Faculty Bibliography

Ultrasonography is a valuable tool that can be used in many capacities to evaluate and treat pediatric orthopaedic patient. It has the capability to depict bone, cartilaginous and soft-tissue structures, and provide dynamic information. This technique can be readily applied to a wide range of pediatric conditions, including developmental dysplasia of the hip, congenital limb deficiencies, fracture management, joint effusions, and many other musculoskeletal pathologies. There are many benefits of implementing ultrasonography as a regular tool. It is readily accessible at most centers, and information can be quickly obtained in a minimally invasive way, which limits the need for radiation exposure. Ultrasonography is a safe and reliable tool that pediatric orthopaedic surgeons can incorporate into the diagnosis and management of a broad spectrum of pathology.

Purpose: To determine the reliability of performing ultrasound enhanced physical examination of infant hips amongst different types providers. The technique of ultrasound enhanced physical examination of the hip allows one of four possible outcomes: normal, dysplastic, unstable and dislocated. It can also be reported in binary form as having either a normal or abnormal outcome.
Method(s): 227 infants underwent ultrasound enhanced physical examination of the hip by one of two different examiners; one was an experienced clinician (considered the gold standard for this study) and the other was one of 3 different providers: a pediatric orthopedic fellowship trained surgeon with 4 years of experience, a fifth year orthopedic surgery resident and a pediatrician with 3 years of experience. All of the second examiners were trained by the senior examiner in a one-on-one training session lasting 2 hours. The examinations were performed on the same day but independent of each other. The results were then analyzed by a third independent blinded reviewer, who was familiar with the technique, to determine agreement amongst the examiners. Inter and intra observer reliability was measured with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) using one-way ANOVA, where a result of 1 represents perfect agreement and 0 represents no agreement.
Result(s): Of the 227 patients (454 hips) there were 18 dislocations, 24 unstable hips and 63 dysplastic hips (as graded by the gold standard examiner). The ICC between the gold standard and the other examiners for all hips was 0.915 (p=0.001). When adjusting for only a binary outcome of "normal" versus "abnormal" hips the ICC was 0.97 (p=0.001).
Conclusion(s): With a 2 hour one-on-one training session, ultrasound enhanced physical examination of the hip was easy to learn and perform and proved to be reliable and have low variability, especially when reported as a binary outcome of normal or abnormal. Clinicians will be able to incorporate ultrasound to their physical examination to improve the diagnostic accuracy of hip dysplasia, it is a simple technique to learn and is reliable

The purpose of this study is to determine the highest-cited articles on developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and analyze their bibliometric characteristics. We searched the Web of Science (WoS) for articles with the highest number of citations on DDH and recorded their number of citations in WoS, Scopus, and Google Scholar (GS). We ranked and selected the top 100 cited articles. The average number of citations in WoS was 148 (range 66-638). The most-cited article in all databases was Crowe's total hip replacement cohort on DDH. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume (n = 35) had the most articles in the list, and the United States (n = 46) contributed with the most articles. The University of Bern had the most publications (n = 8). Most studies were therapeutic (n = 45) or diagnostic (n = 29). Hip preservation and arthroplasty investigations have had an increment in citations in recent decades. We provide an historical perspective on research conducted on DDH. A majority of the articles were observational and therapeutic. All databases had good correlation in the number of citations.

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an effective surgical treatment for hip dysplasia. The goal of PAO is to reorient the acetabulum to improve joint stability, lessen contact stresses and slow the development of hip arthrosis. During PAO, the acetabulum is repositioned to adequately cover the femoral head. PAO preserves the weight-bearing posterior column of the pelvis, maintains the acetabular blood supply and retains the hip abductor musculature. The surgical technique needed to perform PAO is technically demanding, with correct repositioning of the acetabulum the most important-and challenging-aspect of the procedure. Imageless navigation has proven useful in other technically challenging surgeries, although its use in PAO has not yet been investigated. We have modified the standard technique for PAO to include the use of an imageless navigation system to confirm acetabular fragment position following osteotomy. Here, we describe the surgical technique and discuss the potential of this modified technique to improve patient-related outcomes.

BACKGROUND:Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a frequently performed, highly successful orthopedic procedure. Although primary osteoarthritis (PA) is the most common reason for (THA), there are several secondary conditions that lead to degenerative hip disease that are successfully treated with THA. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of these secondary causes of arthritis (SA) leading to THA and to compare the relative surgical costs, operating times, and hospital length of stay (LOS) for THA done for PA versus SA. METHODS:Electronic medical records from 836 continuous patients undergoing primary THA over a 2-year period were reviewed at a single high-volume joint arthroplasty center. Data obtained included age, sex, laterality, diagnosis leading to THA, surgical costs based on hospital fees, operating room time, and hospital LOS. Using operative reports, office visit notes, and radiology reports or images, patients were categorized into PA or SA groupings. PA was defined as osteoarthritis of no other known etiology, whereas SA was defined when a known underlying diagnosis led to degenerative joint disease of the hip. SA included hip dysplasia, post-traumatic arthritis (PTA), avascular necrosis (AVN), inflammatory arthropathy, Perthes disease, and slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Means and proportions of the variables from both groups were analyzed and compared using t-tests and chi-squared tests where applicable. RESULTS:There were 599 patients in the PA group and 237 patients in the SA group. The SA group was significantly younger than the PA group (54.4 years versus 64.0 years; p = 0.0001). The SA cohort had significantly higher mean surgical costs ($29,662 versus $27,078; p = 0.0005), operating room times (189 minutes versus 179 minutes; p = 0.0042), and LOS (4.2 days versus 3.9 days; p = 0.0312). Within the SA group, the hip dysplasia subgrouping had the lowest cost and operating room time, whereas the PTA subgrouping had the highest cost and operating room time. CONCLUSIONS:More than a quarter of primary THAs are performed due to secondary arthritis, most commonly due to hip dysplasia. Cases of THA due to secondary arthritis are associated with significantly increased hospital costs, operating time, and postoperative length of stay compared to THA's performed for primary osteoarthritis. Patients with post-traumatic hip arthritis may contribute the highest economic burden and present the most complex cases for arthroplasty surgeons.

Purpose/UNASSIGNED:The optimal treatment for late-presenting developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is controversial. High tension forces after hip reduction increase the pressure on the femoral head, potentially causing avascular necrosis. Femoral shortening (FS) is commonly used as a means to decrease the pressure on the femoral head. We examined the effect of FS on the outcomes of patients with late-presenting DDH. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A total of 645 hips of a late-presenting DDH cohort treated with open reduction and iliac osteotomies were retrospectively reviewed; 328 hips had a FS performed (FS+) and 317 (FS-) had not. The mean age was 3.9 years (sd 1.55). We classified the hips with the Tönnis and International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) methods; and the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), Iowa Hip Score (IHS) and Severin classification as outcome measurements. Results/UNASSIGNED:The FS- group had higher scores in PODCI (median 95 points; interquartile range (IQR) 78 to 91) and IHS (median 91 points; IQR 64 to 88) than the FS+ group (PODCI: median 94 points; IQR 69 to 89 points; IHS: median 89 points; IQR 62 to 87). The mean Severin scores were similar (FS- 2.65; FS+ 2.5; p = 0.93) but the FS- group had higher rates of good and excellent outcomes (FS- 56%; FS+ 41%; p < 0.00001) and lesser dislocation rates (FS- 6%; FS+ 14%; p = 0.16). Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Although FS should be used when a hip cannot be reduced without undue tension, our results indicate that this procedure is not necessarily related to a better outcome. Level of evidence/UNASSIGNED:Therapeutic, Level III.