Faculty Bibliography

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective Upright MRI Study. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Determine the relationship between lumbar disc herniation and presence of the nerve root sedimentation sign on upright kinematic MRI patients. METHODS:T2-weighted axial upright kMRI images of 100 patients with the presence of disc herniation in at least 1 lumbar disc between L1/L2 and L5/S1 were obtained. Sedimentation sign, spinal canal anterior-posterior (AP) diameter, disc height, disc herniation size, type of herniation, and zone of herniation were evaluated. A positive sedimentation sign was defined as having either the majority of nerve roots running ventrally or centrally in the canal or conglomeration of the nerve roots at the mid-disc level. Herniation types were defined as either no herniation, disc bulge, protrusion, extrusion, or sequestration. Zones of herniation were categorized as either central, lateral, or far lateral. RESULTS:The kappa value of intra-observer reliability was .915. The kappa value of disc levels with a negative sedimentation sign were seen more frequently (n = 326, 65.2%) than those with a positive sedimentation sign (n = 174, 34.8%). The spinal canal AP diameter was significantly decreased at the L3/L4 and L4/L5 level in patients with a positive sedimentation sign. Discs with a positive sedimentation sign had a larger average size of disc herniation compared to those with a negative sign at all levels. A relationship between positivity of the sedimentation sign and disc herniation type was significant at L2/L3, L3/L4, and L4/L5. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with a positive sedimentation sign were seen to have larger disc herniations and more severely degenerated discs.

Study design: This study constitutes a systematic review of the literature. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and present all available studies that report on the costs of osteobiologics used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: The literature was systematically reviewed to identify studies with specific inclusion criteria: (1) randomized controlled trials and observational studies, (2) in adult patients, (3) with herniated disc(s) or degenerative cervical spine disease, (4) reporting on either direct or indirect costs of using specific osteobiologics in an ACDF operation. (5) Only studies in English were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the MINORS and RoB 2.0 tools. Results: Overall, 14 articles were included; one randomized controlled trial and 13 observational studies. The most commonly used osteobiologics other than autograft/iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) were allograft and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP). None of the studies was reported to be industry-supported. There was considerable heterogeneity on the reported costs. Overall, most studies reported on surgery-related costs, such as anesthesia, operating room, surgical materials and surgeon"™s fee. Only two studies, both using allograft, reported the exact cost of the osteobiologic used (450 GBP, $700). Some of the studies reported on the cost of care during hospitalization for the surgical operation, such as radiology studies, emergency room costs, cardiologic evaluation, laboratory studies, pharmacy costs, and room costs. Only a few studies reported on the cost of follow-up, reoperation, and physical therapy and rehabilitation. Conclusion: Based on the data of this current systematic review, no recommendations can be made regarding the cost-effectiveness of using osteobiologics in ACDF. Given the high costs of osteobiologics, this remains a topic of importance. The design of future studies on the subject should include cost effectiveness.

This article is temporarily under embargo.

Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Objective: Although literature does not recommend routine wound drain utilization, there is a disconnect between the evidence and clinical practice. This study aims to explore into this controversy and analyze the surgeon preferences related to drain utilization, and the factors influencing drain use and criterion for removal. Methods: A survey was distributed to AO Spine members worldwide. Surgeon demographics and factors related to peri-operative drain use in 1 or 2-level open fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative pathologies were collected. Multivariate analyses by drain utilization, and criterion of removal were conducted. Results: 231 surgeons participated, including 220 males (95.2%), orthopedics (178, 77.1%), and academic/university-affiliated (114, 49.4%). Most surgeons preferred drain use (186, 80.5%) and subfascial drains (169, 73.2%). Drains were removed based on duration by 52.87% of the surgeons, but 27.7% removed drains based on outputs. On multivariable analysis, significant predictors of drain use were surgeon"™s aged 35-44 (OR = 11.9, 95% CI = 1.2-117.2, P =.034), 45-54 (29.1, 3.1-269.6, P =.003), 55-64 (8.9, 1.4-56.5,.019), and wound closure using coaptive films (6.0, 1.2-29.0, P =.025). Additionally, surgeons from Asia Pacific (OR = 5.19, 95% CI = 1.65-16.38, P =.005), Europe (3.55, 1.22-10.31, P =.020), and Latin America (4.40, 1.09-17.83,.038) were more likely to remove drain based on time duration, but surgeons <5 years of experience (10.23, 1.75-59.71, P =.010) were more likely to remove drains based on outputs. Conclusions: Most spine surgeons worldwide prefer to place a subfascial wound drain for degenerative open lumbar surgery. The choice for drain placement is associated with the surgeon"™s age and use of coaptive films for wound closure, while the criterion for drain removal is associated with the surgeons"™ region of practice and experience.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT/BACKGROUND:Cervical fusion for degenerative disorders carries a known risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD), a complication that often requires surgical intervention to relieve symptoms. Proposed risk factors for development of ASD include both clinical and radiographic patient characteristics. However, the true impact of these risk factors is less understood due to limitations in sample sizes and loss to follow-up in individual studies. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To review and critically examine current literature on the clinical risk factors associated with development of ASD in the cervical spine following ACDF. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. METHODS:We systematically reviewed the literature in December 2019 according to the PRISMA guidelines. Methodological quality of included papers and quality of evidence were evaluated according to MINORS and GRADE framework. Meta-analysis was performed to compute the odds ratio(OR)with corresponding 95% confidence interval(CI)for dichotomous data, and mean difference(MD) with 95% CI for continuous variables. RESULTS:6,850 records were obtained using database query. Title/abstract screening resulted in 19 articles for full review, from which 10 papers met the criteria for analysis. There were no significant differences in gender (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.75-1.30), BMI (MD -0.09, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.29), smoking (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.80-1.59), alcohol (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.70-1.64), diabetes (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.56-1.31), number of segments fused (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64-1.16), and preoperative JOA (MD -0.50, 95% CI -1.04 to 0.04). Age (MD 3.21, 95% CI 2.00-4.42), congenital/developmental stenosis (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.06-3.56), preoperative NDI (MD 4.18, 95% CI 2.11 to 6.26), preoperative VAS (neck) (MD 0.54 95% CI 0.09-0.99), and preoperative VAS (arm) (MD 0.98, 95% CI 0.43-1.34) were found to be statistically significant risk factors. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients with congenital stenosis, advanced age, and high preoperative NDI are at increased risk of developing ASD.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:To date, the available guidance on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in elective lumbar fusion surgery is largely open to surgeon interpretation and preference without any specific suggested chemoprophylactic regimen. RESEARCH QUESTION/UNASSIGNED:This study aimed to comparatively analyze the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) with the use of commonly employed chemoprophylactic agents such as unfractionated heparin (UH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in lumbar fusion surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:An independent systematic review of four scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, Web of Science) was performed to identify relevant articles as per the preferred reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting on DVT/PE outcomes of lumbar fusion surgery in adult patients with UH or LMWH chemoprophylaxis were included for analysis. Analysis was performed using the Stata software. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Twelve studies with 8495 patients were included in the analysis. A single-arm meta-analysis of the included studies found a DVT incidence of 14% (95%CI [8%-20%]) and 1% (95%CI [-6% - 8%]) with LMWH and UH respectively. Both the chemoprophylaxis agents prevented PE with a noted incidence of 0% (95%CI [0%-0.1%]) and 0% (95%CI [0%-1%]) with LMWH and UH respectively. The risk of bleeding-related complications with the usage of LMWH and UH was 0% (95% CI [0.0%-0.30%]) and 3% (95% CI [0.3%-5%]) respectively. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Both LMWH and UH reduces the overall incidence of DVT/PE, but there is a paucity of evidence analyzing the comparative effectiveness of the chemoprophylaxis regimens in lumbar fusion procedures. The heterogeneity in data prevents any conclusions, as there remains an evidence gap. We recommend future high-quality randomized controlled trials to investigate in this regard to help develop recommendations on thromboprophylaxis usage.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a complex and multifaceted condition associated with significant disability and morbidity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between FBSS with new incidences of mental health disorders. METHODS:Our cohort included patients diagnosed with FBSS within 12 months of a posterior fusion, laminectomy, or discectomy, identified using The International Classification of Disease, both Ninth and Tenth Revisions (ICD-9 and ICD-10). In the next step, both non-FBSS and FBSS-diagnosed patients were queried for the diagnosis of first-time occurrence of mental health disorders. The incidence of new mental health disorders was determined within 12-months following FBSS diagnosis. RESULTS:FBSS patients were significantly at greater risk than non-FBSS patients of developing all included mental health pathologies: Depression: OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.8-2.0, p < 0.0001); Anxiety: OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4-1.6, p < 0.0001; Sleep Disorder: OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.7-2.0, p < 0.0001; Bipolar Disorder: OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5-2.0 p < 0.0001; PTSD: OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.8, p < 0.0001; Panic Disorder: OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5-2.1, p < 0.0001; Suicidal Disorder: OR 1.7 95% CI 1.4-2.0, p < 0.0001, ADHD: OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.5, p = 0.0367. CONCLUSIONS:In the current study, patients diagnosed with FBSS were at a significantly greater risk of developing mental health pathologies. While other studies have suggested pre-surgical psychological support and treatment, the current results suggest that a post-operative psychologic care may also be warranted. By identifying potential psychosocial unforeseen obstacles that occur in patients diagnosed with FBSS, more precise treatment pathways can be developed leading to improved patient outcomes.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Lumbar fusion is widely used to treat degenerative and traumatic conditions of the spine, with various perioperative complications. This study compared lumbar fusion complications in patients with and without chronic hyperlipidemia. METHODS:Using the MSpine division of the PearlDiver database, patients with or without chronic hyperlipidemia who underwent lumbar fusions were identified. The appropriate Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes identified patients with single- or multi-level lumbar spinal fusion surgeries. International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 and ICD-10) codes identified patients with chronic hyperlipidemia. The surgical and medical complications were obtained utilizing the appropriate ICD-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes. Propensity score matching analysis was used to control for confounding factors. Chi-square test was applied to compare the incidence of complications among different groups. RESULTS:In single-level fusion group, patients with hyperlipidemia had a higher incidence of wound complications (P < 0.001), surgical site infection (P < 0.001), failed back syndrome (P < 0.001), hardware removal (P < 0.001), deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (P = 0.031), myocardial infarction (P < 0.001) cerebrovascular accident (P < 0.001), renal failure (P < 0.001), sepsis (P < 0.001), and urinary tract infection/incontinence (P < 0.001). In multi-level fusion group, patients with hyperlipidemia had a higher incidence of nerve root injury (P = 0.034), wound complications (P < 0.001), surgical site infection (P < 0.001), failed back syndrome (P < 0.001), hardware removal (P < 0.001), revision (P = 0.002), myocardial infarction (P < 0.001), renal failure (P < 0.001), and urinary tract infection/incontinence (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Following lumbar fusion, patients with chronic hyperlipidemia have an increased risk of perioperative complications, including wound complications, surgical site infection, failed back surgery syndrome, hardware removal, myocardial infarction, renal failure, and urinary tract infection/incontinence.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the trends and patterns of cervical degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine in different age groups of symptomatic patients. METHODS:Overall, 1300 symptomatic patients who had undergone cervical spine MRI from February 2019 to November 2021 were included. Pfirrmann grading was used to evaluate the IVD degeneration. Patients were divided into five groups based on age: group 1 from 20 to 29 years, group 2 from 30 to 39 years, group 3 from 40 to 49 years, group 4 from 50 to 59 years, and group 5 from 60 years and above. The patterns, severity, and the number of degenerated levels in each age group were analysed. RESULTS:The total number of degenerated IVDs (grades IV and V) increased significantly with age, ranging from 76 (4.9%) in group 1 to 677 (43.4%) in group 5. The most common degenerated levels were C2/3 (25% of the total degenerated levels) in group 1, C5/6 (29.0%) in group 2, C5/6 (33.1%) in group 3, C5/6 (31.3%) in group 4, C5/6 (24.8%), in group 5. The number of degenerated IVDs increased significantly with age (P < 0.001). In patients with two or more degenerated levels, contiguous-level disc degeneration was more common than skip lesions. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study evaluated the severity and pattern of cervical disc degeneration at each level in different age groups. The severity and number of degenerated levels increased significantly with increased age. Adjacent-level degeneration is more common than skip lesions in patients with more than one-level degeneration.

BACKGROUND:Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a significant cause of lumbar disability and is associated with severe patient morbidity. As the etiology of FBSS is not completely elucidated, the risk factors and evaluation of patients with FBSS remains challenging. Our analysis of a wide variety of operation types, clinical setting, and their correlation to FBSS seeks to allow fellow clinicians to be aware of the potential risk factors that leads to this devastating diagnosis. METHODS:Data were obtained for patients undergoing anterior lumbar fusion, posterior lumbar fusion, or decompression procedures from January 2010 to December 2017 from the Mariner insurance database. Rates of FBSS at six- and twelve-months post-surgery were determined for patients undergoing single/multilevel procedures according to place of service, and approach/procedure type. RESULTS:From 2010 to 2017, 102,047 patients underwent lumbar fusion or decompression surgery (54% decompression procedures, 36% posterior fusions, and 8.9% anterior fusions).5.4% of patients were diagnosed with FBSS within six months of the index procedure, and 8.4% were diagnosed with FBSS within twelve months. FBSS was higher in the inpatient (6.0%) vs. outpatient (4.3%) cohort. Among the surgical techniques, multi-level procedures had significantly higher rates of FBSS than single-level procedures, the highest being 10% in multi-level inpatient decompression procedures (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The highest rates of FBSS occurred in in the elderly (age group 70-74), for those patients whose index procedure was received in an inpatient setting, as well as for those receiving a multi-level surgery.