Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The impact of atopic dermatitis (AD) on health-related quality of life and health utility in the US adult population is not well established. OBJECTIVE:To determine the health utilities and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) lost in adults with AD versus without AD in the US population. METHODS:A cross-sectional, population-based study of 3495 adults was performed. AD was determined using modified UK diagnostic criteria for AD. AD severity was assessed using self-reported global AD severity, the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, the Patient-Oriented Scoring AD, and the Patient-Oriented Scoring AD itch and sleep. Six-dimensional health state short form (SF-6D) health utility scores and total QALY loss were assessed. RESULTS:The mean SF-6D score was lower in adults with AD compared with healthy adults (0.69 [95% CI, 0.68-0.70] versus 0.79 [95% CI, 0.77-0.79]). In particular, those with moderate-to-severe AD (mean, 0.53-0.66) had similar or lower SF-6D scores compared with those with all other self-reported disorders examined, except autoimmune disorders. Adults with AD and atopic comorbidities had significantly lower SF-6D scores compared with those without atopic comorbidities. Among the 7 disorders examined, AD was associated with higher total QALY loss than autoimmune disorders, diabetes, food allergy, and heart disease in both males and females. The largest QALY loss was for moderate AD in females and mild AD in males. CONCLUSIONS:Moderate-to-severe AD is associated with significant decrements of health utility in the US population. These data illustrate the heavy societal burden of moderate and severe AD and provide important insight for prioritization of resource allocation and cost-effectiveness research.

Population-based estimates on the prevalence of atopic dermatitis in adults vary widely. The objectives of the present study were to determine the prevalence of atopic dermatitis in the population of the United States, distribution of disease severity, and assess its impact on health-related quality of life. Among 1,278 participating adults, the prevalence (95%CI) of atopic dermatitis was 7.3% (5.9-8.8). 60.1% (56.1-64.1%) of participants were classified as mild 28.9% (25.3-32.7%) as moderate and 11% as severe (8.6-13.7%). Patients with atopic dermatitis and those with more severe disease had higher scores in the dermatology life quality index (mean [SD] AD: 4.71 [6.44] vs. controls: 0.97 [2.12] (<0.001), and the hospital anxiety (mean [SD] AD: 7.03 [4.80] vs. controls: 4.73 [4.8], and depression (mean (SD) AD: 5.83 [4.54] vs. controls: 3.62 [3.61]) scale indicating a worse impact on quality of life and an increased likelihood of anxiety or depression. Based on our prevalence estimates 16.5 million adults would have a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis with 6.6 million meeting criteria for moderate-to-severe disease. Our study confirms the high prevalence and disease burden of atopic dermatitis in this population.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects around 13% of children and 7% of adults in the US. It can have a significant impact on the quality of life (QoL) of affected individuals due to pruritus and the visibility of lesions on the skin. AD is increasingly recognized as a systemic disease, since dysregulation of the adaptive and innate immune systems plays a key role in the underlying disease pathogenesis, which has important implications for how the condition is treated. Patients with moderate-to-severe disease who have failed to achieve disease control may benefit from systemic immunomodulatory treatments. Recently published expert perspectives outlined recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in adults, reflecting evidence-based, practical recommendations to support allergists and dermatologists in selecting appropriate treatment in the era of biologic therapies. To help clinicians understand how these practical recommendations can be implemented into clinical practice, we describe two real life case studies of adult patients with AD. In these case studies, we demonstrate how AD severity, treatment response, and treatment failure can be assessed, and the role of emerging systemic treatments in the management of moderate-to-severe AD.

Contact dermatitis accounts for 95% of occupational skin disorders. Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is often caused by cumulative exposure to weak irritants, accounting for 80% of all cases of contact dermatitis. ICD can co-exist with atopic dermatitis (AD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Patients with AD and ACD may have a lower inflammatory threshold for developing ICD. Therefore, it needs to be distinguished from lesions of AD and ACD. ICD Patients report stinging and burning in excess of pruritus. Pruritus is classically reported by patients with AD and ACD. ICD lesions are typically well-demarcated unlike AD and ACD. ICD is diagnosed by exclusion. Patients undergo testing to rule out type I and type IV hypersensitivity. Negative results suggest a diagnosis of ICD. Management consists of irritant identification and avoidance with regular emollient use. Although ICD is more common in certain occupations, genetics and environment play significant roles in its development.

Rationale: Mandatory influenza vaccination for all hospital employees is increasingly common, and was a policy at NYU Langone Health System (NYC, Winthrop, Lutheran) in 2017. Employees applying for exemption based on prior allergic reaction underwent evaluation by an allergist. We assessed the success of mandating the vaccine and whether allergic evaluation increased vaccination rates. Method(s): Prior reaction history, skin testing, and outcomes of evaluation were reviewed from charts. Primary outcomes were total vaccination rate and outcomes of those that applied for exemption. Result(s): A total of 39,146 of 39,558 employees (98.9%) received vaccination without evaluation. Of 39,558 employees, 419 (0.01%) applied for exemption; 73 sought exemption based on prior allergic reaction. Exemption was granted to 303 employees for other reasons. Egg-free vaccine was administered to 38/73 (52%) who reported egg allergy. The remaining 35 underwent allergy evaluation; 15 were granted exemption while 20 (57%) were vaccinated. At Winthrop, 46 employees applied for medical exemption due to allergy; 45 (97%) were ultimately vaccinated. Eight employees with reported vaccine allergy were evaluated. Four received the vaccine without testing, while four were skin tested. One patient developed a generalized rash with skin testing and was granted exemption. The other three successfully received influenza vaccine via graded challenge. Institution-wide, 99.04% (39,182 of 39,558) of employees received the vaccine. Conclusion(s): Mandating flu vaccination is by itself an effective method to ensure compliance (98.9%). Allergy evaluation increased the vaccination rate in those applying for an exemption due to allergy, with only 15/73 (20%) granted exemption.

BACKGROUND:Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with skin lesions, multiple symptoms, and effect of quality of life, all of which factor into disease severity. Self-reported global AD severity may be a valid severity assessment for epidemiologic research. OBJECTIVE:To validate self-reported global AD severity in a representative cohort of adults with AD. METHODS:Preliminary probing-cognitive interviews were performed (n = 8). Next, a cross-sectional US population-based survey study of adults with AD was performed. AD was diagnosed using an adap/tation of the UK Working Party criteria (n = 602). AD severity was assessed using self-reported global AD severity (mild, moderate, severe), Patient-Oriented Scoring AD (PO-SCORAD), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-itch, NRS-sleep, NRS-pain, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS:Self-reported global AD severity had good content validity. Self-reported global AD severity had strong correlations with PO-SCORAD (Spearman correlation ρ = 0.61) and objective PO-SCORAD (ρ = 0.61); moderate correlations with POEM (ρ = 0.54), NRS-itch (ρ = 0.44), NRS-pain (ρ = 0.46), and HADS (ρ = 0.41); and weak correlation with NRS-sleep (ρ = .32) (P < .001 for all). Consistent and significant correlations were observed in stratified analyses by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and level of education. There were stepwise increases of PO-SCORAD, NRS-itch, NRS-sleep, NRS-pain, POEM, and HADS with increasing self-reported global AD severity (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < .01). There was weak-moderate concordance between self-reported AD severity and established severity strata for PO-SCORAD (ρ = 0.44), NRS-itch (ρ = 0.30), and POEM (ρ = 0.43). Rather, self-reported global AD severity was best predicted by a combination of PO-SCORAD, POEM, NRS-itch, NRS-pain, and HADS. No differential item reporting was found by age, sex, or race/ethnicity. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Self-reported AD severity simultaneously assesses multiple AD constructs and appears to be sufficiently valid for assessing AD severity in clinical and epidemiologic studies.

BACKGROUND:Atopic dermatitis (AD) has been associated with multiple comorbid extracutaneous and systemic disorders. The relation between AD severity and disease comorbidities is complex and not fully understood. OBJECTIVE:To determine the complex relation between AD severity and comorbidities. METHODS:A cross-sectional US population-based study of 8,217 adults who were participants in a nationally representative internet health panel was performed using a structured questionnaire. A diagnosis of AD was determined using modified United Kingdom Working Party Criteria for AD (n = 602). AD severity was assessed using Patient-Oriented Scoring AD, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and self-reported global AD severity. Logistic regression and structural equation models were used to explore associations of AD with self-reported allergic, cardiometabolic, anxiety and depression, and autoimmune disease. RESULTS:In multivariable regression models controlling for sociodemographics, AD was associated with higher odds of asthma (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71-2.55), hay fever (OR 4.31, 95% CI 3.27-5.69), food allergy (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.54-2.77), anxiety and depression (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.91-2.87), autoimmune disease (OR 3.05, 95% CI 2.31-4.03), obesity (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.13-1.67), diabetes (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.16-1.99), high blood pressure (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.18-1.80), and heart disease (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.40-2.70) compared with controls (P < .01 for all). All these associations were significant in mild and/or moderate disease, with even stronger effects in severe AD. Results of structural equation models showed direct effects of moderate to severe AD on food allergy, anxiety and depression, and diabetes, direct and indirect effects on obesity, and indirect effects on high blood pressure and heart disease. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:There is a strong relation of AD severity to allergic, autoimmune, and cardiovascular comorbidities.

BACKGROUND:Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) is the preferred patient-reported outcome (PRO) for assessing symptoms of atopic dermatitis (AD). Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is commonly used to assess the burden of skin disease. Previous severity strata were developed for POEM and DLQI in clinical cohorts, which may be biased toward more severe disease. Severity strata were not previously examined in population-based cohorts. Patient-Oriented Scoring AD (PO-SCORAD) is another commonly used PRO for assessing AD symptoms; however, severity strata are not established. OBJECTIVE:We sought to confirm previously developed strata for POEM and DLQI, and to develop strata for the PO-SCORAD in a population-based cohort of adults with AD. METHODS:A cross-sectional, population-based study of 8,217 adults was performed using a structured questionnaire. A diagnosis of AD was determined using modified UK Diagnostic Criteria for AD (n = 602). AD severity was assessed using self-reported global AD severity (anchoring question), POEM, PO-SCORAD, and DLQI. Strata were selected using an anchoring approach based on patient-reported disease severity. RESULTS:We confirmed the existing strata for DLQI (mild = 0-5, moderate = 6-10, severe = 11-30) (kappa = 0.446). However, the preferred strata for POEM was mild = 0-7, moderate = 8-19, and severe = 20-28 (kappa = 0.409) and PO-SCORAD was mild = 1-27, moderate = 28-56, severe = 57-104 (kappa = 0.444). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Existing strata for DLQI performed well in a population-based cohort of adult AD. The optimal severity strata for the POEM in our AD population varies slightly from those previously published for AD. This may suggest that different strata may be optimal in different study settings and cohorts. Finally, we proposed new strata for PO-SCORAD in adult AD.