Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has redefined the frontiers of plastic and reconstructive surgery. At the cutting edge of this evolving paradigm, we present the first successful combined full face and bilateral hand transplant (FT-BHT). METHODS:A 21-year-old man with sequelae of an 80% total body surface area burn injury sustained following a motor vehicle accident presented for evaluation. The injury included full face and bilateral upper extremity composite tissue defects, resulting in reduced quality of life and loss of independence. Multidisciplinary evaluation confirmed eligibility for combined FT-BHT. The operative approach was validated through 11 cadaveric rehearsals utilizing computerized surgical planning. Institutional review board and organ procurement organization approvals were obtained. The recipient, his caregiver, and the donor family consented to the procedure. RESULTS:Combined full face (eyelids, ears, nose, lips, and skeletal subunits) and bilateral hand transplantation (forearm level) was performed over 23 hours on August 12-13th, 2020. Triple induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy and infection prophylaxis were administered. Plasmapheresis was necessary postoperatively. Minor revisions were performed over seven subsequent operations, including five left upper extremity, seven right upper extremity, and seven facial secondary procedures. At eight months, the patient is approaching functional independence and remains free of acute rejection. He has significantly improved range of motion, motor power, and sensation of the face and hand allografts. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Combined FT-BHT is feasible. This is the most comprehensive VCA procedure successfully performed to date, marking a new milestone in plastic and reconstructive surgery for patients with otherwise irremediable injuries.

Introduction: Vascularized composite allotransplantation has redefined the frontiers of plastic and reconstructive surgery. The field has seen considerable advancement since its inception, with the first successful hand transplant in 1998 and the first partial face transplant in 2005. To date, over 40 bilateral hand transplants have been reported in the literature, along with 47 face transplants. Due to still limited available evidence and the heterogeneity of the sample population, little consensus exists on the anticipated timeline of functional recovery following vascularized composite allotransplantation. We hereby report on the early and accelerated functional recovery of a combined face and bilateral hand transplant recipient.
Method(s): A 21-year-old male was referred with sequelae of an 80% total body surface area burn sustained in a motor vehicle accident 1 year prior. The patient had extensive facial and bilateral upper extremity injuries. Serial debridement and split thickness skin grafting procedures left the patient with proximal digital syndactyly and distal digit amputations. Procurement and transplantation of the face and upper extremities was performed over a 23-h period in August of 2020. Postoperative functional assessment at predetermined time points included active range of motion, grip strength, sensory assessment, Carroll's Upper Extremity Function test, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire.
Result(s): Functional assessments were performed at 3 and 6 months post-transplant. Range of motion, grip strength, Carroll's test scores (left = 58 at 6 months post-transplant vs 13 pre-transplant, right = 61 at 6 months post-transplant vs 20 pre-transplant) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand evaluation (37 at 6 months post-transplant vs 90 pretransplant) showed substantial improvement. The patient remained rejection-free during the first 9 months post-transplant and has had steady and progressive functional improvement. He is highly motivated and consistently demonstrates functional independence in activities of daily living.
Conclusion(s): Combined face and bilateral hand transplant is a feasible, comprehensive reconstructive solution for composite face and bilateral hand injury in the appropriately selected recipient. Patient motivation, psychosocial support, intensive physical and occupational therapy, and vigilant clinical and immunologic surveillance are essential features of postoperative recovery

Introduction: Acute rejection is exceptionally common in the first year after vascularized composite allotransplantation. Recipients with burns are at increased risk of developing donor-specific antibodies due to sensitization. Lymphocyte depleting induction with rabbit antithymocyte globulin is commonly utilized. We hypothesized that combination B- and T-cell depletion induction therapy is more efficacious in preventing acute rejection in the early post-transplant period.
Method(s): Our induction protocol calls for intraoperative administration of methylprednisolone (1000 mg) and rabbit antithymocyte globulin beginning intraoperatively (1.5 mg/ kg, cumulative dose 6 mg/kg over the first postoperative week) and rituximab (1000 mg administered on postoperative day 1) for thorough T and mature B-cell depletion. Standard infection prophylaxis is utilized. Donor-specific antibodies are monitored postoperatively with Luminex single-antigen microbeads (mean fluorescence intensity >= 1000 considered clinically significant).
Result(s): Our latest recipient was a 22-year-old male with 80% total body surface area burns. The donor was an ABOidentical, 47-year-old brain dead male. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch was 0, 1, 0 (A, B, DR), and 2 HLA-DPB1. Donor-recipient complement-dependent cytotoxicity and flow cytometric T- and B-cell crossmatch were all negative. Abrupt rise in donor-specific antibodies on postoperative days 7 and 8 was treated with two rounds of plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin. Persistent wound colonization (Acinetobacter baumannii) was treated with meropenem, polymyxin, and tigecycline. The recipient experienced a single episode of acute rejection 9 months post-transplant, successfully treated with pulse doses of methylprednisolone (500 mg intravenous, daily) over 3 days. We suspect this may have been triggered by inflammation induced by revision surgery of all three vascularized composite allotransplantation components in the preceding month
Conclusion(s): We present our third consecutive vascularized composite allotransplantation recipient utilizing this novel immune strategy. In the context of the most extensive vascularized composite allotransplantation performed to date, acute rejection was prevented until 9 months post-transplant in this highly sensitized patient. Two previous recipients remained rejection-free for greater than 1 year post-transplant and have experienced only one rejection episode each to date. Acute rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation may be better prevented by including rituximab in the induction immunosuppression strategy, and the risk of metabolic or severe infectious complications appears to be manageable

Introduction: Vascularized composite allotransplantation provides a reconstructive option for patients with otherwise irreparable defects. Despite significant advances in the field, successful multi-vascularized composite allotransplantation has yet to be reported. We herein describe our experience with the first successful combined face and bilateral hand transplant, focusing on the sequence and timing of allograft procurement.
Method(s): The recipient was a 22-year-old male who presented for multi-vascularized composite allotransplantation evaluation after sustaining a motor vehicle accident resulting in 80% total body surface area burns, including his full face and bilateral upper extremities. Following multidisciplinary team evaluation and institutional review board approval, he was deemed an appropriate candidate for combined face and bilateral hand transplant. In defining his expectations for the transplant, the recipient wished to prioritize recovery of hand function above all else.
Result(s): Combined face and bilateral hand transplant was performed over 23 h and 3 min in two adjacent operating rooms. Given the recipient's right-hand dominance, we opted for procurement and transplantation of the right upper extremity first, followed by the left upper extremity, with the facial allograft procured last. The vascular pedicles in the donor left upper extremity allograft were only divided once vascular inflow and outflow was re-established in the right upper extremity. Similarly, the external carotid arteries were clamped and divided after the left upper extremity was reperfused. To minimize ischemia, no tourniquet was used in the donor room, while tourniquet use was limited to <2 h in the recipient room. Total ischemia times were 2 h and 30 min for the right upper extremity; 2 h and 46 min for the left upper extremity; and 2 h and 52 min for the face. Optimization of arterial inflow and venous outflow was ensured with preservation of the muscular perforators and reconstruction of both the deep and superficial venous systems. At 10 months post-transplant, the recipient is demonstrating continuous improvement in functional outcomes.
Conclusion(s): In this report, we describe our approach for procuring three allografts in the first successful face and bilateral hand transplant. In addition to meticulous preparation, this case highlights the importance of understanding and prioritizing the recipient's goals for the transplant

Transplanting hepatitis C viremic donor organs into hepatitis C virus (HCV)-negative recipients is becoming increasingly common; however, practices for posttransplant direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment vary widely. Protracted insurance authorization processes for DAA therapy often lead to treatment delays.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Appreciate the evolution and increasing complexity of transplanted facial allografts over the past two decades. 2. Discuss indications and contraindications for facial transplantation, and donor and recipient selection criteria and considerations. 3. Discuss logistical, immunologic, and cost considerations in facial transplantation, in addition to emerging technologies used. 4. Understand surgical approaches and anatomical and technical nuances of the procedure. 5. Describe aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial outcomes of facial transplantation reported to date. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:This CME article highlights principles and evolving concepts in facial transplantation. The field has witnessed significant advances over the past two decades, with more than 40 face transplants reported to date. The procedure now occupies the highest rung on the reconstructive ladder for patients with extensive facial disfigurement who are not amenable to autologous reconstructive approaches, in pursuit of optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes. Indications, contraindications, and donor and recipient considerations for the procedure are discussed. The authors also review logistical, immunologic, and cost considerations of facial transplantation. Surgical approaches to allograft procurement and transplantation, in addition to technical and anatomical nuances of the procedure, are provided. Finally, the authors review aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial outcomes that have been reported to date.

Despite utilization of hepatitis C viremic organs for hepatitis C naïve recipients (HCV D+/R-) in other solid organ transplants, HCV viremic pancreata remain an unexplored source of donor organs. This study reports the first series of HCV D+/R- pancreas transplants. HCV D+/R- had shorter wait list times compared to HCV D-/R-, waiting a mean of 16 days from listing for HCV positive organs. HCV D+/R- had a lower match allocation sequence than HCV D-/R-, and this correlated to receipt of organs with a lower Pancreas Donor Risk Index (PDRI) score. All HCV D+R- had excellent graft function with a mean follow up of 438 days and had undetectable HCV RNA levels by a mean of 23 days after initiation of HCV-directed therapy. The rates of infectious complications, re-operation, readmission, rejection, and length of stay were not impacted by donor HCV status. A national review of potential ideal pancreas donors found that 37% of ideal HCV negative pancreas allografts were transplanted, compared to only 5% of ideal HCV positive pancreas allografts. The results of the current study demonstrate the safety of accepting HCV positive pancreata for HCV naïve recipients and advocates for increased utilization of ideal HCV positive pancreas allografts.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates and recipients are at risk of significant morbidity and mortality from infection, including those circulating in the community from unexpected outbreaks. In late 2018-summer of 2019, a measles outbreak occurred in the New York City area, with a total of 649 cases reported. We developed a systematic three-part approach to address measles risk in our adult SOT program through: 1) identification of non-immune adults living in outbreak ZIP codes, 2) education focused on risk reduction for patients from outbreak ZIP codes and 3) risk reduction for non-immune patients. All waitlisted or previously transplanted patients residing in outbreak areas received a measles patient education handout. The electronic medical record of patients born in or after 1957 was reviewed for serologic evidence of measles immunity. Measles immunity testing was performed in patients without documentation of immunity. Patients who tested non-immune were offered MMR vaccination or intravenous immunoglobulin depending on their transplant phase and risk profile. Thus, we demonstrate successful implementation of a systematic risk assessment during a large measles outbreak to identify and protect at-risk SOT patients. As vaccine hesitancy persists, our strategies may be increasingly relevant to transplant centers and those caring for immunocompromised patients.