Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Following ileocolic resection (ICR), the clinical importance and prognostic implications of histologic activity on biopsies in Crohn's disease (CD) patients with endoscopic remission are not well defined. The aim of this study was to determine if histologic activity in patients with endoscopic remission is associated with future risk of endoscopic and/or radiologic postoperative recurrence (POR). METHODS:In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, adult patients with CD who underwent ICR between 2009 and 2020 with endoscopic biopsies of ileal mucosa from Rutgeerts i0 on index colonoscopy were included. The composite rate of endoscopic (Rutgeerts score ≥i2b) and radiologic (active inflammation on imaging) recurrence was compared in patients with and without histologic activity using a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model including clinically relevant risk factors of POR, postoperative biologic prophylaxis, and histology activity was designed. RESULTS:A total of 113 patients with i0 disease on index colonoscopy after ICR were included. Of these, 42% had histologic activity. Time to POR was significantly earlier in the histologically active versus normal group ( P = 0.04). After adjusting for clinical risk factors of POR, histologic activity (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.17-4.79; P = 0.02) and active smoking (HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.02-6.33; P = 0.05) were independently associated with subsequent composite POR risk. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:In patients with postoperative CD, histologic activity despite complete endoscopic remission is associated with composite, endoscopic, and radiographic recurrence. Further understanding of the role of histologic activity in patients with Rutgeerts i0 disease may provide a novel target to reduce disease recurrence in this population.

BACKGROUND:In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), multimorbidity with obesity and type 2 diabetes is common and increasing. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are increasingly being prescribed for patients with IBD, yet their impact on patients with IBD is largely unknown. We aimed to assess the impact of GLP-1 receptor agonists on the course of IBD. METHODS:We identified all IBD patients prescribed GLP-1 receptor agonists at a large academic healthcare network between 2009 and 2023. We analyzed demographics and IBD characteristics in the year pre- and post-GLP-1 receptor agonist prescription and matched them to non-IBD controls. Our primary outcome was IBD exacerbation in the year following GLP-1 receptor agonist initiation, measured as a composite of IBD-related hospitalization, corticosteroid prescription, medication escalation or changes, or IBD-related surgery. Secondary outcomes included change in metabolic risk factors. RESULTS:Overall, 224 patients met inclusion criteria. At GLP-1 receptor agonist initiation, the median age was 54 years, 63% were female, 77% were White, and median BMI was 33.2 kg/m2. Compared to the 12-month period prior to GLP-1 receptor agonist initiation, in the 12 months post-GLP-1 receptor agonist initiation, there was no change in rates of IBD exacerbation, IBD-related hospitalization, steroids prescription, medication escalation or changes, or IBD-related surgery. There was a significant decrease in BMI in the year following GLP-1 receptor agonist initiation (median BMI 33.5 vs 31.6 kg/m2, P < .01), with rates of decrease comparable to non-IBD matched controls. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with IBD, GLP-1 receptor agonists are effective for weight loss and associated with few episodes of disease exacerbation.

BACKGROUND:Outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) following flare complicated by enteric infection (EI) are limited by follow-up duration and insufficient assessment of the role of non-Clostridioides difficile pathogens. We compared 2-year IBD outcomes following flare with and without EI. METHODS:We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults evaluated with stool PCR testing for IBD flare. Subjects were stratified by presence of EI at flare and were matched for age, sex, and date to those without EI. The primary outcome was a composite of steroid-dependent IBD, colectomy, and/or IBD therapy class change/dose escalation at 2 years. Additional analyses were performed by dividing the EI group into C. difficile infection (CDI) and non-CDI EI, and further subdividing non-CDI EI into E. coli subtypes and other non-CDI EI. RESULTS:We identified 137 matched subjects, of whom 62 (45%) had EI (40 [29%] CDI; 17 [12%] E. coli). Enteric infection at flare was independently associated with the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 4.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.62-11.5). After dividing EI into CDI and non-CDI EI, only CDI at flare was independently associated with the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.46-12.6). After separating E. coli subtypes from non-CDI EI, E. coli infection and CDI at flare were both independently associated with the primary outcome; other EI was not. CONCLUSIONS:Enteric infection at flare-specifically with CDI-is associated with worse IBD outcomes at 2 years. The relationship between E. coli subtypes at flare and subsequent IBD outcomes requires further investigation.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) prevents recurrent C. difficile infections (rCDI) in IBD. Patients. Bezlotoxumab is also indicated to prevent rCDI. We assess the impact of FMT in combination with bezlotoxumab in patients with IBD and rCDI. We conducted a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial. All received a single colonoscopic FMT. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive bezlotoxumab or placebo. Sixty-one patients were enrolled (30 received treatment and 31 placebo. Overall, 5 participants (8%) experienced a CDI recurrence; 4 in the treatment arm, 1 in placebo (13% vs 3%, p=0.15). There was no clear benefit to the combination approach compared to FMT alone.

DESCRIPTION/METHODS:The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Update (CPU) Commentary is to discuss the risks of various malignancies in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and the impact of the available medical therapies on these risks. The CPU will also guide the approach to the patient with IBD who develops a malignancy or the patient with a history of cancer in terms of IBD medication management. METHODS:This CPU was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute CPU committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership and underwent internal peer review by the CPU committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. This communication incorporates important and recently published studies in the field, and it reflects the experiences of the authors who are experts in the diagnosis and management of IBD.

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), comprising Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. Individuals with IBD are at an increased risk of developing intestinal neoplasia, particularly colorectal neoplasia (CRN) (including colorectal dysplasia and colorectal cancer [CRC]), as a consequence of chronic colonic inflammation.^– Given that CRC in patients with IBD appears to be preceded by dysplastic changes in the colonic mucosa, prevention strategies to reduce CRC-associated morbidity and mortality have been recommended by multiple society guidelines and independent consensus groups, and include risk assessment, mitigation of inflammation with medical therapies, and screening and surveillance strategies with colonoscopy, with histopathologic assessments at appropriate intervals. Despite these efforts, prevention and management of neoplasia in IBD remains a complex and often confusing topic, requiring careful reappraisal of the evolving evidence base and practicable approaches to clinical practice.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS/OBJECTIVE:In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and a history of cancer, retrospective studies suggest that exposure to immunosuppressive agents does not increase the risk of incident (recurrent or new) cancer compared to unexposed patients. SAPPHIRE is a prospective registry aimed at addressing this issue. METHODS:Since 2016, patients with IBD and confirmed index cancer prior to enrollment were followed annually. Patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation at enrollment, or recurrent cancer within five years were excluded. Primary outcome was development of incident cancer related to exposure to immunosuppressive medications. RESULTS:Among 305 patients (47% male, 88% white), median age at IBD diagnosis and cancer were 32 and 52 years, respectively. Index cancers were solid organ (46%), dermatologic (32%), gastrointestinal (13%), and hematologic (9%). During median follow-up of 4.8 years, 210 (69%) were exposed to immunosuppressive therapy and 46 (15%) developed incident cancers (25 new, 21 recurrent). In unadjusted analysis, the crude rate of incident cancer in unexposed patients was 2.58/100 person-years versus 4.78/100 PY (relative risk 1.85, 95% CI 0.92-3.73) for immunosuppression exposed patients. In a proportional hazards model adjusting for sex, smoking history, age and stage at index malignancy, and non-melanoma skin cancer, no significant association was found between receipt of immunosuppression and incident cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR, 1.41, 95% CI: 0.69-2.90), or with any major drug class. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this interim analysis of patients with IBD and a history of cancer, despite numerically elevated aHRs, we did not find a statistically significant association between subsequent exposure to immunosuppressive therapies and development of incident cancers.

BACKGROUND & AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is linked to reduced female fertility, but it is unclear how fertility rates vary by histological disease activity. METHODS:Nationwide IBD cohort of Swedish women aged 15-44 years. We examined fertility rates during periods with vs. without histological inflammation (n=21,046; follow-up: 1990-2016) and during periods with vs. without clinical activity (IBD-related hospitalization, surgery, or treatment escalation) (n=24,995; follow-up: 2006-2020). Accounting for socio-demographics and comorbidities, we used Poisson regression to estimate adjusted fertility rate ratios (aFRRs) for live-births conceived during 12-month-periods of histological inflammation (vs. histological remission) and 3-month-periods of clinically active IBD (vs. quiescent IBD). RESULTS:During periods with vs. without histological inflammation, there were 6.35 (95%CI=5.98-6.73) and 7.09 (95%CI=6.48-7.70) live-births conceived per 100 person-years of follow-up, respectively, or one fewer child per fourteen women with 10 years of histological inflammation (aFRR=0.90; 95%CI=0.81-1.00). In women with histological inflammation fertility was similarly reduced in ulcerative colitis (UC, aFRR=0.89 [95%CI=0.78-1.02]) and Crohn's disease (CD, aFRR=0.86 [95%CI=0.72-1.04]). Clinical IBD activity was associated with an aFRR of 0.76 (95%CI=0.72-0.79) or one fewer child per six women with 10 years of clinical activity. Fertility was reduced in clinically active UC (aFRR=0.75 [95%CI=0.70-0.81]) and CD (aFRR=0.76 [95%CI=0.70-0.82]). Finally, also among women with clinically quiescent IBD, histological inflammation (vs. histological remission) was associated with reduced fertility (aFRR=0.85 [95%CI=0.73-0.98]). CONCLUSIONS:An association between histological and clinical activity and reduced female fertility in CD and UC was found. Notably, histological inflammation was linked to reduced fertility also in women with clinically quiescent IBD.

BACKGROUND & AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Preoperative risk stratification may help guide prophylactic biologic utilization for the prevention of postoperative Crohn's disease (CD) recurrence; however, there are limited data exploring and validating proposed clinical risk factors. We aimed to explore the preoperative clinical risk profiles, quantify individual risk factors, and assess the impact of biologic prophylaxis on postoperative recurrence risk in a real-world cohort. METHODS:In this multicenter retrospective analysis, patients with CD who underwent ileocolonic resection (ICR) from 2009 to 2020 were identified. High-risk (active smoking, ≥2 prior surgeries, penetrating disease, and/or perianal disease) and low-risk (nonsmokers and age >50 y) features were used to stratify patients. We assessed the risk of endoscopic (Rutgeert score, ≥i2b) and surgical recurrence by risk strata and biologic prophylaxis (≤90 days postoperatively) with logistic and time-to-event analyses. RESULTS:A total of 1404 adult CD patients who underwent ICR were included. Of the high-risk factors, 2 or more ICRs (odds ratio [OR], 1.71; 95% CI, 1.13-2.57), active smoking (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.17-2.53), penetrating disease (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.02-1.94), and history of perianal disease alone (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.42-2.79) were associated with surgical but not endoscopic recurrence. Surgical recurrence was lower in high-risk patients receiving prophylaxis vs not (10.2% vs 16.7%; P = .02), and endoscopic recurrence was lower in those receiving prophylaxis irrespective of risk strata (high-risk, 28.1% vs 37.4%; P = .03; and low-risk, 21.1% vs 38.3%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS:Clinical risk factors accurately illustrate patients at risk for surgical recurrence, but have limited utility in predicting endoscopic recurrence. Biologic prophylaxis may be of benefit irrespective of risk stratification and future studies should assess this.