Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:We investigated racial and ethnic disparities in telehealth counseling among Medicaid-insured patients in outpatient substance use disorder (SUD) treatment clinics and assessed whether the clinic-level proportion of Medicaid-insured patients moderated these disparities. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Using New York State (NYS) Medicaid and statewide treatment registry data, we analyzed 24,814 admission episodes across 399 outpatient SUD clinics during the first 6 months of COVID-19 (April-September 2020). Our outcome measure was the number of tele-counseling sessions within the first 90 days of treatment. Key independent variables included beneficiary race/ethnicity and the clinic-level proportion of Medicaid-insured patients, divided into four quartiles: lowest, second, third, and highest. Mixed effects negative binomial models assessed the associations between race/ethnicity, Medicaid proportions, and telehealth use, with interaction terms evaluating the moderating role of Medicaid proportions. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Black and Latinx patients received fewer telehealth sessions than non-Latinx White patients, with adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.91) for Black patients and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.98) for Latinx patients. Black patients at clinics with the highest Medicaid proportions had higher telehealth usage rates compared to those at clinics with the lowest Medicaid proportions (aIRR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.03-1.41). Patients in clinics with the highest Medicaid proportions were more likely to use individual telehealth counseling (aIRR, 1.02-1.88; 95% CI, 1.01-3.04). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Significant racial disparities in telehealth use exist, with variations persisting across clinics with different Medicaid proportions. Targeted interventions are needed to address these access gaps.

Despite the rise in chronic, untreated opioid use among pregnant women, their rate of receiving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) has remained stagnant since the mid-1990s. Using retrospective cross-sectional substance use treatment admissions data from 2015 to 2019, we examined access to treatment for opioid use by pregnant adults across 48 U.S. states. We found that younger adults, Black women, those referred to treatment by a criminal justice agency (e.g., judge, probation officer), those reporting polysubstance use, and those receiving treatment in residential settings were far less likely to receive MOUD (i.e., methadone, buprenorphine, naltrexone). We used multilevel analysis to examine the structural influence of state-level reproductive rights policies on pregnant women's access to MOUD. Adjusted counterfactual predictions reveal being admitted to treatment in a severely restrictive state context results in a significant decline in the likelihood of receiving MOUD, from 67% to 29%. We estimate 12,609 additional pregnant women seeking treatment for opioid use would have accessed first-line opioid pharmacotherapy if individuals in restrictive states had accessed medication at the same rate as those in more supportive states. Taken together, these findings offer insights into how reproductive rights serve as a structural determinant of health and safeguard for opioid medication treatment. We discuss the consequences of reversing reproductive rights policies amidst rising rates of drug overdose deaths among pregnant women along with the growing availability of illegally manufactured opioid analogs, as well as psychostimulant co-use, re-shaping overdose risk patterns in the U.S.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed various health risks and inequities experienced by international migrant workers. The number of migrant workers in the Republic of Korea (ROK) is rapidly growing and is expected to continue growing. Health related research on migrant workers in ROK is limited, especially among undocumented migrant workers who were more vulnerable to the pandemic. This study aims to examine the experiences of migrant workers and their knowledge and awareness of treatment and immigration policies during the pandemic. METHODS:We used data from the International Migrant Workers' COVID-19 Health Literacy and Access to Medical Care project, a cross-sectional survey conducted with international migrant workers residing in ROK in 2021 (n = 537). Descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models were employed to understand different demographic, occupational, and immigration factors affecting migrant workers' knowledge and awareness of treatment and immigration policies. RESULTS:Undocumented migrant workers had a longer length of residence in ROK and earned less compared to workers with work visa status. None of the undocumented migrant workers had access to health insurance since they were ineligible to enroll in the national health insurance scheme. In the early days of the pandemic, most undocumented migrant workers experienced a decrease in their average income. After adjusting for demographic differences and language proficiency, undocumented migrant workers (AOR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.78) were less likely to be aware of the policy allowing foreigners, including undocumented individuals, to access COVID-19 testing and treatment without the risk of deportation. Workers with a longer length of residence (AOR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.53) were more likely to be aware of this policy. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Undocumented migrant workers were often less informed about COVID-19 policies. While most of the survey respondents were knowledgeable about governmental policies regarding COVID-19 treatment and immigration, our results reveal multiple occupational and health insurance vulnerabilities of undocumented migrant workers living in ROK. More attention is needed to understand healthcare service barriers and how to provide adequate resources for this vulnerable population.

BACKGROUND:Overdose death rates for Hispanic people rose 2010-2022. Opioid overdose rates grew faster among Hispanic people than non-Hispanic White people ("White"). Medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is an effective but underutilized intervention for decreasing overdose risk. The Affordable Care Act ("ACA") should have increased MOUD use, but insurance and behavioral health reforms differed by state. We examined to what extent MOUD use increased post-ACA implementation and differed for Hispanic people (overall and by heritage group) compared to White people who used opioids ("clients"). METHODS:We analyzed first annual ambulatory care episodes (TEDS-A, 2009-2019) for working-age Hispanic (N= 76,591) and White (N=444,753) clients. We categorized Hispanic clients by heritage group (Puerto Rican, Mexican, or Other Hispanic). We grouped states by Medicaid expansion status (California, Other Expansion States, and Non-Expansion States). We used logistic regression to compare the odds of MOUD use pre/post ACA within racial/heritage groups, and, separately, between racial/heritage groups using pre-ACA White clients as a reference group. We used linear probability difference-in-differences to confirm changes in MOUD use between Hispanic and White clients. RESULTS:Among Hispanic clients in ambulatory care, MOUD use was lowest in the Non-Expansion States and highest in California. Nationally, only Puerto Rican and Other Hispanic heritage clients had higher odds of MOUD post-ACA compared to pre-ACA. Nationally and in Other Expansion States, Hispanic and White clients had similar increases in MOUD use post-ACA. CONCLUSIONS:MOUD use among Hispanic clients rose post-ACA, but differences remained between Hispanic heritage groups and between states.

BACKGROUND:Addressing the persistent treatment gap in substance use disorder (SUD) remains a critical challenge, with only 13 % of Americans with SUDs receiving necessary treatment. We explored the complexities of engaging in SUD treatment from patients' perspectives and aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of their treatment experiences. METHODS:We conducted semi-structured interviews with 34 patients who had been attending outpatient SUD clinics in New York State for 6 or less months. Participants were recruited from seven clinics using purposive sampling. Interviews were conducted between June and August 2022. We conducted thematic analysis of coded data to explore patients' experiences and preferences while navigating their treatment journeys. RESULTS:Critical elements for a positive treatment experience included cultural humility, confidentiality, consistency, trust, peer counselors with SUD experience, a strong sense of connection, and addressing needs beyond clinical settings. These included assistance with housing and employment, participation in external clinic events, and access to amenities like coffee and snacks. Participants favored holistic treatment approaches integrating mental health and involving peer recovery counselors. However, participants also identified ineffective aspects, including rigid and generic approaches, stigmatizing attitudes, and challenges related to communities and environmental influences. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The study highlights the multifaceted nature of outpatient SUD treatment, emphasizing the integration of patient-centered, holistic, and culturally competent approaches. Tailoring interventions to individual circumstances and acknowledging the diverse needs of patients are imperative for effective healthcare practices.

OBJECTIVE:Telehealth is an essential tool to provide access to care while reducing infection exposure for high-risk populations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study aims to examine factors associated with telehealth availability and usage among Medicare and dual-eligible recipients 1 year after implementation of the Medicare's temporary telehealth waiver. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANT/METHODS:A cross-sectional, phone survey with a national representative sample of Medicare recipients. We obtained a final study sample from the Winter 2021 COVID-19 Supplement of Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey dataset (N = 10 586). We examined associations for being offered and having had telehealth visits or any video telehealth visits during the pandemic since November 1, 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Our primary outcomes were being offered any telehealth, being offered any video telehealth, having had any telehealth visit, and having had any video telehealth. RESULTS:Although dual eligibility was not significantly associated with being offered or having had any telehealth services during the pandemic, those who were dual eligible were more likely to have had video telehealth visits (adjusted odds ratio = 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.86, P = .03) compared with those with non-dual eligibility. Recipients with disability eligibility, technology access, and severe chronic conditions were more likely to have been offered or have had telehealth. At the same time, those who lived in the nonmetropolitan area were less likely to have been offered or have had telehealth, including video telehealth. CONCLUSIONS:Our findings suggest that the federal waivers to expand telehealth services were successful in continuing care for vulnerable Medicare recipients. The providers' specific outreach and intervention efforts to offer telehealth visits are crucial for dual-eligible recipients. To increase video telehealth uptake, technology access and services to rural areas should be prioritized.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:This study estimated the prevalence of and factors associated with secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, and assessed attitudes and knowledge about SHS among pregnant women in Cairo, Egypt. METHODS:Pregnant women in the third trimester were recruited to participate in a survey assessing tobacco smoking and SHS exposure during their current pregnancy. Participants were recruited from three antenatal clinics in Cairo, Egypt, from June 2015 to May 2016. We examined differences in sociodemographic characteristics and SHS exposure, attitudes, and knowledge by smoking/SHS status. We used multivariable ordinary least squares regression to examine the association between husbands' smoking and pregnant women's mean daily hours of SHS exposure, adjusting for women's smoking status, age group, education, and urban (vs. suburban/rural) residence. RESULTS:Of two hundred pregnant women aged 16-37 years, about two-thirds (69%) had a husband who smoked tobacco. During their current pregnancy, most women reported being non-smokers (71%), and 38% of non-smokers reported being SHS-exposed. Non-smokers exposed to SHS tended to live in more rural areas and have husbands who smoked in the home. In adjusted analyses, having a husband who smoked was significantly associated with a greater mean number of hours of SHS exposure per day exposed, and this difference was driven by husbands who smoked in the home (p < 0.001). Women in the SHS-exposed group were less likely than other groups to agree that SHS exposure was harmful to their own or their future child's health; however, all groups agreed that SHS was harmful to newborn health. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Among our sample of pregnant women in Cairo, Egypt, there was a high rate of SHS exposure as well as misconceptions about the safety of SHS exposure to a developing fetus. Our findings suggest a need for targeted education and gender-sensitive messaging about SHS exposure, along with improved enforcement of existing tobacco control policies.