Faculty Bibliography

» Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) are a common pathology with a likely high asymptomatic incidence rate, particularly in the overhead athlete.» The anatomy, 5-layer histology, and relationship to Ellman's classification of PTRCTs have been well studied, with recent interest in radiographic predictors such as the critical shoulder angle and acromial index.» Depending on the definition of tear progression, rates of PTRCT progression range from 4% to 44% and appear related to symptomatology and work/activity level.» Nearly all PTRCTs should be managed conservatively initially, particularly in overhead athletes, with those that fail nonoperative management undergoing arthroscopic debridement ± acromioplasty if <50% thickness or arthroscopic conversion repair or in situ repair if >50% thickness.» Augmentation of PTRCTs is promising, with leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma having the most robust body of supportive data. Mesenchymal signaling cell biologics and the variety of scaffold onlay augments require more rigorous studies before regular usage.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To compare clinical outcomes and the rate of return to sport among patients that have undergone minimally invasive repair versus open approach of an acute Achilles tendon rupture. METHODS:Patients who underwent surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture at a single urban academic institution from 2017 to 2020 with minimum 2-year follow-up were reviewed retrospectively. Preinjury sport participation and preinjury work activity information, the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), the Tegner Activity Scale, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System for mobility and pain interference were collected. RESULTS:In total, 144 patients were initially included in the study. Of these, 63 patients were followed with a mean follow-up of 45.3 ± 29.2 months. The mean operative time did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.938). Patients who underwent minimally invasive repair returned to sport at a rate of 88.9% at a mean of 10.6 ± 5.8 months, compared to return rate of open procedures of 83.7% at 9.5 ± 5.5 months. There were no significant differences in ATRS (p = 0.246), Tegner (p = 0.137) or VAS pain (p = 0.317) scores between groups. There was no difference in cosmetic satisfaction between PARS and open repair groups (88.4 vs. 76.0; p = 0.244). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients who underwent minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures demonstrate no significant differences with respect to cosmesis, operative time, patient-reported outcomes and the rate and level of return to activities when compared to an open approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.