Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:



Total Results:


Radiation Recall Dermatitis after Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Adult T cell Leukemia Lymphoma post Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant

Hardy-Abeloos, Camille; Gerber, Naamit; Shaikh, Fauzia
To our knowledge, this is the first case report describing radiation recall dermatitis (RRD) after donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) after allogeneic stem cell transplant in a patient with Acute T cell Leukemia Lymphoma. Given its rare occurrence, unclear clinical characterization and etiology, RRD remains poorly understood. In the setting of novel immunotherapies and recent development of Covid 19 mRNA vaccines, we aimed to better characterize RRD and its most likely pathogenesis in our patient's case.
PMID: 36347452
ISSN: 1879-8519
CID: 5357232

Trends in IMRT Utilization for Definitive Treatment of Cervical Cancer, 2004-2018 [Meeting Abstract]

Lee, S S; Weil, C R; Boyd, L; Burt, L M; Chino, F; Gaffney, D K; Shaikh, F; Suneja, G
Purpose/Objective(s): Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is an advanced radiotherapy technique that delivers conformal radiation to desired targets while minimizing dose to surrounding organs at risk. In the post-operative setting, IMRT is associated with reduced acute and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal side effects for patients with cervical cancer. However, no prospective randomized data exist for the use of IMRT in the setting of definitive treatment of intact cervical cancer. The objective of this study was to identify trends in IMRT use for this population. Materials/Methods: Patients with stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer diagnosed from 2004-2018 who were treated with curative intent chemoradiation were identified in the National Cancer Database. Patients who underwent primary surgical management, did not receive external beam radiation to the pelvis or received radiation outside the pelvis, or received an unspecified technique or target of radiation were excluded. The primary outcome of interest was utilization of IMRT vs 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) over time. A Cochrane-Armitage test was performed to assess trends over time. T-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression with propensity score matching were used to identify factors associated with receipt of IMRT.
Result(s): Overall, 13,974 patients met inclusion criteria; 4,590 (33%) received IMRT, and 9,384 (67%) received 3DCRT. In this cohort, 65% were non-Hispanic White, 45% were early stage (I-II), 80% were squamous histology, 62% received brachytherapy, and 28% had lymph node involvement. The utilization of IMRT increased from 30% in 2004 to 71% in 2018 (p<0.001). After adjustment for clinical and demographic variables, factors associated with IMRT use were: Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.5), treatment in the Western U.S. (aOR 1.4, CI 1.2-1.7) and the Southern U.S. (aOR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.5), living more than 50 miles from the treatment facility (aOR 1.2, CI 1.0-1.5), stage III disease (aOR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.5), and lymph node involvement (aOR 1.4, CI 1.3-1.6). Compared to an academic medical center, patients receiving care at a comprehensive community cancer center were less likely to receive IMRT (aOR 0.66, CI 0.59-0.72). There were no differences in IMRT use by age, insurance, or medical comorbidities.
Conclusion(s): Despite the lack of prospective efficacy data supporting the use of IMRT in patients with intact cervical cancer, IMRT has dramatically increased over the last fifteen years especially for patients with advanced-stage disease or lymph node involvement. More data on the optimal use of IMRT, including appropriate target volume margins and on-board imaging, are needed.
ISSN: 1879-355x
CID: 5366262

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in early stage breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy: Concordance of biomarkers and tumor location from primary tumor to in-breast tumor recurrence

Purswani, Juhi M; Shaikh, Fauzia; Wu, S Peter; Kim, Jennifer Chun; Schnabel, Freya; Huppert, Nelly; Perez, Carmen A; Gerber, Naamit K
BACKGROUND:Patients with an in-breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving therapy have a high risk of distant metastasis and disease-related mortality. Classifying clinical parameters that increase risk for recurrence after IBTR remains a challenge. AIM/OBJECTIVE:To describe primary and recurrent tumor characteristics in patients who experience an IBTR and understand the relationship between these characteristics and disease outcomes. METHODS:Patients with stage 0-II breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and adjuvant radiation were identified from institutional databases of patients treated from 2003-2017 at our institution. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. We identified patients who experienced an isolated IBTR. Concordance of hormone receptor status and location of tumor from primary to recurrence was evaluated. The effect of clinical and treatment parameters on disease outcomes was also evaluated. RESULTS:= 0.004) decreased the risk of IBTR. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Among patients with early stage breast cancer who had breast conserving surgery treated with adjuvant RT, ER/PR status and quadrant were highly concordant from primary to IBTR. Tumor size greater than 1.5 cm and use of adjuvant endocrine therapy were significantly associated with decreased risk of IBTR.
PMID: 31976307
ISSN: 2218-4333
CID: 4273472

Whole breast irradiation with high tangents in the prone position

Shaikh, Fauzia; Tam, Moses; Taneja, Sameer; Huppert, Nelly; McCarthy, Allison; Hitchen, Christine; Maisonet, Olivier; Perez, Carmen; Barbee, David; Gerber, Naamit Kurshan
ISSN: 1948-7894
CID: 4898682

PORT in properly selected patients with completely resected NSCLC should not be quickly dismissed [Letter]

Wu, S Peter; Shaikh, Fauzia; Cerfolio, Robert; Cooper, Benjamin T
PMID: 30447194
ISSN: 1552-6259
CID: 3458732

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) improves local control and overall survival compared to conventionally fractionated radiation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

von Reibnitz, Donata; Shaikh, Fauzia; Wu, Abraham J; Treharne, Gregory C; Dick-Godfrey, Rosalind; Foster, Amanda; Woo, Kaitlin M; Shi, Weiji; Zhang, Zhigang; Din, Shaun U; Gelblum, Daphna Y; Yorke, Ellen D; Rosenzweig, Kenneth E; Rimner, Andreas
BACKGROUND:Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been adopted as the standard of care for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with local control rates consistently >90%. However, data directly comparing the outcomes of SBRT with those of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CONV) is lacking. MATERIAL AND METHODS/METHODS:Between 1990 and 2013, 497 patients (525 lesions) with early-stage NSCLC (T1-T2N0M0) were treated with CONV (n = 127) or SBRT (n = 398). In this retrospective analysis, five endpoints were compared, with and without adjusting for clinical and dosimetric factors. Competing risks analysis was performed to estimate and compare the cumulative incidence of local failure (LF), nodal failure (NF), distant failure (DF) and disease progression. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the Cox regression model. Propensity score (PS) matched analysis was performed based on seven patient and clinical variables: age, gender, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), histology, T stage, biologically equivalent dose (BED), and history of smoking. RESULTS:The median dose delivered for CONV was 75.6 Gy in 1.8-2.0 Gy fractions (range 60-90 Gy; median BED = 89.20 Gy) and for SBRT 48 Gy in four fractions (45-60 Gy in three to five fractions; median BED = 105.60 Gy). Median follow-up was 24.4 months, and 3-year LF rates were 34.1% with CONV and 13.6% with SBRT (p < .001). Three-year OS rates were 38.9 and 53.1%, respectively (p = .018). PS matching showed a significant improvement of OS (p = .0497) for SBRT. T stage was the only variable correlating with all five endpoints. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:SBRT compared to CONV is associated with improved LF rates and OS. Our data supports the continued use and expansion of SBRT as the standard of care treatment for inoperable early-stage NSCLC.
PMID: 29873277
ISSN: 1651-226x
CID: 4898622

Post-mastectomy Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Nodal Micrometastases

Wu, S Peter; Tam, Moses; Shaikh, Fauzia; Lee, Anna; Chun, Jennifer; Schnabel, Freya; Guth, Amber; Adams, Sylvia; Schreiber, David; Oh, Cheonguen; Gerber, Naamit K
BACKGROUND:Recent data support the use of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in women with one to three positive lymph nodes; however, the benefit of PMRT in patients with micrometastatic nodal disease (N1mi) is unknown. We evaluated the survival impact of PMRT in patients with N1mi within the National Cancer Database. METHODS:The pattern of care and survival benefit of PMRT was examined in women with pT1-2N1mi breast cancer who underwent mastectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were employed for survival analysis, and subanalyses of high-risk patients and a propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort were completed. RESULTS:From 2004 to 2014, we identified 14,019 patients who fitted the study criteria. PMRT was delivered in 18.5% of patients and its use increased over the study period. Patients treated with PMRT were younger, had better performance status and larger primaries, were estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, had higher grade, lymphovascular invasion and positive surgical margins, and more often received systemic therapy. PMRT was significantly associated with overall survival (OS) in univariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75 [0.64-0.89]), but was not significant in multivariable analysis (adjusted HR 1.01 [0.84-1.20]). There was no survival benefit to PMRT in ER-negative, high-grade, and/or young patients. There were 2 (0.9%) death events in the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) + PMRT group versus 21 (2.9%) in the SLNB-alone group (log-rank p = 0.053), and 8 (3.9%) death events in the axillary lymph node biopsy (ALNB) + PMRT group versus 27 (3.6%) in the axillary lymph node dissection-alone group (p = 0.82). There was no significant association between PMRT and OS within the PSM subgroup. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this largest reported retrospective study, no OS differences were associated with PMRT, which suggests that PMRT may not benefit every patient with microscopic nodal disease.
PMID: 29987606
ISSN: 1534-4681
CID: 3192442

Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Irradiation in Women Less Than 50 Years Old Treated on 4 Prospective Protocols

Shaikh, Fauzia; Chew, Jessica; Hochman, Tsivia; Purswani, Juhi; Maisonet, Olivier; Peat, Elecia; Huppert, Nelly; Cooper, Benjamin T; Tam, Moses; Goldberg, Judith D; Perez, Carmen A; Formenti, Silvia C; Gerber, Naamit K
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Hypofractionated whole-breast radiation therapy (RT) has proved to be equivalent to conventionally fractionated RT in multiple randomized trials. There is controversy regarding its use in younger women because of their underrepresentation in trials and the concern for late toxicity. We evaluated disease control and cosmetic outcomes in patients aged <50 years treated with hypofractionated RT in 4 prospective single-institutional trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:From 2003 to 2015, 1313 patients were enrolled in 4 prospective protocols investigating the use of adjuvant hypofractionated RT after breast-conserving surgery with a daily or weekly concomitant boost. We identified the records of 348 patients aged <50 years at consultation for this analysis. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method by study and across studies using meta-analytic methods. The late effects of RT, clinician-rated cosmesis, and patient-rated cosmesis were also evaluated. RESULTS:With a median follow-up period of 66.9 months, the overall survival rate was 99.6%, the disease-free survival rate was 96.3%, and the local recurrence-free survival rate was 97.7% at 3 years. Clinician-rated cosmesis (n = 242) was excellent or good in 93.4% of cases and fair or poor in 6.6%. Patient-rated cosmesis (n = 259) was excellent or good in 86.1% and fair or poor in 13.9%. When patients rated themselves differently than their physicians, patients more often rated themselves poorly compared with their physicians (P = .0044, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test). CONCLUSIONS:At a median follow-up of 5 years, an analysis of patients aged <50 years demonstrated that hypofractionated RT was safe and effective, with good to excellent cosmesis as assessed by both clinicians and patients.
PMID: 29859789
ISSN: 1879-355x
CID: 3144252

Improved Outcomes with Modern Lung-Sparing Trimodality Therapy in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Shaikh, Fauzia; Zauderer, Marjorie G; von Reibnitz, Donata; Wu, Abraham J; Yorke, Ellen D; Foster, Amanda; Shi, Weiji; Zhang, Zhigang; Adusumilli, Prasad S; Rosenzweig, Kenneth E; Krug, Lee M; Rusch, Valerie W; Rimner, Andreas
INTRODUCTION:Higher target conformity and better sparing of organs at risk with modern radiotherapy (RT) may result in higher tumor control and less toxicity. In this study, we compare our institutional multimodality therapy experience of adjuvant chemotherapy and hemithoracic intensity-modulated pleural RT (IMPRINT) with previously used adjuvant conventional RT (CONV) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) treated with lung-sparing pleurectomy/decortication (P/D). METHODS:We analyzed 209 patients who underwent P/D and adjuvant RT (131 who received CONV and 78 who received IMPRINT) for MPM between 1974 and 2015. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to calculate OS; competing risks analysis was performed for local failure-free survival and progression-free survival. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed with relevant clinical and treatment factors. RESULTS:The median age was 64 years, and 80% of the patients were male. Patients receiving IMPRINT had significantly higher rates of the epithelial histological type, advanced pathological stage, and chemotherapy treatment. OS was significantly higher after IMPRINT (median 20.2 versus 12.3 months, p = 0.001). Higher Karnofsky performance score, epithelioid histological type, macroscopically complete resection, and use of chemotherapy/IMPRINT were found to be significant factors for longer OS in multivariate analysis. No significant predictive factors were identified for local failure or progression. Grade 2 or higher esophagitis developed in fewer patients after IMPRINT than after CONV (23% versus 47%). CONCLUSIONS:Trimodality therapy including adjuvant hemithoracic IMPRINT, chemotherapy, and P/D is associated with promising OS rates and decreased toxicity in patients with MPM. Dose constraints should be applied vigilantly to minimize serious adverse events.
PMID: 28341225
ISSN: 1556-1380
CID: 4898612

Recurrence Patterns and Second Primary Lung Cancers After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Implications for Surveillance

Spratt, Daniel E; Wu, Abraham J; Adeseye, Victoria; Din, Shaun U; Shaikh, Fauzia; Woo, Kaitlin M; Zhang, Zhigang; Foster, Amanda; Rosenzweig, Kenneth E; Gewanter, Richard; Huang, James; Rimner, Andreas
BACKGROUND:Patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are subject to locoregional and distant recurrence, as well as the formation of second primary lung cancers (SPLCs). The optimal surveillance regimen for patients treated with SBRT for early-stage NSCLC remains unclear; we therefore investigated the posttreatment recurrence patterns and development of SPLCs. METHODS:Three hundred sixty-six patients with pathologically proven inoperable early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT between 2006 and 2013 were assessed. Patients underwent a computed tomographic (CT) scan of the chest every 3 months during years 1 and 2, every 6 months during years 3 and 4, and annually thereafter. Competing risk analysis was used for all time-to-event analyses. RESULTS:With a median follow-up of 23 months, the 2-year cumulative incidence of local, nodal, and distant treatment failures were 12.2%, 16.1%, and 15.5%, respectively. In patients with disease progression after SBRT (n = 108), 84% (n = 91) of cases occurred within the first 2 years. Five percent (n = 19) of patients experienced SPLCs. The median time to development of an SPLC was 16.5 months (range, 6.5-71.1 months), with 33% (n = 6) of these patients experiencing SPLCs after 2 years. None of the never smokers, but 4% of former tobacco smokers and 15% of current tobacco smokers, experienced an SPLC (P = .005). CONCLUSION:Close monitoring with routine CT scans within the first 2 years after SBRT is effective in detecting early disease progression. In contrast, the risk for the development of an SPLC remains elevated beyond 2 years, particularly in former and current smokers.
PMID: 26602271
ISSN: 1938-0690
CID: 4898592