Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is effective for patients with medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia with a 75%-90% response rate. Consideration of the integral dose (ID) to the target nerve within the 50% isodose line was reported to help select prescription doses to maximize effectiveness and minimize bothersome numbness. The objective of this study was to externally validate the ID as a predictor of outcomes after SRS. METHODS:We reviewed the outcomes and parameters of 94 consecutive patients of type 1 trigeminal neuralgia who had SRS for the first time where nerve ID was calculated. 70% of the prescription doses were 80 Gy, with 28% at 85 Gy, and 2% at 70 Gy. RESULTS:The median follow-up time was 14.4 months. A total of 85 (90%) patients reported significant pain relief (Barrow Neurological Institute I-III) after initial SRS. The median pain recurrence-free survival was 82 months (95% CI 41.1-NA), and estimates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 80.5%, 65.5%, and 55.9%, respectively. The ID was not significantly associated with initial pain relief, or affect the risk of pain recurrence or sensory dysfunction after SRS using the Cox proportional hazards model. A nerve mean dose ≥65 Gy was associated with a reduced risk of pain recurrence on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.408, P = .039). Twenty (21%) patients experienced sensory dysfunction after SRS with 3 (3%) requiring further medications, which was not correlated with the prescription dose or brainstem maximum dose. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The ID did not predict recurrence-free survival or sensory dysfunction. Our observations suggest improved nerve coverage by the most powerful area of the isocenter, for instance, by targeting a narrower segment if feasible, could result in more durable pain relief. Further studies to validate these findings are needed.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Radiation myelitis (RM) is a rare complication of radiation therapy (RT). The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic spinal cord task force aimed to identify RT dose effects and assess risk factors for RM in children. Through systematic review, we analyzed RT dose, fraction size, latency between completion of RT and toxicity, chemotherapy use, age when irradiated, and sex. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:We conducted literature searches of peer-reviewed manuscripts published from 1964 to June 2017 evaluating RM among children. Normality of variables was assessed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov or Shapiro-Wilk tests. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to test correlations between RT dose/fraction size and latency between RT and development of toxicity. RESULTS:Of 1329 identified and screened reports, 144 reports were fully reviewed and determined to have adequate data for analysis; 16 of these reports had a total of 33 cases of RM with a median age of 13 years (range, 0.2-18) at the time of RT. The most common primary tumor histologies were rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 9), medulloblastoma (n = 5), and Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 2); the most common chemotherapy agents given were vincristine (n = 15), intrathecal methotrexate (n = 12), and intrathecal cytarabine (n = 10). The median RT dose and fraction size were 40 Gy (range, 24-57.4 Gy) and 1.8 Gy (range, 1.3-2.6 Gy), respectively. RT dose resulting in RM in patients who also received chemotherapy was lower than in those not receiving chemotherapy (mean 39.6 vs 49.7 Gy; P = .04). There was no association of age with RT dose. The median latency period was 7 months (range, 1-29). Higher RT dose was correlated with longer latency periods (P = .03) to RM whereas sex, age, fraction size, and chemotherapy use were not. Two of 17 patients with adequate follow-up recovered from RM; unfortunately, it was fatal in 6 of 15 evaluable patients. Complication probability modeling was not possible because of the rarity of events. CONCLUSIONS:This report demonstrates a relatively short latency from RT (with or without chemotherapy) to RM and a wide range of doses (including fraction sizes) associated with RM. No apparent association with age at the time of RT could be discerned. Chemotherapy appears to reduce spinal cord tolerance. Recovery from RM is rare, and it is often fatal.

Radiation therapy is part of a multimodality treatment approach to lung cancer. The radiologist must be aware of both the expected and the unexpected imaging findings of the post-radiation therapy patient, including the time course for development of post- radiation therapy pneumonitis and fibrosis. In this review, a brief discussion of radiation therapy techniques and indications is presented, followed by an image-heavy differential diagnostic approach. The review focuses on computed tomography imaging examples to help distinguish normal postradiation pneumonitis and fibrosis from alternative complications, such as infection, local recurrence, or radiation-induced malignancy.

In this review, we cover the current understanding of how radiation therapy, which uses ionizing radiation to kill cancer cells, mediates an anti-tumor immune response through the cGAS-STING pathway, and how STING agonists might potentiate this. We examine how cGAS-STING signaling mediates the release of inflammatory cytokines in response to nuclear and mitochondrial DNA entering the cytoplasm. The significance of this in the context of cancer is explored, such as in response to cell-damaging therapies and genomic instability. The contribution of the immune and non-immune cells in the tumor microenvironment is considered. This review also discusses the burgeoning understanding of STING signaling that is independent of inflammatory cytokine release and the various mechanisms by which cancer cells can evade STING signaling. We review the available data on how ionizing radiation stimulates cGAS-STING signaling as well as how STING agonists may potentiate the anti-tumor immune response induced by ionizing radiation. There is also discussion of how novel radiation modalities may affect cGAS-STING signaling. We conclude with a discussion of ongoing and planned clinical trials combining radiation therapy with STING agonists, and provide insights to consider when planning future clinical trials combining these treatments.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Standard therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant durvalumab. For biomarker-selected patients with LA-NSCLC, we hypothesized that sequential pembrolizumab and risk-adapted radiotherapy, without chemotherapy, would be well-tolerated and effective. METHODS:Patients with stage III NSCLC or unresectable stage II NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were eligible for this trial. Patients with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥50% received three cycles of induction pembrolizumab (200 mg, once every 21 days), followed by a 20-fraction course of risk-adapted thoracic radiotherapy (55 Gy delivered to tumors or lymph nodes with metabolic volume exceeding 20 cc, 48 Gy delivered to smaller lesions), followed by consolidation pembrolizumab to complete a 1-year treatment course. The primary study end point was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included response rates after induction pembrolizumab, overall survival (OS), and adverse events. RESULTS:Twenty-five patients with a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50% were enrolled. The median age was 71, most patients (88%) had stage IIIA or IIIB disease, and the median PD-L1 TPS was 75%. Two patients developed disease progression during induction pembrolizumab, and two patients discontinued pembrolizumab after one infusion because of immune-related adverse events. Using RECIST criteria, 12 patients (48%) exhibited a partial or complete response after induction pembrolizumab. Twenty-four patients (96%) received definitive thoracic radiotherapy. The 1-year PFS rate is 76%, satisfying our efficacy objective. One- and 2-year OS rates are 92% and 76%, respectively. The most common grade 3 adverse events were colitis (n = 2, 8%) and esophagitis (n = 2, 8%), and no higher-grade treatment-related adverse events have occurred. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Pembrolizumab and risk-adapted radiotherapy, without chemotherapy, are a promising treatment approach for patients with LA-NSCLC with a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50%.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Dose selection for brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) classically has been based on tumor diameter with a reduction of dose in the settings of prior brain irradiation, larger tumor volumes, and critical brain location. However, retrospective series have shown local control rates to be suboptimal with reduced doses. We hypothesized that lower doses could be effective for specific tumor biologies with concomitant systemic therapies. This study aims to report the local control (LC) and toxicity when using low-dose SRS in the era of modern systemic therapy. METHODS:We reviewed 102 patients with 688 tumors managed between 2014 and 2021 who had low-margin dose radiosurgery, defined as ≤14 Gy. Tumor control was correlated with demographic, clinical, and dosimetric data. RESULTS:The main primary cancer types were lung in 48 (47.1%), breast in 31 (30.4%), melanoma in 8 (7.8%), and others in 15 patients (11.7%). The median tumor volume was 0.037cc (0.002-26.31 cm3), and the median margin dose was 14 Gy (range 10-14). The local failure (LF) cumulative incidence at 1 and 2 years was 6% and 12%, respectively. On competing risk regression analysis, larger volume, melanoma histology, and margin dose were predictors of LF. The 1-year and 2-year cumulative incidence of adverse radiation effects (ARE: an adverse imaging-defined response includes increased enhancement and peritumoral edema) was 0.8% and 2%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:It is feasible to achieve acceptable LC in BMs with low-dose SRS. Volume, melanoma histology, and margin dose seem to be predictors for LF. The value of a low-dose approach may be in the management of patients with higher numbers of small or adjacent tumors with a history of whole brain radio therapy or multiple SRS sessions and in tumors in critical locations with the aim of LC and preservation of neurological function.

INTRODUCTION:Radiation therapy is a promising modality for treating keloids after surgical excision. However, it is currently not standard practice among physicians because of concern surrounding the risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers, especially among pediatric patients. There is minimal research assessing the complications for radiation therapy in keloid management. AIM:The goal of this study was to determine radiation oncologists' perspectives about the utility and appropriateness of radiation therapy for keloid management in both adult and pediatric patients. This study also aimed to characterize radiation modality, dose, fractionation, and secondary complications observed by providers. METHODS:An electronic survey was delivered to 3102 members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology. The survey subjects were radiation oncologists who are currently practicing in the United States. Rates of responses were analyzed. RESULTS:A total of 114 responses from practicing radiation oncologists were received. Of these, 113 providers (99.1%) supported radiation therapy for keloid management in adults, whereas only 54.9% supported radiation therapy for pediatric patients. Of 101 providers that treated adults in the past year, the majority used external beam: electrons (84.2%), applied 3 fraction regimens (54.4%), and delivered radiation within 24 hours postexcision (45.5%). In pediatric patients, only 42 providers reported treating at least 1 patient. The majority used electron beam radiation (76.2%), applied 3 faction regimens (65%), and delivered radiation on the same day of keloid excision (50.0%) The main concern when treating pediatric patients were risk of secondary malignancy (92.1%). CONCLUSION:Although radiation therapy appears to be a widely accepted adjuvant treatment option for adults with keloids, the use of radiation therapy for pediatric patients is less widely accepted because of concerns regarding secondary malignancy. The findings suggest additional studies need to be carried out to assess the risk of those complications.

Purpose/Objective(s): Radiation therapy-induced cell death produces cytosolic DNA that activates the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-STimulator of INterferon Genes (STING) pathway, crucial for the induction of Type I interferons (IFN-I). Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) resistance mechanisms have been linked to impaired IFN signaling. Preclinical data have shown STING agonists to reverse CPI resistance in tumors with prior exposure, particularly when used with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. TAK-676 (a synthetic STING agonist) potently modulates the innate immune system, leading to cytokine release, adaptive immune activation, and antitumor responses in preclinical studies (Appleman et al., AACR 2022). TAK-676 is being investigated as a single agent, and in combination with pembrolizumab, for advanced solid tumors, in a first-in-human phase 1 study (NCT04420884). TAK-676 is optimally designed for intravenous (IV) delivery, with a prolonged half-life in serum and enhanced tissue permeability, allowing access to tumor sites and lymphatic tissue. Following radiation therapy, TAK-676 has the potential to stimulate T-cell mediated antitumor immunity via STING-mediated IFN-I release, particularly when used with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. Here, we present a second phase 1 study to investigate the safety and preliminary antitumor activity of TAK-676 in combination with pembrolizumab following radiation therapy, in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, TNBC, or SCCHN who have progressed on CPIs (NCT04879849). Materials/Methods: Patients aged >=18 years who progressed on CPIs and have >=2 lesions, of which one is targetable with radiation, are being enrolled. Patients receive 8 Gy x 3 followed by (after a minimum of 40 hours) escalating doses of IV TAK-676 on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 21-day cycle, and 200 mg of IV pembrolizumab on day 1 of each cycle until disease progression, intolerance, or withdrawal of consent. Dose escalation of TAK-676 will be guided by the Bayesian Optimal Interval design. At screening and between days 15-21 of cycle 1, patients with a safely accessible lesion outside of the radiation field will have paired biopsies collected once the pharmacologically active dose levels of TAK-676 have been observed. The primary objective is to determine the safety and tolerability of TAK-676 in combination with pembrolizumab following radiation therapy. Secondary objectives are to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of TAK-676 in combination with pembrolizumab following radiation therapy, and to assess the local (within the radiation field) and systemic (non-radiated lesions) preliminary antitumor activity. As of February 2022, ~10% of the planned patients have been enrolled.
Result(s): TBD
Conclusion(s): TBD
Copyright