Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES: Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is a vascular tumor that can affect the mucosa of the upper aerodigestive tract. Although KS is the most common malignancy in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, it is rare in immunocompetent persons. We describe an unusual presentation of KS in 2 related individuals and describe our attempts to determine whether oropharyngeal KS is associated with human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8). METHODS: All relevant clinical and surgical information, including information on tumor histopathologic and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serologic tests, was abstracted from the patient charts and electronic databases. HHV-8 immunohistochemistry was performed on paraffin-fixed specimens. RESULTS: Both patient 1 and patient 2 (the nephew of patient 1) were referred for workup of a tonsillar mass that was pathologically confirmed to be KS. In each case, HIV serologic testing was negative, and a screening immunologic workup, including a quantitative natural killer cell count, a B- and T-lymphocyte count, and immunoglobulin analysis, also yielded findings that were within normal limits. Immunohistochemistry performed on 1 pathological specimen showed positive staining for the presence of HHV-8, the etiologic agent of KS. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of oropharyngeal KS in 2 related HIV-negative individuals supports a role for genetic factors in susceptibility to KS, a common exposure to an infectious agent such as HHV-8, or both. Whereas most KS cases in industrialized countries are associated with immunodeficiency, clinical and laboratory data do not suggest that either of the patients described in this report are immunodeficient. Their susceptibility to KS may be secondary to a subtle inherited defect in host resistance to HHV-8, or another unknown factor

OBJECTIVE: To review the background, case characteristics, and outcomes of malpractice litigation resulting from surgical injury of the spinal accessory nerve. DESIGN: Retrospective review of indemnity insurance cases (part 1) and court trials (part 2) between January 1, 1985, and January 1, 2007. In part 1, records of the Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company identified 41 lawsuits in New York State; part 2 was a review of a national legal database (WestLaw) that identified 81 court trials. Case details were analyzed, and awards were adjusted for inflation. RESULTS: For part 1, of 41 indemnity insurance cases, 39 (95%) involved a posterior triangle lymph node biopsy. Defendants were mainly general surgeons and otolaryngologists. Most lawsuits against surgeons (22 of 34 [65%]) were settled before trial, and only 4 of 34 (12%) were discontinued. Of these 34 cases, 28 (82%) ultimately compensated the plaintiff. The mean inflation-adjusted pretrial settlement was $264 395, and the mean settlement at trial was $443 538. Cases reaching trial received significantly higher settlements (P = .01). For part 2, 81 cases of alleged surgical injury to the spinal accessory nerve were identified. Defendant physicians were mainly general surgeons and otolaryngologists. Most operations were cervical lymph node biopsies (55 [68%]), followed by sebaceous cyst excisions (6 [7%]), neck dissections (4 [5%]), and other procedures (12 [15%]). Morbidity included weakness (81 patients [100%]), pain (30 patients [37%]), inability to work (20 patients [25%]), need for a nerve repair procedure (16 patients [20%]), deformity (9 patients [11%]), and numbness (4 patients [5%]). Types of malpractice alleged included negligent surgical technique (79 cases [98%]), lack of informed consent (17 cases [21%]), and failure to diagnose the injury (16 cases [20%]). Thirty-seven cases (46%) were decided for the defendant, 32 (40%) were decided for the plaintiff, and 12 (15%) were settled (percentages do not total 100 because of rounding). The mean inflation-adjusted settlement was $356 132, and the mean jury award was $515 968. Jury awards were significantly higher than settlements (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Unintended injury to the spinal accessory nerve after head and neck surgery is a significant source of malpractice litigation. Timely diagnosis and treatment of this complication are essential. Regardless of whether the medical community considers careful surgical technique and nerve preservation to be the standard of care, the legal system clearly treats it as such, awarding compensation in 82% of cases. Strategies for optimal surgical care and litigation risk reduction are discussed

Objective: To compare the extent of exposure and surgical maneuverability provided by facial translocation and transtemporal approaches for access to the infratemporal fossa and anterolateral skull base. Materials and Methods: Surgical procedures were performed on five fresh frozen adult cadavers (ten sides) with no known pathology. Facial transfacial approaches with and without a mandibulotomy and transtemporal approaches were evaluated. Objective measures were (1) the distance from the surgical plane to designated anatomic landmarks and (2) the surgical angle of exposure. Results: Distances from the surgical plane to the anatomic reference points were comparable for most of the access procedures (3 to 6 cm). The extended midfacial translocation and bilateral facial translocation approaches did, however, provide a shorter operative distance (1 to 3 cm) for access to the infratemporal fossa and contralateral structures, respectively. The transtemporal approaches facilitate a better angle of exposure (74 to 84 degrees) to the petrotemporal region, while the transfacial approaches were superior for access to the infratemporal structures. Conclusions: Based on the results, we propose a clinical algorithm for selecting a surgical approach based on the position and extent of an infratemporal or petrotemporal lesion

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) via thoracoscopy and laparoscopy have reduced the morbidity and mortality of total esophagectomy at experienced centers. MIE has not been evaluated in combination with major head and neck surgery, or in the otolaryngology literature. METHODS: Case series of 11 consecutive patients undergoing either open or MIE with an ablative neck procedure. RESULTS: Comparing 4 MIEs and 7 open operations, similar operative time, blood loss, and ICU and hospital length of stay were observed. There was one mortality in the open group. A 100% rate of major complications was observed in the MIE group. CONCLUSION: Our multidisciplinary team was unable to achieve improved outcomes in a series of head and neck surgical patients undergoing MIE. This result may represent an early stage of the learning curve for MIE, but may also be attributed to the escalated surgical requirements of head and neck patients

Segmental mandibulectomy leads to a great deficit in the form and function of the patient. Vascularised bone flaps have become the choice of the method of reconstruction of the mandible in an oncologic setting. Fibula osseous or oseteocutaneous flaps have become the favored method in centers across the world. This article reviews certain pertinent and practical points with regards to fibula flap reconstruction of the mandible. Methods of osteosynthesis, merits of inclusion of the FHL muscle in the flap and use of osteointegrated implants are discussed in detail. The reader will also be able at the end to understand the role of pre operative vascular imaging, steps taken when there is an irreversible flap failure and steps to maintain and rehabilitate occlusion as practiced in the author's service

PURPOSE: Since its description in the 1970s, the radial forearm free flap has earned a clearly defined role in the armamentarium of reconstructive head and neck surgery. Three decades later, the donor site remains an intrinsic drawback primarily due to its esthetic impact, although functional morbidity is significant in a minority. These points do not outweigh significant advantages but are occasionally reasons for the choice of alternative flaps. Modifications evolved in an effort to improve these undesirable features include primary closure, rotation-advancement, proximal paddle placement, full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) and suprafascial dissection. We describe a novel technique of engineering a composite graft of cadaveric acellular dermal matrix and autologous split-thickness skin graft (STSG) for a better donor-site closure. METHODS: From December 1995 to August 2003, 23 patients underwent radial forearm reconstruction of head and neck defects. Control patients (Group I; n = 5) had donor sites closed by conventional STSG technique (0.014-0.016 inch). In 18 patients (Group II), the donor site was closed with a composite technique (dermal allograft, 0.020-0.030 inch, and an ultrathin STSG, 0.0080 inch). Both groups of patients were retrospectively studied for comparative defects. Contralateral upper extremities also served as controls. All patients underwent a standardized functional examination of the donor and contralateral extremities, as well as an outcome questionnaire. All extremities were photographed for visual comparison by the author. RESULTS: Three of the 5 group I patients were available for follow-up, which averaged 64 months (60-72 months). Thirty-three percent had a decrease in functional parameters and 67% complained of paresthesia. Patient satisfaction was 3.5/5. Six of the 18 patients were excluded from Group II due to insufficient follow-up or inability to follow. Follow-up averaged 8 months (1-24 months). Functional parameters in all patients were comparable to the contralateral extremity, except in 1 patient. In this case, a 0.030-inch allograft was used which never revascularized, inhibiting wrist motion. Other patients exhibited excellent range of motion of the wrist and fingers. This was the only patient in this group that exhibited paresthesia of the donor site. Patient satisfaction was 4.6/5. Esthetic results were extremely gratifying as judged by the author. Esthetic results were better than those observed in Group I. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Composite grafting with acellular dermal matrix and STSG provides a comparable (trending to superior) result with traditional STSG for the treatment of radial forearm graft donor sites. Even if functionally equivalent, it is esthetically superior and therefore a technique warranting further investigation

Although abnormalities of vascular anatomy in the forearm are common, variations of the radial and ulnar arteries are rare. Nevertheless, arterial variants in the forearm may present clinically with neurovascular signs or symptoms. Even when anomalous arteries are not apparent, they may complicate surgery of the forearm and hand, as well as reconstructive surgery that involves the harvest of radial or ulnar artery-based forearm free flaps. For example, the superficial ulnar artery has an incidence of 2.7% and has been well described as a 'hidden trap' in the harvest of radial forearm flaps. We present a case report of a variant of the radial artery-the superficial dorsal artery of the forearm. This artery has an estimated incidence of 0.75% and is associated with either an absent or small-caliber radial artery. We believe this is the first report of such an artery presenting to clinical attention, as well as the first imaging of this structure with magnetic resonance angiography. The embryology of this structure and its clinical implications to the hand surgeon, peripheral vascular surgeon, and reconstructive microsurgeon, are also discussed