Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

All

Total Results:

535728


Population-Level 10-Year Implications of the New 2025 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Hypertension Guideline Recommendations for Primary Prevention in the United States: A NHANES-Based Cohort Study (2009-2018)

Al-Jarshawi, Mustafa; Bangalore, Sripal; Wijeysundera, Harindra C; Chew, Nicholas Ws; Asher, Elad; Mihailidou, Anastasia S; Van Spall, Harriette G C; Mamas, Mamas A
BACKGROUND:In August 2025, the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology released updated hypertension guidelines. Under the new guidelines, therapy is advised at blood pressure ≥130/80 mm Hg in adults with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or a Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events-estimated 10-year cardiovascular disease risk ≥7.5%. The long-term population-level changes following these guidelines remains uncertain. METHODS:We analyzed NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) 2009 to 2018 data linked to mortality through 2019. Hypertensive adults without baseline cardiovascular disease were included. Treatment eligibility was defined using guideline criteria. Cox models estimated associations between antihypertensive therapy and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Simulation analyses projected lives saved under full and partial treatment uptake. RESULTS:The weighted cohort represented 81.0 million US adults with hypertension. Of these, 22.8 million (28%) were guideline eligible for therapy; 13.1 million (57%) were treated, and 9.7 million (43%) remained untreated. Antihypertensive therapy was associated with a 23% reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.63-0.94]) and 50% reduction in cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.36-0.68]). At 10 years, universal treatment of eligible but untreated adults was projected to prevent ~200 900 all-cause and ~ 162 600 cardiovascular deaths. Benefits were greatest in adults with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS:In this nationally representative cohort, nearly 1 in 3 US adults with hypertension were newly eligible for therapy under the guideline, yet >2 in 5 remained untreated. Extending treatment to all eligible adults could prevent >200 000 all-cause and 160 000 cardiovascular deaths over the next decade.
PMID: 42522939
ISSN: 2047-9980
CID: 6070437

Incidental findings during pancreatic cyst surveillance: clinical relevance and implications for MRI protocol design

Liu, Timothy; Shen, Yiqiu; Chandarana, Hersh; Gonda, Tamas; Kim, Sooah; Huang, Chenchan
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the prevalence and clinical relevance of incidental findings detected during pancreatic cyst surveillance and explore their implications for pancreas-focused imaging protocols. METHODS:This single-center retrospective study analyzed abdominal MRI and CT reports for pancreatic cyst surveillance (2005-2025) using a large language model (LLM). Incidental findings were findings unrelated to the clinical indication. Only the earliest surveillance examination per patient was included. Patients were stratified into cyst-only surveillance (cyst-only), cyst surveillance with high-risk pancreatic screening (cyst-HRI), or cyst surveillance with additional clinical indications (cyst-other). Electronic health record (EHR) review evaluated suspected extrapancreatic neoplastic incidental findings and incidental intrapancreatic hyperenhancing lesions. LLM performance was validated against two reviewers in 100 sampled reports. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS:6174 patients (mean age, 70.6 ± 12.3 years; 65.7% women) were included; 94.8% underwent MRI. LLM-reviewer agreement was high (Cohen κ = 0.857 and 0.882). Incidental findings were identified in 43.0% of examinations and were predominantly nonneoplastic (98.7%), with most not requiring further action (70.2%). EHR targeted review confirmed 19 extrapancreatic neoplasms, most commonly renal neoplasms (n = 14). Extrapancreatic neoplasms were more frequent in cyst-other than cyst-only patients (14/906 [1.55%] vs. 5/4,822 [0.10%]; aOR, 14.20; 95% CI 5.09-39.61; p < 0.001). No extrapancreatic neoplasms were identified in cyst-HRI patients (0/446; 95% CI 0.00-0.82%). Incidentally detected intrapancreatic hyperenhancing lesions were uncommon (31/6,174, 0.50%); final diagnoses included 25 neuroendocrine tumors and four intrapancreatic splenules. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Clinically significant extrapancreatic neoplasms were rare during pancreatic cyst surveillance, particularly among cyst-only and cyst-HRI patients. While this study did not directly assess the diagnostic performance of reduced field-of-view or non-contrast MRI, the low burden of extrapancreatic neoplasms suggests these protocol strategies warrant further evaluation in selected populations.
PMID: 42517903
ISSN: 2366-0058
CID: 6070413

Biopsies Can Predict Lung Adenocarcinoma IASLC Grade: A New Proposal and Grading Pitfalls

Zhou, Fang; Basu, Atreyee; Mantilla, Jose G; Narula, Navneet; Moreira, Andre L
INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer grading system for resected invasive lung adenocarcinoma provides robust prognostic stratification for recurrence risk and overall survival. However, most patients present at advanced stages, where only small biopsy samples are available, leaving no established prognostic tool for such cases. We propose a practical biopsy-based grading method for pulmonary adenocarcinoma. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We analyzed 267 paired biopsies and resections. The following two biopsy grading (bxG) models were tested:•Model 1: Based on the predominant pattern-grade 1 (lepidic), grade 2 (acinar/papillary), grade 3 (solid/micropapillary/complex glandular).•Model 2: Any percentage of high-grade patterns classified as grade 3, regardless of predominance. BxG 1 and 2 are defined as predominant patterns as described.For analysis, grades 1 and 2 were combined (G1-2), and grade 3 was considered a separate category. Diagnostic performance was assessed using resections as the reference standard. Interobserver reliability was evaluated, and discrepant cases were reviewed. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= 21) were primarily due to sampling limitations and artifacts, such as tangential sectioning. Adjusting for these factors improved interobserver agreement from moderate to almost perfect. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Biopsy grading using the presence of any high-grade pattern correlates well with International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer-based resection grading. Although bxG1 to 2 biopsies may underestimate tumor grade, bxG3 biopsies demonstrate more than 90% specificity and PPV for predicting G3 resections, supporting their potential utility as a clinical prognostic marker.
PMCID:13382940
PMID: 42519409
ISSN: 2666-3643
CID: 6070420

Loneliness and Bullying by Siblings in Gender-Diverse Adolescents: Results From the Population-Based Generation R Study

Xerxa, Yllza; Ghassabian, Akhgar; Hillegers, Manon H J; Agulleiro, Luis Martinez; Jansen, Pauline W; Busa, Samantha; Castellanos, Francisco Xavier; White, Tonya
OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Gender-diverse individuals often face a burden of poor mental health. This study examined whether gender-diverse experiences were associated with higher levels of loneliness in adolescents, over and above depression and anxiety, and how family environmental factors, including maladaptive parenting, being bullied by a sibling at home (victimization), and bullying a sibling at home (perpetration), moderate the associations between gender-diverse and loneliness experiences among 4,424 adolescents in a population-based cohort. METHOD/UNASSIGNED:This cross-sectional study was embedded in Generation R, a multiethnic population-based cohort from fetal life onward. Adolescents with information on self-reported or parent-reported gender diversity and loneliness at ages 13 to 15 years were included. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:s > .10). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Gender diversity is associated with higher levels of loneliness in adolescents. Being a target of bullying modified the association of gender diversity with loneliness experiences, suggesting that gender-diverse adolescents who are bullied by siblings experience particularly higher levels of loneliness.
PMCID:13420606
PMID: 42534685
ISSN: 2949-7329
CID: 6070474

ISN International Expert Forum: Exploring the Nexus of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) Health

Pecoits-Filho, Roberto; Banerjee, Debasish; Jardine, Meg J; Neuen, Brendon; Soler, Maria Jose; Ahmed, Sofia B; Anderson, Lisa J; Bavanandan, Sunita; Bansal, Shweta; Burton, James O; Carrero, Juan Jesus; Chang, Tara I; Clase, Catherine M; Cobo-Marcos, Marta; Manzano, Alfonso Cueto; de Boer, Ian H; Greenwood, Sharlene A; Grams, Morgan E; Herrington, William G; Heerspink, Hiddo J L; Jha, Vivekanand; Kotwal, Sradha S; Kovesdy, Csaba P; Krishnasamy, Rathika; Levin, Adeera; Madero, Magdalena; Malik, Charu; Mathew, Roy O; Michos, Erin D; Moorthy, Monica; Navaneethan, Sankar D; Perkovic, Vlado; Rossing, Peter; Reusch, Jane E B; Robinson, Bruce M; Sarnak, Mark J; Sloan, Lance; Stenvinkel, Peter; Taal, Maarten W; Tangri, Navdeep; Tuttle, Katherine R; Viecelli, Andrea K; Yee-Moon Wang, Angela; Wheeler, David C; Wong, Michelle M Y; Herzog, Charles A; ,
The Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) framework recognizes the interconnected biological, clinical, and societal drivers of cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and obesity. To advance an integrated perspective, aligned with the kidney community focus, the International Society of Nephrology (ISN) convened an International Expert Forum bringing together a global and multidisciplinary team of leaders in this field. This meeting report synthesizes key discussions spanning CKM risk stratification, lifestyle interventions, guideline-directed medical therapies, emerging late-stage therapeutics, and models of care delivery. Participants emphasized the importance of early, integrated case-finding; long-term, joint kidney-cardiovascular risk assessment; and timely use of evidence-informed therapies to reduce kidney disease progression, kidney failure, and cardiovascular events. Persistent gaps including therapeutic inertia, fragmented care, and global inequities in access to care were highlighted, alongside promising multidisciplinary and system-level care models. Emerging therapies targeting residual risk further underscore the need for adaptive implementation strategies. Aligned with ISN's mission, this forum represents a foundational step toward connecting disciplines, bridging evidence-to-practice gaps, and building global capacity to improve equitable CKM outcomes.
PMID: 42521017
ISSN: 1523-1755
CID: 6070425

Restrictive vs Liberal Transfusion Strategy After Myocardial Infarction: A Post Hoc Analysis of the MINT Randomized Clinical Trial

Bertolet, Marnie; Carrier, Francois Martin; Glynn, Simone; Abbott, J Dawn; Defilippis, Andrew P; Simon, Tabassome; Fordyce, Christopher B; Senaratne, Janek; Potter, Brian J; Herbert, Brandon M; Rao, Sunil V; Caixeta, Adriano; Tessalee, Meechai; Cooper, Howard A; Beraldo de Andrade, Pedro; Dall'Orto, Frederico Toledo Campo; Silvain, Johanne; Carson, Jeffrey L; Brooks, Maria Mori; ,
IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:The decision to transfuse a patient with myocardial infarction (MI) and anemia at a higher vs lower hemoglobin threshold must consider the potential benefit of reduced risk of 30-day death or MI and the potential risk of heart failure. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:To estimate bayesian posterior risk differences and posterior probabilities that a liberal vs restrictive transfusion strategy is associated with reduced risk of 30-day death or MI and whether the probabilities exceed predefined thresholds. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:The Myocardial Ischemia and Transfusion (MINT) trial recruited adults from April 26, 2017, to April 14, 2023, who were hospitalized with MI and anemia at 144 sites in 6 countries. Statistical analysis was performed from July 31, 2024, to February 18, 2026. INTERVENTION/UNASSIGNED:The MINT trial randomized participants to a restrictive (transfuse if hemoglobin is <7 to 8 g/dL) or liberal (maintain hemoglobin at >10 g/dL) transfusion strategy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Bayesian posterior risk differences were estimated for 30-day death or MI and for heart failure using 3 prior beliefs regarding the treatment strategies: noninformative, liberal strategy superiority, or restrictive strategy superiority. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The mean (SD) age of the 3504 participants was 72.1 (11.6) years and 1911 (54.5%) were men. Compared with the restrictive strategy, the risk of 30-day death or MI with the liberal strategy was 1.4% (95% credible interval, -0.8% to 3.5%) to 2.4% (95% credible interval, 0.3%-4.6%) lower, depending on prior beliefs. The probability that the liberal strategy was associated with a lower risk of 30-day death or MI ranged from 89.1% to 98.8%, and the probability that a liberal strategy was associated with at least 1 less death or MI per 100 treated was between 62.7% and 90.4%. Conversely, the risk of heart failure with the liberal strategy was 0.2% (95% credible interval, -1.6% to 1.2%) to 0.6% (95% credible interval, -2.0% to 0.8%) higher compared with the restrictive strategy, depending on prior beliefs. The probability that the liberal strategy was associated with a higher risk of heart failure ranged from 60.6% to 80.0%, and the probability that a liberal strategy was associated with at least 1 more heart failure event per 100 treated was between 13.3% and 29.3%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:This post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial of patients with MI and anemia suggests that a liberal transfusion strategy was associated with a lower risk of 30-day death or MI, outweighing the increased risk of heart failure. Consistent with guideline recommendations and according to patients' values and clinician risk assessment, a liberal transfusion strategy may be reasonable. TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02981407.
PMCID:13409005
PMID: 42507445
ISSN: 2574-3805
CID: 6070390

Current evidence on the management of re-recurrent rectal cancer: a systematic review

Giannos, Georgios; Theodoropoulos, Panagiotis; Frountzas, Maximos; Qiu, Sheng; Katsigeorgis, Maria; Chen, Sophia Y; Rasheed, Shahnawaz; Tekkis, Paris; Safar, Bashar; Kontovounisios, Christos
BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Re-recurrent rectal cancer (RRRC) represents a highly complex disease following curative-intent treatment of recurrent rectal cancer (RRC). While management principles for primary and locally recurrent rectal cancer (RRC) have been defined by expert collaborations, no specific guidelines currently outline the perioperative management of RRRC. This systematic review aimed to appraise the reported perioperative strategies and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing curative-intent treatment for RRRC. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Eligibility criteria, Studies reporting perioperative management and outcomes of adult patients undergoing curative-intent treatment for RRRC were included. Non-English articles, letters, abstracts, and studies lacking surgical or oncological data were excluded. Information sources, The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251244390). MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for relevant articles. Risk of bias, Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Synthesis of results, Given heterogeneity in treatment strategies and outcome reporting, results were synthesized narratively. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Included studies, Three retrospective cohort studies comprising 169 patients treated with curative intent surgery for RRRC were included. Synthesis of results, Neoadjuvant therapy was administered in 20-92% of included patients, depending on the previous cumulative radiation dose. Pelvic exenteration was frequently required, with total exenteration performed in 6-20% and sacrectomy in up to 15% of cases; reconstructive procedures were reported in less than 16%. IORT was used in 44-77% of patients in centers where it was available. R0 resection rates ranged from 33% to 62%, with oncological outcomes directly associated with margin status. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Limitations of evidence, Evidence was limited to retrospective observational studies with small sample sizes, heterogeneous management, and varied institutional resources, precluding meta-analysis. Interpretation, Curative-intent surgery for RRRC is feasible in highly selected patients, with R0 being the principal prognostic determinant of oncological outcome. However, significant variability in perioperative pathways, margin definition, MRI-based classification, and reconstructive strategies underlines the necessity for the development of standardized, consensus-based recommendations to optimize multidisciplinary treatment. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251244390, identifier CRD420251244390.
PMCID:13414183
PMID: 42528735
ISSN: 2234-943x
CID: 6070456

Small- and large-calibre ureteroscopes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Di Bello, Francesco; Verri, Paolo; Bravo-Balado, Alejandra; Izquierdo, Paula; Fila, Lucio; Kanashiro, Andres K; Gogaj, Rozalba; Wells, Elizabeth; Traxer, Olivier; Angerri, Oriol; Emiliani, Esteban
OBJECTIVE:To systematically review and meta-analyse the available evidence comparing perioperative outcomes between small- (≤6.3/7.5 F) and large-calibre (≥7.5/9.8 F) ureteroscopes. METHODS:A literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, and Scopus was performed prior to March 2026 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The endpoints of interest were stone-free rates (SFRs), overall complications, and operative time. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomised Trials for non-randomised and randomised studies. Sensitivity analyses were completed on studies reporting flexible ureteroscopes only, 7.5- vs >7.5-F ureteroscopes, and on randomised controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS:Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Of those, four were RCTs while four were retrospective. Specifically, three studies compared 6.3- vs 7.5-F ureteroscopes, one 6.3- vs 8.5-F ureteroscopes, one 6- vs 7.5-F ureteroscopes, while three compared 7.5- vs >7.5-F ureteroscopes. Within the meta-analysis comparing 6.3- vs 7.5-F ureteroscopes, the small-calibre ureteroscopes were associated with a risk ratio [RR] for SFR of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.06), of 1.08 (95% CI 0.77-1.51) for overall complications, and a standardised mean difference in operative time of -14.5 min (95% CI -33.4 to 3.3 min). These results were virtually confirmed by all sensitivity analyses. No differences in the above outcomes were recorded for the comparison between 7.5- vs >7.5-F ureteroscopes. CONCLUSIONS:Within the present meta-analysis, the small-calibre ureteroscopes achieved comparable outcomes to large-calibre ureteroscopes. To overcome the substantial heterogeneity and residual confounding across studies, well-designed and adequately powered RCTs are required.
PMID: 42521215
ISSN: 1464-410x
CID: 6070428

Platelet Reactivity Expression Score and Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Limb Events in CKD

Hamo, Carine E; Muller, Matthew A; Barrett, Tessa J; Murphy, Lila; Ruggles, Kelly V; Coresh, Josef; Grams, Morgan E; Charytan, David M; Berger, Jeffrey S
PMID: 42508683
ISSN: 1523-6838
CID: 6070396

Feasibility study of a novel mHealth clinical decision support application to enable community health workers to manage hypertension in rural Guatemala

Duffy, Sean; Chavez, Alejandro; Arthur, Ian Stanley; Ortiz, Gabriella Lucia; Bermudez-Cañete, Alvaro; Nuñez-Perez, Pablo; White, Elizabeth; Aguilar, Valerie; Aguirre, Juan; Dang, Do; Perez Abaj, Celina Sonia; Letona López, Yoselin Emelina; Tun, Rafael; Valley, Taryn McGinn
BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Hypertension is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where low healthcare access limits diagnosis and treatment. Community health workers (CHWs) supported by mobile health (mHealth) clinical decision support (CDS) tools may help. This study evaluated the feasibility of CHW-led hypertension management using an mHealth CDS application in rural Guatemala. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We conducted a single-group feasibility study in San Lucas Tolimán, Guatemala. Trained CHWs assisted by a CommCare-based CDS application provided direct patient care. Application algorithms were based on World Health Organization guidelines and assisted with medication titration, lifestyle counselling, and physician consultation. Adults (≥18 years) with diagnosed hypertension were followed monthly for six months. The primary feasibility outcome was prescribing agreement between CHWs and supervising physicians with application of antihypertensive recommendations (minimum acceptable agreement was 90%). Primary clinical outcomes were changes in systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure. Secondary outcomes included retention, patient satisfaction, and safety. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:In total 32 participants were enrolled and 30 (93.8%) completed six-month follow-up, with 96.4% of possible visits completed. CHW-physician agreement with application recommendations was 98.9%. The median decrease in SBP was 7.5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.0, 12.0), and the mean decrease in DBP was 3.1 mm Hg (95% CI = 0.1, 6.1). The proportion of patients with controlled SBP (<140 mm Hg) increased from 66.7% to 76.7% (P = 0.505). A total of 11 application errors (5.0% of 217 visits) occurred, none of which resulted in adverse events. Only three patients experienced significant adverse events, none of which required hospitalisation. Patient satisfaction remained high. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:In this pilot, CHWs supported by an mHealth CDS application safely managed hypertension with high physician agreement, patient retention, and blood pressure improvement. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of CHW task-sharing hypertension management in low-resource settings and support evaluation of this approach in larger trials. REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05479097.
PMCID:13424920
PMID: 42533611
ISSN: 2047-2986
CID: 6070470