Searched for: person:golana01
in-biosketch:true
No difference in operative time, outcomes, cosmesis, or return to activity and/or sport after minimally invasive versus open repair of primary Achilles ruptures: a retrospective review
Savage-Elliott, Ian; Li, Zachary I; Moore, Michael R; Lezak, Bradley; Jazrawi, Taylor; Golant, Alexander; Meislin, Robert J
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To compare clinical outcomes and the rate of return to sport among patients that have undergone minimally invasive repair versus open approach of an acute Achilles tendon rupture. METHODS:Patients who underwent surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture at a single urban academic institution from 2017 to 2020 with minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed retrospectively. Preinjury sport participation and preinjury work activity information, the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), the Tegner Activity Scale, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System for mobility and pain interference were collected. RESULTS:In total, 144 patients were initially included in the study. Of these, 63 patients were followed with a mean follow-up of 45.3 ± 29.2 months. The mean operative time did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.938). Patients who underwent minimally invasive repair returned to sport at a rate of 88.9% at a mean of 10.6 ± 5.8 months, compared to return rate of open procedures of 83.7% at 9.5 ± 5.5 months. There were no significant differences in ATRS (p = 0.246), Tegner (p = 0.137) or VAS pain (p = 0.317) scores between groups. There was no difference in cosmetic satisfaction between PARS and open repair groups (88.4 vs. 76.0; p = 0.244). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients who underwent minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures demonstrate no significant differences with respect to cosmesis, operative time, patient-reported outcomes and the rate and level of return to activities when compared to an open approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.
PMID: 38436745
ISSN: 1432-1068
CID: 5672832
Management of the Structurally Intact ACL with Residual Instability
Chapter by: Golant, Alexander; Geswell, Matthew; Nicholas, Stephen J
in: Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction : A Case-Based Approach by Alaia, Michael J; Jones, Kristofer J [Eds]
Cham : Springer International Publishing AG, 2022
pp. 63-76
ISBN: 9783030969967
CID: 5363732
Superior capsule reconstruction : review of a novel operative technique for management of irreparable rotator cuff tears
Chapter by: Golant, Alexander; Kano, D; Quach, T; Jiang, K; Rosen, J
in: Advances in shoulder surgery by Sonar S [Ed]
London : IntechOpen, 2018
pp. -
ISBN: 9781789230178
CID: 5363792
Brachial Artery Tear Occurring Concurrently with A Distal Biceps Injury
Gonzalez, Gerardo; Dayal, Rajeev; Andy, Lee; Golant, Alexander
ORIGINAL:0016287
ISSN: 2167-1222
CID: 5363682
Potential consequences to repeat concussions
Classie, J; Golant, Alexander
ORIGINAL:0016283
ISSN: 1529-6350
CID: 5363642
Strong hamstrings may prevent injury
Golant, Alexander; Jiang, K
ORIGINAL:0016284
ISSN: 1529-6350
CID: 5363652
Ankle injuries in snowboarding
Golant, Alexander
ORIGINAL:0016285
ISSN: 1529-6350
CID: 5363662
Shoulder injuries in volleyball players
Golant, Alexander
ORIGINAL:0016286
ISSN: 1529-6350
CID: 5363672
Wrestling injuries
Golant, Alexander
ORIGINAL:0016289
ISSN: n/a
CID: 5363702
Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with a looped semitendinosus tendon, using knotless anchor fixation on the patella and hybrid fixation on the femur
Golant, Alexander; Quach, Tony; Rosen, Jeffrey E
Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a reliable surgical method for stabilizing a dislocating patella, with multiple techniques previously described. Although outcomes are generally favorable, the procedure is technically demanding and relies on precise identification of native MPFL insertion sites, secure fixation of the graft to these sites, and appropriate graft tension. We describe a technique for MPFL reconstruction with a looped semitendinosus tendon. The 2 free limbs of the graft are secured into blind-end patellar sockets with knotless anchors, and the looped end is initially secured into a medial femoral socket with a button on the opposite (lateral) cortex. Use of an adjustable-loop button allows for gradual adjustment of graft tension, as well as re-tensioning after cycling of the knee, before final aperture fixation on the femur with an interference screw.
PMCID:4044545
PMID: 24904762
ISSN: 2212-6287
CID: 5363592