Faculty Bibliography

Background: Bone sarcomas present a unique diagnostic challenge because of the considerable morphologic overlap between different entities. The choice of optimal treatment, however, is dependent upon accurate diagnosis. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling has emerged as a new approach to aid in the diagnosis of brain tumors, with diagnostic accuracy exceeding standard histopathology. In this work we developed and validated a methylation based classifier to differentiate between osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, and synovial sarcoma. Methods: DNA methylation status of 482,421 CpG sites in 15 osteosarcoma, 10 Ewing's sarcoma, and 11 synovial sarcoma samples were measured using the Illumina HumanMethylation450 array. From this training set of 36 samples we developed a random forest classifier using the 400 most differentially methylated CpG sites (FDR q value < 0.001). This classifier was then validated on 10 synovial sarcoma samples from TCGA, 86 osteosarcoma samples from TARGET-OS, and 15 Ewing's sarcoma from a recently published series (Huertas-Martinez et al., Cancer Letters 2016). Results: Methylation profiling revealed three distinct molecular clusters, each enriched with a single sarcoma subtype. Within the validation cohorts, all samples from TCGA were correctly classified as synovial sarcoma (10/10, sensitivity and specificity 100%). All but one sample from TARGET-OS were classified as osteosarcoma (85/86, sensitivity 98%, specificity 100%) and all but one sample from the Ewing's sarcoma series was classified as Ewing's sarcoma (14/15, sensitivity 93%, specificity 100%). The single misclassified osteosarcoma sample was classified as Ewing's sarcoma, and was later determined to be a misdiagnosed Ewing's sarcoma based on RNA-Seq demonstrating high EWRS1 and ETV1 expression. An additional clinical sample that was misdiagnosed as a synovial sarcoma by initial histolopathology, was accurately recognized as osteosarcoma by the methylation classifier. Conclusions: Osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma and synovial sarcoma have distinct epigenetic profiles. Our validated methylation-based classifier can be used to provide an accurate diagnosis when histological and standard techniques are inconclusive

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy suffer from increased complications and inferior outcomes compared with those not irradiated, but advances in radiation delivery have allowed for more nuanced therapy. The authors investigated whether these advances impact patient outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified all implant-based reconstructions performed at a single institution from November of 2010 to November of 2013. These data were cross-referenced with a registry of patients undergoing breast irradiation. Patient demographics, treatment characteristics, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-six patients (533 reconstructions) were not irradiated, whereas 83 patients (125 reconstructions) received radiation therapy; mean follow-up was 24.7 months versus 26.0 months (p = 0.49). Overall complication rates were higher in the irradiated group (35.2 percent versus 14.4 percent; p < 0.01). Increased maximum radiation doses to the skin were associated with complications (maximum dose to skin, p = 0.05; maximum dose to 1 cc of skin, p = 0.01). Different treatment modalities (e.g., three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, field-in-field, and hybrid techniques) did not impact complication rates. Prone versus supine positioning significantly decreased the maximum skin dose (58.5 Gy versus 61.7 Gy; p = 0.05), although this did not translate to significantly decreased complication rates in analysis of prone versus supine positioning. CONCLUSIONS: As radiation techniques evolve, the maximum dose to skin should be given consideration similar to that for heart and lung dosing, to optimize reconstructive outcomes. Prone positioning significantly decreases the maximum skin dose and trends toward significance in reducing reconstructive complications. With continued study, this may become clinically important. Interdepartmental studies such as this one ensure quality of care. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Purpose/UNASSIGNED:Pediatric sarcomas provide a unique diagnostic challenge. There is considerable morphologic overlap between entities, increasing the importance of molecular studies in the diagnosis, treatment, and identification of therapeutic targets. We developed and validated a genome-wide DNA methylation based classifier to differentiate between osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, and synovial sarcoma. Materials and Methods/UNASSIGNED:DNA methylation status of 482,421 CpG sites in 10 Ewing's sarcoma, 11 synovial sarcoma, and 15 osteosarcoma samples were determined using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 array. We developed a random forest classifier trained from the 400 most differentially methylated CpG sites within the training set of 36 sarcoma samples. This classifier was validated on data drawn from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) synovial sarcoma, TARGET Osteosarcoma, and a recently published series of Ewing's sarcoma. Results/UNASSIGNED:Methylation profiling revealed three distinct patterns, each enriched with a single sarcoma subtype. Within the validation cohorts, all samples from TCGA were accurately classified as synovial sarcoma (10/10, sensitivity and specificity 100%), all but one sample from TARGET-OS were classified as osteosarcoma (85/86, sensitivity 98%, specificity 100%) and 14/15 Ewing's sarcoma samples classified correctly (sensitivity 93%, specificity 100%). The single misclassified osteosarcoma sample demonstrated high EWSR1 and ETV1 expression on RNA-seq although no fusion was found on manual curation of the transcript sequence. Two additional clinical samples, that were difficult to classify by morphology and molecular methods, were classified as osteosarcoma when previously suspected to be a synovial sarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma on initial diagnosis, respectively. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Osteosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and Ewing's sarcoma have distinct epigenetic profiles. Our validated methylation-based classifier can be used to provide diagnostic assistance when histological and standard techniques are inconclusive.

BACKGROUND:The majority of chemoradiation (CRT) trials for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have relied on platinum-based chemotherapy regimens administered every-3-weeks. However, given the increased utilization of weekly platinum regimens, it remains unclear how different chemotherapy schedules compare regarding efficacy and toxicity. METHODS:We retrospectively identified 212 patients with HNSCC who were treated at a single academic medical center with concurrent platinum-based CRT given weekly (N = 68) or every-three-weeks (N = 144). JMP version 10 (SAS Institute) was used for statistical analysis. Discrete variables were compared with the chi-square test and differences in the medians were assessed using the Wilcoxon test. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method and significance was assessed using the log rank test. For univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, we used Cox proportional hazard or logistic regression models to compare differences in survival or differences in categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS:Patients receiving weekly platinum regimens were more likely to be older (median age 61.4 vs. 55.5 y; P < .001), have high or very high Charlson comorbidity index (45.6% vs. 27.8%; P = .01), and receive carboplatin-based chemotherapy (6.3% vs. 76.5%; P < .001). Weekly and every-3-week platinum regimens had similar locoregional control (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.63-1.88; P = .72), progression-free survival (HR 1.13; 95% CI 0.75-1.69; P = .55), and overall survival (HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.64-1.86; P = .71). Every-3-weeks platinum regimens were associated with increased days of hospitalization (median: 3 days vs. 0 days; P = .03) and acute kidney injury (AKI) during radiotherapy (50.0% vs. 22.1%; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, AKI was significantly associated with every-3-weeks regimens (OR: 24.38; 95% CI 3.00-198.03; P = .003) and high comorbidity scores (OR: 2.74; 95% CI 2.15-5.99; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS:Our results suggest that every-3-weeks and weekly platinum-containing CRT regimens have similar disease control but weekly platinum regimens are associated with less acute toxicity.

PURPOSE: Maximum dose to the left anterior descending artery (LADmax) is an important physical constraint to reduce the risk of cardiovascular toxicity. We generated a simple algorithm to guide the positioning of the tangent fields to reliably maintain LADmax <10 Gy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dosimetric plans from 146 consecutive women treated prone to the left breast enrolled in prospective protocols of accelerated whole breast radiation therapy, with a concomitant daily boost to the tumor bed (40.5 Gy/15 fraction to the whole breast and 48 Gy to the tumor bed), provided the training set for algorithm development. Scatter plots and correlation coefficients were used to describe the bivariate relationships between LADmax and several parameters: distance from the tumor cavity to the tangent field edge, cavity size, breast separation, field size, and distance from the tangent field. A logistic sigmoid curve was used to model the relationship of LADmax and the distance from the tangent field. Furthermore, we tested this prediction model on a validation data set of 53 consecutive similar patients. RESULTS: A lack of linear relationships between LADmax and distance from cavity to LAD (-0.47), cavity size (-0.18), breast separation (-0.02), or field size (-0.28) was observed. In contrast, distance from the tangent field was highly negatively correlated to LADmax (-0.84) and was used in the models to predict LADmax. From a logistic sigmoid model we selected a cut-point of 2.46 mm (95% confidence interval, 2.19-2.74 mm) greater than which LADmax is <10 Gy (95% confidence interval, 9.30-10.72 Gy) and LADmean is <3.3 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Placing the edge of the tangents at least 2.5 mm from the closest point of the contoured LAD is likely to assure LADmax is <10 Gy and LADmean is <3.3 Gy in patients treated with prone accelerated breast radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To identify differences in breast cancer patient-reported quality of life (QOL) between 2 radiation tumor bed boost dose regimens. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four hundred patients with stage 0, I, or II breast cancer who underwent segmental mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy and/or axillary node dissection were treated with either a daily or weekly boost. Patients were treated prone to 40.5 Gy/15 fractions to the whole breast, 5 days per week. Patients were randomized to a concomitant daily boost to the tumor bed of 0.5 Gy, or a weekly boost of 2 Gy on Friday. Patients completed 6 validated QOL survey instruments at baseline, last week of treatment (3 weeks), 45-60 days from the completion of radiation treatment, and at 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: There were no statistically significance differences in responses to the 6 QOL instruments between the daily and weekly radiation boost regimens, even after adjustment for important covariates. However, several changes in responses over time occurred in both arms, including worsening functional status, cosmetic status, and breast-specific pain at the end of treatment as compared with before and 45 to 60 days after the conclusion of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-breast, prone intensity modulated radiation has similar outcomes in QOL measures whether given with a daily or weekly boost. This trial has generated the foundation for a current study of weekly versus daily radiation boost in women with early breast cancer in which 3-dimensional conformal radiation is allowed as a prospective stratification factor.

PURPOSE: To report the results of a prospective randomized trial comparing a daily versus weekly boost to the tumor cavity during the course of accelerated radiation to the breast with patients in the prone position. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2009 to 2012, 400 patients with stage 0 to II breast cancer who had undergone segmental mastectomy participated in an institutional review board-approved trial testing prone breast radiation therapy to 40.5 Gy in 15 fractions 5 d/wk to the whole breast, after randomization to a concomitant daily boost to the tumor bed of 0.5 Gy, or a weekly boost of 2 Gy, on Friday. The present noninferiority trial tested the primary hypothesis that a weekly boost produced no more acute toxicity than did a daily boost. The recurrence-free survival was estimated for both treatment arms using the Kaplan-Meier method; the relative risk of recurrence or death was estimated, and the 2 arms were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: At a median follow-up period of 45 months, no deaths related to breast cancer had occurred. The weekly boost regimen produced no more grade >/=2 acute toxicity than did the daily boost regimen (8.1% vs 10.4%; noninferiority Z = -2.52; P=.006). No statistically significant difference was found in the cumulative incidence of long-term fibrosis or telangiectasia of grade >/=2 between the 2 arms (log-rank P=.923). Two local and two distant recurrences developed in the daily treatment arm and three local and one distant developed in the weekly arm. The 4-year recurrence-free survival rate was not different between the 2 treatment arms (98% for both arms). CONCLUSIONS: A tumor bed boost delivered either daily or weekly was tolerated similarly during accelerated prone breast radiation therapy, with excellent control of disease and comparable cosmetic results.