism), and gene ontology enrichment analysis was performed (Enrichr) [12]. Results Several pre-existing antigen-specific IgG autoantibody targets were observed to have associations with good outcomes (SD/PR) or objective clinical responses (PR/CR) versus patients with progressive disease (POD). While final determination of the most predictive subsets is ongoing, many targets represent genes in an axis surrounding immune signaling pathways, hereditary neurodegenerative disease, and the ubiquitin proteasome pathway (ie, UBQLN1, UBQLN2). An exemplary example was observed in the autoantibody responses shared by >10% of all patients regardless of clinical outcome. Gene ontology enrichment analysis of these shared melanoma-patient autoantibodies versus KEGG 2019 [12] demonstrates this set of proteins is strongly enriched for neurotrophin signaling-associated proteins after multi-sample correction (P=0.004) (Table 1). Several other associations were observed cohort-wide for ontologies with tissuespecific enrichment in the brain, neurons, and neuronal processes. Conclusions In this pilot study, we found strong associations across the cohort for autoantibodies against nerve-growth-inducing neurotrophins and genes like UBQLN1 and UBQLN2 which have strong associations with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's, and Alzheimer's - neurodegenerative diseases that are known to have incidences which correlate with melanoma [14-16]; this hints at a potential immunologic connection between the conditions, perhaps related to an antitumor / autoimmune axis involving the targets reported here. (Table Presented)

BACKGROUND:Recent evidence suggests that immunotherapy efficacy in melanoma is modulated by gut microbiota. Few studies have examined this phenomenon in humans, and none have incorporated metatranscriptomics, important for determining expression of metagenomic functions in the microbial community. METHODS:In melanoma patients undergoing immunotherapy, gut microbiome was characterized in pre-treatment stool using 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenome sequencing (n = 27). Transcriptional expression of metagenomic pathways was confirmed with metatranscriptome sequencing in a subset of 17. We examined associations of taxa and metagenomic pathways with progression-free survival (PFS) using 500 × 10-fold cross-validated elastic-net penalized Cox regression. RESULTS:Higher microbial community richness was associated with longer PFS in 16S and shotgun data (p < 0.05). Clustering based on overall microbiome composition divided patients into three groups with differing PFS; the low-risk group had 99% lower risk of progression than the high-risk group at any time during follow-up (p = 0.002). Among the species selected in regression, abundance of Bacteroides ovatus, Bacteroides dorei, Bacteroides massiliensis, Ruminococcus gnavus, and Blautia producta were related to shorter PFS, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Coprococcus eutactus, Prevotella stercorea, Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus anginosus, and Lachnospiraceae bacterium 3 1 46FAA to longer PFS. Metagenomic functions related to PFS that had correlated metatranscriptomic expression included risk-associated pathways of L-rhamnose degradation, guanosine nucleotide biosynthesis, and B vitamin biosynthesis. CONCLUSIONS:This work adds to the growing evidence that gut microbiota are related to immunotherapy outcomes, and identifies, for the first time, transcriptionally expressed metagenomic pathways related to PFS. Further research is warranted on microbial therapeutic targets to improve immunotherapy outcomes.

PURPOSE:/UNASSIGNED:To report that metastatic choroidal melanoma (systemic and intraocular) can respond to systemic immunotherapy. METHODS:/UNASSIGNED:In 2010, a 64-year-old woman with a choroidal melanoma was treated with palladium-103 plaque brachytherapy. Developing 2.5 years later, radiation maculopathy was suppressed with periodic intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for five additional years. Development of a new, discrete choroidal melanoma in the same eye prompted radiographic imaging of the orbits, abdomen/pelvis, and chest. Multi-organ metastasis in the eye, the liver, and nodes was treated with systemic combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) and nivolumab (1 mg/kg) intravenous every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by nivolumab (3 mg/kg) intravenous every 4 weeks as maintenance. Subsequent ophthalmic and systemic surveillance were performed. RESULTS:/UNASSIGNED:All sites of metastases were found to regress on systemic immunotherapy. For example, ophthalmic ultrasound imaging revealed that the intraocular metastasis was reduced from 6.6 to 1.5 mm in thickness. Synchronously, serial radiographic imaging revealed progressive shrinkage and disappearance of hepatic and nodal metastasis (except for one gastrohepatic node). However, combination stereotactic body radiation therapy (30 Gy) with nivolumab maintenance was found to induce a significant reduction in this remaining node. Continued periodic intraocular anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy has suppressed her radiation maculopathy resulting in 20/25 vision, now 8 ½ years after initial plaque therapy. CONCLUSION:/UNASSIGNED:This case shows that metastatic choroidal melanoma can present in the same eye as the primary tumor. It also shows that systemic immunotherapy can control both ocular and systemic metastases as well as prolong both life and sight.

Despite major improvements in combatting metastatic melanoma since the advent of immunotherapy, the overall survival for patients with advanced disease remains low. Recently, there is a growing number of reports supporting an "obesity paradox," in which patients who are overweight or mildly obese may exhibit a survival benefit in patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. We studied the relationship between body mass index and progression-free survival and overall survival in a cohort of 423 metastatic melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy, enrolled and prospectively followed up in the NYU Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group database. We analyzed this association stratified by first vs. second or greater-line of treatment and treatment type adjusting for age, gender, stage, lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, number of metastatic sites, and body mass index classification changes. In our cohort, the patients who were overweight or obese did not have different progression-free survival than patients with normal body mass index. Stratifying this cohort by first vs. non-first line immunotherapy revealed a moderate but insignificant association between being overweight or obese and better progression-free survival in patients who received first line. Conversely, an association with worse progression-free survival was observed in patients who received non-first line immune checkpoint inhibitors. Specifically, overweight and obese patients receiving combination immunotherapy had a statistically significant survival benefit, whereas patients receiving the other treatment types showed heterogeneous trends. We caution the scientific community to consider several important points prior to drawing conclusions that could potentially influence patient care, including preclinical data associating obesity with aggressive tumor biology, the lack of congruence amongst several investigations, and the limited reproduced comprehensiveness of these studies.

Multiple primary melanoma (MPM) has been associated with a higher 10-year mortality risk compared to patients with single primary melanoma (SPM). Given that 3-8% of patients with SPM develop additional primary melanomas, new markers predictive of MPM risk are needed. Based on the evidence that the immune system may regulate melanoma progression, we explored whether germline genetic variants controlling the expression of 41 immunomodulatory genes modulate the risk of MPM compared to patients with SPM or healthy controls. By genotyping these 41 variants in 977 melanoma patients, we found that rs2071304, linked to the expression of SPI1, was strongly associated with MPM risk reduction (OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.45-0.81; p = 0.0007) when compared to patients with SPM. Furthermore, we showed that rs6695772, a variant affecting expression of BATF3, is also associated with MPM-specific survival (HR = 3.42; 95% CI = 1.57-7.42; p = 0.0019). These findings provide evidence that the genetic variation in immunomodulatory pathways may contribute to the development of secondary primary melanomas and also associates with MPM survival. The study suggests that inherited host immunity may play an important role in MPM development.

Melanoma in the head and neck is known to metastasize to cranial nerves. Prompt treatment is critical for preventing progression and reducing neuropathy. We report a patient who presented with cranial neuropathy related to a malignant skull base lesion that originated as lentigo maligna. The diagnosis was challenging, requiring two surgeries to obtain tissue and neither biopsy leading to a definitive diagnosis. Pathological analyses demonstrated positive immunoreactivity for SOX10 and S100, preservation of H3K27me3, and PTEN and STK11 mutations. The patient was managed with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery and combination immunotherapy. Imaging at 9 months post-SRS showed resolution of the mass lesion. Clinically, the patient has occasional left-sided facial pain requiring no medication and denies facial numbness. We favor a diagnosis of desmoplastic neurotropic melanoma due to the neurotropic spread and response to melanoma-targeted immunotherapy.

Genetic analysis of melanoma has allowed us to identify a population of patients who have more aggressive disease and harbor the driver mutation BRAF. This mutation is found in approximately 50% of metastatic disease and provides a target for focused therapies to control this disease. These responses are usually brisk; however, they lack the durability of immunotherapy. Frontline therapy for patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma is not as straightforward as prescribing BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Prior trials of combination immunotherapy demonstrate similar responses and durability of responses in patients with BRAF wild-type as well as BRAF-mutated disease. Decisions about immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or the combination of immunotherapy with targeted therapy require an oncologist to evaluate multiple factors to select which treatment option is best for the patient. Trials for metastatic melanoma have included biomarkers as secondary endpoints and aim to identify some way to predict a response, or lack thereof, to therapy. Here, we discuss the utility and reliability of biomarkers in determining therapy for patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma and discuss combination immunotherapy with targeted therapy versus sequential immunotherapy/targeted therapy as well as which regimen should be implemented as initial therapy.

Patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma have varied clinical courses, even in patients with similar disease characteristics. We examine the impact of initial stage of melanoma diagnosis, BRAF status of primary melanoma, and receiving adjuvant therapy on postmetastatic overall survival (pmOS). We studied melanoma patients presenting to Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University and prospectively enrolled in New York University melanoma biospecimen database and followed up on protocol-driven schedule. Patients were stratified by stage at initial melanoma diagnosis as per AJCC 7th ed. guidelines. pmOS was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox's proportional hazards models were used to assess hazard ratios (HRs). Three hundred and four out of 3204 patients developed metastatic disease over the time of follow-up (median follow-up 2.2 years, range: 0.08-35.2 years). Patients diagnosed with stage I (n=96) melanoma had longer pmOS (29.5 months) than those diagnosed with stage II (n=99, pmOS 14.9 months) or stage III (n=109, pmOS 15.1 months) melanoma (P=0.036). Initial stage of diagnosis remained significant in multivariate analysis when controlling for lactate dehydrogenase and site of metastases [primary diagnosis stage II (HR 1.44, P=0.046), stage III (HR 1.5, P=0.019)]. Adjuvant treatment was associated with better survival but BRAF mutation status did not show an association. Our data challenge the general assumption that primary melanomas converge upon diagnosis of metastatic disease and behave uniformly. Primary stage of melanoma at the time of diagnosis may be prognostic of outcome, similar to lactate dehydrogenase and metastatic disease sites.