Searched for: person:cerfor01
in-biosketch:true
Innovation: ice cream in the recovery room rules out chylothorax after thoracic lymphadenectomy and affords same-day chest tube removal
Cerfolio, Robert J; McCormack, Ashley J
OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:Early removal of chest tubes reduces pain and morbidity. This study aimed to remove chest tubes immediately after robotic pulmonary resection with complete thoracic lymphadenectomy by administering ice cream to rule out chylothorax. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This quality improvement study utilized prospectively gathered data from one thoracic surgeon. Patients were given 3.6 fl oz of ice cream in the recovery room within 1 h after their operation. Chest tubes were removed within 4 h if there was no chylous drainage and air leak on the digital drainage system. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:From January 2022 to August 2023, 343 patients underwent robotic pulmonary resection with complete thoracic lymphadenectomy. The median time to ingest the ice cream was 1.5 h after skin closure. The incidence of chylothorax was 0.87% (3/343). Two patients were diagnosed with chylothorax after consuming ice cream within 4 h of surgery. One patient, whose chest tube remained in place due to an air leak, had a chylothorax diagnosed on postoperative day 1 (POD1). All three patients were discharged home on POD1 with their chest tubes in place, adhering to a no-fat, medium-chain triglyceride diet. All chylothoraces resolved within 6 days. None of the remaining patients developed chylothorax postoperatively with a minimum follow-up period of 90 days. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Providing ice cream to patients after pulmonary resection and complete thoracic lymphadenectomy is an effective and reliable technique to rule out chylothorax early in the postoperative period and facilitates early chest tube removal. Further studies are needed to ensure that this simple, inexpensive test is reproducible.
PMCID:11347312
PMID: 39193401
ISSN: 2296-875x
CID: 5729742
Interprofessional education in cardiothoracic surgery: a narrative review
Lampridis, Savvas; Scarci, Marco; Cerfolio, Robert J
Interprofessional education, an approach where healthcare professionals from various disciplines learn with, from, and about each other, is widely recognized as an important strategy for improving collaborative practice and patient outcomes. This narrative review explores the current state and future directions of interprofessional education in cardiothoracic surgery. We conducted a literature search using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, focusing on English-language articles published after 2000. Our qualitative synthesis identified key themes related to interprofessional education interventions, outcomes, and challenges. The integration of interprofessional education in cardiothoracic surgery training programs varies across regions, with a common focus on teamwork and interpersonal communication. Simulation-based training has emerged as a leading modality for cultivating these skills in multidisciplinary settings, with studies showing improvements in team performance, crisis management, and patient safety. However, significant hurdles remain, including professional socialization, hierarchies, stereotypes, resistance to role expansion, and logistical constraints. Future efforts in this field should prioritize deeper curricular integration, continuous faculty development, strong leadership support, robust outcome evaluation, and sustained political and financial commitment. The integration of interprofessional education in cardiothoracic surgery offers considerable potential for enhancing patient care quality, but realizing this vision requires a multifaceted approach. This approach must address individual, organizational, and systemic factors to build an evidence-based framework for implementation.
PMCID:11408362
PMID: 39296347
ISSN: 2296-875x
CID: 5721562
Interprofessional education in cardiothoracic surgery: a narrative review
Lampridis, Savvas; Scarci, Marco; Cerfolio, Robert J
Interprofessional education, an approach where healthcare professionals from various disciplines learn with, from, and about each other, is widely recognized as an important strategy for improving collaborative practice and patient outcomes. This narrative review explores the current state and future directions of interprofessional education in cardiothoracic surgery. We conducted a literature search using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, focusing on English-language articles published after 2000. Our qualitative synthesis identified key themes related to interprofessional education interventions, outcomes, and challenges. The integration of interprofessional education in cardiothoracic surgery training programs varies across regions, with a common focus on teamwork and interpersonal communication. Simulation-based training has emerged as a leading modality for cultivating these skills in multidisciplinary settings, with studies showing improvements in team performance, crisis management, and patient safety. However, significant hurdles remain, including professional socialization, hierarchies, stereotypes, resistance to role expansion, and logistical constraints. Future efforts in this field should prioritize deeper curricular integration, continuous faculty development, strong leadership support, robust outcome evaluation, and sustained political and financial commitment. The integration of interprofessional education in cardiothoracic surgery offers considerable potential for enhancing patient care quality, but realizing this vision requires a multifaceted approach. This approach must address individual, organizational, and systemic factors to build an evidence-based framework for implementation.
PMCID:11408362
PMID: 39296347
ISSN: 2296-875x
CID: 5721552
Interprofessional education in cardiothoracic surgery: a narrative review
Lampridis, Savvas; Scarci, Marco; Cerfolio, Robert J
Interprofessional education, an approach where healthcare professionals from various disciplines learn with, from, and about each other, is widely recognized as an important strategy for improving collaborative practice and patient outcomes. This narrative review explores the current state and future directions of interprofessional education in cardiothoracic surgery. We conducted a literature search using the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, focusing on English-language articles published after 2000. Our qualitative synthesis identified key themes related to interprofessional education interventions, outcomes, and challenges. The integration of interprofessional education in cardiothoracic surgery training programs varies across regions, with a common focus on teamwork and interpersonal communication. Simulation-based training has emerged as a leading modality for cultivating these skills in multidisciplinary settings, with studies showing improvements in team performance, crisis management, and patient safety. However, significant hurdles remain, including professional socialization, hierarchies, stereotypes, resistance to role expansion, and logistical constraints. Future efforts in this field should prioritize deeper curricular integration, continuous faculty development, strong leadership support, robust outcome evaluation, and sustained political and financial commitment. The integration of interprofessional education in cardiothoracic surgery offers considerable potential for enhancing patient care quality, but realizing this vision requires a multifaceted approach. This approach must address individual, organizational, and systemic factors to build an evidence-based framework for implementation.
PMCID:11408362
PMID: 39296347
ISSN: 2296-875x
CID: 5721542
Driving change and quality care in a healthcare"”the Efficiency Quality Index
Cerfolio, Robert J.
SCOPUS:85179933493
ISSN: 2519-0792
CID: 5620842
The process and safety of removing chest tubes 4 to 12 hours after robotic pulmonary lobectomy and segmentectomy
McCormack, Ashley J; El Zaeedi, Mohamed; Geraci, Travis C; Cerfolio, Robert J
OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Chest tubes cause pain and morbidity. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This is a quality initiative study and review of patients who underwent robotic pulmonary resection by 1 surgeon (R.J.C.). The goal was to remove chest tubes within 4 to 12 hours after robotic segmentectomy and lobectomy. Primary outcome was removal without the need for reinsertion, thoracentesis, or any morbidity due to early removal of the chest tube. Secondary outcomes were symptomatic pneumothorax, pleural effusion, chylothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, and chest tube reinsertion or thoracentesis within 60 days of surgery. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .001) were associated with chest tube removal within 4 to 12 hours of surgery. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Chest tubes can be safely removed within 4 to 12 hours after robotic segmentectomy and lobectomy. Factors associated with successful early chest tube removal are nonsmoking, segmentectomy, and team members becoming comfortable with the process.
PMCID:10775092
PMID: 38204643
ISSN: 2666-2736
CID: 5755332
A chest tube after robotic thymectomy is unnecessary
McCormack, Ashley J; El Zaeedi, Mohamed; Dorsey, Michael; Cerfolio, Robert J
OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Chest tubes are frequently placed after thymectomy, without data to support this common practice. We report our experience in eliminating them after robotic thymectomy. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This is a retrospective database review of patients who underwent robotic thymectomy performed by a single surgeon in which intraoperative chest tube insertion was not planned. Patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes are presented. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Between January 2018 and October 2022, 75 patients underwent robotic thymectomy performed by a single surgeon. Of those, 64 (85.3%) underwent a left-sided thoracic approach. The most common indication for resection was a suspicious anterior mediastinal mass. There were no conversions to an open operation. The median operative time was 72 minutes (range, 38-164 minutes), and the median estimated blood loss was 20 cc (range, 10-60 cc). Ten patients (13.3%) went home on the day of surgery, and all others (86.7%) were discharged on postoperative day 1. A chest tube was placed in 1 patient at time of closure because of a persistent air leak after extensive adhesiolysis from a prior thoracotomy; the tube was removed on the day of surgery after resolution of the air leak. No other patient required chest tube placement intraoperatively, immediately postoperatively, or within 60 days postoperation. Two patients underwent outpatient thoracentesis within 1 month postoperation for effusions. There were no 30- or 90-day mortality and no major morbidities. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:A chest tube after robotic thymectomy is not necessary in almost all patients and can be safely omitted. The dogmatic routine practice of chest tube placement should be questioned.
PMCID:10775103
PMID: 38204665
ISSN: 2666-2736
CID: 5755342
Commentary: Scrubs united with suits to provide quality care and profits [Comment]
Cerfolio, Robert J
PMID: 36931998
ISSN: 1097-685x
CID: 5595012
Pulmonary Open, Robotic and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy (PORTaL) Study: Survival Analysis of 6,646 Cases
Kent, Michael S; Hartwig, Matthew G; Vallières, Eric; Abbas, Abbas E; Cerfolio, Robert J; Dylewski, Mark R; Fabian, Thomas; Herrera, Luis J; Jett, Kimble G; Lazzaro, Richard S; Meyers, Bryan; Reddy, Rishindra M; Reed, Michael F; Rice, David C; Ross, Patrick; Sarkaria, Inderpal S; Schumacher, Lana Y; Spier, Lawrence N; Tisol, William B; Wigle, Dennis A; Zervos, Michael
OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to analyze overall survival of robotic-assisted lobectomy (RL), video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATS) and open lobectomy (OL) performed by experienced thoracic surgeons across multiple institutions. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Surgeons have increasingly adopted RL for resection of early-stage lung cancer. Comparative survival data following these approaches is largely from single-institution case series or administrative datasets. METHODS:Retrospective data was collected from 21 institutions from 2013-2019. Consecutive cases performed for clinical stage IA-IIIA lung cancer were included. Induction therapy patients were excluded. The propensity-score method of inverse-probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate association among OS and relevant risk factors. RESULTS:A total of 2,789 RL, 2,661 VATS, and 1,196 OL cases were included. The unadjusted 5-year overall survival rate was highest for OL (84%) followed by RL (81%) and VATS (74%); P=0.008. Similar trends were also observed after IPTW adjustment (RL 81%; VATS 73%, OL 85%, P=0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that OL and RL were associated with significantly higher overall survival compared to VATS (OL vs. VATS: HR 0.64, P<0.001 and RL vs. VATS: HR 0.79; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS:Our finding from this large multicenter study suggests that patients undergoing RL and OL have statistically similar OS, while the VATS group was associated with shorter OS. Further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to help evaluate these observations.
PMID: 36762564
ISSN: 1528-1140
CID: 5420972
Resistance to Change from Super Performers: The EQI, Ego and the Safety Card
Cerfolio, Robert J
PMID: 36115389
ISSN: 1552-6259
CID: 5336612