Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:To determine the representation of Black/AA women surgeons in academic medicine among U.S. medical school faculty and to assess the number of NIH grants awarded to Black/AA women surgeon-scientists over the past 2 decades. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Despite increasing ethnic/racial and sex diversity in U.S. medical schools and residencies, Black/AA women have historically been underrepresented in academic surgery. METHODS:A retrospective review of the Association of American Medical Colleges 2017 Faculty Roster was performed and the number of grants awarded to surgeons from the NIH (1998-2017) was obtained. Data from the Association of American Medical Colleges included the total number of medical school surgery faculty, academic rank, tenure status, and department Chair roles. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS:Of the 15,671 U.S. medical school surgical faculty, 123 (0.79%) were Black/AA women surgeons with only 11 (0.54%) being tenured faculty. When stratified by academic rank, 15 (12%) Black/AA women surgeons were instructors, 73 (59%) were assistant professors, 19 (15%) were associate professors, and 10 (8%) were full professors of surgery. Of the 372 U.S. department Chairs of surgery, none were Black/AA women. Of the 9139 NIH grants awarded to academic surgeons from 1998 and 2017, 31 (0.34%) grants were awarded to fewer than 12 Black/AA women surgeons. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:A significant disparity in the number of Black/AA women in academic surgery exists with few attaining promotion to the rank of professor with tenure and none ascending to the role of department Chair of surgery. Identifying and removing structural barriers to promotion, NIH grant funding, and academic advancement of Black/AA women as leaders and surgeon-scientists is needed.

BACKGROUND:While mass-casualty incidents (MCIs) may have competing absolute definitions, a universally ac-cepted criterion is one that strains locally available resources. In the fall of 2017, a MCI occurred in New York and Bellevue Hospital received multiple injured patients within minutes; lessons learned included the need for a formal-ized, efficient patient and injury tracking system. Our objective was to create an organized MCI clinical tracking form for civilian trauma centers. METHODS:After the MCI, the notes of the surgeon responsible for directing patient triage were analyzed. A suc-cinct, organized template was created that allows MCI directors to track demographics, injuries, interventions, and other important information for multiple patients in a real-time fashion. This tool was piloted during a subsequent MCI. RESULTS:In late 2018, the hospital received six patients following another MCI. They arrived within a 4-minute window, with 5 patients being critically injured. Two emergent surgeries and angioembolizations were performed. The tool was used by the MCI director to prioritize and expedite care. All physicians agreed that the tool assisted in orga-nizing diagnostic and therapeutic triage. CONCLUSIONS:During MCIs, a streamlined patient tracking template assists with information recall and communica-tion between providers and may allow for expedited care.

BACKGROUND:Osteopenia is common in the elderly, increasing their risk of sustaining cervical fractures after ground level falls (GLFs). We sought to examine the incidence of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) and subsequent stroke in elderly GLF patients as compared with other higher injury mechanisms. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:The Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2011-2016) was used to identify blunt trauma patients with isolated (other body region abbreviated injury scale <3) cervical spine (C1-C7) fractures. Patients were stratified into three groups: nonelderly patients (<65) with all mechanisms of injury, elderly patients (≥65) with GLF, and elderly patients with all other mechanism of injury. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors for BCVI, stroke, spinal cord injury, and acute kidney injury. RESULTS:Seventeen thousand six hundred twenty-eight patients with cervical spine injuries were identified. BCVI was highest in the <65 group (0.8%) and lowest in elderly patients with GLF (0.3%, P = 0.001). When controlling for other factors, elderly patients with GLF were less likely to sustain BCVI (adjusted odds ratio: 0.46, P = 0.03) but had comparable rates of stroke attributable to BCVI (18.2% versus 6.5%, P = 0.184) and comparable rate of acute kidney injury compared with elderly patients with other mechanism of injury. CONCLUSIONS:In elderly patients with isolated cervical spine fracture after GLF, BCVI occurs less frequently but is associated with a comparable rate of stroke as compared with other mechanisms. Low injury mechanism should not preclude BCVI screening in the presence of cervical spine fractures.

This study evaluated the safety of early anti-factor Xa assay-guided enoxaparin dosing for chemoprophylaxis in patients with TBI. We hypothesized that assay-guided chemoprophylaxis would be comparable in the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression to fixed dosing. An observational analysis of adult patients with blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI) was performed at a Level I trauma center from August 2016 to September 2017. Patients in the assay-guided group were treated with an initial enoxaparin dose of 0.5 mg/kg, with peak anti-factor Xa activity measured four hours after the third dose. Prophylactic range was defined as 0.2 to 0.5 IU/mL with a dose adjustment of ± 10 mg based on the assay result. The assay-guided group was compared with historical fixed-dose controls and to a TBI cohort from the most recent Trauma Quality Improvement Project dataset. Of 179 patients included in the study, 85 were in the assay-guided group and 94 were in the fixed-dose group. Compared with the fixed-dose group, the assay-guided group had a lower Glasgow Coma Score and higher Injury Severity Score. The proportion of severe (Abbreviated Injury Score, head ≥3) TBI, ICH progression, and venous thromboembolism rates were similar between all groups. The assay-guided and fixed-dose groups had chemoprophylaxis initiated earlier than the Trauma Quality Improvement Project group. The assay-guided group had the highest percentage of low molecular weight heparin use. Early initiation of enoxaparin anti-factor Xa assay-guided venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis has a comparable risk of ICH progression to fixed dosing in patients with TBI. These findings should be validated prospectively in a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND:Elderly patients with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) are frequently transferred to designated Trauma Centers (TC). We hypothesized that TC transfer is associated with improved outcomes. METHODS:Retrospective study utilizing the National Trauma Databank. Demographics, injury and outcomes data were abstracted. Patients were dichotomized by transfer to a designated level I/II TC vs. not. Multivariate regression was used to derive the adjusted primary outcome, mortality, and secondary outcomes, complications and discharge disposition. RESULTS:19,664 patients were included, with a mean age of 78.1 years. 70% were transferred to a level I/II TC. Transferred patients had a higher ISS (12 vs. 10, p < 0.001). Mortality was significantly lower in patients transferred to level I/II TCs (5.6% vs. 6.2%, Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) 0.84, p = 0.011), as was the likelihood of discharge to skilled nursing facilities (26.4% vs. 30.2%, AOR 0.80, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Elderly patients with mild TBI transferred to level I/II TCs have improved outcomes. Which patients with mild TBI require level I/II TC care should be examined prospectively.

BACKGROUND:We sought to evaluate the role of trauma center designation in the association of race and insurance status with disposition to rehabilitation centers among elderly patients with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). METHODS:The National Trauma Data Bank (2014-2015) was used to identify elderly (age ≥ 65) patients with isolated moderate to severe blunt TBI who survived to discharge. Race, insurance status, and outcomes were stratified by trauma center designation and compared. RESULTS:3,292 patients met the inclusion criteria. Black patients were 1.5 times less likely (AOR 0.64, p = 0.01) and Latino patients were 1.7 times less likely (AOR 0.58, p = 0 0.007) to be discharged to rehabilitation centers as compared with White patients. Asian patients at Level I hospitals were more likely to be discharged to rehabilitation centers if they had private vs. non-private insurance (42.9% versus 12.7%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Black and Latino patients were less likely to be discharged to rehabilitation centers compared to White patients. The etiology of these disparities deserves further study.

BACKGROUND:While mass-casualty incidents (MCIs) may have competing absolute definitions, a universally accepted criterion is one that strains locally available resources. In the fall of 2017, a MCI occurred in New York and Bellevue Hospi-tal received multiple injured patients within minutes; lessons learned included the need for a formalized, efficient patient and injury tracking system. Our objective was to create an organized MCI clinical tracking form for civilian trauma centers. METHODS:After the MCI, the notes of the surgeon responsible for directing patient triage were analyzed. A suc-cinct, organized template was created that allows MCI directors to track demographics, injuries, interventions, and other important information for hmultiple patients in a real-time fashion. This tool was piloted during a subsequent MCI. RESULTS:In late 2018, the hospital received six patients following another MCI. They arrived within a 4-minute window, with 5 patients being critically injured. Two emergent surgeries and angioembolizations were performed. The tool was used by the MCI director to prioritize and expedite care. All physicians agreed that the tool assisted in organizing diagnostic and therapeutic triage. CONCLUSIONS:During MCIs, a streamlined patient tracking template assists with information recall and communica-tion between providers and may allow for expedited care.

BACKGROUND:The mangled extremity (ME) is a limb with a multisystem injury (soft tissue, bone, nerves, or vessels). We hypothesized that trauma patients who present with mangled lower extremities (ME) experience a higher rate of venous thromboembolism when matched against trauma patients of similar injury burden without ME. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Data were abstracted from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database from 2013 to 2016. Baseline comparisons were made between patients with and without ME. Propensity score matching with logistic regression modeling on the matched sample was performed controlling for patient gender, race, insurance status, age, injury severity score, Charlson comorbidity index, presence of significant other non-ME trauma, use of and time to prophylactic anticoagulation, placement of an inferior vena cava filter, and if immediate operative intervention was performed. RESULTS:A total of 1060 patients presented with an ME. Compared with other trauma patients, those with ME tended to be younger and male. They were more likely to receive prophylactic anticoagulation and an inferior vena cava filter. After propensity score matching, ME was statistically significantly associated with pulmonary embolism (PE) but not deep venous thrombosis (average treatment effect on the treated 1.7%, P = 0.04; and 1.4%, P = 0.22, respectively). These results were confirmed in a logistic regression on the matched sample (odds ratios 1.6, P = 0.11 for deep venous thrombosis, and odds ratio 3.2, P = 0.006 for PE). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with mangled lower extremities experience higher rates of PE. Based on these findings, institutions may consider evaluating their own VTE rates and chemoprophylaxis protocols in those with MEs.

BACKGROUND:Early thoracotomy (ET) is a procedure performed on patients in extremis. Identifying factors associated with ET survival may allow for optimization of guidelines and improved patient selection. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to assess whether ETs performed at Level I trauma centers (TC) are associated with improved survival. METHODS:This was a retrospective study utilizing the National Trauma Databank 2014-2015. We included all thoracotomies performed within 1 h of hospital arrival. Patients were stratified according to TC designation level. Patient demographics, outcomes, and center characteristics were compared. We conducted multivariable regression with survival as the outcome. RESULTS:There were 3183 ETs included in this study; 2131 (66.9%) were performed at Level I TCs. Patients treated at Level I and non-Level I TCs had similar median injury severity scores, as well as signs of life and systolic blood pressures on admission. Patients treated at Level I TCs had significantly higher survival rates (21.6% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.001), with 40% greater odds of survival after controlling for injury-specific factors and emergency medical services transportation time (adjusted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.89, p = 0.03). Penetrating injuries had 23.1% survival after ET vs. 12.9% for blunt injuries (adjusted odds ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.37-2.53, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:ETs performed at Level I TCs were associated with 40% greater odds of survival compared with ETs at non-Level I TCs. This demonstrates that factors extrinsic to the patient may play a role in survival of severely injured patients.