Faculty Bibliography

Importance/UNASSIGNED:The rapidly expanding novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, has challenged the medical community to an unprecedented degree. Physicians and health care workers are at added risk of exposure and infection during the course of patient care. Because of the rapid spread of this disease through respiratory droplets, health care workers who come in close contact with the upper aerodigestive tract during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, such as otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons, are particularly at risk. A set of safety recommendations was created based on a review of the literature and communications with physicians with firsthand knowledge of safety procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Observations/UNASSIGNED:A high number of health care workers were infected during the first phase of the pandemic in the city of Wuhan, China. Subsequently, by adopting strict safety precautions, other regions were able to achieve high levels of safety for health care workers without jeopardizing the care of patients. The most common procedures related to the examination and treatment of upper aerodigestive tract diseases were reviewed. Each category was reviewed based on the potential risk imposed to health care workers. Specific recommendations were made based on the literature, when available, or consensus best practices. Specific safety recommendations were made for performing tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19. Conclusions and Relevance/UNASSIGNED:Preserving a highly skilled health care workforce is a top priority for any community and health care system. Based on the experience of health care systems in Asia and Europe, by following strict safety guidelines, the risk of exposure and infection of health care workers could be greatly reduced while providing high levels of care. The provided recommendations, which may evolve over time, could be used as broad guidance for all health care workers who are involved in the care of patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND:To the authors' knowledge, the question of whether human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is associated with outcomes in patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) is not well studied at this time. In the current study, the authors investigated patterns of HPV testing and its association with survival in patients with SNSCC using the National Cancer Data Base. METHODS:The authors selected all SNSCC cases diagnosed between 2010 and 2016. HPV testing practices, clinicodemographic factors, treatments, and survival were analyzed. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity score-matched survival analyses were performed. RESULTS:A total of 6458 SNSCC cases were identified. Of these, only 1523 cases (23.6%) were tested for HPV and included in the current study. The median patient age was 64 years and the majority had advanced stage tumors (overall AJCC stage III-IV, 721 patients; 62.1%). HPV-positive SNSCC comprised 31.5% (447 of 1418 cases) of the final study cohort. Among 15 hospitals that routinely tested nonoropharyngeal SCCs for HPV, the percentage of HPV-positive SNSCCs was smaller (24.6%; P = .04). Patients with HPV-positive SNSCC were younger (aged 60 years vs 65 years; P < .001), with tumors that were more likely to be high grade (55.3% vs 41.7%; P < .001), and attributed to the nasal cavity (62.2% vs 44.0%; P < .001). HPV-positive SNSCC was associated with significantly improved overall survival in multivariable regression analysis (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.72 [P = .001]) and propensity score-matched (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.96 [P = .03]) analyses controlling for clinicodemographic and treatment factors. CONCLUSIONS:Currently, only a minority of patients with SNSCC are tested for HPV. However, a sizable percentage of SNSCC cases may be HPV related; furthermore, HPV-positive SNSCC is associated with improved overall survival. Routine HPV testing may be warranted in patients with SNSCC.

BACKGROUND:Small cohort studies have suggested oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) could be associated with worse prognosis in individuals younger than 40. METHODS:We compared the survival of all OTSCC cases in the National Cancer Database under 40 years old with those older than 40, excluding patients over 70. Cox regression and propensity score matched (PSM) survival analyses were performed. RESULTS:A total of 22 930 OTSCC patients were identified. The under 40 group consisted of 2566 (9.9%) cases; 20664 were 40 to 70 (90.1%). Most were male (13 713, 59.8%), stage I-II (12 754, 72.4%), and treated by surgery alone (13 973, 63.2%). Survival in patients under 40 was higher (79.6% vs 69.5%, P < .001). In PSM analysis (n = 2928) controlling for all 10 significant factors in multivariate regression, patients under 40 had a 9% higher 5-year survival (77.1% vs 68.2%, P < .001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Contrary to the prior reports, younger patients with OTSCC did not have worse survival in the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND:Four-dimensional computed tomography is routinely used to localize parathyroid disease, with consistently excellent parathyroid gland localization rates reported. This study evaluated whether pairing 4-dimensional computed tomography results with preoperative clinical variables can accurately predict single-gland disease in primary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS:Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent both 4-dimensional computed tomography imaging and parathyroidectomy between January 2019 and September 2021 at a large academic health system were included. Patient demographics, preoperative characteristics, and peri- and postoperative data were collected. The accuracy of 4-dimensional computed tomography in correctly identifying patients with single-gland disease with and without preoperative calcium and parathyroid hormone levels was calculated. Single-gland disease was defined by intraoperative parathyroid hormone decrease >50% and a hypercellular gland on pathology. RESULTS:One hundred seventy-five patients had 4-dimensional computed tomography results suggestive of single gland disease. One hundred fifty-two patients (87%) were predicted correctly to have single-gland disease. The predictive accuracy increased when stratifying by preoperative calcium (≥10.5 mg/dL, ≥11 mg/dL, and ≥12 mg/dL) and parathyroid hormone levels (≥65 pg/mL, ≥100 pg/mL, and ≥200 pg/dL). The accuracy further increased when stratifying by age (≤50 years). Accuracy for single gland disease was 100% when combined with any of the following: (1) calcium ≥12 mg/dL, (2) parathyroid hormone ≥200 pg/dL, or (3) calcium ≥11 mg/dL in patients ≤50 years. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Four-dimensional computed tomography alone accurately predicted single gland disease in 87% of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. When combined with preoperative calcium, parathyroid hormone and age thresholds, predictive accuracy for single-gland disease approached 100%. Given the high likelihood of single-gland disease in these scenarios, clinicians may consider offering focused unilateral parathyroidectomy without intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring in selected patients.

OBJECTIVE:To investigate the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy in isolated locally advanced oral cavity cancers (pT3N0M0) without adverse features. METHODS:We selected all patients from the National Cancer Database (2004-2019) who underwent surgical treatment where the final pathology was T3N0M0 with negative margins. Demographics, details of treatment, and outcomes were abstracted. The impact of radiotherapy on survival was assessed with univariable, multivariable, and propensity score-matched analyses. RESULTS:We identified 571 patients in our survival cohort. Most were male (348, 60.9%), and median age was 65. Less than one-third (176, 30.8%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. The median length of follow-up was 29 months. Overall, adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with improved survival (87.2% vs. 77.7%, at 2 years, p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis controlling for age and comorbidities, this survival difference persisted (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43-0.90, p = 0.01). In a propensity score-matched population of 278 patients matched on age and comorbidities, adjuvant radiotherapy was still associated with longer survival (87.4% vs. 78.5%, p = 0.014). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In our study, adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with improved survival in completely excised locally advanced oral cavity tumors (T3N0M0). However, a significant proportion of patients do not receive adjuvant radiotherapy. These findings highlight the need for continued efforts to promote guideline-recommended care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:3 Laryngoscope, 134:2236-2242, 2024.

BACKGROUND:The present study aims to quantify the opportunity cost of training residents and fellows for head and neck surgery. METHODS:A 2005-2015 review of ablative head and neck surgical procedures was performed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Work relative value units (wRVU) generated per hour were compared among procedures performed by attendings alone, attendings with residents, and attendings with fellows. RESULTS:Among 34,078 ablative procedures, the rate of wRVU generation per hour was greatest for attendings alone (10.3), followed by attendings with residents (8.9) and attendings with fellows (7.0, p < 0.001). Resident and fellow involvement was associated with opportunity costs of $60.44 per hour (95% CI: $50.21-$70.66/h) and $78.98 per hour ($63.10-$94.87/h, 95% CI), respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:wRVU-based physician reimbursement does not consider or adjust for the extra effort involved in training future head and neck surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:NA Laryngoscope, 134:113-119, 2024.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:In addition to their patient management value, multidisciplinary tumor boards have been recognized as effective learning tools. However, the value of using a virtual tumor board as a learning tool for head and neck surgical oncology fellows has not been studied. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To describe the structure and content of the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) Virtual Tumor Board and assess its educational value as perceived by attendees. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:All sessions of the AHNS Virtual Tumor Board from April 8, 2020, to June 1, 2022, were reviewed. Topics, presenters, participants, and viewership data were collected as of October 15, 2022, from session recordings posted to an online video sharing and social media platform. Additionally, an anonymous, 14-question online survey was designed to elicit feedback from head and neck surgery trainees on virtual tumor board engagement, strengths, and weaknesses. The survey was electronically distributed in June and July 2022 to the 101 fellows enrolled in AHNS-accredited programs between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The primary aim was to tabulate online viewership of the sessions. The secondary aim was to qualitatively assess the experience of head and neck trainees with the AHNS Virtual Tumor Board using a survey. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Forty-two sessions of the virtual tumor board were held between April 8, 2020, and June 1, 2022. Almost all sessions (41 [98%]) were case based. One hundred and sixteen cases were presented, representing 2 to 3 cases per session, by 75 unique faculty members. Each session was viewed a mean of 217 times (range, 64-2216 views). In the 2021 to 2022 academic year, a mean of 60 viewers (range, 30-92 viewers) attended each live session. In all, 29 survey responses were collected from 101 fellows in AHNS-accredited programs (29% response rate). Most respondents felt the format allowed for excellent teaching (18 of 26 respondents [69%]) and discussion (19 of 26 respondents [73%]). Most respondents (22 of 29 respondents [76%]) believed that practicing head and neck surgeons would benefit from the sessions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:This survey study found that the AHNS Virtual Tumor Board was well-attended and well-reviewed by head and neck surgical oncology trainees. The virtual tumor board format could be used as model of remote learning for other organizations.

OBJECTIVE:To quantify the price that private payers pay hospitals for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatments and identify hospital-level factors associated with price variation. STUDY DESIGN:Cross-sectional study. SETTING:Price transparency files. METHODS:Files from the top 50 hospitals in otolaryngology according to the US News and World Report were analyzed between December 2021 and June 2022. This study analyzed the following Food and Drug Administration-approved HNSCC therapies: pembrolizumab, nivolumab, cetuximab, cisplatin, carboplatin, and paclitaxel. RESULTS:Twenty-four (48%) hospitals reported prices for at least 1 medication in our sample. Newer biologics were significantly more expensive than traditional chemotherapeutic agents. Given approved medication regimens, all biologics in our sample have similar annual costs. Price markups over acquisition costs ranged between 109% (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and 530% for carboplatin. Across hospitals, prices varied the most for paclitaxel, the cheapest medication in our sample, and prices varied the least for pembrolizumab the most expensive medication in our sample. Hospital 340B status and geographic location in the northeast/west are associated with lower price markups. CONCLUSION:Price nondisclosure remains a significant problem among hospitals. Newer biological medications are more expensive when compared to traditional chemotherapeutic agents. Prices vary significantly across hospitals, with lower price markups observed in 340B hospitals as well as hospitals located in the geographic northeast and west. It remains to be seen if price transparency will lead to more uniform pricing or lower costs of treatments.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Lacrimal gland cancer is a rare malignancy with little data known about its pathologic characteristics or optimal management. We performed a large database analysis using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to elucidate this unusual condition. METHODS:Patients with lacrimal gland cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 were included in the analysis. Using available clinical data, we excluded all patients with histologies likely reflective of lacrimal sac or duct cancer, which are coded similarly to lacrimal gland cancer in the NCDB. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards models were used to indicate covariates associated with survival. RESULTS:A total of 440 cases of lacrimal gland cancer were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 52.9 months. The five-year OS for the entire cohort was 65.0%. Adenoid cystic carcinoma was the predominant histology (47.3%). Cox models showed that improved OS was associated with surgical resection (UVA: p < 0.001; MVA: p = 0.035). A detriment in OS was associated with increasing age, Charlson-Deyo score of 1, T4 stage, and positive margins and on UVA for adenocarcinoma and malignant mixed tumor histology. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Adenoid cystic carcinoma comprises the plurality of lacrimal gland cancers. About half of patients with lacrimal gland carcinoma will live beyond 10 years, underscoring the importance of reduced morbidity of treatment. Surgical management is associated with improved prognosis. Further study will elucidate the role of surgical excision and radiotherapy in lacrimal gland cancer.