Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Cardiac anomalies are prevalent in patients with bony spinal anomalies. Prior studies evaluating incidences of bony congenital anomalies of the spine are limited. The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) yields national discharge estimates of rare pediatric conditions like congenital disorders. This study utilized cluster analysis to study patterns of concurrent vertebral anomalies, anal atresia, cardiac malformations, trachea-esophageal fistula, renal dysplasia, and limb anomalies (VACTERL anomalies) co-occurring in patients with spinal congenital anomalies. METHODS:Retrospective review of KID 2003-2012. KID-supplied hospital- and year-adjusted weights allowed for incidence assessment of bony spinal anomalies and cardiac, gastrointestinal, urinary anomalies of VACTERL. K-means clustering assessed relationships between most frequent anomalies within bony spinal anomaly discharges; k set to n - 1(n = first incidence of significant drop/little gain in sum of square errors within clusters). RESULTS:There were 12,039,432 KID patients 0-20 years. Incidence per 100,000 discharges: 2.5 congenital fusion of spine, 10.4 hemivertebra, 7.0 missing vertebra. The most common anomalies co-occurring with bony vertebral malformations were atrial septal defect (ASD 12.3%), large intestinal atresia (LIA 11.8%), and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA 10.4%). Top congenital cardiac anomalies in vertebral anomaly patients were ASD, PDA, and ventricular septal defect (VSD); all three anomalies co-occur at 6.6% rate in this vertebral anomaly population. Cluster analysis revealed that of bony anomaly discharges, 55.9% of those with PDA had ASD, 34.2% with VSD had PDA, 22.9% with LIA had ASD, 37.2% with ureter obstruction had LIA, and 35.5% with renal dysplasia had LIA. CONCLUSIONS:In vertebral anomaly patients, the most common co-occurring congenital anomalies were cardiac, renal, and gastrointestinal. Top congenital cardiac anomalies in vertebral anomaly patients were ASD, PDA, and VSD. VACTERL patients with vertebral anomalies commonly presented alongside cardiac and renal anomalies.

OBJECTIVE Most cervical fixations for atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) are bilateral and symmetric; however, in the setting of osseous and vascular deformity at the craniovertebral junction, asymmetrical and hybrid fixations are used as "salvage" techniques. Because of the rarity of these cases, hybrid cervical fixations for AAD have not been fully explored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility and outcomes of posterior hybrid cervical fixations for AAD. METHODS Twenty-one AAD cases were retrospectively studied; 18 had cervical myelopathy with Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores ranging from 9 to 16 (mean 13.5). Hybrid fixation techniques included unilateral pedicle screws, transarticular screws, C-2 laminar screws, cervical lateral mass screws, and spinous process screws. During the same period, 82 AAD cases, treated using symmetric traditional fixations, were analyzed as controls. RESULTS Atlantoaxial fixation was performed in 11 cases, while occiput-cervical fixation was used in 10 cases. All cases achieved solid osseous fusion. Anatomical reduction was achieved in 20 cases (95.2%). All 18 cases with myelopathy showed postoperative improvement, with JOA scores ranging from 13 to 17 (mean 15.5). Three cases (14.2%) experienced complications, including delayed wound healing, CSF leakage, and fixation loosening. Hybrid fixation techniques showed significantly greater estimated blood loss when compared with controls (208.1 ± 19.30 ml vs 139.63 ± 8.75 ml, p = 0.001). Operative duration (125.38 ± 6.29 min vs 119.41 ± 3.77 min, p = 0.464), complication rates (14.3% vs 4.9%, p = 0.148), and JOA improvement rates (61% ± 7% vs 49% ± 4%, p = 0.161) showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS For ADD with osseous or vascular deformity, posterior cervical reduction and stabilization can be achieved using hybrid techniques, resulting in comparable clinical results to symmetric traditional fixation.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE:Determine whether alignment or myelopathy improvement drives patient outcomes after cervical deformity (CD) corrective surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:CD correction involves radiographic malalignment correction and procedures to improve motor function and pain. It is unknown whether alignment or myelopathy improvement drives patient outcomes. METHODS:Inclusion: Patients with CD with baseline/1-year radiographic and outcome scores. Cervical alignment improvement was defined by improvement in Ames CD modifiers. modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) improvement was defined as mild [15-17], moderate [12-14], severe [<12]. Patient groups included those who only improved in alignment, those who only improved in mJOA, those who improved in both, and those who did not improve. Changes in quality-of-life scores (neck disability index [NDI], EuroQuol-5 dimensions [EQ-5D], mJOA) were evaluated between groups. RESULTS:A total of 70 patients (62 yr, 51% F) were included. Overall preoperative mJOA score was 13.04 ± 2.35. At baseline, 21 (30%) patients had mild myelopathy, 33 (47%) moderate, and 16 (23%) severe. Out of 70 patients 30 (44%) improved in mJOA and 13 (18.6%) met 1-year mJOA minimal clinically important difference. Distribution of improvement groups: 16/70 (23%) alignment-only improvement, 13 (19%) myelopathy-only improvement, 18 (26%) alignment and myelopathy improvement, and 23 (33%) no improvement. EQ-5D improved in 11 of 16 (69%) alignment-only patients, 11 of 18 (61%) myelopathy/alignment improvement, 13 of 13 (100%) myelopathy-only, and 10 of 23 (44%) no myelopathy/alignment improvement. There were no differences in decompression, baseline alignment, mJOA, EQ-5D, or NDI between groups. Patients who improved only in myelopathy showed significant differences in baseline-1Y EQ-5D (baseline: 0.74, 1 yr:0.83, P < 0.001). One-year C2-S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA; mJOA r = -0.424, P = 0.002; EQ-5D r = -0.261, P = 0.050; NDI r = 0.321, P = 0.015) and C7-S1 SVA (mJOA r = -0.494, P < 0.001; EQ-5D r = -0.284, P = 0.031; NDI r = 0.334, P = 0.010) were correlated with improvement in health-related qualities of life. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:After CD-corrective surgery, improvements in myelopathy symptoms and functional score were associated with superior 1-year patient-reported outcomes. Although there were no relationships between cervical-specific sagittal parameters and patient outcomes, global parameters of C2-S1 SVA and C7-S1 SVA showed significant correlations with overall 1-year mJOA, EQ-5D, and NDI. These results highlight myelopathy improvement as a key driver of patient-reported outcomes, and confirm the importance of sagittal alignment in patients with CD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:3.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective radiographic review. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To understand the effect of variability in sacral endplate selection in transitional lumbosacral vertebrae (TLSV) and its impact on pelvic, regional, and global spinal alignment parameters. BACKGROUND:TLSV can have the characteristics of both lumbar and sacral vertebrae. Difficulties in identification of the S1 endplate may come from nomenclature, number of lumbar vertebrae, sacra, and morphology and may influence the interpretation and consistency of spinal alignment parameters. METHODS:Patients with TLSV were identified and radiographic measurements including pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1-pelvic angle (TPA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, thoracic kyphosis (TK), and spinal inclination (T1SPi) were obtained. Radiographic measurements were performed twice with the sacral endplate at the cephalad and caudal options. Paired t tests assessed the difference between different selection groups. RESULTS:Of 1,869 patients, 70 (3.7%) were found to have TLSV on radiographic imaging. Fifty-eight (82.9%) had lumbarized sacral segments whereas 12 (17.1%) had sacralized lumbar segments. T1-SPi (mean: -1.77°) and TK (mean: 34.86°) did not vary from altering sacral endplate selection. Selection of the caudal TLSV as the sacral endplate resulted in an increase in all pelvic parameters (PI: 66.8° vs. 44.3°, PT: 25.1° vs. 12.7°, and SS: 41.6° vs. 31.6°), regional lumbar parameters (LL: -54.1° vs. 44.0°, PI-LL: 12.7° vs. 0.3°), and global parameters (SVA: 46.1 mm vs. 28.3 mm, TPA: 23.3° vs. 10.8°) as compared to selecting the cephalad TLSV. All mean differences between radiographic parameters were found to be statistically significant (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS:Variation in sacral endplate selection in TLSV significantly affects spinal alignment parameter measurements. A standardized method for measuring TLSV is needed to reduce measurement error and ultimately allow more accurate understanding of alignment targets in patients with TLSV. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III.

Introduction: Cervical deformity (CD) correction has becomeincreasingly complex and challenging. Osteotomies are commonlyperformed to correct sagittal malalignment, however the risks andbenefits of performing a major osteotomy for cervical deformitycorrection have been understudied. The purpose of this study was toinvestigate the risks and benefits of performing a major osteotomy forCD correction.Methods: Retrospective review of a multicenter prospective CDdatabase. CD was defined as at least one of the following: C2-C7Cobb [10, CL [10, cSVA [4 cm, CBVA [25. Patientsstratified based on having a major osteotomy (MAJ-pedicle subtraction osteotomy or vertebral column resection) or minor (MIN).Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed controlling forbaseline cSVA and T1S. Flexibility of the deformity was assessedusing C2-C7 lordosis and T1S change greater than 10 betweenflexion and extension. Independent t-tests and Chi Squared tests wereused to assess differences between MAJ and MIN.Results: 89 CD patients were included (62 years, 65%F). 19 (21.3%)CD patients underwent a MAJ osteotomy. MAJ and MIN had nodifferences in any baseline radiographic parameters, with the exception of cSVA (MAJ: 59.3 mm, MIN: 41.9 mm, p = 0.007). AfterPSM for cSVA, 38 patients were included (60 years, 60%F). 19(21.3%) CD patients underwent a MAJ osteotomy (14 pedicle subtraction osteotomy, 5 vertebral column resection). MAJ patientsunderwent more invasive surgeries, with more levels fused (10.6 vs7.1, p <0.001) and blood loss (1442 cc vs 802 cc, p = 0.036),despite similar operative time and intra-and post-operative complication rates as MIN patients. At 3 M post-op, MAJ and MIN patientshad similar NDI, mJOA, and EQ5D scores, however by 6M and 1Ypost-op MAJ patients reached MCID for NDI less than MIN patients(10.5 vs 57.9%, p = 0.003). Comparing patients with fixed versusnon-fixed CL, MAJ patients with non-fixed lordosis trended towardsimprovement in NDI (p = 0.30) but also trended towards highercomplication (78 vs 43%, p = 0.182) and reoperation rates (44 vs 0%,p = 0.069) than fixed deformities. Rigid deformities trended towardsimprovement in TS-CL (43% improve vs 33%, p = 0.54) and cSVA(14 vs 0%, p = 0.49) for MAJ patients and lower complication rate(MIN most commonly had DJK and reoperation) (43 vs 100%,p = 0.09).Conclusions: Cervical deformity patients who underwent a majorosteotomy had similar clinical outcomes at 3-months but worseclinical outcomes at 6-months and 1-year, assessed by NDI and EQ-5D, as compared with patients with minor osteotomies, in partbecause patients undergoing major osteotomies have more severedeformities and have more prolonged recovery kinetics. Patients withflexible curves showed similar alignment and clinical outcomes butincreased complication risk when undergoing a major osteotomy.Contrarily, patients with rigid deformities who underwent a majorosteotomy trended towards radiographic and clinical improvementand lower rates of DJK and reoperation

Background: Recent studies suggest non-routine discharge, includingdischarge to inpatient rehab and skilled nursing facilities, is associatedwith increased cost of care. Given the rising prevalence of cervicaldeformity (CD)-corrective surgery and the necessity of value-basedhealthcare, it is important to identify indicators for non-routine discharge in surgical CD patients.Study Design: Retrospective review of prospective, multicenter CDdatabase.Methods: Included: Surgical CD patients (C2-C7 Cobb [10,CL [10, cSVA [4 cm, or CBVA [25) [18 years with discharge and baseline (BL) radiographic data. Non-routine dischargedefined: inpatient rehab or skilled nursing facility. ConditionalInference Decision Trees identified predictors of non-routine discharge, and cut-off points at which predictors have a global effect.A Conditional Variable Importance Table used non-replacementsampling set of 3000 Conditional Inference trees to identify influential patient/surgical factors. Binary logistic regression indicated effectsize of influential factors at significant cut-off points. Means comparison testing assessed the relationship between non-routinedischarge and reop/HRQL outcomes.Results: Included: 138 patients (61 +/- 10 years, 63%F) undergoingCD-corrective surgery (8.2 +/- 4.6 levels; 49% posterior-onlyapproach, 16% anterior-only, 35% combined). 29% of patientsexperienced non-routine discharge (21% inpatient rehab, 8% SNF).BL cervical and upper-cervical malalignment was the strongest predictor of non-routine discharge: [1] C1 slope [14 (OR:8.4 [95%CI:3.1-22.7]), [3] C2 slope [57 (OR: 7.0 [2.6-18.3]), [4] TSCL [57 (OR: 5.9 [2.2-15.9]), [14] C0 slope[-0.66 (OR: 4.2[1.9-9.3]), [15] cSVA [40 mm (OR: 4.6 [2.0-10.9]), [18] McGregor's slope [1.9 (OR: 4.1 [1.7-9.9]). Patient-related predictors ofnon-routine discharge were [2] BL gait impairment (OR: 5.29[2.3-12.4]), [8] age [59 years (OR: 4.3 [1.6-11.1]), [10] apex of CDprimary driver [C7 (OR: 3.9[1.8-8.6]), and [13] admission tosurgical ICU (OR: 5.4 [1.9-14.8]). Experiencing 2 or more complications was predictive of non-routine discharge (OR: 4.2 [1.9-9.2]),but the only specific complications predictive of non-routone discharge were EBL [900 cc (OR: 3.6 [1.7-7.7]) and presence of anyneuro complication (OR: 2.8 [1.8-8.4]). The only surgical predictor ofnon-home discharge was [12] fusion[8 levels (OR: 4.0 [1.8-9.0]).LOS [6 days was also predictive of non-routone discharge (OR: 4.0[1.8-8.9]). There was no relationship between non-routine dischargeand reop within 3 months (P = 0.249), 6 months (P = 0.793), or1 year (P = 0.814) of index procedure. Despite no differences in BLEQ-5D (P = 0.946), non-routine patients had inferior 1-year postopEQ-5D scores (non-routine: 0.75, home: 0.79, P = 0.044).Conclusions: Preop cervical malalignment was a top predictor ofnon-routine discharge in surgical CD patients. Age, driver of deformity, and [8 level fusion also predicted non-routine discharge, andshould be taken into account to improve resource allocation andpatient counseling

Summary: In cervical deformity surgery, failure to correct cSVA andC2 slope (C2S) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Currentsurgical planning and intraoperative measurements are limited tocervical lordosis (CL) correction. By predicting T1 Slope (T1S)change from baseline to 3 month postop and adding a correctionfactor for the change in distal junctional kyphosis angle (DJKA),cSVA and C2S can be predicted more accurately.Hypothesis: While correction of CL is commonly used to predictpost-op alignment, post-op cSVA, and C2S can be predicted betterusing additional variables.Design: Prospective cohort study.Introduction: Cervical malalignment is associated with severe disability. Currently, surgical planning and intraop measurements ofcorrection are limited to CL change. We aim to develop a predictivemodel for postop cSVA C2S and T1S using more than CL change.Methods: A prospective database of operative CD patients wasanalyzed. Inclusion criteria were cervical kyphosis [10, cervicalscoliosis [10, cSVA [4 cm or CBVA [25. The patients wererandomly filtered to include 66.7% of the cohort for model development. Predictive models were developed to estimate post-op T1S,cSVA, and C2S using linear regression. The new predictive equationswere validated in the remaining 33.3% of the cohort.Results: 153 patients with CD met inclusion criteria. T1S changedsignificantly (32.4-35.2, p =.05) from baseline to 3M follow-up.The mean DJKA change was-6.59. 101 patients were included inmodel development. To predict post-opT1S, CLchange and preT1Sexplained 62.4% of the variability of data (R2 = 0.624). By includingDJKA, R2 improved to 0.724. When predicting postop cSVA,CLchange and preop cSVA accounted for 57.2% of variability(R2 = 0.572). With change in DJKA, the R2 improved to 0.661. Themodel was optimized with the change in T1S (R2 = 0.777). Pre-opC2S and CLchange lead to poor predictability in post-op C2S(R2 = 0.348). Using DJKA change, the R2 improved to 0.550. Byincluding DJKA and T1S change, the model was optimized(R2 = 0.926).The predictive equations were applied to the remaining 52 patientsusing the mean DJKA (-6.59) for the DJKA variable and the T1Schange calculated for the predictive model. Predicted postop alignments correlated to postop T1S, cSVA, and C2S (R = 0.712,R = 0.736, and R = 0.584 respectively, p <0.01).Conclusions: Realignment in CD surgery is critical to obtain optimaloutcomes. Current surgical planning of CD does not accurately predict postop cSVA and C2S. A reliable predictive model is presentedfor cSVA and C2S using changes in T1S and DJKA

Cervical deformity (CD) can be debilitating. Surgery forsevere CD has high rates of radiographic and clinical failure. Among66 patients with severe CD, 62% had failure of radiographic correction at 1 year. Failed corrections were associated with worse baselinecervical alignment, male gender and greater intraoperative blood loss.Patients with failed corrections had less improvement in NDI at6 months and 1 year. More patients with successful correctionsattained MCID for NDI (84.2%) at 6 months.Hypothesis: Surgery for severe CD is challenging and there are highrates of radiographic and clinical failure.Design: Prospective cohort study.Introduction: Cervical malalignment is associated with disability.Surgical corrections of severe CD present considerable challenges.Demographic, surgical and postop factors associated with failedradiographic and clinical outcomes have not been well established.Methods: A prospective database of operative CD patients (Inclusioncriteria: cervical kyphosis[10, cervical scoliosis [10, cSVA [4 cm or CBVA [25) was analyzed. Inclusion was restricted tosevere baseline cervical deformities (cSVA [4 cm or C2 Slope(C2S) [20) and 1 year follow-up. Failed surgeries was defined ascSVA [4 cm at 1 year while successful surgery was defined ascSVA\4 cm at 1 year. Successful surgeries were compared to failedones with health related outcome measures, including the MCID forNDI (improvement [7).Results: 66 patients with severe CD met inclusion criteria, including41 failed (62%) surgery and 25 successful. Failed surgery patients hadworse alignment at baseline and 1 year by cSVA, C2S, T1S, TS-CL,and CTPA (p<0.05). Failed surgery patients were more commonlymale (51.2 vs 12%, p <0.01) and had greater intraop blood loss (1.2vs. 44L, p <0.01). History of prior cervical fusion, age, frailty, fusionlength, op-time, use of 3CO, DJK rate, and revision surgery were notassociated with failed surgery. Patients with failed surgery had lessimprovement in clinical outcomes by NDI at 6 months (-8.6 vs-21.7, p <.05) and 1 year (-7.7 vs-17.6, p <.05). Morepatients with successful surgery attained MCID for NDI at 6 months(84.2 vs 51.7%, p = 0.02) but there was no sig difference at 1 year(76.0 vs 56.8%, p = 0.12).Conclusions: Baseline cervical malalignment, male gender and intraop blood loss were associated with failed radiographic outcomes inpatients with severe CD. Failed surgery patients had less improvement in NDI at 6 months and 1 year. More patients with successfulsurgeries attained MCID for NDI at 6 months. In correcting severeCD, surgeons need to obtain optimal radiographic alignment to attainbetter clinical outcomes

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective multi-center cohort study with consecutive enrollment OBJECTIVE.: To evaluate pre-operative alignment and surgical factors associated with sub-optimal early post-operative radiographic outcomes following surgery for cervical deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Recent studies have demonstrated correlation between cervical sagittal alignment and patient reported outcomes. Few studies have explored cervical deformity correction prospectively, and the factors that result in successful vs. failed cervical alignment corrections remain unclear. METHODS:Adult cervical deformity (ACD) patients included with either cervical kyphosis >10°, cSVA >4 cm, or CBVA >25°. Patients were categorized into failed outcomes group if cSVA >4 cm or TS-CL >20° at 6 months post-operatively. RESULTS:71 ACD patients (mean age 62yrs, 56%Female, 41% revisions) were included. 45 had primary cervical deformities and 26 at the CT junction. 33 (46.4%) had failed radiographic outcomes by cSVA and 46 (64.7%) by TS-CL. Failure to restore cSVA was associated with worse preoperative C2 pelvic tilt angle (CPT: 64.4 vs 47.8°, p = 0.01), worse postoperative C2 Slope (35.0 vs 23.8°, p = .004), TS-CL (35.2 vs 24.9°, p = .01), CPT (47.9 vs 28.2°, p < .001), "+" Schwab modifiers (p = 0.007), revision surgery (p = 0.05) and failure to address the secondary, thoracolumbar driver of the deformity (p = .02). Failure to correct TS-CL was associated with worse preoperative cervical kyphosis (10.4 vs -2.1°, p = .03), CPT (52.6 vs 39.1°, p = .04), worse postoperative C2 Slope (30.2 vs 13.3°, p < .001), cervical lordosis (-3.6 vs -15.1°, p = .01), and CPT (37.7 vs 24.0°, p < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed post-operative DJK associated with sub-optimal outcomes by cSVA (OR- 0.06, CI- 0.01-0.4, p = .004) and TS-CL (OR-0.15, CI- 0.02-0.97, p = .05). CONCLUSIONS:Factors associated with failure to correct the cSVA included revision surgery, worse preop CPT, and concurrent thoracolumbar deformity. Failure to correct the TS-CL mismatch was associated with worse preoperative cervical kyphosis and CPT. Occurrence of early post-operative DJK significantly affects post-operative radiographic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:3.

Surgical treatment for spinal metastasis has benefited from improvements in surgical techniques. However, the trends in treatment and outcomes for spinal metastasis surgery have not been well-established in a pediatric population. Patients <20 years old with metastatic spinal tumors undergoing spinal surgery were identified in the KID database. Trends for spinal metastases treatment and patient outcomes were analyzed using weight-adjusted ANOVAs. 333 patients were identified in the KID database. The top five primary diagnoses were metastatic brain/spinal cord tumor (19.8%), metastatic nervous system tumor (15.9%), metastatic bone cancer (13.2%), spinal cord tumor (4.2%), and tumor of ventricles (3.0%). There was an increased incidence of spinal metastasis diagnoses from 2003 to 2012 (88.5-117.9 per 100,000; p < 0.001) and an increased trend in the incidence of surgical treatment for spinal metastasis from 2003 to 2012 (p = 0.014). The average age was 10.19 ± 6.33 years old and 38.4% were female. The average length of stay was 17.34 ± 24.36 days. Average CCI increased over time (2003: 7.87 ± 1.40, 2012: 8.44 ± 1.39; p = 0.006). The most common surgeries were excision of spinal cord/meninges lesions (69.1%) and decompression of spinal canal (38.1%). Length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality did not change over time (17.34-18.04 days, p = 0.337; 1.6%-2.9%, p = 0.801). 10.5% of patients underwent a posterior fusion and 22.2% had at least one complication (nervous system, respiratory, dysphagia, infection). The overall complication rate remained stable over time (23.4%-21.8%, p = 0.952). Surgical treatment for spinal metastasis in the last decade has increased, though the complication rates, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay have remained stable.