Faculty Bibliography

Background/Purpose: Early LeFort III (LFIII) surgery or LFIII distraction involve osteotomies and disjunction in the region of the maxillary tuberosity in proximity to the maxillary posterior tooth buds. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of early LFIII advancement and/or distraction on survival of the maxillary posterior permanent dentition. Methods/Description: A retrospective review of patients with syndromic craniosynostosis treated by early LFIII surgery and distraction was conducted. Of 225 syndromic craniosynostosis patients enrolled between 1973 and 2006, a total of 50 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria: 1) surgical intervention prior to age 8 years; 2) two panoramic radiographs, one prior to surgery and one in adolescence; 3) no apparent abnormalities in the position of permanent tooth buds. Of the 50 patients, 25 underwent LFIII surgery and 25 underwent midface distraction (M = 21, F = 29, average age at time of surgery = 5 +/- 1.1 years with diagnoses of Crouzon (20), Apert (17) and Pfeiffer (13), syndromes). Panoramic radiographs presurgically (T1) and postsurgically (T2) were inspected by a trained observer. The tooth buds were classified as being present (P), displaced (D), impacted (I), ankylosed (ANK), extracted (E), or absent (A). SPSS software was used to carry out chi-squared analysis and Fisher exact test.
Result(s): In the LFIII surgery group, 94% of maxillary second molars (D = 16%, I = 8%, E = 6%, A = 64%) and 28% of maxillary first molars (D = 18%, I = 4%, ANK = 2%, E = 2%, A = 2%) experienced a disturbance in eruption. Of the displaced second molars, 75% were located in the maxillary sinus and 25% in the maxillary tuberosity. Of the displaced first molars, 78% were located in the maxillary sinus and 22% in the maxillary tuberosity. In the distraction group, 80% of maxillary second molars (D = 38%, ANK = 4%, E = 14%, A = 24%) and 18% of maxillary first molars (D = 10%, I = 2%, E = 2%, A = 4%) experienced a disturbance in eruption. Of the displaced second molars, 37% were located in the maxillary sinus and 63% in the maxillary tuberosity. Of the displaced first molars, 100% were located in the maxillary tuberosity. Traditional LFIII osteotomy was significantly more likely to result in an adverse event for maxillary second molars compared to distraction (chi² = 4.33, P = .037).
Conclusion(s): The eruption of maxillary second molars had a high incidence of disruption following early LFIII intervention, with traditional LFIII surgery having greater negative consequences for the maxillary second molars compared to distraction. The maxillary first molars show significantly less disruption during early LFIII intervention with no significant differences noted between surgical procedures. Furthermore, a common disruption seen postsurgically is the displacement of the maxillary second molar tooth buds into the maxillary sinus, leading to the question if presurgical planning should include extraction/enucleation of the second molar tooth buds to avoid this sequela

OBJECTIVE:To quantify 3-dimensional (3D) nasal changes in infants with unilateral cleft lip with or without cleft palate (UCL±P) treated by nasoalveolar molding (NAM) and cheilorhinoplasty and compare to noncleft controls. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective case series of infants treated with NAM and primary cheilorhinoplasty between September, 2012 and July, 2016. Infants were included if they had digital stereophotogrammetric records at initial presentation (T1), completion of NAM (T2), and following primary cheilorhinoplasty (T3). Images were oriented in 3dMD Vultus software, and 16 nasolabial points identified. PATIENTS/METHODS:Twenty consecutively treated infants with UCL±P. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS:Nasoalveolar molding and primary cheilorhinoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Anthropometric measures of nasal symmetry and morphology were compared in the treatment group between time points using paired Student t tests. Postsurgical nasal morphology was compared to noncleft controls. RESULTS:Nasal tip protrusion increased, and at T3 was 2.64 mm greater than noncleft controls. Nasal base width decreased on the cleft side by 4.01 mm after NAM and by 6.73 mm after cheilorhinoplasty. Columellar length of the noncleft to cleft side decreased from 2:1 to 1:1 following NAM. Significant improvements in subnasale, columella, and nasal tip deviations from midsagittal plane were observed. Treatment improved symmetry of the alar morphology angle and the nasal base-columella angle between cleft and noncleft sides. CONCLUSIONS:Three-dimensional analysis of UCL±P patients demonstrated significant improvements in nasal projection, columella length, nasal symmetry, and nasal width. Compared to noncleft controls, nasal form was generally corrected, with overcorrection of nasal tip projection, columella angle, and outer nasal widths.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To investigate intrinsic palatal and alveolar tissue deficiency in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) as compared to age-matched individuals without UCLP using surface area measurements on 3D scans of plaster casts. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:22 maxillary casts of infants with UCLP from the Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery of NYU Langone Medical Center and 37 maxillary casts from infants without clefts from Sillman's longitudinal study were scanned by Ortho Insight 3D by Motion View Software, LLC (Chattanooga, TN) and measured using Checkpoint software (Stratovan, Davis, CA). The palatal and alveolar surface areas of each cast were measured. The most superior point of the alveolar ridge in front of the incisive papilla and the most superior point of each maxillary tuberosity were connected by a line that ran along the highest part of the alveolar ridge. This line was used to set boundaries for the palatal surface area measurements. The surface areas of greater and lesser segments were measured independently on UCLP casts. A total palatal surface area for the UCLP sample including width of the cleft gap was also measured. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:< .0001). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:An intrinsic palatal and alveolar tissue deficiency exists in patients born with UCLP. The amount of tissue deficiency for a patient with UCLP should be considered when developing and executing a patient-specific treatment plan.

BACKGROUND: Maxillary position in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis after midface distraction has been shown to be stable 1 year postoperatively. The purpose of this study is to assess midfacial position in the growing child with craniosynostosis 5 years after Le Fort III advancement with a rigid external device (RED). METHODS: Seventeen consecutive patients were identified to have the diagnosis of syndromic craniosynostosis and who underwent midface advancement. There were 10 males and 7 females, 7 patients had Crouzon syndrome, 5 had Apert syndrome, and 5 had Pfeiffer syndrome. A standard subcranial Le Fort III osteotomy was performed. Cephalometric analysis was performed to assess the position of the maxilla. RESULTS: After device removal, orbitale advanced 13.67 mm along the x axis and downward 1.70 mm along the y axis. A Point advanced 15.97 mm along the x axis and downward 1.14 mm along the y axis. At 1 year post-distraction, both orbitale and A point had advanced an additional 0.47 mm and 0.24 mm along the x axis and downward 0.58 mm and 1.78 mm along the y axis respectively. At 5 years post-distraction, orbitale moved posterior 0.58 mm and A point advanced an additional 2.08 mm along the x axis. Orbitale and A point descended 3.23 mm and 5.2 mm along the y axis respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After Le Fort III advancement with distraction, the maxillary position remains stable and continues to advance minimally along the x axis and demonstrates more growth along the y axis over the long term.

The orthodontic treatment of adolescents with cleft lip and palate is complex and highly individualized. For such patients, there is a great need for thorough and comprehensive diagnosis as well as attention to multi-disciplinary aspects of orthodontic care. A framework for categorizing patients with varying forms and degrees cleft lip and palate into three levels of skeletal discrepancy from least to most severe is presented, and the specific treatment objectives of phase II orthodontic treatment for each of the three categories is then outlined. Moreover, due to specific challenges of a cleft-related dentition, the various aspects of the management of missing teeth are reviewed. Finally, the importance and most pertinent methods of retention are emphasized. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Maxillary hypoplasia is a common finding in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). This study evaluated the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in patients with CLP treated with an occlusally bonded maxillary protraction headgear (PHG) appliance. A total of 267 consecutive patients (1995-2012) treated with a PHG appliance were reviewed. In all, 40 patients with CLP (mean age 7.70 years) met the inclusion criteria. Mean treatment duration was 7.5 months with a mean force of 405 g per side. X- and Y-axis displacement for 38 lateral cephalometric landmarks was recorded at pretreatment (T-0), following removal of PHG (T-1), and at 1.5 years follow-up (T-2). From T-0 to T-1, A-point advanced by +2.48 mm (p &lt; 0.01), UIE advanced by +4.91 mm (p &lt; 0.01) and B-point moved posteriorly by -2.03 mm (p &lt; 0.01) and inferiorly by -3.86 mm (p &lt; 0.01). During the same time interval, the ANB angle changed from 0.08 to 3.77 (p &lt; 0.01). At 1.5 year follow-up, A-point moved posteriorly by -0.28 mm (p &gt; 0.05), B-point moved anteriorly by 3.69 mm (p &lt; 0.01) and the ANB angle decreased to 0.51 (p &lt; 0.01). A PHG appliance with a mean 810 g of force resulted in 54.60% skeletal and 45.40% dentoalveolar advancement. At 1.5 years (T2), the maxillary position was stable with minimal anterior growth; however, the mandible showed significant anterior growth contributing to reduction of the ANB angle. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Presurgical infant orthopedics has been employed since 1950 as an adjunctive neonatal therapy for the correction of cleft lip and palate. Most of these therapies did not address deformity of the nasal cartilage in unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate as well as the deficiency of the columella tissue in infants with bilateral cleft. The NasolAveolar molding (NAM) technique, a new approach to presurgical infant orthopedics, developed by Grayson reduces the severity of the initial cleft alveolar and nasal deformity. This enables the surgeon and the patient to enjoy the benefits associated with repair of a cleft deformity that is minimal in severity. This paper will discuss the appliance design, clinical management, and biomechanical principles of nasolaveolar molding therapy. Long-term studies on NAM therapy indicate better lip and nasal form, reduced oronasal fistula and labial deformities, and 60% reduction in the need for secondary alveolar bone grafting. No effect on growth of midface in sagittal and vertical plane has been recorded up to the age of 18 years. With proper training and clinical skills NAM has demonstrated tremendous benefit to the cleft patients as well as to the surgeon performing the repair. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cleft lip and palate is a complex craniofacial anomaly typically requiring treatment from a range of specialists to produce excellent outcomes. Due to the challenges of coordinating this extensive range of specialists, treatment is best provided by a centralized cleft lip and palate treatment team. This article outlines the members of a modern treatment team, their contributions and responsibilities in patient care, and the benefits to both patient and practitioner when treatment is provided by an experienced multidisciplinary team. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.