Faculty Bibliography

AIM/UNASSIGNED:Inadequate adherence to colorectal cancer screening reduces individual and population level health benefits. Blood-based tests offer a new modality that may help patients overcome barriers, but there are concerns about the impact of patients switching from existing guideline-recommended screening modalities. This study estimates the population health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of offering blood-based testing using a validated individual-level simulation model based on patient preference evidence from randomized controlled trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:In this study, a validated discrete-event simulation model was used to evaluate the performance of different combinations of colorectal cancer screening strategy preferences per 10,000 screened individuals beginning at age 45. Preferences for screening options were informed by randomized controlled trials of patients with and without the option of blood-based testing. Adherence to initial patient preferences over a simulated lifetime was modeled as: (1) assumed 100% adherence and (2) longitudinal using a calibrated model. Simulated outcomes included clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness from a healthcare sector perspective. A strategy was deemed cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The introduction of blood-based testing to an unscreened population with evidence from randomized controlled trials is projected to increase colorectal cancer deaths averted by 35% to 116% and from 68% to 247% relative to no screening, for stated preference and revealed preference scenarios, respectively. These outcomes are cost-effective, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from $63,994 to $85,497 and from $30,464 to $54,764 across stated preference and revealed preference scenarios, respectively. LIMITATIONS/UNASSIGNED:Given limited data, natural history and real-world longitudinal adherence to screening are based on evidence-informed assumptions. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Using a simulation model to extrapolate data from two recent trials, we demonstrate that the introduction of blood-based tests has the potential to lead to cost-effective increases in the number of CRC deaths averted among the unscreened population.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS/OBJECTIVE:Growing evidence suggests that the gut microbiome plays a role in carcinogenesis for early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC). The novel Ring Finger Protein 213 (RNF213) gene has broad antimicrobial properties. Our study aimed to compare RNF213 mutation rates in EOCRC and late-onset colorectal cancer using data from the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. METHODS:All participants from the cBioPortal with CRC samples that profiled the RNF213 gene were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between EOCRC and primary tumor RNF213 mutation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the influence of RNF213 mutation on all-cause mortality risk. All tests were two-sided. RESULTS:OR 1.61, 95% CI 0.72, 3.22). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality risk by RNF213 mutation status. CONCLUSIONS:Primary tumor mutations in exon 29 of the RNF213 gene are associated with significantly increased odds of EOCRC diagnosis in a multicohort sample of participants with CRC. Future studies of germline and precancerous RNF213 mutations are needed to elucidate its possible role in EOCRC tumorigenesis.

BACKGROUND:Individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an elevated risk of colorectal neoplasia (CRN), including colorectal dysplasia and cancer (CRC). Despite surveillance strategies to prevent CRC, the clinical course of dysplasia types remains poorly understood. METHODS:We conducted a nationwide cohort study using the Swedish Patient Register and the ESPRESSO histopathology cohort to identify patients diagnosed with IBD between 1969 and 2023. Patients were classified according to their first (baseline) incident episode of dysplasia (no dysplasia, ND; indefinite, IND; low-grade, LGD; high-grade, HGD). Our primary outcome was future advanced CRN (HGD or CRC) during follow-up. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox regression. RESULTS:We identified 54,534 patients with IBD, including 1,320 with a first (baseline) episode of dysplasia (264 IND, 1031 LGD, 25 HGD), and 53,214 with ND. Over a median follow-up of 13.3 years, 2.3% of ND patients had future advanced CRN compared to 5.3% of IND patients (aHR 1.85, 95% CI 1.09-3.15) and 8.3% of LGD patients (aHR 3.51, 95% CI 2.77-4.45). Of those with HGD, 40% developed CRC (aHR 47.88, 95% CI 25.53-89.80). Risk factors for future dysplasia included male sex, younger age at diagnosis, extensive colitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and histologic inflammation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients with IBD and dysplasia have a significantly increased risk of future dysplasia, particularly among patients with HGD. Personalized surveillance strategies based on risk factors are critical for preventing advanced CRN.

BACKGROUND:Cognitive impairment, a precursor to dementia, is an important geriatric syndrome. We aimed to describe cognitive function in adults ≥60 years with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and determine the relationship between cognitive function and IBD activity. METHODS:We recruited IBD patients ≥60 years from 6 American centers. We collected demographics, IBD history, administered IBD activity indices and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Follow-up assessments were nested in routine clinical care within one year. The primary outcome was change in cognitive function testing at follow-up; secondary outcome was IBD activity at follow-up. We constructed multi-variate logistic regression models to assess for the outcomes. RESULTS:We recruited 356 patients with a median age of 70 years (range: 60-89 years), 51% female, 66% had at least a Bachelor's degree; median IBD duration was 18 years and 60% had Crohn's disease. At baseline, 42% screened positive for cognitive impairment. Deficits in delayed recall and visuospatial functioning were the most prevalent. At follow-up within a year, 31% demonstrated an improved MoCA score, while 19% had a worse MoCA score. Adjusting for age, race, education, depression, number of comorbidities, IBD type, IBD duration as well as cognitive function score at baseline, symptomatically active IBD at baseline was significantly associated with worsening cognitive testing at follow-up (aOR:3.01, 95%CI:1.20-7.50). We also found that deficits in delayed recall, a MoCA sub-domain, were significantly associated with symptomatically active IBD at follow-up (aOR:2.22, 95%CI:1.10-4.47). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These data provide further impetus to effectively treat IBD in older adults and suggest that delayed recall could be a useful screening tool for older adults with IBD.

BACKGROUND:The American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) assembled a multidisciplinary task force to evaluate the current state and future direction of artificial intelligence (AI) in gastroenterology, hepatology, and endoscopy leading to the development of consensus-based recommendations for responsible AI integration in clinical practice. METHODS:A total of 32 subject-matter experts and 12 industry partners, representing diverse practice settings and expertise, conducted subgroup literature reviews across five key areas (endoscopy, practice management clinical applications, training and education, IBD and liver disease, ethics and equity). Draft statements were developed and rated on a 5-point Likert scale using a modified Delphi process. A consensus was set at ≥70% combined agreement. Non-consensus items were revised and re-voted electronically. RESULTS:A total of 43 statements, 40 (93%) reached consensus in round 1 and the remaining 3 achieved consensus after round 2. Evidence supports computer-aided detection (CADe) improving adenoma detection rate and miss rate in controlled studies, with mixed "real-world" impact and insufficient long-term outcomes (e.g., interval colon cancer rate). Recommendations emphasize thorough validation and reduction of bias via heterogeneous datasets. Outside endoscopy, ambient AI scribes, NLP-enabled coding, workflow optimization, and prior authorization support show potential. Training recommendations endorse a structured AI curriculum while preserving independent procedural competence to avoid "deskilling". In IBD and hepatology, AI could help improve diagnostic accuracy, help predict risk for disease progression, and help guide therapy. Equity, governance, and reimbursement statements call for chain-of-custody data protections, specialty-society oversight, and payment models that reward quality and cost reduction. CONCLUSIONS:This consensus outlines how AI can augment rather than replace clinical expertise while promoting safety, transparency, interoperability, and equity. Priorities include pragmatic and prospective trials, multi-institutional data-sharing consortia, bias mitigation, and workforce training to enable trustworthy and clinically impactful AI adoption in GI, liver, and endoscopy care.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Potassium competitive acid blockers (PCABs) are superior to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for healing of Los Angeles (LA) class C/D erosive esophagitis (EE) and are approved for non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) given their efficacy measured by heartburn-free days. However, they are more expensive than PPIs. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of PCABs compared to PPIs for the management of GERD. METHODS:A decision tree was constructed for the base case of a patient with GERD. We tested scenarios in which NERD, LA A/B, or LA C/D esophagitis was present, comparing PCABs to PPIs as first-line therapy, including step up therapy and/or class switching if symptoms persisted. Using publicly available cost estimates, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were compared using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000/QALY from a societal perspective at 6 months. RESULTS:The cost of PCABs for GERD was $3,240 more than PPIs, with an ICER of $144,208/QALY. When evaluating GERD phenotypes separately, the ICER was consistently over our WTP threshold. One-way analyses showed the most influential parameters were PCAB cost and efficacy for heartburn-free days. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis favored PPIs 71.7% out of 100,000 iterations. Reducing one-week costs to below $91 would make PCABs a cost effective first-line strategy across all GERD phenotypes. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Despite PCAB efficacy, PPIs are a cost-effective strategy for GERD treatment, and can be positioned ahead of PCAB escalation on this basis. Reducing PCAB costs or accepting a higher WTP threshold would influence this finding, though PCABs may be favored in some current situations as evidenced by probabilistic sensitivity results.

OBJECTIVE:To describe the imaging appearances and treatment response patterns of the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) following radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS:From an internal database, 17 patients (8 male; mean age: 67±14 y) with 18 pathology-proven, localized, nonfunctioning panNETs <3 cm who underwent EUS-RFA for curative intent were included. A total of 32 preablation and 33 postablation scans were included (CT, MRI, or 68Ga-DOTATATE PET). Lesion size and enhancement on CT/MRI were independently assessed by 2 readers, while SUVmax was extracted from the original PET reports by a separate reviewer. The Wilcoxon signed-rank and McNemar tests were performed. Treatment response is defined as a complete response (loss of enhancement and SUVmax), a partial response (decrease in size, enhancement, or SUVmax), or no response (no change). RESULTS:Mean lesion size decreased from 1.4​​​​​​±0.5​ cm preablation to 0.3±0.5 cm postablation (P<0.0001). Mean SUVmax declined from 17.3±11.2 to 3.1±6.0 (P<0.001). Hyperenhancement was present in 15/18 (83.3%) lesions preablation versus 5/18 (27.8%) postablation (P<0.01). Of these 15 hyperenhancing lesions, 11 were solid, 3 were cystic, and 1 was mixed cystic and solid. Complete response occurred in 12/18 (66.7%) lesions, with either complete disappearance 5/12 (41.4%) or bland cavity formation 7/12 (58.5%). Partial response occurred in 5/18 (27.8%) lesions; 4/5 decreased in size (mean±SD: 1.4±0.5 cm preablation vs. 0.6±0.7 cm postablation), and 3/5 demonstrated decreased SUVmax. One patient with partial response underwent 2 repeat ablations with an ultimate decrease in SUVmax from 34.1 to 5.9. One solid, hyperenhancing pancreatic body lesion demonstrated no response (1.3 cm); preablation SUVmax was 10.8, but they did not undergo postablation DOTATATE PET. One patient developed postablation pancreatitis. Mean clinical follow-up was 650 days (423). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:RFA is an emerging treatment for small, nonfunctioning panNET. Postablation imaging findings most commonly included complete resolution of the tumor, decreased enhancement, decreased SUVmax, and formation of a bland cavity. As interest in this technique continues to grow, radiologists' familiarity with expected post-treatment imaging appearances and their associated response patterns is essential for accurate assessment.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Fecal microbiota, live-jslm (RBL) is the first single-dose, microbiota-based product approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada to prevent recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) following standard-of-care antibiotics. The phase 3 PUNCH CD3-OLS study enrolled participants with numerous comorbidities and permitted inclusion of participants hospitalized due to rCDI. The safety and efficacy of RBL were evaluated in this subgroup analysis of hospitalized participants from PUNCH CD3-OLS. METHODS:The hospitalization subgroup included participants hospitalized for rCDI within 90 days prior to RBL administration. Participants received a single dose of RBL 24-72 h after completion of standard-of-care antibiotic treatment for rCDI. These exploratory analyses evaluated the number of participants with RBL- or administration-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment success at 8 weeks, sustained clinical response at 6 months, and incidence of rehospitalization for rCDI during study participation. RESULTS:The hospitalization subgroup included 74 of 697 (10.6%) participants. Within 6 months following RBL administration, 47 (63.5%) and 350 (56.7%) participants in the hospitalization and nonhospitalization subgroups experienced TEAEs, respectively; most TEAEs were of mild to moderate severity. Serious TEAEs in the hospitalization subgroup were frequently related to preexisting conditions; none were related to RBL or its administration. Most participants (87.8% [65/74]) in the hospitalization subgroup were not rehospitalized within 6 months. Treatment success at 8 weeks was 62.5% (45/72) and 75.1% (449/598) among participants in the hospitalization and nonhospitalization subgroups, respectively. Of those achieving treatment success, 86.7% (39/45) and 91.3% (410/449) had sustained clinical response through 6 months in the hospitalization and nonhospitalization subgroups, respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:RBL was safe and effective in a subgroup of hospitalized participants in the PUNCH CD3-OLS study. Efficacy in this subgroup was slightly lower than in nonhospitalized participants, but rCDI-related rehospitalization remained rare. TRIAL REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:NCT03931941.

BACKGROUND:Risk calculators (RCs) support clinicians estimating the likelihood that a pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) would progress so that surveillance might be discontinued for low-risk lesions. We tested the effect of an RC on clinicians' judgment and decision-making and identified their cancer risk threshold for changing their decision. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:We presented clinicians with three vignettes (V1, V2, and V3) of patients with low-risk IPMNs and asked them to assess the likelihood that the IPMN would progress to develop high-risk features and whether they would recommend continuing surveillance imaging. Clinicians were randomly assigned to the clinical vignettes alone (n = 35) or supplemented by data from the Dutch-American Risk Stratification Tool (DART-1 RC: n = 37). We compared clinicians' judgments and decisions between groups and assessed their cancer risk threshold (level of risk at which recommendation would change). RESULTS:Across all vignettes, the RC resulted in no change in clinicians' judged likelihood of IPMN progression (V1 8.49 vs. 8.41%, p = 0.09; V2 4.39 vs. 6.75%, p = 0.99; V3 13.61 vs. 13.29%, p = 0.27) or recommendation to continue surveillance (V1 57 vs. 41%, p = 0.78; V2 41 vs. 59%, p = 0.55; V3 66 vs. 34%, p = 0.31). Clinicians varied in their reported risk threshold (V1 9%, interquartile range [IQR] 2, 13%; V2 9% [IQR 1, 15%], V3 8% [IQR 3, 20%]). CONCLUSIONS:An RC did not significantly influence clinicians' risk perception or decision to continue surveillance, although the study was limited by low sample size. The cancer risk threshold at which clinicians would change their recommendation varies widely. Future work is needed to understand why RCs do not appear to alter decision-making.

Recent developments in organoid technology have enabled the creation of patient-derived intestinal organoids (PDIOs) that recapitulate the structural, functional, genetic, and epigenetic features of their original tissues. However, conventional passage-derived organoids inevitably yield heterogeneous populations in size and number, leading to inconsistent results even under identical conditions. To address this, a standardized approach, referred to here as "single cell-seeded PDIOs," was established. In this method, mature PDIOs were enzymatically dissociated into single cells and seeded at a defined number into individual wells of a 96-well plate. This controlled seeding normalized the size and number of PDIOs. Compared with passage-derived organoids, single cell-seeded PDIOs displayed reduced inter-well variability in organoid numbers and intra-well variability in organoid sizes, which enables the determination of generation efficiency and improves the reproducibility of viability assays. Moreover, this platform is compatible with downstream analysis, including transcriptomic analysis and protein expression profiling. Collectively, this approach may enhance experimental consistency and provide a practical foundation for reproducible PDIO-based studies.