Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:



Total Results:


Prednisone -- Responsive Hypercalcemia in a Patient With IgG4 Disease and Elevated Serum PTHrP Levels [Meeting Abstract]

Cohen, Melissa; Sanchez, Julienne; Toft, Daniel Joseph; Eisenberg, Yuval; Kukreja, Subhash C
ISSN: 2472-1972
CID: 5007252

Primary Adrenal Insufficiency after COVID-19 Infection [Meeting Abstract]

Perez, Julienne Sanchez; Cohen, Melissa; Zapater, Joseph L; Eisenberg, Yuval
ISSN: 1530-891x
CID: 5007242

Sinonasal Papilloma Masquerading as a Pituitary Macroadenoma [Meeting Abstract]

Cohen, Melissa; Wilson, John IV; Toft, Daniel Joseph
ISSN: 2472-1972
CID: 5007322

Method of detection of thyroid nodules: correlation with frequency of fine-needle aspiration and malignancy rate

Rothberger, Gary D; Cohen, Melissa; Sahay, Priya; Szczepanczyk, Paula T; Islam, Shahidul
BACKGROUND:Thyroid nodules are commonly found by screening, and the clinical implications are unclear. METHODS:We retrospectively studied 460 patients who were evaluated for thyroid nodules. Medical records were queried to determine how the nodules were detected. We compared the rates of fine needle aspiration (FNA) and malignancy between nodules detected clinically, incidentally on imaging, or by screening. RESULTS:Nodules were detected clinically in 184 patients (40%), incidentally in 121 patients (26%), and by screening in 155 patients (34%). The rates of FNA and malignancy were lower for patients with nodules detected by screening (28% and 1%, respectively), compared to patients with clinically apparent nodules (75% and 15%) and patients with incidental nodules (69% and 8% [P < .001]). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Thyroid nodules detected via screening has a lower rate of FNA and is less likely to be diagnosed as a malignancy compared to nodules detected clinically or incidentally on imaging. Thyroid ultrasound examinations should be reserved for nodules that are clinically apparent or to evaluate nodules found incidentally on imaging.
PMID: 31613420
ISSN: 1097-0347
CID: 4158942

Utilizing quantitative measures of visceral adiposity in evaluating trauma patient outcomes

Docimo, Salvatore Jr; Lamparello, Brooke; Cohen, Melissa Fay; Kopatsis, Anthony; Vinces, Fausto
INTRODUCTION: Body mass index (BMI) has commonly been used as a parameter to assess obesity in trauma patients. However, the variability of height and weight data in trauma patients limits the use of BMI as an accurate assessment tool in the trauma population. Quantitative radiologic measurements of visceral adiposity is an accurate method for assessing obesity in patients but requires further analysis before it can be accepted as a measurement tool for trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of trauma cases with pre-operative CT scan from 2008 to 2015 produced 57 patients for evaluation. Preoperative BMI was calculated using measured height (m2) and weight (kg). Radiologic measurements of adiposity were obtained from preoperative CT scans using OsiriX DICOM viewer software. Visceral fat areas (VFA) and subcutaneous fat areas (SFA) were measured from a single axial slice at the level of L4-L5 intervertebral space. RESULTS: No statistically significant results were found relating visceral fat:subcutaneous fat ratios to length of stay or post-operative complications. Initial clinical observations noting an increased incidence of complications among patients with a V/S >/= 0.4 demonstrates a possible link between obesity and poor outcomes in trauma patients. A statistically significant correlation was noted between length of stay, peri-nephric fat and injury severity score. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our pilot study should be viewed as the foundation for a larger prospective study, utilizing quantitative measurements of visceral adiposity to assess outcomes in trauma patients.
PMID: 26166742
ISSN: 1743-9159
CID: 1739962