Faculty Bibliography

Background/UNASSIGNED:While Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccines are highly effective, breakthrough infections are occurring. Booster vaccinations have recently received emergency use authorization (EUA) for certain populations but are restricted to homologous mRNA vaccines. We evaluated homologous and heterologous booster vaccination in persons who had received an EUA Covid-19 vaccine regimen. Methods/UNASSIGNED:virus particles, or Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 30-μg; nine combinations). The primary outcomes were safety, reactogenicity, and humoral immunogenicity on study days 15 and 29. Results/UNASSIGNED:458 individuals were enrolled: 154 received mRNA-1273, 150 received Ad26.CoV2.S, and 153 received BNT162b2 booster vaccines. Reactogenicity was similar to that reported for the primary series. Injection site pain, malaise, headache, and myalgia occurred in more than half the participants. Booster vaccines increased the neutralizing activity against a D614G pseudovirus (4.2-76-fold) and binding antibody titers (4.6-56-fold) for all combinations; homologous boost increased neutralizing antibody titers 4.2-20-fold whereas heterologous boost increased titers 6.2-76-fold. Day 15 neutralizing and binding antibody titers varied by 28.7-fold and 20.9-fold, respectively, across the nine prime-boost combinations. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Homologous and heterologous booster vaccinations were well-tolerated and immunogenic in adults who completed a primary Covid-19 vaccine regimen at least 12 weeks earlier. (Funded by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Clinical Trials.gov number, NCT04889209 ).

Disseminated strongyloidiasis and hyperinfection syndrome can cause significant morbidity and mortality after transplantation. Screening and treatment prior to transplantation can reduce or prevent this disease. Targeted screening of transplant candidates, based on assessed risk, fails to identify all who would benefit. We implemented universal serology-based screening for Strongyloides at our transplant center, located in a non-endemic area. Of 200 transplant candidates who were evaluated for cardiothoracic transplant from January 2018 to June 2019, 169 were screened serologically and 21 (12.4%) were seropositive. Among seropositive patients, 57% reported travel to an endemic region, 38% were born outside the USA, 38% had eosinophilia, 5% had history of gram-negative bacteremia. We estimate that universal screening for strongyloidiasis could identify an average of 17 additional candidates for preventive treatment for every 200 transplant candidates.

The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted LGBTQ+ communities. Many disparities mirror those of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. These health inequities have repeated throughout history due to the structural oppression of LGBTQ+ people. We aim to demonstrate that the familiar patterns of LGBTQ+ health disparities reflect a perpetuating, deeply rooted cycle of injustice imposed on LGBTQ+ people. Here, we contextualize COVID-19 inequities through the history of the HIV/AIDS crisis, describe manifestations of LGBTQ+ structural oppression exacerbated by the pandemic, and provide recommendations for medical professionals and institutions seeking to reduce health inequities.

Improving long-term protective immunity elicited by prime-boost vaccinations requires a deeper understanding of the immunologic outcomes of different vaccine platforms. Given the variety of platforms used to develop vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, we reasoned that SARS-CoV-2 offered an opportunity to compare vaccine platforms in humans. We used flow cytometry and single-cell transcriptomics to explore the B cell response to different homologous and heterologous vaccine regimens. We found that an adenovirus vector prime followed by a messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine boost showed the greatest short-term B cell expansion and preferentially elicited an activated atypical B cell subset that was associated with antibody binding titers against spike protein. In contrast, an mRNA primary series followed by homologous boost induced a different activated B cell subset with more proliferative potential and high frequencies of a long-lived resting memory subset. Moreover, immunoglobulin A (IgA)-expressing memory B cells had more somatic hypermutations than the predominant IgG-expressing B cell population. This heterogeneity in vaccine-elicited B cell responses underscores the potential of tailoring vaccine regimens that combine different platforms to achieve potent and durable protection against infectious diseases.

In the Coronavirus Variant Immunologic Landscape Trial (COVAIL) conducted in the United States in 2022-2023, 985 participants received a second COVID-19 booster with one of twelve monovalent or bivalent mRNA inserts. Pseudovirus serum inhibitory dilution 50% neutralizing antibody titer (nAb titer) measured two-weeks post booster significantly associated with lower COVID-19 incidence over six months follow-up in this trial. COVAIL investigators sequenced SARS-CoV-2 Spike amino acid sequences for all COVID-19 cases, with a sequence successfully obtained from 129 of 195 cases. For COVID-19 endpoint cases we calculated five distances of the case-causing sequence to a reference sequence, the first two physico-chemical weighted Hamming distances of Spike or receptor binding domain (RBD) to a participant's nearest Spike or RBD vaccine-insert sequence, and the other three estimated degrees of neutralizing antibody escape from the XBB.1.5 RBD strain calculated with deep mutational scanning. Hypothesizing that the nAb titer correlate of risk may have a stronger association with COVID-19 when focusing on COVID-19 infections more closely matched to the vaccine insert in Spike or RBD amino acid sequence or with lower RBD antibody escape score, we tested this hypothesis for the combined group receiving a monovalent Prototype (ancestral strain) booster (n = 143) and for the combined group receiving an Omicron-containing booster (n = 744). For both combined groups, the nAb titer correlate of risk did not significantly vary across any of the assessed sequence distances from the vaccine insert (all p-values >0.10), although RBD Hamming distance had point estimates consistent with a weakening correlate with distance, motivating further exploration in settings with greater antigenic heterogeneity. Indeed, statistical power was bounded by the limited antigenic variability of viruses infecting trial participants over the follow-up period (April 21, 2022 to May 25, 2023), which spanned only a 3.02-fold nAb titer range of differential sensitivity to sera from XBB.1.5-infected individuals. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05289037.

BACKGROUND:Mucosal immunity plays a critical role in preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and replication. Understanding the capacity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines to elicit both mucosal and systemic antibodies could help optimize vaccination strategies. METHODS:We conducted an open-label, phase 1/2 adaptive-design clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of COVID-19 immunizations. Healthy adults received 2 priming doses of mRNA-1273, a booster dose of mRNA-1273, and a second booster of bivalent (WA-1 and BA.4/BA.5) mRNA-1273.222. Adverse event data were collected. Serum and mucosal immunity were evaluated. RESULTS:One hundred six persons were enrolled. Thirty received all 4 study-related vaccine doses. All vaccines were well tolerated, with injection site pain, malaise, myalgias, and headache being the most frequently reported symptoms. Among those who received a second booster, 24 of 30 (80%) had serological evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Following the second booster, increases in geometric mean binding and pseudovirus neutralization antibody titers to the ancestral strain and BA.1 and BA.5 variants were observed. Increases in mucosal immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies in nasal and salivary samples were observed in both previously infected and infection-naive participants, although prior infection markedly boosted virus-specific mucosal IgA responses. CONCLUSIONS:The mRNA-1273.222 booster vaccine was safe and immunogenic and induced mucosal antibody responses in previously infected and infection-naive persons. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:NCT04889209.

Since its establishment in 1962, the Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units (VTEUs) have employed cutting-edge technologies to develop novel vaccines and therapeutics to mitigate emerging public health threats in the United States and globally. Clinical trial innovation has been the hallmark of these efforts as novel approaches to testing countermeasures are investigated in pace with advances in technology and evolving public health needs. The spectrum of trials conducted by the VTEUs ranges from proof-of-concept or first-in-human phase 1 to late-phase trials that establish efficacy and inform licensure decisions or "real world" vaccine usage such as with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and rotavirus mix-and-match trials aimed to inform standard of care. The VTEUs have also been instrumental in developing experimental wild-type challenge studies to preliminarily assess vaccine immunogenicity against influenza, shigellosis, cholera, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, enteropathogenic E. coli, and malaria to help select promising vaccine candidates for further development. During the COVID-19 pandemic, novel strategies for recruitment and improved accessibility of vaccine clinical trials emerged. However, the pandemic also highlighted the need for improved representation in clinical trials and underscored the importance of community engagement. As we consider what challenges to address in the upcoming years, engagement of the population in clinical trials is critical to establishing safety and efficacy and community acceptance of vaccines and therapeutics. It is imperative to develop skills that engender community advocacy while staying on the cutting edge of science, henceforth serving as the guideposts for new frontiers in clinical trial innovation.

UNLABELLED:The 2022 global outbreak of clade IIb mpox was the first major outbreak of mpox outside of African nations. To control the outbreak, public health officials began vaccination campaigns using the third-generation orthopoxvirus vaccine modified vaccinia Ankara from Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN). Prior to this outbreak, the durability of monkeypox virus (MPXV)-specific immunity induced by MVA-BN was poorly understood. In 2022, we launched the New York City Observational Study of Mpox Immunity (NYC OSMI, NCT05654883), a longitudinal study of 171 participants comprising MVA-BN vaccines and mpox convalescent individuals. Peripheral blood sampling was performed at intervals including prior to vaccination, after one dose, and after the second dose. MVA-BN vaccinees with and without a history of smallpox vaccination demonstrated detectable MPXV-specific memory B cells at 1-year post-vaccination. Additionally, MVA-BN increased MPXV neutralizing titers in smallpox vaccine-naïve vaccinees, with a comparable maximum titer reached in naïve and smallpox vaccine-experienced vaccinees. However, neutralizing titers returned to baseline within 5-7 months for naïve individuals, while remaining elevated in those with prior smallpox vaccination. Both naïve and experienced individuals generated robust IgG responses against MPXV H3 and A35, but naïve vaccinees' IgG responses showed lower avidity than experienced vaccinees. These data highlight a low avidity antibody response elicited by MVA-BN that is short-lived in naïve vaccinees. This work supports the need for long-term studies on protection induced by MVA-BN, including the potential need for booster doses as well as the development of next-generation orthopoxvirus vaccines. IMPORTANCE/OBJECTIVE:The ongoing outbreaks of mpox demonstrate the continuing threat of orthopoxviruses to global health. While previous orthopoxvirus vaccines generated lifelong antibody and cellular immunity, we show here that the current mpox vaccine, MVA-BN or JYNNEOS, fails to induce durable antibody immunity in individuals with no prior smallpox vaccination. This raises the important question of whether MVA-BN vaccinees have long-term protection from mpox. Our work highlights the need for further studies into the durability of protection generated by MVA-BN as well as whether subsequent booster doses are necessary to maintain protection.