Faculty Bibliography

The rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) carry the promise to reshape abdominal imaging by offering transformative solutions to challenges in disease detection, classification, and personalized care. AI applications, particularly those leveraging deep learning and radiomics, have demonstrated remarkable accuracy in detecting a wide range of abdominal conditions, including but not limited to diffuse liver parenchymal disease, focal liver lesions, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), renal tumors, and bowel pathologies. These models excel in the automation of tasks such as segmentation, classification, and prognostication across modalities like ultrasound, CT, and MRI, often surpassing traditional diagnostic methods. Despite these advancements, widespread adoption remains limited by challenges such as data heterogeneity, lack of multicenter validation, reliance on retrospective single-center studies, and the "black box" nature of many AI models, which hinder interpretability and clinician trust. The absence of standardized imaging protocols and reference gold standards further complicates integration into clinical workflows. To address these barriers, future directions emphasize collaborative multi-center efforts to generate diverse, standardized datasets, integration of explainable AI frameworks to existing picture archiving and communication systems, and the development of automated, end-to-end pipelines capable of processing multi-source data. Targeted clinical applications, such as early detection of PDAC, improved segmentation of renal tumors, and improved risk stratification in liver diseases, show potential to refine diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic planning. Ethical considerations, such as data privacy, regulatory compliance, and interdisciplinary collaboration, are essential for successful translation into clinical practice. AI's transformative potential in abdominal imaging lies not only in complementing radiologists but also in fostering precision medicine by enabling faster, more accurate, and patient-centered care. Overcoming current limitations through innovation and collaboration will be pivotal in realizing AI's full potential to improve patient outcomes and redefine the landscape of abdominal radiology.

Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) provides an elegant solution for MR acceleration while preserving image quality. This advancement is crucial for body imaging, which is frequently marred by the increased likelihood of motion-related artifacts. Multiple vendor-specific models focusing on T2, T1, and diffusion-weighted imaging have been developed for the abdomen, pelvis, and chest, with the liver and prostate being the most well-studied organ systems. Variational networks with supervised DL models, including data consistency layers and regularizers, are the most common DLR methods. The common theme for all single-center studies on this subject has been noninferior or superior image quality metrics and lesion conspicuity to conventional sequences despite significant acquisition time reduction. DLR also provides a potential for denoising, artifact reduction, increased resolution, and increased signal-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) that can be balanced with acceleration benefits depending on the imaged organ system. Some specific challenges faced by DLR include slightly reduced lesion detection, cardiac motion-related signal loss, regional SNR variations, and variabilities in ADC measurements as reported in different organ systems. Continued investigations with large-scale multicenter prospective clinical validation of DLR to document generalizability and demonstrate noninferior diagnostic accuracy with histopathologic correlation are the need of the hour. The creation of vendor-neutral solutions, open data sharing, and diversifying training data sets are also critical to strengthening model robustness.

BACKGROUND:MRI plays a critical role in prostate cancer (PCa) detection and management. Bi-parametric MRI (bpMRI) offers a faster, contrast-free alternative to multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI). Routine use of mpMRI for all patients may not be necessary, and a tailored imaging approach (bpMRI or mpMRI) based on individual risk might optimize resource utilization. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate a deep learning (DL) model for classifying clinically significant PCa (csPCa) using bpMRI and to assess its potential for optimizing MRI protocol selection by recommending the additional sequences of mpMRI only when beneficial. STUDY TYPE/METHODS:Retrospective and prospective. POPULATION/METHODS:The DL model was trained and validated on 26,129 prostate MRI studies. A retrospective cohort of 151 patients (mean age 65 ± 8) with ground-truth verification from biopsy, prostatectomy, or long-term follow-up, alongside a prospective cohort of 142 treatment-naïve patients (mean age 65 ± 9) undergoing bpMRI, was evaluated. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE/UNASSIGNED:3 T, Turbo-spin echo T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and single shot EPI diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). ASSESSMENT/RESULTS:The DL model, based on a 3D ResNet-50 architecture, classified csPCa using PI-RADS ≥ 3 and Gleason ≥ 7 as outcome measures. The model was evaluated on a prospective cohort labeled by consensus of three radiologists and a retrospective cohort with ground truth verification based on biopsy or long-term follow-up. Real-time inference was tested on an automated MRI workflow, providing classification results directly at the scanner. STATISTICAL TESTS/METHODS:AUROC with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used to evaluate model performance. RESULTS:In the prospective cohort, the model achieved an AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89) for PI-RADS ≥ 3 classification, with 93% sensitivity and 54% specificity. In the retrospective cohort, the model achieved an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91) for Gleason ≥ 7 classification, with 93% sensitivity and 62% specificity. Real-time implementation demonstrated a processing latency of 14-16 s for protocol recommendations. DATA CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The proposed DL model identifies csPCa using bpMRI and integrates it into clinical workflows. EVIDENCE LEVEL/METHODS:1. TECHNICAL EFFICACY/UNASSIGNED:Stage 2.

MRI is widely used for the diagnosis and management of various abdominal diseases involving organs such as the liver, pancreas, and kidneys. However, one major limitation of MRI is its relatively slow imaging speed compared to other modalities. In addition, respiratory motion poses a significant challenge in abdominal MRI, often requiring patients to hold their breath multiple times during an exam. This requirement can be particularly challenging for sick, elderly, and pediatric patients, who may have reduced breath-holding capacity. As a result, rapid imaging plays an important role in routine clinical abdominal MRI exams. Accelerated data acquisition not only reduces overall exam time but also shortens breath-hold durations, thereby improving patient comfort and compliance. Over the past decade, significant advancements in rapid MRI have led to the development of various accelerated imaging techniques for routine clinical use. These methods improve abdominal MRI by enhancing imaging speed, motion compensation, and overall image quality. Integrating these techniques into clinical practice also enables new applications that were previously challenging. This paper provides a concise yet comprehensive overview of rapid imaging techniques applicable to abdominal MRI and discusses their advantages, limitations, and potential clinical applications. By the end of this review, readers are expected to learn the latest advances in accelerated abdominal MRI and explore new frontiers in this evolving field. Evidence Level: N/A Technical Efficacy: Stage 5.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:A single-shot T2-weighted deep-learning-based image reconstruction (DL-HASTE) has been recently developed allowing for shorter acquisition time than conventional half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo-spin echo (HASTE). The purpose of this study was to compare image quality of conventional 6 mm HASTE with DL-HASTE at 4 mm and 6 mm slice thickness. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:91 patients (51 female; mean±SD age: 44±10years) who underwent 3T MR enterography from 5/15/2023-7/15/2023 including pelvic conventional HASTE and DL-HASTE were included. Patients either had 4 mm-DL-HASTE or 6 mm-DL-HASTE. Four abdominal radiologists, blinded to sequence type, independently evaluated overall image quality, artifacts over bowel, bowel wall sharpness, and confidence for the presence/absence of bowel abnormalities on 5-point Likert scales. Readers recorded the presence/absence of ileal wall thickening, ileal inflammation, stricture, and penetrating disease on each sequence. Wilcoxon signed-rank test with continuity correction was used for paired comparisons and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for unpaired ordinal comparisons. A p < .05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS:Acquisition times for 6 mm HASTE, 4 mm-DL-HASTE, and 6 mm-DL-HASTE were 64 s, 51 s, and 49 s, respectively. Overall image quality and bowel sharpness were significantly improved for 4 mm-DL-HASTE versus HASTE for 3/4 readers (all p < .05) and similar for the 4th reader (p > .05). Diagnostic confidence was similar for all readers (p > .05). 6 mm-DL-HASTE was similar to HASTE for bowel sharpness, image quality, and confidence for 3/4 readers (all p > .05). The presence of ileal thickening, ileal inflammation, stricture, and penetrating disease were similar for all readers for HASTE, 4 mm-DL-HASTE, and 6 mm-DL-HASTE (all p > .05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:4 mm-DL-HASTE had superior image quality than conventional HASTE at shorter acquisition time.

Respiratory motion-induced image blurring and artifacts can compromise image quality in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the liver. Despite remarkable advances in respiratory motion detection and compensation in past years, these techniques have not yet seen widespread clinical adoption. The accuracy of image-based motion detection can be especially compromised in the presence of contrast enhancement and/or in situations involving deep and/or irregular breathing patterns. This work proposes a framework that combines GRASP-Pro (Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI with imProved performance) MRI with a new radial sampling scheme called navi-stack-of-stars for free-breathing DCE-MRI of the liver without the need for explicit respiratory motion compensation. A prototype 3D golden-angle radial sequence with a navi-stack-of-stars sampling scheme that intermittently acquires a 2D navigator was implemented. Free-breathing DCE-MRI of the liver was conducted in 24 subjects at 3T including 17 volunteers and 7 patients. GRASP-Pro reconstruction was performed with a temporal resolution of 0.34-0.45 s per volume, whereas standard GRASP reconstruction was performed with a temporal resolution of 15 s per volume. Motion compensation was not performed in all image reconstruction tasks. Liver images in different contrast phases from both GRASP and GRASP-Pro reconstructions were visually scored by two experienced abdominal radiologists for comparison. The nonparametric paired two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare image quality scores, and the Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated to evaluate the inter-reader agreement. GRASP-Pro MRI with sub-second temporal resolution consistently received significantly higher image quality scores (P < 0.05) than standard GRASP MRI throughout all contrast enhancement phases and across all assessment categories. There was a substantial inter-reader agreement for all assessment categories (ranging from 0.67 to 0.89). The proposed technique using GRASP-Pro reconstruction with navi-stack-of-stars sampling holds great promise for free-breathing DCE-MRI of the liver without respiratory motion compensation.

BACKGROUND:Postacute Covid-19 patients commonly present with respiratory symptoms; however, a noninvasive imaging method for quantitative characterization of respiratory patterns is lacking. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate if quantitative characterization of respiratory pattern on free-breathing higher temporal resolution MRI stratifies patients by cardiopulmonary symptom burden. STUDY TYPE/METHODS:Prospective analysis of retrospectively acquired data. SUBJECTS/METHODS:A total of 37 postacute Covid-19 patients (25 male; median [interquartile range (IQR)] age: 58 [42-64] years; median [IQR] days from acute infection: 335 [186-449]). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE/UNASSIGNED:0.55 T/two-dimensional coronal true fast imaging with steady-state free precession (trueFISP) at higher temporal resolution. ASSESSMENT/RESULTS:Patients were stratified into three groups based on presence of no (N = 11), 1 (N = 14), or ≥2 (N = 14) cardiopulmonary symptoms, assessed using a standardized symptom inventory within 1 month of MRI. An automated lung postprocessing workflow segmented each lung in each trueFISP image (temporal resolution 0.2 seconds) and respiratory curves were generated. Quantitative parameters were derived including tidal lung area, rates of inspiration and expiration, lung area coefficient of variability (CV), and respiratory incoherence (departure from sinusoidal pattern) were. Pulmonary function tests were recorded if within 1 month of MRI. Qualitative assessment of respiratory pattern and lung opacity was performed by three independent readers with 6, 9, and 23 years of experience. STATISTICAL TESTS/METHODS:Analysis of variance to assess differences in demographic, clinical, and quantitative MRI parameters among groups; univariable analysis and multinomial logistic regression modeling to determine features predictive of patient symptom status; Akaike information criterion to compare the quality of regression models; Cohen and Fleiss kappa (κ) to quantify inter-reader reliability. Two-sided 5% significance level was used. RESULTS:; CV: 0.072, 0.067, and 0.058). Respiratory incoherence was significantly higher in patients with two or more symptoms than in those with one or no symptoms (0.05 vs. 0.043 vs. 0.033). There were no significant differences in patient age (P = 0.19), sex (P = 0.88), lung opacity severity (P = 0.48), or pulmonary function tests (P = 0.35-0.97) among groups. Qualitative reader assessment did not distinguish between groups and showed slight inter-reader agreement (κ = 0.05-0.11). DATA CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Quantitative respiratory pattern measures derived from dynamic higher-temporal resolution MRI have potential to stratify patients by symptom burden in a postacute Covid-19 cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Early detection of HCC is a key factor in enabling curative therapies and improving overall survival. Worldwide, several guidelines are available for surveillance of at-risk populations and diagnosis of HCC. This article provides a current comprehensive update on screening and diagnosis of HCC.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To introduce an alternative idea for fat suppression that is suited both for low-field applications where conventional fat-suppression approaches become ineffective due to narrow spectral separation and for applications with strong B0 homogeneities. METHODS:Separation of fat and water is achieved by sweeping the frequency of RF saturation pulses during continuous radial acquisition and calculating frequency-resolved images using regularized iterative reconstruction. Voxel-wise signal-response curves are extracted that reflect tissue's response to RF saturation at different frequencies and allow the classification into fat or water. This information is then utilized to generate water-only composite images. The principle is demonstrated in free-breathing abdominal and neck examinations using stack-of-stars 3D balanced SSFP (bSSFP) and gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequences at 0.55 and 3T. Moreover, a potential extension toward quantitative fat/water separation is described. RESULTS:Experiments with a proton density fat fraction (PDFF) phantom validated the reliability of fat/water separation using signal-response curves. As demonstrated for abdominal imaging at 0.55T, the approach resulted in more uniform fat suppression without loss of water signal and in improved CSF-to-fat signal ratio. Moreover, the approach provided consistent fat suppression in 3T neck exams where conventional spectrally-selective fat saturation failed due to strong local B0 inhomogeneities. The feasibility of simultaneous fat/water quantification has been demonstrated in a PDFF phantom. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The proposed principle achieves reliable fat suppression in low-field applications and adapts to high-field applications with strong B0 inhomogeneity. Moreover, the principle potentially provides a basis for developing an alternative approach for PDFF quantification.

OBJECTIVE:To perform image quality comparison between deep learning-based multiband diffusion-weighted sequence (DL-mb-DWI), accelerated multiband diffusion-weighted sequence (accelerated mb-DWI), and conventional multiband diffusion-weighted sequence (conventional mb-DWI) in patients undergoing clinical liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS:Fifty consecutive patients who underwent clinical MRI of the liver at a 1.5-T scanner, between September 1, 2021, and January 31, 2022, were included in this study. Three radiologists independently reviewed images using a 5-point Likert scale for artifacts and image quality factors, in addition to assessing the presence of liver lesions and lesion conspicuity. RESULTS:DL-mb-DWI acquisition time was 65.0 ± 2.4 seconds, significantly (P < 0.001) shorter than conventional mb-DWI (147.5 ± 19.2 seconds) and accelerated mb-DWI (94.3 ± 1.8 seconds). DL-mb-DWI received significantly higher scores than conventional mb-DWI for conspicuity of the left lobe (P < 0.001), sharpness of intrahepatic vessel margin (P < 0.001), sharpness of the pancreatic contour (P < 0.001), in-plane motion artifact (P = 0.002), and overall image quality (P = 0.005) by reader 2. DL-mb-DWI received significantly higher scores for conspicuity of the left lobe (P = 0.006), sharpness of the pancreatic contour (P = 0.020), and in-plane motion artifact (P = 0.042) by reader 3. DL-mb-DWI received significantly higher scores for strength of fat suppression (P = 0.004) and sharpness of the pancreatic contour (P = 0.038) by reader 1. The remaining quality parameters did not reach statistical significance for reader 1. CONCLUSIONS:Novel diffusion-weighted MRI sequence with deep learning-based image reconstruction demonstrated significantly decreased acquisition times compared with conventional and accelerated mb-DWI sequences, while maintaining or improving image quality for routine abdominal MRI. DL-mb-DWI offers a potential alternative to conventional mb-DWI in routine clinical liver MRI.