Faculty Bibliography

Outcomes: 1. Understand the historical use of palliative care for patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) 2. Describe the use of palliative care for patients with AKI and COVID-19 during the surge at our institution 3. Describe the associations of palliative care with subsequent health care utilization such as hospice use, ICU time, and mechanical ventilation Original Research Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common morbidity seen in patients with COVID-19 and is associated with high mortality. Palliative care is valuable for these patients yet is historically underused in AKI. Research Objectives: To describe the use of palliative care and subsequent health care utilization by COVID-19 patients with AKI.
Method(s): A retrospective analysis of NYU's electronic health data of COVID-19 hospitalizations between March 2, 2020 and August 25, 2020. AKI was defined by the AKI Network creatinine criteria. Regression models examined characteristics associated with a receiving palliative care and discharge to hospice versus death in the hospital.
Result(s): Patientswith COVID-19 and AKI were more likely than those without AKI to receive palliative care (42% vs 7%, p < 0.001); however, consults came significantly later (10 days from admission vs 5 days, p < 0.001). 66% of patients initiated on renal replacement therapy (RRT) received palliative care versus 37% (p < 0.001) of those with AKI not on RRT, also later in timing (12 days from admission vs 9 days, p = 0.002). Patients with AKI had a significantly longer stay, more ICU admissions, use of mechanical ventilation, discharges to hospice (6% vs 3%), and changes in code status (34% vs 7%, p < 0.001) than those without AKI. Among those who received palliative care, AKI both without RRT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-0.95) and with RRT (aOR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.67) was associated with a lower likelihood of discharge to hospice versus hospital death compared to those without AKI.
Conclusion(s): Palliative care was used more for patients with AKI and COVID-19 than historically reported, yet this consultation came later in the hospital course and did not avoid invasive interventions despite high mortality. Implications for Research, Policy, or Practice: These data can lead to further exploration of earlier timing of palliative care consultation in AKI.
Copyright

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Effective communication is essential to good health care, and hearing loss disrupts patient-provider communication. For the more than 2 million veterans with severe hearing loss, communication is particularly challenging in noisy health care environments such as emergency departments. The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe patient and provider perspectives of feasibility and potential benefit of providing a hearing assistance device, a personal amplifier, during visits to an emergency department in an urban setting affiliated with the Department of Veterans Affairs. METHODS:This qualitative descriptive study was conducted in parallel with a randomized controlled study. We completed a semistructured interview with 11 veterans and 10 health care providers to elicit their previous experiences with patient-provider communication in the ED setting and their perspectives on hearing screening and using the personal amplifier in the emergency department. Interview data were analyzed using content analysis and Atlas.ti V8.4 software (Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany). RESULTS:The veteran sample (n = 11) had a mean age of 80.3 years (SD = 10.2). The provider sample included 7 nurses and 3 physicians. In the ED setting, hearing loss disrupts patient-provider communication. Screening for hearing loss in the emergency department was feasible except in urgent/emergent cases. The use of the personal amplifier made communication more effective and less effortful for both veterans and providers. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Providing the personal amplifier improved the ED experience for veterans and offers a promising intervention that could improve health care quality and safety for ED patient populations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:AKI is a common complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is associated with high mortality. Palliative care, a specialty that supports patients with serious illness, is valuable for these patients but is historically underutilized in AKI. The objectives of this paper are to describe the use of palliative care in patients with AKI and COVID-19 and their subsequent health care utilization. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:We conducted a retrospective analysis of New York University Langone Health electronic health data of COVID-19 hospitalizations between March 2, 2020 and August 25, 2020. Regression models were used to examine characteristics associated with receiving a palliative care consult. RESULTS:=0.002). Despite greater use of palliative care, patients with AKI had a significantly longer length of stay, more intensive care unit admissions, and more use of mechanical ventilation. Those with AKI did have a higher frequency of discharges to inpatient hospice (6% versus 3%) and change in code status (34% versus 7%) than those without AKI. CONCLUSIONS:Palliative care was utilized more frequently for patients with AKI and COVID-19 than historically reported in AKI. Despite high mortality, consultation occurred late in the hospital course and was not associated with reduced initiation of life-sustaining interventions. PODCAST/UNASSIGNED:This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2022_02_24_CJN11030821.mp3.

Many older adults with diabetes (DM) have co-occurring Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and AD-Related Dementias (ADRD). Complex treatment plans may impose treatment burden for caregivers responsible for day-to-day self-management. The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe caregiver perceptions of treatment burden for people with DM-AD/ADRD. Caregivers (n = 33) of patients with DM-AD/ADRD participated in semi-structured interviews about their caregiver role and perceptions of treatment burden of DM-AD/ADRD management. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis (ATLAS.ti). Caregivers reported high levels of burden related to complex treatment/self-management for patients with DM-AD/ADRD that varied day-to-day with the patient's cognitive status. Four themes were: (1) trajectory of treatment burden; (2) navigating multiple healthcare providers/systems of care; (3) caregiver role conflict; and (4) emotional burden. Interventions to reduce caregiver treatment burden should include activating supportive services, education, and care coordination especially, if patient treatment increases in complexity over time.

Background: We recently implemented the Age-Friendly Health System's 4Ms (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) framework in New York City Health + Hospitals/Bellevue Hospital Center's Geriatrics clinic to improve care of older adults.
Method(s): We examined the impact of 4Ms assessment on patient care and changes in care processes through specific interventions triggered after assessment. We conducted chart reviews of patient visits during March 2021, the first month of 4Ms implementation and identified interventions made during these visits. To assess "What Matters" providers asked "What Matters the most to you;" potentially inappropriate Medications (PIM) were identified using the Beers list; Mentation was evaluated using the Mini-Cog; and Mobility was determined using timed up and go (TUG) test. We used descriptive statistics to characterize findings.
Result(s): Among the 121 patients who had 4Ms assessment in March 2021, 85% (n=103) were asked "What Matters;" providers reviewed Medications for almost all (n=118; 98%) and conducted a Mini-Cog for 64% (n=78). Most not cognitively assessed were either previously screened (n=11; 9%) or had dementia (n=12; 10%). Providers used the TUG test for 87% (n=105). What Mattered to patients most commonly was "getting better" (n=24; 23%). There were 39 (33%) patients with potentially inappropriate Medications (including proton pump inhibitors, gabapentinoids, and NSAIDS) of which 10 (26%) Medications were either discontinued or reduced. Other interventions included further cognitive evaluation (n=2) and home care referrals (n=2) among 14 (18%) with an abnormal Mini- Cog. Among the 51 (42%) patients with an abnormal TUG, providers intervened for 19 (37%) with devices, referrals or home services.
Conclusion(s): The adoption of 4Ms assessment during routine visits identified issues with Medications, Mentation and Mobility, triggering several interventions for common geriatric conditions. 4Ms assessment is a helpful strategy to organize geriatric care, routinely assess patients for common geriatric syndromes, and improve care. Future directions include prioritizing interventions integrated with "What Matters" to maintain patient-centered care

Background: Neighborhood disadvantage influences health outcomes regardless of personal economic status, illustrating the importance of neighborhood context on health. The Area Deprivation index (ADI) establishes a ranking system of U.S. neighborhoods on state and national levels based on 17 neighborhood factors. Using data from an ongoing study of patients with dual diagnoses of diabetes and dementia, we investigated the relationship between ADI and diabetic outcomes, including glycemic control, blood pressure, and dementia severity.
Method(s): We conducted descriptive and bivariate statistics using 3 years of health record data from patients of NYU Langone Health. We included patients >=65 years, with ADRD and DM, and on DM medication. In addition to demographic measures and NY home addresses, we collected hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and assessed dementia severity, surveying proxies with the dementia severity rating scale (DSRS). We used ArcGIS and ADI data to link patient addresses to an ADI score. We stratified the sample into two groups: a low deprivation group with ADI scores 1-5, and a high deprivation group with ADI scores 6-10.
Result(s): Of those meeting inclusion criteria (n=996), most were over 75 years (73.5%), female (60.1%), white (71.2%), and not Hispanic or Latino (72.4%). Mean patient age was 81.3; standard deviation (SD): 7.6. More than 50% of patients had an NY state ADI score of 1, 2 or 3 out of 10, indicating that the majority of the population lived in neighborhoods of less disadvantage. 83.4% (n=831) of the population fell into the low deprivation group. There were no differences in hemoglobin A1c (7.09 vs. 7.01) or dementia severity (25.5 +/- 0.8 vs. 22.4 +/- 2.0) between low and high deprivation groups, respectively. However, systolic blood pressure was greater in high deprivation individuals (132.4 +/- 19.3 mm Hg vs. 128.6 +/- 18.2; p=0.02).
Conclusion(s): The ADI in this study was associated with blood pressure but not diabetic control or dementia severity. Less heterogeneity in disadvantage limited our ability to detect this potential social determinant of health. In a city, where neighborhood disadvantage changes from block to block, the influence of environment on health may be more difficult to detect

Background: Clinical trials are important to improve evidencebased care for persons living with dementia (PLWD) and for their care partners (dyads). Barriers to research recruitment are numerous, including care partners concerns' of ill health, cognitive impairment (CI) severity, and denial of need. The aim of this study is to determine whether a performance- or informant-based screening test for CI is associated with trial enrollment and whether mode of administration influences one's decision to participate.
Method(s): We used cross-sectional data from patients and caregivers who visited the EDs of New York University (NYU) and Indianapolis University (IU) during screening for the Program of Intensive Support in Emergency Departments (ED) for Care Partners of Cognitively Impaired Patients (POISED), which is testing a care management intervention. We offered CI screening to patients >75 years using the Mini-Cog and if unable to do this, we offered their care partners the Short Portable Informant Questionnaire of Cognitive Decline (IQ-CODE). We used chi-square tests and logistic regression to determine whether likelihood of enrollment differed between screening tests and mode of administration: in-person versus telephone.
Result(s): We screened 8860 patients or care partners (dyads) between 3/3/2018-4/1/2021, of which n=2840 at NYU and n=660 at IU had positive screens. Of these 3500 dyads, 2142 had a positive Mini-Cog (<2) and 1358 had a positive IQ-CODE (>3.40). We enrolled 13.9% (n=297) of positive Mini-Cogs and 14.5% (n=309) of positive in-person IQ-CODEs. During the pandemic we conducted all IQCODEs by phone and enrolled 34% (n=196) of those who screened positive. Adjusting for age, sex, and gender, compared to Mini-Cog screening, only those having positive IQCODES by phone were more likely to enroll (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 3.75 (95% CI: 2.76, 5.11).
Conclusion(s): Higher enrollment using informant-based telephone screening after discharge suggests that care partner recognition of a problem and perhaps having less distraction from the ED visit may increase trial enrollment. Whether the pandemic was the predomant factor encouraging enrollment is unknown