Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Hemodialysis has an essential role in the treatment of certain poisoned patients, both by enhancing the elimination of select poisons and correcting underlying fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base disturbances. We sought to identify barriers to the performance of hemodialysis when it was recommended by our poison center. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Data from a single United States poison center were retrospectively queried for adult patients for whom the poison center recommended intermittent hemodialysis for poison removal. The primary outcome was the performance of intermittent hemodialysis within 12 h of the poison center recommendation, which we defined as timely hemodialysis. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to assess the effect of the following variables on this outcome: age group, patient sex, time of day of the recommendation, day of week of the recommendation, year of the recommendation, hospital location, and poison category. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 535 patient encounters were analyzed. The majority (72%) of patients had intermittent hemodialysis performed within 12 h of when it was recommended. The multivariable analyses showed that the odds of receiving recommended intermittent hemodialysis within 12 h were significantly lower when the recommendation was made during the nighttime (OR: 0.660; 95% CI: 0.442-0.987) compared to daytime and during the weekend (OR: 0.605; 95% CI: 0.398-0.918) compared to weekdays. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Intermittent hemodialysis is resource-intensive and requires specialized equipment and personnel, which is likely less available outside of regular business hours. This study is limited by its retrospective nature and may not be generalizable to other poison centers. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Patients for whom our poison center recommended intermittent hemodialysis during non-weekday times had lower odds of receiving timely hemodialysis. Hospital administrators and healthcare providers should be aware of this potential treatment obstacle for poisoned patients and identify the specific barriers involved in order to facilitate timely hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Methylthioninium chloride is used for multiple treatment purposes and is sometimes administered through peripheral intravenous lines. We highlight the potential adverse effects of methylthioninium chloride extravasation during continuous peripheral intravenous administration. CASE SUMMARY/UNASSIGNED:A 38-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with multifactorial hypovolemic and septic shock. She was treated with a continuous peripheral infusion of intravenous methylthioninium chloride for shock refractory to multiple vasopressors. IMAGES/UNASSIGNED:One day after administration commenced, the patient developed blue staining of the left upper arm due to extravasation of methylthioninium chloride proximal to the site of infusion. Further images show its later spread. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:While reported cases of methylthioninium chloride extravasation are rare, it is our preference that methylthioninium chloride should be administered through a central line in cases of continuous infusion due to the risk of potential toxicity from extravasation.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Prescriptions of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist administered weekly for Type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, are increasing. Adverse effects from semaglutide overdose are poorly described. We report adverse effects from three unintentional semaglutide overdoses upon initiation. CASE REPORTS/UNASSIGNED: DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:These unintentional semaglutide overdoses occurred due to deficits in patient and prescriber knowledge, and evasion of regulated access to pharmaceuticals. Nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms predominated. The potential for hypoglycemia following glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist overdose is unclear, though it did not occur in our patients. It is thought that glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists are unlikely to cause hypoglycemia because their effects are glucose-dependent and diminish as serum glucose concentrations approach euglycemia. There is, however, an increase in hypoglycemia when glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists are combined with sulfonylureas. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:This case series highlights the critical role of patient education and training upon initiation of semaglutide therapy to minimize administration errors and adverse effects from injection of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.