Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:There is no established standard of care for treating central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia (CCCA), and treatment approaches vary widely. OBJECTIVE:To develop consensus statements regarding the use of various pharmacological therapies in treating adults with CCCA. METHODS:We invited 27 dermatologists with expertise in hair and scalp disorders to participate in a 3-round modified Delphi study between January and March 2023. Statements met strong consensus if 75% of respondents agreed or disagreed. Statements met moderate consensus if 55% or more but less than 75% agreed or disagreed. RESULTS:In Round 1, 5 of 33 (15.2%) statements met strong consensus, followed by 9 of 28 (32.1%) in Round 2. After the final Round 3 meeting, strong consensus was reached for 20 of 70 (28.6%) overall statements. Two statements achieved moderate consensus. LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:This study included only English-speaking, US-based dermatologists and did not consider non-pharmacological therapies. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Despite varying opinions among dermatologists, consensus was reached for several statements to help clinicians manage CCCA. We also highlight areas that lack expert consensus with the goal of advancing research and therapeutic options for CCCA.

Keratosis pilaris atrophicans faciei (KPAF) and frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) present diagnostic challenges due to their similar clinical characteristics. Dermatologists often employ overlapping treatment regimens, which may hinder accurate diagnosis and treatment expectations. Genetic testing offers promise for precise diagnosis and tailored treatment strategies, yet its utility in these conditions remains underexplored. This manuscript presents a unique case study of a 36-year-old male with symptoms of both KPAF and FFA, who underwent genetic testing. Despite testing negative for this mutation, the case underscores the potential of genetic testing to enhance diagnostic accuracy and optimize treatment outcomes.

Alopecia is traditionally classified into scarring and nonscarring subtypes, with etiopathologies ranging from androgen-mediated to immuno-inflammatory. Over 50% of men and almost 50% of women will experience some form of hair loss in their lifetime. Given this prevalence and the psychosocial significance of hair, understanding the pathophysiology and comorbidities of different types of hair loss is imperative. Other proinflammatory dermatologic disorders, such as psoriasis, are recognised to have systemic manifestations including an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease, and are now considered CV risk-enhancing conditions. With increased recognition of the importance of systemic inflammation in promoting atherosclerosis, high prevalence, and improved treatment strategies, there is increased interest in establishing whether a similar association between alopecia and cardiovascular disease (CVD) exists. In this manuscript, we aim to review the current literature regarding CV risk in androgenic alopecia (AGA) and alopecia areata (AA). Additionally, we review the literature for cicatricial alopecias and highlight the need for more research into their potential associations with CV risk. Evidence from the identified AGA publications suggests an association of AGA with CV risk factors including hypertension, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance, as well as with coronary artery disease. For AA, most of the identified studies found an association between AA and CV risk, though the relationships were not always statistically significant. Research on cicatricial alopecias and CV risk is limited and often contradictory. There is great need for more studies regarding the association between various types of alopecia and the development of CVD, and potential mechanisms. Particularly needed are more studies of cicatricial alopecias and potential associated CV risk. While some literature suggests that patients with alopecia have an increased risk of CVD, the lack of concrete evidence represents a notable gap in our current understanding.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Current measures of alopecia areata (AA) severity, such as the Severity of Alopecia Tool score, do not adequately capture overall disease impact. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To explore factors associated with AA severity beyond scalp hair loss, and to support the development of the Alopecia Areata Severity and Morbidity Index (ASAMI). EVIDENCE REVIEW/UNASSIGNED:A total of 74 hair and scalp disorder specialists from multiple continents were invited to participate in an eDelphi project consisting of 3 survey rounds. The first 2 sessions took place via a text-based web application following the Delphi study design. The final round took place virtually among participants via video conferencing software on April 30, 2022. FINDINGS/UNASSIGNED:Of all invited experts, 64 completed the first survey round (global representation: Africa [4.7%], Asia [9.4%], Australia [14.1%], Europe [43.8%], North America [23.4%], and South America [4.7%]; health care setting: public [20.3%], private [28.1%], and both [51.6%]). A total of 58 specialists completed the second round, and 42 participated in the final video conference meeting. Overall, consensus was achieved in 96 of 107 questions. Several factors, independent of the Severity of Alopecia Tool score, were identified as potentially worsening AA severity outcomes. These factors included a disease duration of 12 months or more, 3 or more relapses, inadequate response to topical or systemic treatments, rapid disease progression, difficulty in cosmetically concealing hair loss, facial hair involvement (eyebrows, eyelashes, and/or beard), nail involvement, impaired quality of life, and a history of anxiety, depression, or suicidal ideation due to or exacerbated by AA. Consensus was reached that the Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment scale adequately classified the severity of scalp hair loss. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:This eDelphi survey study, with consensus among global experts, identified various determinants of AA severity, encompassing not only scalp hair loss but also other outcomes. These findings are expected to facilitate the development of a multicomponent severity tool that endeavors to competently measure various disease impact. The findings are also anticipated to aid in identifying candidates for current and emerging systemic treatments. Future research must incorporate the perspectives of patients and the public to assign weight to the domains recognized in this project as associated with AA severity.