Searched for: person:hoagwk01
Festschrift for Leonard Bickman: Introduction to The Future of Children's Mental Health Services Special Issue [Editorial]
Schoenwald, Sonja K; Bradshaw, Catherine P; Hoagwood, Kimberly Eaton; Atkins, Marc S; Ialongo, Nicholas; Douglas, Susan R
This introductory article describes the genesis of the Festschrift for Leonard Bickman and of this Festschrift special issue entitled, The Future of Children's Mental Health Services. The special issue includes a collection of 11 original children's mental health services research articles, broadly organized in accordance with three themes (i.e., Improving Precision and Use of Service Data to Guide Policy and Practice, Implementation and Dissemination, and Preparing for Innovation), followed by an interview-style article with Bickman. Then follows a featured manuscript by Bickman himself, three invited commentaries, and a compilation of letters and notes in which colleagues reflect on his career and on their experiences of him. The introduction concludes with a few thoughts about the future of children's mental health services portended by the extraordinary scholarly contributions of Bickman and those who have been inspired by him.
PMCID:7382702
PMID: 32715428
ISSN: 1573-3289
CID: 4540082
Dissemination Strategies to Accelerate the Policy Impact of Children's Mental Health Services Research
Purtle, Jonathan; Nelson, Katherine L; Bruns, Eric J; Hoagwood, Kimberly E
The United States is in the midst of a children's mental health crisis, with rates of depression, anxiety, and suicide increasing precipitously. Evidence produced by children's mental health services research can help address this crisis by informing public policy decisions about service delivery, system design, and investments in the social determinants of mental health. Unfortunately, the policy impact of children's mental health services research is limited because evidence often fails to reach policy makers, be responsive to their needs, resonate with their worldview, or reflect the contexts in which they make decisions. Dissemination strategies-defined as the development and targeted distribution of messages and materials about research evidence pertaining to a specific issue or intervention-can help address these challenges. Yet, limited integrated guidance exists to inform the design of such strategies. This article addresses this need by synthesizing the results of empirical studies to provide guidance about how to enhance the dissemination of children's mental health services research to policy makers. The article provides four recommendations about the content of policy maker-focused dissemination materials, discusses how strategic framing and message tailoring can increase the chances that evidence is persuasive to policy makers, and highlights strategies to ensure that evidence reaches policy makers.
PMID: 32517640
ISSN: 1557-9700
CID: 4489592
Policy and Practice Innovations to Improve Prescribing of Psychoactive Medications for Children
Kelleher, Kelly J; Rubin, David; Hoagwood, Kimberly
Psychoactive medications are the most expensive and fastest-growing class of pharmaceutical agents for children. The cost, side effects, and unprecedented growth rate at which these drugs are prescribed have raised alarms from health care clinicians, patient advocates, and agencies about the appropriateness of how these drugs are distributed to parents and their children. This article examines current prescribing of three classes of psychoactive drugs-stimulants, antidepressants, and antipsychotics-and efforts to improve pediatric prescribing of these agents. Federal policy efforts to curb questionable prescribing of psychoactive medications to children have focused particularly on oversight of antipsychotic use among foster care children. The article reviews system-level interventions, including delivery system enhancements, which increase availability of alternatives to medication treatments, employ electronic medical record reminders, and increase cross-sector care coordination; clinician prescribing enhancements, which disseminate best-practice guidelines, create quality and learning collaboratives, and offer "second opinion" psychiatric consultations; and prescriber monitoring programs, which include retrospective review and prospective monitoring of physicians' prescribing to identify patterns suggestive of inappropriate prescribing. Potential interventions to deter inappropriate pediatric prescribing are briefly described, such as transparency in drug prices and incentives among insurers, public agencies, and pharmacy benefit managers; value-based purchasing, specifically value-based payment for medications; and preventive interventions, such as parent training.
PMID: 32188362
ISSN: 1557-9700
CID: 4353622
Evaluation of a Web-Based Training Model for Family Peer Advocates in Children's Mental Health
Horwitz, Sarah McCue; Cervantes, Paige; Kuppinger, Anne D; Quintero, Patricia L; Burger, Susan; Lane, Heather; Bradbury, Donna; Cleek, Andrew F; Hoagwood, Kimberly Eaton
OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:The aim of this study was to compare knowledge gains from a new online training program with gains from an existing in-person training program for family peer advocates. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Data were used from a pre-post study of individuals who enrolled in the Web-based Parent Empowerment Program training; 144 participants completed the training and pre-post tests, and 140 were admitted to the analyses. Knowledge was assessed with 34 questions, 29 of which were common to the online and in-person trainings. Pre-post knowledge scores were available from the in-person training. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Statistically significant gains in knowledge were found with both the 34 questions and the 29 questions common to both trainings. Knowledge gains across the two training models did not differ. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Data on knowledge gains from this accessible, affordable online model show promise for training the growing and important workforce of family peer advocates.
PMID: 31910753
ISSN: 1557-9700
CID: 4257242
Implementing combined WHO mhGAP and adapted group interpersonal psychotherapy to address depression and mental health needs of pregnant adolescents in Kenyan primary health care settings (INSPIRE): a study protocol for pilot feasibility trial of the integrated intervention in LMIC settings
Kumar, Manasi; Huang, Keng-Yen; Othieno, Caleb; Wamalwa, Dalton; Hoagwood, Kimberly; Unutzer, Jurgen; Saxena, Shekhar; Petersen, Inge; Njuguna, Simon; Amugune, Beatrice; Gachuno, Onesmus; Ssewamala, Fred; McKay, Mary
Background/UNASSIGNED:Addressing adolescent pregnancies associated health burden demands new ways of organizing maternal and child mental health services to meet multiple needs of this group. There is a need to strengthen integration of sustainable evidence-based mental health interventions in primary health care settings for pregnant adolescents. The proposed study is guided by implementation science frameworks with key objective of implementing a pilot trial testing a full IPT-G version along with IPT-G mini version under the mhGAP/IPT-G service framework and to study feasibility of the integrated mhGAP/IPT-G adolescent peripartum depression care delivery model and estimate if a low cost and compressed version of IPT-G intervention would result in similar size of effect on mental health and family functioning as the Full IPT-G. There are two sub- studies embedded which are: 1) To identify multi-level system implementation barriers and strategies guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to enhance perinatal mhGAP-depression care and evidence-based intervention integration (i.e., group interpersonal psychotherapy; IPT-G) for pregnant adolescents in primary care contexts; 2) To use findings from aim 1 and observational data from Maternal and Child Health (MCH) clinics that run within primary health care facilities to develop a mental health implementation workflow plan that has buy-in from key stakeholders, as well as to develop a modified protocol and implementation training manual for building health facility staff's capacity in implementing the integrated mhGAP/IPT-G depression care. Methods/UNASSIGNED:For the primary objective of studying feasibility of the integrated mhGAP/IPT-G depression care in MCH service context for adolescent perinatal depression, we will recruit 90 pregnant adolescents to a three-arm pilot intervention (unmasked) trial study (IPT-G Full, IPT-G Mini, and wait-list control in the context of mhGAP care). Pregnant adolescents ages 13-18, in their 1st-2nd trimester with a depression score of 13 and above on EPDS would be recruited. Proctor's implementation evaluation model will be used. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention implementation and size of effects on mental health and family functioning will be estimated using mixed method data collection from caregivers of adolescents, adolescents, and health care providers. In the two sub-studies, stakeholders representing diverse perspectives will be recruited and focus group discussions data will be gathered. For aim 2, to build capacity for mhGAP-approach of adolescent depression care and research, the implementation-capacity training manual will be applied to train 20 providers, 12 IPT-G implementers/health workers and 16 Kenyan researchers. Acceptability and appropriateness of the training approach will be assessed. Additional feedback related to co-located service delivery model, task-shifting and task-sharing approach of IPT-G delivery will be gathered for further manual improvement. Discussion/UNASSIGNED:This intervention and service design are in line with policy priority of Government of Kenya, Kenya Vision 2030, World Health Organization, and UN Sustainable Development Goals that focus on improving capacity of mental health service systems to reduce maternal, child, adolescent health and mental health disparities in LMICs. Successfully carrying out this study in Kenya will provide an evidence-based intervention service development and implementation model for adolescents in other Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries. The study is funded by FIC/NIH under K43 grant.
PMCID:7507720
PMID: 32974045
ISSN: 2055-5784
CID: 4671032
The role of the outer setting in implementation: associations between state demographic, fiscal, and policy factors and use of evidence-based treatments in mental healthcare
Bruns, Eric J; Parker, Elizabeth M; Hensley, Spencer; Pullmann, Michael D; Benjamin, Philip H; Lyon, Aaron R; Hoagwood, Kimberly E
BACKGROUND:Despite consistent recognition of their influence, empirical study of how outer setting factors (e.g., policies, financing, stakeholder relationships) influence public systems' investment in and adoption of evidence-based treatment (EBT) is limited. This study examined associations among unmodifiable (e.g., demographic, economic, political, structural factors) and modifiable (e.g., allocation of resources, social processes, policies, and regulations) outer setting factors and adoption of behavioral health EBT by US states. METHODS:Multilevel models examined relationships between state characteristics, an array of funding and policy variables, and state adoption of behavioral health EBTs for adults and children across years 2002-2012, using data from the National Association for State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute and other sources. RESULTS:Several unmodifiable state factors, including per capita income, controlling political party, and Medicaid expansion, predicted level of state fiscal investments in EBT. By contrast, modifiable factors, such as interagency collaboration and investment in research centers, were more predictive of state policies supportive of EBT. Interestingly, level of adult EBT adoption was associated with state fiscal supports for EBT, while child EBT adoption was predicted more by supportive policies. State per capita debt and direct state operation of services (versus contracting for services) predicted both child and adult EBT adoption. CONCLUSIONS:State-level EBT adoption and associated implementation support is associated with an interpretable array of policy, financing, and oversight factors. Such information expands our knowledge base of the role of the outer setting in implementation and may provide insight into how best to focus efforts to promote EBT for behavioral health disorders.
PMCID:6854683
PMID: 31722738
ISSN: 1748-5908
CID: 5069902
Correction to: A repeated cross-sectional study of clinicians' use of psychotherapy techniques during 5 years of a system-wide effort to implement evidence-based practices in Philadelphia
Beidas, Rinad S; Williams, Nathaniel J; Becker-Haimes, Emily M; Aarons, Gregory A; Barg, Frances K; Evans, Arthur C; Jackson, Kamilah; Jones, David; Hadley, Trevor; Hoagwood, Kimberly; Marcus, Steven C; Neimark, Geoffrey; Rubin, Ronnie M; Schoenwald, Sonja K; Adams, Danielle R; Walsh, Lucia M; Zentgraf, Kelly; Mandell, David S
.
PMID: 31500641
ISSN: 1748-5908
CID: 4115342
A repeated cross-sectional study of clinicians' use of psychotherapy techniques during 5Â years of a system-wide effort to implement evidence-based practices in Philadelphia
Beidas, Rinad S; Williams, Nathaniel J; Becker-Haimes, Emily M; Aarons, Gregory A; Barg, Frances K; Evans, Arthur C; Jackson, Kamilah; Jones, David; Hadley, Trevor; Hoagwood, Kimberly; Marcus, Steven C; Neimark, Geoffrey; Rubin, Ronnie M; Schoenwald, Sonja K; Adams, Danielle R; Walsh, Lucia M; Zentgraf, Kelly; Mandell, David S
BACKGROUND:Little work investigates the effect of behavioral health system efforts to increase use of evidence-based practices or how organizational characteristics moderate the effect of these efforts. The objective of this study was to investigate clinician practice change in a system encouraging implementation of evidence-based practices over 5 years and how organizational characteristics moderate this effect. We hypothesized that evidence-based techniques would increase over time, whereas use of non-evidence-based techniques would remain static. METHOD/METHODS:Using a repeated cross-sectional design, data were collected three times from 2013 to 2017 in Philadelphia's public behavioral health system. Clinicians from 20 behavioral health outpatient clinics serving youth were surveyed three times over 5 years (n = 340; overall response rate = 60%). All organizations and clinicians were exposed to system-level support provided by the Evidence-based Practice Innovation Center from 2013 to 2017. Additionally, approximately half of the clinicians participated in city-funded evidence-based practice training initiatives. The main outcome included clinician self-reported use of cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic techniques measured by the Therapy Procedures Checklist-Family Revised. RESULTS:Clinicians were 80% female and averaged 37.52 years of age (SD = 11.40); there were no significant differences in clinician characteristics across waves (all ps > .05). Controlling for organizational and clinician covariates, average use of CBT techniques increased by 6% from wave 1 (M = 3.18) to wave 3 (M = 3.37, p = .021, d = .29), compared to no change in psychodynamic techniques (p = .570). Each evidence-based practice training initiative in which clinicians participated predicted a 3% increase in CBT use (p = .019) but no change in psychodynamic technique use (p = .709). In organizations with more proficient cultures at baseline, clinicians exhibited greater increases in CBT use compared to organizations with less proficient cultures (8% increase vs. 2% decrease, p = .048). CONCLUSIONS:System implementation of evidence-based practices is associated with modest changes in clinician practice; these effects are moderated by organizational characteristics. Findings identify preliminary targets to improve implementation.
PMID: 31226992
ISSN: 1748-5908
CID: 3939522
Are There Missed Opportunities to Maximize Organ Donation Registrations? An Examination of Driver's License Applications Across the United States
Stevens, Jack; Tumin, Dmitry; Shaffer, Kelly L; Bickman, Leonard; Hoagwood, Kimberly E; Hayes, Don
INTRODUCTION:With 116 000 people waiting for transplants and 8000 patients dying annually on waiting lists, the United States has a considerable organ shortage. An insufficient number of Americans have registered to become organ donors when obtaining driver's licenses or ID cards. Across states, there is considerable variability in organ donor registration rates as well as driver's license applications. METHODS:The purpose of this project was to describe the variability in the phrasing of the organ donor registration question by state bureaus of motor vehicles as well as other application questions that might influence this decision. In particular, the frequency of states employing empirically supported messages to increase donor registrations was ascertained. The content and phrasing of 46 different driver's license applications was coded in regard to seeking organ donor registrations. FINDINGS:No states used the empirically supported strategies of reciprocity, descriptive norms, or loss/gain framing from the interdisciplinary field of behavioral economics. Twelve states used injunctive norms to signify social approval for organ donation. Many state applications had lengthy organ donation sections and health questions that could discourage donor registrations. DISCUSSION:There is an extremely low use of empirically supported messages to increase organ donation registrations in driver's license applications in the United States. Opportunities exist for thoughtful consideration of the wording of driver's license applications. States interested in exploring ways to increase donations could undertake controlled variation of applications to test the effects of message framing on registration rates.
PMID: 30845877
ISSN: 2164-6708
CID: 5069892
Implementation and Use of a Client-Facing Web-Based Shared Decision-Making System (MyCHOIS-CommonGround) in Two Specialty Mental Health Clinics
Finnerty, Molly; Austin, Elizabeth; Chen, Qingxian; Layman, Deborah; Kealey, Edith; Ng-Mak, Daisy; Rajagopalan, Krithika; Hoagwood, Kimberly
Electronic shared-decision making programs may provide an assistive technology to support physician-patient communication. This mixed methods study examined use of a web-based shared decision-making program (MyCHOIS-CommonGround) by individuals receiving specialty mental health services, and identified qualitative factors influencing adoption during the first 18 months of implementation in two Medicaid mental health clinics. T-tests and χ2 analyses were conducted to assess differences in patient use between sites. Approximately 80% of patients in both clinics created a MyCHOIS-CommonGround user profile, but marked differences emerged between clinics in patients completing shared decision-making reports (79% vs. 28%, χ2(1) = 109.92, p < .01) and average number of reports (7.20 vs. 3.60, t = - 3.64, p < .01). Results suggest high penetration of computer-based programs in specialty mental health services is possible, but clinic implementation factors can influence patient use including leadership commitment, peer staff funding to support the program, and implementation strategy, most notably integration of the program within routine clinical workflow.
PMID: 30317442
ISSN: 1573-2789
CID: 3368972