Faculty Bibliography

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE:To examine the link between major complications, surgical techniques, and perioperative care in the intralesional spondylectomy of the upper cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Spondylectomy has been demonstrated to prolong cancer-free survival in many patients with locally aggressive spinal tumors. However, the challenging nature of this surgical procedure and the potential for severe complications often limit its application in the upper cervical spine. METHODS:Nineteen patients with primary upper cervical tumors were treated with spondylectomy from March 2005 to August 2009, using either the anterior-posterior or posterior-anterior approach. Anterior procedures were transmandibular, transoral, or high retropharyngeal. Anterior reconstructions were performed in plates with iliac crest strut grafts, plates with mesh cages, and Harms mesh cages alone. Occipitocervical fixation was performed with Halo-vest application for postoperative immobilization. RESULTS:Vertebral artery injuries occurred unilaterally in 5 cases intraoperatively: 4 occurred in the anterior approach of anterior-posterior procedures. Fusion was achieved in 9 patients with intact internal instrumentation. Fusion with the anterior construct in a tilted position occurred in 3 patients, all of whom underwent anterior-posterior procedures with Halo-vest immobilization for less than 1 month. Nonunion occurred in 3 cases after the posterior-anterior procedure because of anterior bone graft absorption. Prolonged Halo-vest immobilization maintained postoperative stability. Failure of internal instrumentation occurred in 3 cases. Anterior construct dislocation and severe tilting occurred in 2 cases after the anterior-posterior procedure. Five patients had a local recurrence. All recurrent lesions were malignant tumors and occurred in regions where surgical exposure was inadequate with incomplete excision. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The order of the surgical approach is a critical determinant of complications, fusion rates, choice of surgical technique, and reconstruction methods. The postoperative use of a Halo-vest is recommended. Local recurrence is associated with tumor malignancy and inadequate excision margin. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:4.

OBJECTIVE:History of previous cervical spine surgery is a frequently cited cause of worse outcomes after cervical spine surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine any differences in clinical outcomes after cervical spine surgery between patients with and without a history of previous cervical spine surgery. METHODS:A multicenter prospective database was reviewed retrospectively to identify patients with cervical spondylosis undergoing surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with (W) or without (WO) previous history of cervical spine surgery. Statistical analyses of Health-Related Quality of Life scores were analyzed with statistical software to fit linear mixed models for continuous longitudinal outcome. RESULTS:A total of 1286 patients (377 W, 909 WO) met criteria for inclusion. Overall, patients in both groups experienced an improvement in their Health-Related Quality of Life scores. However, patients in the W group had significantly decreased improvement compared with WO patients in the Neck Disability Index score and the following SF-36 domain scores: Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Health Transition, and Physical Component Summary at all time points (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the W and WO groups in operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, or complications (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with a history of previous cervical spine surgery had inferior improvement in quality of life outcome scores. Patients with a history of previous surgical intervention who elect to undergo subsequent surgeries should be appropriately counseled about expected results.

Interest in the application of bundled payments to the field of spine surgery continues to grow. There may be great potential for cost-savings for spinal procedures under bundled payments. However, challenges such as heterogeneity of DRGs, complex procedures requiring lengthy recoveries, and appropriate outcomes measurement pose barriers to successful bundled payment design. In this paper, we review the challenges and opportunities posed by bundled payments in spine surgery. We also present several key considerations for policymakers interested in payment reform within spine surgery. Surgeon involvement will be critical in providing guidance for generating effective alternative payment models.

Nationwide utilization of spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is not known; to address this void, the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) from 2004 to 2013 was used for analysis. Spinal SBRT was defined as 1-5 fractions (14-32Gy) delivered to the cervical, thoracic, lumbar or sacral spine. From 2004 to 2013, 1044 patients received spinal SBRT, most commonly in single-fraction (38%), three-fraction (26%) and five-fractions (25%). Metastatic spinal disease most commonly originated from the lung (34%), kidney (14%), and blood (9%). The most common insurance status receiving spinal SBRT was private (44%) followed by Medicare (43%), with Medicaid (8%) a distant third. Fifty-six percent of patients were male, and 55% of patients were younger than age 65. 80% of patients were Caucasian, with 13% being African-American. The vast majority (74%) of patients had no Charlson/Deyo comorbidities. The incidence of spinal SBRT gradually increased over time, rising from 2% to 20% of cases from 2004 to 2013. Comprising only 1.4% of spinal metastases radiation in 2004, SBRT rose to a 5.8% share in 2013. In conclusion, SBRT for spine metastases in the United States has more than quadrupled in utilization over a recent ten-year span. Although the majority of spinal SBRT is multi-fraction, the most popular fractionation scheme was single-fraction. It has been most commonly used for Caucasian men under age 65 with private/Medicare insurance and no comorbidities. By far the most common origin of spinal metastases treated by SBRT was the lung, followed by renal cancer. These results provide a baseline for further prospective investigation.

OBJECTIVE Depression and anxiety have been demonstrated to have negative impacts on outcomes after spine surgery. In patients with cervical deformity (CD), the psychological and physiological burdens of the disease may overlap without clear boundaries. While surgery has a proven record of bringing about significant pain relief and decreased disability, the impact of depression and anxiety on recovery from cervical deformity corrective surgery has not been previously reported on in the literature. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of depression and anxiety on patients' recovery from and improvement after CD surgery. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter CD database. Patients with a history of clinical depression, in addition to those with current self-reported anxiety or depression, were defined as depressed (D group). The D group was compared with nondepressed patients (ND group) with a similar baseline deformity determined by propensity score matching of the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). Baseline demographic, comorbidity, clinical, and radiographic data were compared among patients using t-tests. Improvement of symptoms was recorded at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. All health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores collected at these follow-up time points were compared using t-tests. RESULTS Sixty-six patients were matched for baseline radiographic parameters: 33 with a history of depression and/or current depression, and 33 without. Depressed patients had similar age, sex, race, and radiographic alignment: cSVA, T-1 slope minus C2-7 lordosis, SVA, and T-1 pelvic angle (p > 0.05). Compared with nondepressed individuals, depressed patients had a higher incidence of osteoporosis (21.2% vs 3.2%, p = 0.028), rheumatoid arthritis (18.2% vs 3.2%, p = 0.012), and connective tissue disorders (18.2% vs 3.2%, p = 0.012). At baseline, the D group had greater neck pain (7.9 of 10 vs 6.6 on a Numeric Rating Scale [NRS], p = 0.015), lower mean EQ-5D scores (68.9 vs 74.7, p < 0.001), but similar Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores (57.5 vs 49.9, p = 0.063) and myelopathy scores (13.4 vs 13.9, p = 0.546). Surgeries performed in either group were similar in terms of number of levels fused, osteotomies performed, and correction achieved (baseline to 3-month measurements) (p < 0.05). At 3 months, EQ-5D scores remained lower in the D group (74.0 vs 78.2, p = 0.044), and NDI scores were similar (48.5 vs 39.0, p = 0.053). However, neck pain improved in the D group (NRS score of 5.0 vs 4.3, p = 0.331), and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores remained similar (14.2 vs 15.0, p = 0.211). At 6 months and 1 year, all HRQOL scores were similar between the 2 cohorts. One-year measurements were as follows: NDI 39.7 vs 40.7 (p = 0.878), NRS neck pain score of 4.1 vs 5.0 (p = 0.326), EQ-5D score of 77.1 vs 78.2 (p = 0.646), and mJOA score of 14.0 vs 14.2 (p = 0.835). Anxiety/depression levels reported on the EQ-5D scale were significantly higher in the depressed cohort at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months (all p < 0.05), but were similar between groups at 1 year postoperatively (1.72 vs 1.53, p = 0.416). CONCLUSIONS Clinical depression was observed in many of the study patients with CD. After matching for baseline deformity, depression symptomology resulted in worse baseline EQ-5D and pain scores. Despite these baseline differences, both cohorts achieved similar results in all HRQOL assessments 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, demonstrating no clinical impact of depression on recovery up until 1 year after CD surgery. Thus, a history of depression does not appear to have an impact on recovery from CD surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Complication rates for adult cervical deformity are poorly characterized given the complexity and heterogeneity of cases. PURPOSE: To compare peri-operative complication rates following adult cervical deformity corrective surgery between a prospective multi-center database for cervical deformity patients (PCD) and Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of prospective databases. PATIENT SAMPLE: 11,501 adult cervical deformity patients (11,379 patients from NIS and 122 patients from PCD database). OUTCOME MEASURES: Peri-operative medical and surgical complications. METHODS: The NIS was queried (2001-2013) for cervical deformity discharges for patients >/=18yrs undergoing cervical fusions using ICD-9 coding. Patients >/=18 years from the PCD database (2013-2015) were selected. Equivalent complications were identified and rates were compared. Bonferroni correction (p<0.004) was used for Pearson chi2. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate differences in complication rates between databases. RESULTS: 11,379 NIS patients and 122 PCD patients were identified. PCD patients were older (62.49 vs. 55.15,p<0.001) but displayed similar gender distribution. Intra-operative complication rate was higher in PCD (39.3%) compared to NIS (9.2%,p<0.001). PCD had an increased risk of reporting overall complications than NIS (OR:2.81, CI:1.81-4.38). Only device-related complications were greater in NIS (7.1% vs. 1.1%,p=0.007). PCD patients displayed higher rates of the following complications: peripheral vascular (0.8% vs. 0.1%,p=0.001), GI (2.5% vs. 0.2%,p<0.001), infection (8.2% vs. 0.5%,p<0.001), dural tear (4.1% vs. 0.6%, p<0.001), and dysphagia (9.8% vs. 1.9%,p<0.001). GU, wound, and DVT complications were similar between databases (p>0.004). Based on surgical approach, PCD reported higher GI and neurologic complication rates for combined anterior/posterior procedures (p<0.001). For posterior-only procedures, NIS had more device-related complications (12.4% vs. 0.1%,p=0.003), while PCD had more infections (9.3% vs. 0.7%,p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the surgeon-maintained cervical database revealed higher overall and individual complication rates and higher data granularity. The nationwide database may underestimate ACD patient complications particularly in regards to peri-operative surgical details due to coding and deformity generalizations. The surgeon-maintained database captures the surgical details, but may underestimate some medical complications.

OBJECTIVE Using 2 complication-reporting methods, the authors investigated the incidence of major medical complications and mortality in elderly patients after surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) during a 2-year follow-up period. METHODS The authors queried a multicenter, prospective, surgeon-maintained database (SMD) to identify patients 65 years or older who underwent surgical correction of ASD from 2008 through 2014 and had a minimum 2 years of follow-up (n = 153). They also queried a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims database (MCD) for patients 65 years or older who underwent fusion of 8 or more vertebral levels from 2005 through 2012 (n = 3366). They calculated cumulative rates of the following complications during the first 6 weeks after surgery: cerebrovascular accident, congestive heart failure, deep venous thrombosis, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and pulmonary embolism. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS During the perioperative period, rates of major medical complications were 5.9% for pneumonia, 4.1% for deep venous thrombosis, 3.2% for pulmonary embolism, 2.1% for cerebrovascular accident, 1.8% for myocardial infarction, and 1.0% for congestive heart failure. Mortality rates were 0.9% at 6 weeks and 1.8% at 2 years. When comparing the SMD with the MCD, there were no significant differences in the perioperative rates of major medical complications except pneumonia. Furthermore, there were no significant intergroup differences in the mortality rates at 6 weeks or 2 years. The SMD provided greater detail with respect to deformity characteristics and surgical variables than the MCD. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of most major medical complications in the elderly after surgery for ASD was similar between the SMD and the MCD and ranged from 1% for congestive heart failure to 5.9% for pneumonia. These complications data can be valuable for preoperative patient counseling and informed consent.

OBJECTIVE It is becoming increasingly necessary for surgeons to provide evidence supporting cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment for cervical spine pathology. Anticipating surgical risk is critical in accurately evaluating the risk/benefit balance of such treatment. Determining the risk and cost-effectiveness of surgery, complications, revision procedures, and mortality rates are the most significant limitations. The purpose of this study was to determine independent risk factors for medical complications (MCs), surgical complications (SCs), revisions, and mortality rates following surgery for patients with cervical spine pathology. The most relevant risk factors were used to structure an index that will help quantify risk and anticipate failure for such procedures. METHODS The authors of this study performed a retrospective review of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for patients treated surgically for cervical spine pathology between 2001 and 2010. Multivariate models were performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of the independent risk factors that led to MCs and repeated for SCs, revisions, and mortality. The models controlled for age (< and > 65 years old), sex, race, revision status (except for revision analysis), surgical approach, number of levels fused/re-fused (2-3, 4-8, >/= 9), and osteotomy utilization. ORs were weighted based on their predictive category: 2 times for revision surgery predictors and 4 times for mortality predictors. Fifty points were distributed among the predictors based on their cumulative OR to establish a risk index. RESULTS Discharges for 362,989 patients with cervical spine pathology were identified. The mean age was 52.65 years, and 49.47% of patients were women. Independent risk factors included medical comorbidities, surgical parameters, and demographic factors. Medical comorbidities included the following: pulmonary circulation disorder, coagulopathy, metastatic cancer, renal failure, congestive heart failure, alcohol abuse, neurological disorder, nonmetastatic cancer, liver disease, rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular diseases, and chronic blood loss/anemia. Surgical parameters included posterior approach to fusion/re-fusion, >/= 9 levels fused/re-fused, corpectomy, 4-8 levels fused/re-fused, and osteotomy; demographic variables included age >/= 65 years. These factors increased the risk of at least 1 of MC, SC, revision, or mortality (risk of death). A total of 50 points were distributed among the factors based on the cumulative risk ratio of every factor in proportion to the total risk ratios. CONCLUSIONS This study proposed an index to quantify the potential risk of morbidity and mortality prior to surgical intervention for patients with cervical spine pathology. This index may be useful for surgeons in patient counseling efforts as well as for health insurance companies and future socioeconomics studies in assessing surgical risks and benefits for patients undergoing surgical treatment of the cervical spine.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS) adopt a forward flexed posture in an attempt to decompress neural elements. The relationship between sagittal alignment and severity of lumbar stenosis has not previously been studied. PURPOSE: We hypothesized that patients with increasing radiological severity of lumbar stenosis will exhibit worsening sagittal alignment. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Our sample consists of patients who have DLS. OUTCOME MEASURES: Standing pelvic, regional, lower extremity and global sagittal alignment, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were the outcome measures. METHODS: Patients with DLS were identified from a retrospective clinical database with corresponding full-body stereoradiographs. Exclusion criteria included coronal malalignment, prior spine surgery, spondylolisthesis>Grade 1, non-degenerative spinal pathology, or skeletal immaturity. Central stenosis severity was graded on axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from L1-S1. Foraminal stenosis and supine lordosis was graded on sagittal T1-weighted images. Standing pelvic, regional, lower extremity, and global sagittal alignment were measured using validated software. The HRQoL measures were also analyzed in relation to severity of stenosis. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients were identified with DLS on appropriate imaging. As central stenosis grade increased, patients displayed significantly increasing standing T1 pelvic angle, pelvic tilt, sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (p<.05). No significant difference wasfound in pelvic incidence, supine lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, or T1 spinopelvic inclination between central stenosis groups. Despite similar supine lordosis between stenosis groups, patients with Grades 2 and 3 stenosis had less standing lordosis, suggesting antalgic posturing. Upper lumbar (L1-L3) stenosis predicted worse alignment than lower lumbar (L4-S1) stenosis. Increasing severity of foraminal stenosis was associated with reduced lumbar lordosis; however, no significant postural difference in lordosis, thoracolumbar, or lower extremity compensatory mechanisms were noted between foraminal stenosis groups. Stenosis grading did not predict worsening HRQoLs in central or foraminal stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Severity of central lumbar stenosis as graded on MRI correlates with severity of sagittal malalignment. These findings support theories of sagittal malalignment as a compensatory mechanism for central lumbar stenosis.