Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the cost/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of the operative treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis and identify factors associated with cost-effectiveness at 2 years. METHODS: We evaluated patients who underwent surgery for spondylolisthesis. The QALY was determined from the EQ5D. Outcomes were also assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Surgical, neuromonitoring, and anesthesia Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes as well as hospital Diagnosis-Related Group codes were used to determine the Medicare direct care costs of surgery. Indirect costs were modeled based on existing literature. A discounting rate of 3% was applied. Analysis was performed to determine which factors were associated with a cost/QALY less than $100,000. RESULTS: There were 44 patients who underwent surgery for either degenerative (30) or isthmic spondylolisthesis (14). There were 27 women and 17 men, with an average age at surgery of 59.7 years (standard deviation [SD] = 14.69) and an average follow-up of 2 years (SD = 0.82). The average postoperative improvement in ODI was 24.77 (SD = 23.9), and change in QALY was 0.43 (SD = 0.30). The average cost/QALY at 2 years for direct care costs was $89,065. The average cost/QALY at 2 years for direct plus indirect costs was $112,588. Higher preoperative leg pain and greater leg pain change was associated with a cost/QALY <$100,000 (p < .005, p < .028). The cost-effective group had a higher proportion of patients with disease extent of two or more levels (p = .021). When comparing surgical techniques of anterior-posterior and posterior only, there was no difference in cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Spondylolisthesis surgery is cost-effective at 2 years, with a QALY change of 0.43 and a direct cost/QALY of $89,065. Higher preoperative leg pain and larger extent of disease was associated with cost-effectiveness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

INTRODUCTION: Wound infections following spinal surgery place a high toll on both the patient and the healthcare system. Although several large series studies have examined the incidence and distribution of spinal wound infection, the applicability of these studies varies greatly since nearly every study is either retrospective and/or lacks standard inclusion criteria for defining surgical site infection. To address this void, we present results from prospectively gathered thoracolumbar spine surgery data for which the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria were stringently applied to define a surgical site infection (SSI). METHODS: A prospective randomized trial of 314 patients who underwent multilevel thoracolumbar spinal surgery with instrumentation followed by postoperative drain placement was completed (Takemoto et al., 2015). The trial consisted of two antibiotic arms: one for 24-hours, and the other for the duration of the drain; no differences were found between the arms. All infections meeting CDC criteria for SSI were included. RESULTS: A total of 40 infections met CDC criteria for SSI, for an overall incidence of 12.7%. Of these, 20 (50%) were culture-positive. The most common organism was Staphylococcus aureus (4 total: methicillin-sensitive=2; methicillin-resistant=2), followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (3 cases), Propionibacterium acnes and Escherichia coli (2 cases each). Six infections grew multiple organisms, most commonly involving coagulase-negative staphylococcus and enterococcus. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that thoracolumbar SSI occurs at the higher end of the range cited in the literature (2-13%), which is largely based on retrospective data not subjected to the inclusivity of SSI as defined by the CDC. The three most common organisms in our analysis (S. aureus, P. acnes, E. coli) are consistent with previous reports. Staphylococcus aureus continues to be the most common causative organism and continued vigilance and searching for preventive measures need to be a high priority. This study provides Level I evidence.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Numerous studies have demonstrated poorer outcomes in patients with Workers' Compensation (WC) when compared to those without WC following treatment of various of health conditions including spine disorders. It is thus important to consider compensation status when assessing treatment outcomes in spine surgery. However, reported strengths of association have varied significantly (1.31-7.22). PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of unsatisfactory outcomes on compensation status in spine surgery patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Meta-analysis PATIENT SAMPLE: Not applicable OUTCOME MEASURE: Demographics, type of surgery, country, follow-up time, patient satisfaction, return to work and non-union events. METHODS: Both prospective and retrospective studies that compared outcomes between compensated and non-compensated patients in spine surgery were included. Two independent investigators extracted outcome data. The meta-analysis was performed using Revman software. Random effects model was used to calculate risk ratio (RR, 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous variables. There are no conflicts of interest to report among the authors, and no funding was received for this study. RESULTS: 31 studies (13 prospective; 18 retrospective) with a total of 3567 patients were included in the analysis. Follow-up time varied from 4 months to 10 years. 12 studies involved only decompression; the rest were fusion. Overall RR of an unsatisfactory outcome was 2.12 [1.74, 2.58; p<0.001] in patients with WC when compared to those without WC after surgery. RR of an unsatisfactory outcome in patients with WC, compared to those without, was 2.09 [1.38, 3.17]; p<0.01 among studies from Europe and Australia and 2.14 [1.48, 2.60]; p<0.01 among US studies. RR of decompression-only procedures was 2.53 [1.85, 3.47]; p<0.01 and 1.79 [1.45, 2.21]; p<0.01 for fusion. 43% (209/491) of patients with WC returned to work versus 17% (214/1250) of those without WC (RR 2.07 [1.43, 2.98]; p<0.001). 25 % (74/292) and 13.5% (39/287) of patients had non-union in the compensated and non-compensated groups, respectively. This was not statistically significant (RR 1.33 [0.92, 1.91]; p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Workers' compensation patients have a two-fold increased risk of an unsatisfactory outcome compared to non-compensated patients after surgery. This association was consistent when studies were grouped by country or procedure. Compensation status must be considered in all surgical intervention studies.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to report and quantify the associated factors for morbidity and mortality following surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was use to retrospectively review all patients over 25 years of age with a diagnosis of CSM who underwent anterior and/or posterior cervical fusion or laminoplasty between 2001 and 2010. The main outcome measures were total procedure-related complications and mortality. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify demographic, comorbidity, and surgical parameters associated with increased morbidity and mortality risk [reported as: OR (95 % CI)]. RESULTS: A total of 54,348 patients underwent surgical intervention for CSM with an overall morbidity rate of 9.83 % and mortality rate of 0.43 %. Comorbidities found to be associated with an increased complication rate included: pulmonary circulation disorders [6.92 (5.91-8.12)], pathologic weight loss [3.42 (3.00-3.90)], and electrolyte imbalance [2.82 (2.65-3.01)]. Comorbidities found to be associated with an increased mortality rate included: congestive heart failure [4.59 (3.62-5.82)], pulmonary circulation disorders [11.29 (8.24-15.47)], and pathologic weight loss [5.43 (4.07-7.26)]. Alternatively, hypertension [0.56 (0.46-0.67)] and obesity [0.36 (0.22-0.61)] were found to confer a decreased risk of mortality. Increased morbidity and mortality rates were also identified for fusions of 4-8 levels [morbidity: 1.55 (1.48-1.62), mortality: 1.80 (1.48-2.18)] and for age >65 years [morbidity: 1.65 (1.57-1.72), mortality: 2.74 (2.25-3.34)]. An increased morbidity rate was found for posterior-only [1.55 (1.47-1.63)] and combined anterior and posterior fusions [3.20 (2.98-3.43)], and an increased mortality rate was identified for posterior-only fusions [1.87 (1.40-2.49)]. Although revision fusions were associated with an increased morbidity rate [1.81 (1.64-2.00)], they were associated with a decreased rate of mortality [0.24 (0.10-0.59)]. CONCLUSION: The NIS database was used to provide national estimates of morbidity and mortality following surgical management of CSM in the United States. Several comorbidities, as well as demographic and surgical parameters, were identified as associated factors.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: In transforminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), bilateral pedicle screw/rod fixation has been shown to increase fusion construct stability and decrease posterior instrumentation stress when compared to unilateral instrumentation. However, unilateral instrumentation is beneficial over bilateral instrumentation due to shorter operative time, less blood loss and reduced implant costs. It is important to note though that comparative studies between unilateral and bilateral instrumentation in TLIF have shown similar patient satisfaction outcomes, they are limited in their evaluation of complications due to small sample size of studies. PURPOSE: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate complications, and fusion rates between unilateral and bilateral instrumentation in TLIF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PATIENT SAMPLE: 549 patients undergoing one- and multi-levels TLIF. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome data extracted included fusion rates, health related quality of life (HRQoL) scores and complications including cage migration, dural tear, deep vein thrombosis, surgical site infections and screw failures. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared outcomes between unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation in single- and multi-level TLIF were identified. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5. Weighted standardized mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Jadad scoring was used to assess bias of included studies. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were included, having a total of 549 patients (267 unilateral/282 bilateral). Minimum follow-up ranged from 3 to 24 months. Bias-assessment scores varied between 0 and 3 indicating high-moderate bias-risk. Six involved open TLIF procedures and two involved minimally invasive TLIF. There was no difference between postoperative Health Related Quality of Life scores in the unilateral and bilateral instrumented groups (SMD = 0.29; [-0.77, 0.18]; p=0.69). There was no statistical difference in fusion rates (OR = 0.47; 95% CI [0.21, 1.04], p=0.68), with 88.9% and 95.0% achieving fusion in the unilateral and bilateral groups, respectively. The unilateral cohort had a higher incidence of cage migration (5.6%) when compared to the bilateral cohort (2.5%), approaching statically significant (p=0.07). Other complications which included dural tears, deep vein thrombosis, surgical site infections and screw failures were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fusion rates and complications appear comparable in unilateral and bilateral instrumentation in TLIF. Though not statistically significant, there was higher incidence of cage migration in the unilateral cohort

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Numerous studies have demonstrated poorer outcomes in patients receiving Workers' Compensation following treatment of various health conditions including spine disorders. It is thus important to consider compensation status when assessing treatment outcomes in spine surgery. However, reported strengths of association have varied significantly (1.31-7.22). PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of unsatisfactory outcomes on compensation status in spine surgery patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Meta-analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: 3567 patients undergoing spine surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, type of surgery, country, follow-up time, patient satisfaction, return to work and non-union events. METHODS: Both prospective and retrospective studies that compared outcomes between compensated and non-compensated patients in spine surgery were included. Outcome data extracted by two independent investigators. The meta-analysis was performed using Revman software. Depending on heterogeneity, a fixed or random effects model was used to calculate risk ratio (RR, 95% confidence interval [CI]) for dichotomous variables. RESULTS: 31 studies (13 prospective; 18 retrospective) with a total of 3,567 patients were included in the analysis. Follow-up time varied from 4 months to 10 years. Twelve studies involved only decompression; the rest were fusion. Overall RR of an unsatisfactory outcome was 2.12 [1.74, 2.58; p<0.001] in compensated patients when compared to noncompensated patients after surgery. RR of an unsatisfactory outcome in compensated patients compared to noncompensated was 2.09 [1.38, 3.17]; p< 0.01 among studies from Europe and Australia and 2.14 [1.48, 2.60]; p< 0.01 among US studies. RR of decompression-only procedures was 2.53 [1.85, 3.47] and 1.79 [1.45, 2.21] for fusion. 52% (182/491) of compensated patients returned to work versus 82% (1034/1250) of non-compensated (RR 0.73 [0.59, 0.90]; p<0.001). 25 % (74/292) and 13.5% (39/ 287) of patients had nonunion in the compensated and noncompensated groups, respectively. This was not statistically significant (RR 1.33 [0.92, 1.91]; p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Workers' Compensation patients have a two-fold increased risk of an unsatisfactory outcome compared to noncompensated patients after surgery. This association was consistent when studies were grouped by country or procedure. Compensation status must be considered in all surgical intervention studies

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS) patients adopt forward-bending posture as a compensatory mechanism, increasing spinal canal and foraminal volume. Previous data show laminectomy 6 short segment fusion results in improvement of sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT) and PI-LL (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis) mismatch by SRS-Schwab classification in <25% of patients. The magnitude of deformity for which a DLS patient should have realignment remains unknown. PURPOSE: To identify differences in compensatory mechanisms between DLS and adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with increasing, and to identify at what point DLS patients recruit ASD-type compensatory mechanisms. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective clinical and radiological review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Baseline X-ray images of 239 patients without spinal instrumentation, with the clinical radiological and diagnosis of DLS or ASD were assessed for patterns of spino-pelvic compensatory mechanisms. Patients were stratified by sagittal vertical axis (SVA) by the Schwab-SRS classification. OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographic spino-pelvic parameters were measured in the DLS and ASD groups, including SVA, PI-LL, T1SPi, TPA and PT. METHODS: Patients were identified using a single-institution database with sole diagnosis of DLS, >40 years and if they had any of the following: PT >25degree, SVA >5cm, thoracic kyphosis (TK) >60degree or PI-LL mismatch >10degree. The patient's diagnosis was taken from the patient history chart based on correlation between history, examination and available imaging. Matched cohort with sole diagnosis of ASD was identified. Groups were stratified by SVA using Schwab-SRS classification: 0(<4cm), +(4-9.5cm), ++( >9.5cm). Sagittal spino-pelvic parameters were compared between the 2 groups with unpaired t-test. RESULTS: 239 patients were identified (122 DLS, 117 ASD). There was no difference in age or pelvic incidence between DLS and ASD with SVA stratifications. DLS patients with SVA 0 had less PT (19.8degree vs 29.2degree p<0.0001), less PI-LL mismatch (3.3degree vs 15.8degree, p<0.001), lower TPA (14.6degree vs 21.8degree, p<0.001) but higher T1SPi (-5.17degree vs -7.44degree, p< 0.001) than those with ASD. DLS patients with SVA+ had less PT (22.6degree vs 26.1degree, p=0.019) and higher T1SPi (0.64degree vs -0.70degree, p=0.008) than ASD patients. DLS patients resembled a decompensated deformity with a higher T1SPi relative to TPA when compared to the ASD cohort in groups 0 and +. No significant differences between ASD and DLS for any parameters in the SVA++ group were identified. No difference was found between DLS or ASD in TK for SVA groups 0, + or ++. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in PI-LL observed in ASD/DLS group '0' underlies the pathogenesis of ASD vs DLS. DLS patients increase SVA for neuronal decompression but without a PI-LL mismatch, they need not increase PT. As PI-LL increases in SVA >9.5cm, recruitment of PT ensues as the need for alignment overtakes desire for decompression. Their compensatory mechanism then resembles ASD. Laminectomy 6 fusion may be more appropriate for DLS patients with SVA< 9.5cm. Given <25% of patients improve in classification after fusion, surgeons should consider realignment surgery in DLS with SVA >9.5cm. Further understanding of HRQOL scores in mal-aligned DLS patients is required to best understand the importance of alignment in DLS

STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. OBJECTIVE: To investigate national trends, risks, and benefits of surgical interventions for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The surgical management of DS continues to evolve whereas the most clinically and cost-effective treatment is debated. With an aging US population and growing restraints on a financially burdened health care system, a clear understanding of national trends in the surgical management of DS is needed. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients with DS undergoing lumbar fusions from 2001 to 2010, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis and procedure codes. Analyses compared instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF), posterolateral fusion with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF + PLF), PLF with posterior interbody fusion (P/TLIF + PLF), anterior instrumented interbody fusion (ALIF), and posterior interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation (P/TLIF). Clinical data were analyzed representing the initial acute phase care after surgery. RESULTS: There were 48,911 DS surgical procedures identified, representing 237,383 procedures. The percentage of patients undergoing PLF, ALIF + PLF, or ALIF increased whereas the percentage of P/TLIF or P/TLIF + PLF decreased over time. Total charges were less (P < 0.001), average length of hospital stay was shorter (P < 0.01), and average age was older (P < 0.01) for patients who underwent PLF compared with any other procedure. Type of procedure varied on the basis of the geographic region of the hospital, teaching versus nonteaching hospital, and size of hospital (P < 0.01). Patients who had P/TLIF + PLF or ALIF had a higher risk of mortality than patients who had PLF (odds ratios: 5.02, 2.22, respectively). Patients were more likely to develop a complication if they had ALIF + PLF, P/TLIF + PLF, ALIF, and P/TLIF than if they had PLF (odds ratios: 1.45, 1.23, 1.49, 1.12, respectively). CONCLUSION: Variation in the surgical management of DS related to patient demographics, hospital charges, length of hospital stay, insurance type, comorbidities, and complication rates was found within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. During the acute phase of care immediately after surgery, PLF procedures were found to reduce length of hospital stay, hospital charges, and postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

BACKGROUND: Wound drains that are left in place for a prolonged period of time have a higher rate of bacterial contamination. Following spinal surgery, a drain is often left in place for a longer period of time if it maintains a high output. Given the major consequences of an infection following spinal surgery and the lack of data with regard to the use of antibiotics and drains, we performed a study of patients with a drain following spinal surgery to compare infection rates between those who were treated with antibiotics for twenty-four hours and those who received antibiotics for the duration for which the drain was in place. METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized trial of 314 patients who underwent multilevel thoracolumbar spinal surgery followed by use of a postoperative drain. The patients were randomized into two groups, one of which received perioperative antibiotics for twenty-four hours (twenty-four-hour group) and the other of which received antibiotics for the duration that the drain was in place (drain-duration group). Data collected included demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, type of spinal surgery, and surgical site infection. RESULTS: Twenty-one (12.4%) of the 170 patients in the twenty-four-hour group and nineteen (13.2%) of the 144 in the drain-duration group developed a surgical site infection (p = 0.48). There were no significant differences between the twenty-four-hour and drain-duration groups with respect to demographic characteristics (except for the American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classification), operative time, type of surgery, drain output, or length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Continuing perioperative administration of antibiotics for the entire duration that a drain is in place after spinal surgery did not decrease the rate of surgical site infections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort. OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative morbidity of patients with cardiac stents after spine surgery who continue to take aspirin before and after the operation with a similar group of patients who preoperatively discontinued aspirin. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The preoperative discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy has been the standard of care for orthopedic surgical procedures. However, recent literature has demonstrated significant cardiac risk associated with aspirin withdrawal in patients with cardiac stents. Although it has recently been demonstrated that performing orthopedic surgery while continuing low-dose aspirin therapy seems to be safe, studies focused on spinal surgery have not yet been performed. Because of the risk of intraspinal bleeding and the serious consequences of subsequent epidural hematoma with associated spinal cord compression, spinal surgeons have been reluctant to operate on patients taking aspirin. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved study included 200 patients. Preoperative parameters and postoperative outcome measures were analyzed for 100 patients who underwent spinal surgery after the discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy and 100 patients who continued to take daily aspirin through the perioperative period. The primary outcome measure was serious bleeding-related postoperative complications such as spinal epidural hematoma. The operative time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, hospital length of stay, transfusion of blood products, and 30-day hospital readmission rates were also recorded and compared. RESULTS: The patients who continued taking aspirin in the perioperative period had a shorter hospital length of stay on average (4.1 +/- 2.7 vs. 6.2 +/- 5.8; P < 0.005), as well as a reduced operative time (210 +/- 136 vs. 266 +/- 143; P < 0.01), whereas there was no significant difference in the estimated blood loss (642 +/- 905 vs. 697 +/- 1187), the amount of blood products transfused, overall intra- and postoperative complication rate (8% vs. 11%), or 30-day hospital readmission rate (5% vs. 5%). No clinically significant spinal epidural hematomas were observed in either of the study groups. CONCLUSION: The current study has observed no appreciable increase in bleeding-related complication rates in patients with cardiac stents undergoing spine surgery while continuing to take aspirin compared with patients who discontinued aspirin prior to surgery. Although very large studies will be needed to determine whether aspirin administration results in a small complication rate increase, the current study provides evidence that perioperative aspirin therapy is relatively safe in patients undergoing spinal surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.