Faculty Bibliography

Background: There are no predictive biomarkers of ipilimumab (IPI) toxicity. Of metastatic melanoma (MM) patients (pts) receiving IPI (3mg/kg), 35% require systemic therapies to treat immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and 20% must terminate treatment (Horvat et al., JCO 2015). Here we tested the hypothesis that a pre-existing autoantibody (autoAb) profile is predictive of IPI irAEs. Methods: We measured autoAb levels in pre- and post-treatment sera from mm pts who received IPI (3mg/kg) monotherapy on a proteome microarray containing ~20,000 unique full-length human proteins (HuProt array, CDI Laboratories). Clinical data were prospectively collected with protocol-driven follow-up. IrAEs were categorized by CTCAE guidelines as none (grade 0), mild (grade 1-2), or severe (grade 3-4). AutoAb levels were standardized using median quantile normalization and considered positive hits if > 2-SD above the peak array signal and differed by >=2 fold with p < 0.05 between toxicity groups (Non-parametric Analysis/Wilcox test). Results: Seventy-eight sera from 37 mm pts were analyzed. Antibodies against CTLA-4 were significantly elevated post IPI treatment (p < 0.0001), validating the assay. The pre-treatment levels of 190 IgG autoAbs were significantly diferent in pts who experienced irAEs (n = 28) compared to those with no irAEs (n = 9). Comparison of severe irAE (n = 9) and no irAE (n = 9) groups revealed 129 IgG autoAbs that significantly differed in pre-treatment sera. Localization and pathway analysis (UniProt, KEGG, Reactome) showed 81/190 (43%) of the autoAbs targeted nuclear and mitochondrial antigens and were enriched in metabolic pathways (p = 0.015). AutoAbs associated with irAEs did not correlate with treatment response. Conclusions: AutoAbs to antigens enriched in metabolic pathways prior to treatment may predict IPI-induced toxicity in MM. The subcellular localization of targeted antigens could explain the autoimmune toxicities associated with IPI. Studies in larger cohorts and in pts receiving other checkpoint inhibitors and/or combination therapies are essential to determine the validity of the data. If validated, our results would support the discovery of the first toxicity predictor in cancer immunotherapy

Agents that modulate immune checkpoint proteins, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1), have become a mainstay in cancer treatment. The clinical benefit afforded by immune checkpoint inhibitors can be accompanied by immune-related adverse events (irAE) that affect the skin, gastrointestinal tract, liver, and endocrine system. The types of irAEs associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are generally consistent across tumor types. Immune-related endocrine events can affect the pituitary, thyroid, and adrenal glands, as well as other downstream target organs. These events are unique when compared with other irAEs because the manifestations are often irreversible. Immune-related endocrine events are typically grade 1/2 in severity and often present with non-specific symptoms, making them difficult to diagnose. The mechanisms underlying immune-related target organ damage in select individuals remain mostly undefined. Management includes close patient monitoring, appropriate laboratory testing for endocrine function, replacement of hormones, and consultation with an endocrinologist when appropriate. An awareness of the symptoms and management of immune-related endocrine events may aid in the safe and appropriate use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: Since 2011, metastatic melanoma treatment has evolved with commercial approval of BRAF- and MEK-targeted therapy and CTLA-4- and PD-1-blocking antibodies (immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICI). While novel therapies have demonstrated improved prognosis in clinical trials, few studies have examined the evolution of prognosis and toxicity of these drugs among an unselected population. We assess whether survival and toxicity reported in trials, which typically exclude most patients with brain metastases and poor performance status, are recapitulated within a commercial access population. METHODS: 182 patients diagnosed with stage IV melanoma from July 2006 to December 2013 and treated with BRAF- and/or MEK-targeted therapy or ICI were prospectively studied. Outcomes and clinicopathologic differences between trial and commercial cohorts were assessed. RESULTS: Patients receiving commercial therapy (vs. on trial) had poorer prognostic features (i.e., brain metastases) and lower median overall survival (mOS) when assessed across all treatments (9.2 vs. 17.5 months, p = 0.0027). While toxicity within trial and commercial cohorts did not differ, patients who experienced toxicity had increased mOS (p < 0.001), irrespective of stratification by trial status or therapy. CONCLUSION: Metastatic melanoma patients receiving commercial treatment may represent a different clinical population with poor prognostic features compared to trial patients. Toxicity may prognosticate treatment benefit.

A 60-year-old woman with history of vaginal malignant melanoma and inguinal nodal metastases underwent F-FDG PET/CT for restaging following ipilimumab (Yervoy) immunotherapy, a Food and Drug Administration-approved human monoclonal antibody targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. PET/CT demonstrated mildly FDG-avid multifocal enlarging bilateral lung opacities. Within each lung lesion, there was circumferential uptake localizing to a high-attenuation rim with a photopenic ground-glass center on CT, consistent with "reversed halo sign." Patient was asymptomatic at the time of imaging. Ipilimumab was discontinued, and 3-month follow-up PET/CT revealed spontaneous complete resolution of the lung lesions, supporting the diagnosis of ipilimumab-induced organizing pneumonia.

Importance: Limited therapies are available in patients with inoperable locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Objective: To determine the efficacy of programmed cell death 1 receptor (PD-1) inhibitors in locally advanced cSCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single patient with locally advanced cSCC who declined surgery and radiotherapy underwent treatment with pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, at an academic dermatologic surgery section and cancer center. The patient was followed up for clinical and radiologic regression of cSCC. With the use of NanoString to amplify potential biomarkers, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence, the ex vivo expression of PD-1 and a ligand (PD-L2) was assessed in 38 cSCC biopsy specimens from 24 patients with cSCC. Expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in the cSCC microenvironment was defined. Intervention: Pembrolizumab, 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, for 4 cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures: Expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in the cSCC microenvironment. Results: In 1 patient with locally advanced cSCC who was treated with pembrolizumab, nearly complete tumor regression was observed after 4 cycles of therapy. The NanoString technology used in 38 cSCC biopsy specimens from 24 patients with cSCC (19 men and 5 women; mean [SD] age, 76.4 [12.2] years) detected increased PD-1 and PD-L2 expression in high-risk cSCC. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed enhanced expression of PD-1 and its ligands in cSCC with perineural invasion (mean [SEM] expression, 5.06 [1.27]; P = .05), superficial cSCC (mean [SEM] expression, 3.58 [1.50]; P = .15), organ transplant-associated cSCC (mean [SEM] expression, 3.01 [0.54]; P = .005), and infiltrative cSCC (mean [SD] expression, 2.01 [0.30]; P = .006) compared with normal skin specimens. In double-label immunofluorescence staining, CD11c+, a marker of myeloid dendritic cells, colocalized with PD-L1 and PD-L2 in cSCC lesions. Conclusions and Relevance: The favorable treatment response combined with significant involvement of PD-1 and PD ligands in cSCC lesions suggests that PD-1 blockade may be a viable therapeutic option for locally advanced cSCC and provides rationale for further investigation in future clinical trials.

Purpose TAK-733, an investigational, selective, allosteric MEK1/2 inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor effects against multiple cancer cell lines and xenograft models. This first-in-human study investigated TAK-733 in patients with solid tumors. Methods Patients received oral TAK-733 once daily on days 1-21 in 28-day treatment cycles. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for AEs version 3.0. Response was assessed using RECIST v1.1. Blood samples for TAK-733 pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (inhibition of ERK phosphorylation) were collected during cycle 1. Results Fifty-one patients received TAK-733 0.2-22 mg. Primary diagnoses included uveal melanoma (24 %), colon cancer (22 %), and cutaneous melanoma (10 %). Four patients had dose-limiting toxicities of dermatitis acneiform, plus fatigue and pustular rash in one patient, and stomatitis in one patient. The maximum tolerated dose was 16 mg. Common drug-related AEs included dermatitis acneiform (51 %), diarrhea (29 %), and increased blood creatine phosphokinase (20 %); grade >/= 3 AEs were reported in 27 (53 %) patients. Median Tmax was 3 h; systemic exposure increased less than dose-proportionally over the dose range 0.2-22 mg. On day 21 maximum inhibition of ERK phosphorylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 46-97 % was seen in patients receiving TAK-733 >/= 8.4 mg. Among 41 response-evaluable patients, 2 (5 %) patients with cutaneous melanoma (one with BRAF L597R mutant melanoma) had partial responses. Conclusions TAK-733 had a generally manageable toxicity profile up to the maximum tolerated dose, and showed the anticipated pharmacodynamic effect of sustained inhibition of ERK phosphorylation. Limited antitumor activity was demonstrated. Further investigation is not currently planned.

BACKGROUND:Results from phase 2 and 3 trials in patients with advanced melanoma have shown significant improvements in the proportion of patients achieving an objective response and prolonged progression-free survival with the combination of nivolumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) plus ipilimumab (an anti-CTLA-4 antibody) compared with ipilimumab alone. We report 2-year overall survival data from a randomised controlled trial assessing this treatment in previously untreated advanced melanoma. METHODS:wild-type melanoma achieving an investigator-assessed objective response. Overall survival was an exploratory endpoint and is reported in this Article. Efficacy analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population, whereas safety was assessed in all treated patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01927419, and is ongoing but no longer enrolling patients. FINDINGS/RESULTS:Between Sept 16, 2013, and Feb 6, 2014, we screened 179 patients and enrolled 142, randomly assigning 95 patients to nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 47 to ipilimumab alone. In each treatment group, one patient no longer met the study criteria following randomisation and thus did not receive study drug. At a median follow-up of 24·5 months (IQR 9·1-25·7), 2-year overall survival was 63·8% (95% CI 53·3-72·6) for those assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 53·6% (95% CI 38·1-66·8) for those assigned to ipilimumab alone; median overall survival had not been reached in either group (hazard ratio 0·74, 95% CI 0·43-1·26; p=0·26). Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 51 (54%) of 94 patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with nine (20%) of 46 patients who received ipilimumab alone. The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were colitis (12 [13%] of 94 patients) and increased alanine aminotransferase (ten [11%]) in the combination group and diarrhoea (five [11%] of 46 patients) and hypophysitis (two [4%]) in the ipilimumab alone group. Serious grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 34 (36%) of 94 patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab (including colitis in ten [11%] of 94 patients, and diarrhoea in five [5%]) compared with four (9%) of 46 patients who received ipilimumab alone (including diarrhoea in two [4%] of 46 patients, colitis in one [2%], and hypophysitis in one [2%]). No new types of treatment-related adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred in this updated analysis. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:Although follow-up of the patients in this study is ongoing, the results of this analysis suggest that the combination of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab might lead to improved outcomes compared with first-line ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma. The results suggest encouraging survival outcomes with immunotherapy in this population of patients. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:Bristol-Myers Squibb.