Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:Evaluate real-world effectiveness, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and safety/tolerability of brivaracetam in patients (≥16 years) with focal-onset seizures currently receiving ≥ 1 antiseizure medication (ASM), and with historical or current use of levetiracetam, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and/or carbamazepine. METHODS:EP0088 was a 12-month, prospective, observational study of brivaracetam in a clinical practice setting in the US. Primary study outcome was brivaracetam retention at 12 months after brivaracetam initiation. Effect of brivaracetam on patients' perceptions of their health was assessed using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short forms and Seizure-Related Disability Assessment Scale (SERDAS). Safety outcomes included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS:254 patients (mean age: 44.3 years; median duration of epilepsy: 17.3 years) received ≥ 1 brivaracetam dose (Safety Set; SS). Patients had a median of 3.0 historical and 2.0 concomitant ASMs (SS). For all patients (SS), including those who dropped out with unknown brivaracetam treatment status, 12-month brivaracetam retention was 57.1 % (n = 145/254); in patients with known brivaracetam treatment status (post hoc analysis), 12-month brivaracetam retention was 72.1 % (n = 145/201). Slight improvements in mean PROMIS T-scores, and improvements in mean SERDAS scores, were seen by month 1.5, and generally maintained up to 12 months (Full Analysis Set). 49.6 % of patients reported ≥ 1 TEAE, 38.2 % had drug-related TEAEs, and 16.1 % discontinued due to TEAEs (SS). CONCLUSIONS:Brivaracetam was effective in patients with difficult-to-control focal-onset seizures; as shown by brivaracetam retention at 12 months. Improvements in PROs were seen early. Brivaracetam was well-tolerated and no new safety signals were observed.

OBJECTIVE:In traditionally designed randomized clinical trials of antiseizure medications, participants take a blinded treatment for a prespecified number of weeks, irrespective of continued seizures. The alternative design time to prerandomization monthly seizure count (T-PSC) allows participants to end the blinded treatment after an individually prespecified number of seizures, which shortens exposure to placebo and ineffective treatment. Previous reanalyses have shown that T-PSC replicated the efficacy conclusions of trials; therefore, we evaluated whether T-PSC also could replicate tolerability and safety conclusions. METHODS:We retrospectively applied the T-PSC design to analyze treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from three blinded, placebo-controlled trials of perampanel for focal onset seizures (NCT00699972, NCT00699582, NCT00700310). We evaluated the incidences of TEAEs, treatment-related TEAEs, serious TEAEs, and TEAEs that prompted medication adjustment compared to those observed during the full-length trial. RESULTS:Of the 1480 participants in the three trials, 1093 experienced any TEAE, of whom 1006 (92%) had onset prior to T-PSC. When evaluating the differences in each type of TEAE for each dose of perampanel from placebo within each trial, there was no consistent pattern of under- or overestimation. Across the three studies, 23 of 79 (29%) serious TEAEs, most requiring hospitalization, occurred after T-PSC. SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:Almost all TEAEs occurred before T-PSC. Similar conclusions regarding the tolerability and safety of perampanel would have been reached if the T-PSC design had been used. This suggests that the T-PSC design may potentially benefit participants by allowing earlier change from an ineffective treatment to an alternate treatment, which could reduce the risk of serious consequences of ineffective treatment, such as hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE:This study was undertaken to investigate diagnostic delay in adolescent onset focal epilepsy, including reasons for longer delays and associated morbidities. METHODS:Secondary analysis was done using enrollment data from the Human Epilepsy Project, a multi-institutional cohort including 34 sites in the USA, Canada, Finland, Austria, and Australia (2012-2017). Participants were aged 11-64 years at enrollment and within 4 months of treatment initiation for newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Participants with seizure onset at age ≤ 21 years were evaluated. Data included seizure diaries documenting onset, frequency, and characteristics of seizures, reasons for diagnostic delays, and prediagnosis morbidities, including injuries, suicidal ideation, and self-injurious behaviors. RESULTS: = 7.04, p = .008). SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:This study highlights significant delays in diagnosing adolescent onset focal epilepsy, especially in cases with nonmotor seizures. These delays, often due to lack of recognition by patients and health care providers, are linked to more frequent seizures, higher injury rates, and increased suicidal ideation and self-injury. Early recognition and diagnosis may mitigate adverse outcomes and improve quality of life for adolescents with epilepsy.

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has updated the operational classification of epileptic seizures, building upon the framework established in 2017. This revision, informed by the implementation experience, involved a working group appointed by the ILAE Executive Committee. Comprising 37 members from all ILAE regions, the group utilized a modified Delphi process, requiring a consensus threshold of more than two thirds for any proposal. Following public comments, the Executive Committee appointed seven additional experts to the revision task force to address and incorporate the issues raised, as appropriate. The updated classification maintains four main seizure classes: Focal, Generalized, Unknown (whether focal or generalized), and Unclassified. Taxonomic rules distinguish classifiers, which are considered to reflect biological classes and directly impact clinical management, from descriptors, which indicate other important seizure characteristics. Focal seizures and those of unknown origin are further classified by the patient's state of consciousness (impaired or preserved) during the seizure, defined operationally through clinical assessment of awareness and responsiveness. If the state of consciousness is undetermined, the seizure is classified under the parent term, that is, the main seizure class (focal seizure or seizure of unknown origin). Generalized seizures are grouped into absence seizures, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and other generalized seizures, now including recognition of negative myoclonus as a seizure type. Seizures are described in the basic version as with or without observable manifestations, whereas an expanded version utilizes the chronological sequence of seizure semiology. This updated classification comprises four main classes and 21 seizure types. Special emphasis was placed on ensuring translatability into languages beyond English. Its aim is to establish a common language for all health care professionals involved in epilepsy care, from resource-limited areas to highly specialized centers, and to provide accessible terms for patients and caregivers.

OBJECTIVE:To report interim data from an ongoing, open-label extension (OLE) of a Phase 2b study (X-TOLE) of azetukalner in adults with focal onset seizures (FOS) receiving 1-3 antiseizure medications. METHODS:Eligible participants enrolled in the 7-year OLE at 20 mg azetukalner once daily with food. Long-term seizure outcomes included median percentage change (MPC) in monthly (28 days) FOS frequency from the double-blind phase (DBP) baseline and achievement of ≥50%, ≥75%, ≥90%, and 100% seizure reductions. RESULTS:285 participants completed the DBP, and 275 (96.5%) enrolled in the OLE. At the 24-month interim analysis (September 5, 2023), 182 participants had been treated for ≥12 months and 165 for ≥24 months; 152 (55.3%) continued in the study. The median (range) treatment duration in the OLE was 26.3 (0.1-46.6) months. MPC reduction was 83.2% at 24 months in the OLE vs. DBP baseline. For all participants who entered the OLE, 56.4% (155/275) and 44.4% (122/275) achieved a ≥50% seizure reduction, 28.4% (78/275) and 19.6% (54/275) achieved a ≥90% seizure reduction, and 22.2% (61/275) and 14.9% (41/275) achieved seizure freedom (100% seizure reduction) for any consecutive ≥6- and ≥12-month period, respectively. For those who reached ≥24 months in the OLE, seizure freedom was achieved by 34.5% (57/165) and 23.6% (39/165) for any consecutive ≥6- and ≥12-month period, respectively. The majority of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild or moderate. The most common TEAEs were dizziness (21.8%), headache (15.3%), coronavirus infection (15.3%), somnolence (12.7%), fall (12.7%), and memory impairment (10.9%). Serious AEs were reported in 35 (12.7%) participants. SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:The efficacy demonstrated by azetukalner in reducing FOS seizure frequency in the DBP was sustained in this interim analysis. Azetukalner was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals compared to the DBP. These data suggest sustained long-term efficacy and safety of azetukalner in a difficult-to-treat population. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:This long-term study assessed the safety and efficacy of azetukalner to treat focal seizures. Patients taking azetukalner daily with food for about 2 years had far fewer focal seizures with azetukalner than before taking the medication. For those who had been treated for 24 months, about a third were seizure-free for a consecutive 6-month period, and about a quarter were seizure-free for a consecutive 12-month period. Most side effects were mild or moderate, and these included dizziness, headache, and somnolence (sleepiness).

Presence of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS) in focal epilepsy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for FBTCS are poorly understood, and little is known regarding FBTCS recurrence after treatment initiation. This study aimed to investigate factors related to FBTCS in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and their recurrence after starting antiseizure medications (ASMs) in the Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) cohort. HEP was an international, prospective cohort study that enrolled people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy within 4 months of treatment initiation and followed them for up to 6 years. Baseline characteristics, treatment choices, and seizure outcomes were collected. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was conducted to assess the differences between study participants who had FBTCS and those who never experienced FBTCS. A total of 443 participants were included in this analysis; 77% (n = 342) had FBTCS at some point prior to or within the study period. In participants with FBTCS, regardless of initial seizure type, diagnosis was mostly made after FBTCS (335/342, 98%). After treatment initiation, FBTCS did not recur in 57% (n = 194/342) of cases. A higher number of total pretreatment seizures (median = 16 vs. 11, p = .048, Mann-Whitney U-test), predominantly focal aware seizures (FAS) or focal impaired awareness seizures (FIAS; median = 15 vs. 10, p = .049, Mann Whitney U-test), was associated with no recurrence in FBTCS after treatment initiation. Of 108 participants without FBTCS prior to treatment, only seven (6%) developed FBTCS after treatment initiation. There was no significant difference in choice of initial ASM class (levetiracetam vs. sodium channel blockers) between participants who experienced FBTCS and those who did not. This study highlights the significance of FBTCS among individuals with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. The majority of participants who experienced FBTCS were diagnosed with epilepsy after experiencing their first FBTCS despite preceding FAS/FIAS. The more frequent FAS/FIAS in participants whose FBTCS resolved may be a characteristic of their epilepsy.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of seletracetam (SEL), a potent modulator of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A), in patients with photoparoxysmal EEG response (PPR) to intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) as proof-of-principle of efficacy in patients with epilepsy. In this multicenter, single-blind Phase II study, adults with photosensitive epilepsy, with/without concomitant antiseizure medication therapy, underwent IPS under 3 eye conditions (at eye closure, eyes closed and eyes open) after a single oral dose of placebo (day - 1) or SEL (day 1; 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 10, or 20 mg). Complete suppression was a standardized photosensitivity range reduction to 0 over ≥ 1 time points for all eye conditions. Partial suppression was a ≥ 3-point reduction over ≥ 3 testing times vs the same time points on day - 1 in ≥ 1 eye condition. In addition, pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed. Of 27 evaluable patients, 9 reentered to receive a 2nd dosing 1-6 months later, providing a total of 36 individual exposures. At all doses administered - even the lowest -, several subjects reached a complete abolishment of PPR, with a rapid onset of effect. Overall, complete abolishment of PPR was obtained in 40-71 % of the patients; the effect increasing with the dose. In terms of effective doses to suppress PPR, SEL was at least 1,500 times more potent than levetiracetam and 10-20 times more potent than brivaracetam. Adverse events of SEL, including dizziness and somnolence, were mild to moderate. Pharmacokinetics of SEL demonstrated rapid absorption and a linear dose:plasma level relationship. This proof-of-principle study demonstrates that - based on our own experience - SEL is the most potent compound ever tested in the photosensitivity model.

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are the most severe group of epilepsies, characterized by drug-resistant seizures and developmental slowing or regression. DEEs encompass many epilepsy syndromes, although not all patients with a DEE can be classified into a specific syndrome. Our understanding of the etiologies of DEEs has been revolutionized with next-generation sequencing, with more than 900 genes implicated, in addition to structural causes. It is therefore now possible to consider precision medicine and novel therapeutic approaches for these devastating diseases with trials of repurposed and new drugs, including gene therapies. Trials are being designed to target either DEE diseases more broadly, specific DEE syndromes, or specific genetic DEEs. To serve this purpose, a clear operational definition of DEEs is needed to ensure that appropriate patients are selected for trials with precisely defined, targeted outcome measures. Herein we propose the operational definition of DEEs to set the stage for the development of DEE therapies.

OBJECTIVE:Seizures can impact cognition both acutely and chronically. However, among those without significant comorbidities and broadly average cognition at epilepsy onset, the relationship between cognitive function at the time of diagnosis and long-term seizure control has been relatively unexplored. This analysis investigated associations between participant characteristics including specific aspects of cognitive performance at the time of focal epilepsy diagnosis and antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment resistance. METHODS:This was a secondary analysis of Human Epilepsy Project (HEP) data, which enrolled people with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and broadly average cognition (estimated IQ ≥ 70) from June 29, 2012, to September 1, 2019. Participants analyzed in this study were between 18 and 60 years old, and scored within an acceptable range (i.e., Standard Score of ≥80) on measures estimating premorbid cognitive ability were offered the Cogstate Brief Battery (CBB). Participant characteristics were analyzed, including the presence of any anxiety disorders or depression, and summary CBB scores. HEP participants who were classified by the study as treatment resistant if they had experienced failure to achieve seizure freedom after two adequate trials of ASMs. Treatment resistance was modeled using multiple logistic regression to assess for independent associations between attention and working memory after correcting for the presence of the other potentially explanatory variables. RESULTS:200 HEP participants had comprehensive enrollment records including CBB results and complete seizure outcome data for analysis in this study. After correcting for potentially confounding variables, there were no independent associations between cognitive measures on the CBB at the time of enrollment and subsequent development of ASM treatment resistance. Specifically, z-scores for reaction time on the CBB (an average of the CBB Identification and Detection tests) were not associated with treatment resistance (p = 0.51) and z-scores for memory performance (an average of the CBB One Card Learning test and One Back tests) were not associated with treatment resistance (p = 0.24). There were no significant independent associations between age or the presence of depression or anxiety disorders at the time of CBB testing and treatment resistance. However, there was an independent association between employment status and treatment resistance, with those who were employed or students (>18 years old) at the time of enrollment and CBB testing having 0.35 times lower odds of treatment resistance (95 %CI 0.15-0.81, p = 0.01). SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:The findings from this study suggest that in otherwise healthy people with new onset focal epilepsy who have broadly average intelligence, attention and working memory as measured by the CBB at the time of diagnosis is not associated with treatment resistance. Although performance on cognitive testing at epilepsy onset may not be predictive of risk of treatment resistance in this population, other individual characteristics such as employment status at the time of diagnosis may be indirect markers of long-term seizure outcomes and require further investigation.

OBJECTIVE:Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of novel treatments for epilepsy. However, there have been concerning increases in the placebo responder rate over time. To understand these trends, we evaluated features associated with increased placebo responder rate. METHODS:Using individual-level data from 20 focal-onset seizure trials provided by seven pharmaceutical companies, we evaluated associations with change in seizure frequency in participants randomized to placebo. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate participant and study factors associated with differing rates of 50% reduction in seizure frequency during blinded placebo treatment, as compared to pre-randomization baseline seizure frequency. In addition, we focused on the association of placebo responder rate with pre-randomization baseline seizure frequency and country of recruitment. RESULTS:). In addition, there was a significantly higher 50RR in participants with a baseline seizure frequency of six or fewer seizures per 28 days (29% vs 21%, p = .00018). SIGNIFICANCE/CONCLUSIONS:These results can assist future RCTs in estimating the expected placebo responder rate, which may lead to more reliable power estimates. Higher placebo responder rate was associated with markers of less-refractory epilepsy. There were concerning significant differences in placebo responder rate by country and geographic region as well as an elevated placebo responder rate in participants with baseline seizure frequency close to the minimum eligibility criteria.