Faculty Bibliography

Background/Purpose: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a complex immune-mediated disease. Beyond its deleterious effects in the skin and joints, PsA can lead to decreased quality of life, increased psychosocial stress, and is associated with high levels of depression and anxiety. However, little is known about the effects of mental health on disease activity and severity. This may be especially important in PsA where up to half of patients have residual symptoms (i.e., pain, fatigue) despite effective immunomodulatory therapies. The objective of this study was to characterize the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities and their impact on PsA outcomes in an urban, academic, combined clinic setting.
Method(s): Consecutive adult patients meeting CASPAR criteria (n=537) were prospectively recruited at the NYU Psoriatic Arthritis Center and followed for up to 2 years. All data was obtained from clinical visits using a standardized EPIC template. Depression was defined as patient-reported depression and/or use of anti-depressant medications.
Result(s): The cohort was 53% male, mostly Caucasian (79.7%) and had an average age of 49 years. Within our population, 23% had depression, 18% anxiety, and 4% ADHD (Table 1). At the initial visit, patients with depression were more likely to be female, older, and have concomitant anxiety compared to those without depression. Moreover, compared to their nondepressed counterparts, patients with depression had similar swollen joint counts (SJCs), tender joint counts (TJCs) and RAPID3 scores, as well as a lower percent body surface area (BSA). However, at the subsequent timepoints, while other outcomes remained similar between the groups, patients with depression had a higher TJC (Figure 1). When adjusting for age, sex, race, medication use, and comorbidities, the rate ratio (RR) of TJC in patients with depression vs. without depression was 1.23 (95%CI 0.78, 1.94, p=0.79) at baseline (Figure 2). This ratio was even higher at year 1 (RR 1.47, 95%CI 0.91, 2.35, p=0.19) and year 2 (RR 1.75, 95%CI 0.97, 3.14, p=0.07), nearing significance. In the adjusted models for SJC, BSA, and RAPID3, this pattern was not seen.
Conclusion(s): High rates of depression and anxiety in this cohort expand upon previously reported data. While most patients improve over time, TJC is significantly higher in those who carry a diagnosis of depression whereas SJC and BSA are similar in patients with and without depression. This may reflect differences in how patients with depression perceive their disease and may lead to difficulty in achieving low disease activity/remission by composite score measures. Therefore, addressing depression, along with inflammatory symptoms, should be considered, especially in those with residual pain. Further work is needed to understand if intervening on depression could help improve PsA outcomes

Background/Purpose: The skin is recognized as a window into the immunopathogenic mechanisms driving the vast phenotypic spectrum of psoriatic disease.
Method(s): To better decipher the cellular landscape of both healthy and psoriatic skin, we employed spatial transcriptomics (ST), a ground-breaking technology that precisely maps gene expression from histologically-intact tissue sections (Fig. 1A).
Result(s): Findings gleaned from computationally integrating our 23 matched lesional and non-lesional psoriatic and 7 healthy control samples with publicly-available single-cell ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing datasets established the ability of ST to recapitulate the tissue architecture of both healthy and inflamed skin (Fig. 1B) and highlighted topographic shifts in the immune cell milieu, from a predominantly perifollicular distribution in steady-state skin to the papillary and upper reticular dermis in psoriatic lesional skin. We also incidentally discovered that ST's ability to ascertain gene expression patterns from intact tissue rendered it particularly conducive to studying the transcriptome of lipid-laden cells such as dermal adipose tissue and sebaceous glands (Fig. 1C), whose expression profiles are typically lost in the process of tissue handling and dissociation for bulk and single-cell RNA seq. Unbiased clustering of pooled healthy and psoriatic samples identified two epidermal clusters and one dermal cluster that were differentially expanded in psoriatic lesional skin (p values <=0.05) (Fig. 1D); pathway analysis of these clusters revealed enrichment of known psoriatic inflammatory pathways (Fig. 1E). Unsupervised classification of skin-limited psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis samples revealed stratification by cutaneous disease severity or Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score and not by presence or absence of concomitant systemic/synovial disease (Fig. 1F). Remarkably, this PASI-dependent segregation was also evident in distal, non-lesional samples and was driven by the dermal macrophage and fibroblast cluster and the lymphatic endothelium (Fig. 2A). Inquiry into the mechanistic drivers of this observed stratification yielded enrichment of pathways associated with key T cell and innate immune cell activation, B cells, and metabolic dysfunction (Fig. 2B). Finally, tissue scale computational cartography of gene expression revealed differences in regional enrichment of specific cell types across phenotypic groups, most notably upward extension of fibroblasts to the upper dermis in both lesional and non-lesional samples from mild psoriasis and restriction to the lower dermis in the moderate-to-severe psoriasis samples (Fig. 2C), suggesting that disease severity stratification may be driven by emergent cellular ecosystems in the upper dermis. Fig. 1. (A) Schematic of spatial transcriptomics study workflow. Four mm skin punch biopsies were obtained from healthy volunteers (n=3) and lesional and non-lesional skin from patients with psoriatic disease (n=11). Ten micron-thick sections were then placed on capture areas on the ST microarray slide, each containing molecularly barcoded, spatially encoded spots with a diameter of 50 microns and a center-to-center distance of 100 microns. (B) Side-by-side comparison of a hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) stained section of representative healthy, lesional, and non-lesional skin samples and the corresponding ST plots showed concordance of unbiased gene expression-based clustering with histologic tissue architecture. (C) Pathway analysis of the adipose cluster in healthy skin (cluster 2) confirmed upregulation of lipid-associated processes. Inset: Spots corresponding to the adipose cluster highlighted in yellow. (D) Wilcoxon rank sum test (results displayed as box plots) yielded statistically significant expansion of three clusters in lesional skin compared to both non-lesional and healthy skin-inflamed suprabasal epidermis (cluster 4), epidermis 2 (cluster 7), and inflamed dermis (cluster 10). HC=healthy control, L=lesional psoriatic skin, NL=non-lesional psoriatic skin. (E) Pathways enriched in clusters 4, 7, and 10. (F) Principal component analysis (PCA) plots demonstrating segregation of samples by severity of cutaneous disease in both lesional and non-lesional samples along the first principal component (right) that was not seen in the samples categorized according to presence or absence of arthritis (left). PsA=psoriatic arthritis, PsO=skin-limited psoriasis. Fig. 2. (A) PCA of lesional and non-lesional samples colored by disease severity in spatial clusters 1 (left) and 12 (right) revealed more discrete clustering. (B) Pathways significantly enriched in clusters 1 (left) and 12 (right) showed enrichment of pathways associated with key T cell and innate immune cell activation, B cells, and metabolic dysfunction (highlighted in red). (C) SpaceFold one dimension projection of cell distribution from an independently-generated single-cell RNA seq data set on aggregated ST lesional and non-lesional samples from mild (PASI-low) and moderate-severe (PASI-high) samples. Y-axis represents tissue position, starting with the lower dermis marked as position 0 to suprabasal epidermis marked as position 1. Dashed line represents epidermal-dermal junction, discerned by cell types in the basal epidermal layer (melanocytes and Langerhans cells). Fibroblast signatures (red arrows) were largely relegated to the lower dermis in the PASI-high group, but extended to the upper dermis in the PASI-low group. This striking difference in fibroblast localization was also noted in non-lesional PASI-high vs. PASI-low groups. In addition to fibroblasts, lymphatic, endothelial, myeloid, and T cells signatures (black arrows) were also observed in the upper dermis of lesional PASI-low samples, but were much lower in the dermis of PASI-low non-lesional and all samples in the PASI-high group. Interfollicular epidermis (IFE), hair follicle and infundibulum (HF/IFN), n= number of individual biopsies.
Conclusion(s): Thus, we have been able to successfully leverage ST integrated with independently-generated single-cell RNA seq data to spatially define the emergent cellular ecosystems of healthy and matched psoriatic lesional and non-lesional skin and in so doing, demonstrated the value of ST in unearthing the genetic groundwork at both the site of inflammation and in distal, clinically-uninvolved skin

Background/Purpose: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at high risk for severe disease from COVID-19 and decreased vaccine efficacy, due to inherent immune perturbations and frequent immunosuppressant use. The impact of vaccine responses was "pressure" tested in New York City (NYC) from December 2021-February 2022, due to the highly infectious omicron BA.1 variant which resulted in a significant increase in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations. This study was performed to assess clinical efficacy and seroreactivity in SLE patients with and without an additional vaccination dose after initial vaccine series, particularly during the omicron BA.1 surge in NYC.
Method(s): COVID-19 infections after vaccination were evaluated during patient encounters and chart review in subjects from the NYU Lupus Cohort who received an initial SARS-CoV-2 vaccine series with follow-up for at least 6 months or until breakthrough infection. Clinical follow-up was required after February 4, 2022 (when NYC COVID-19 cases returned to their preomicron BA.1 baseline), with last patient follow-up recorded April 24, 2022. Positive PCR or antigen-based testing was required, performed at the clinical site or self-reported. Fifty-seven patients receiving additional vaccine doses were evaluated longitudinally for recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain antibodies (#BT10500; R&D Systems). Low post-vaccine antibody response was defined as <=100 units/ml.
Result(s): Among the 163 subjects evaluated, 125 (76.7%) received an additional COVID-19 vaccination after the initial series. Demographics and medication usage were similar in patients who did and did not receive the additional vaccination dose, with 50% on at least one immunosuppressant and 16% on more than one at the time of the initial vaccine. Twentyeight (63.6%) of the 44 patients with a breakthrough infection had received an additional vaccination compared to 97 (81.5%) of the 119 without breakthrough infection (p=0.022) (Table 1). Of the 44 COVID-19 cases, only 2 occurred prior to the omicron wave, both in patients who did not receive the additional dose. There were no COVID-19 related deaths and two patients were hospitalized. Among the 57 patients with serologic evaluation, the median antibody level after initial vaccination series was 397 u/mL (IQR 57-753), and 1036 (IQR 517-1338.5) after the additional dose. After initial vaccination, 21 (37%) had low ELISA responses, but only 4 (7%) continued to have low responses after the additional dose. There was no association between the level of antibody after the additional dose and COVID-19 breakthrough.
Conclusion(s): SLE patients from a cohort of patients in NYC who received an additional SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose were significantly less likely to have a subsequent COVID-19 infection compared to those who only completed their initial vaccine series. SLE patients demonstrated an improvement in serologic response after an additional dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The mild disease in all vaccinated patients is reassuring given the risks inherent and frequent immunosuppressant use in this patient population

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate seroreactivity and disease flares after COVID-19 vaccination in a multi-ethnic/racial cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS:90 SLE patients and 20 healthy controls receiving a complete COVID-19 vaccine regimen were included. IgG seroreactivity to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) and SARS-CoV-2 microneutralization were used to evaluate B cell responses; IFN-γ production to assess T cell responses was measured by ELISpot. Disease activity was measured by the hybrid SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) and flares were assigned by the SELENA/SLEDAI flare index. RESULTS:Overall, fully vaccinated SLE patients produced significantly lower IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD than controls. Twenty-six SLE patients (28.8%) generated an IgG response below that of the lowest control (<100 units/ml). In logistic regression analyses, the use of any immunosuppressant or prednisone and a normal anti-dsDNA level prior to vaccination associated with decreased vaccine responses. IgG seroreactivity to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD strongly correlated with the SARS-CoV-2 microneutralization titers and antigen-specific IFN-γ production determined by ELISpot. In a subset of patients with poor antibody responses, IFN-γ production was likewise diminished. Pre-/post-vaccination SLEDAI scores were similar. Only 11.4% of patients had a post-vaccination flare; 1.3% were severe. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In a multi-ethnic/racial study of SLE patients 29% had a low response to the COVID-19 vaccine which was associated with being on immunosuppression. Reassuringly, disease flares were rare. While minimal protective levels remain unknown, these data suggest protocol development is needed to assess efficacy of booster vaccination.

Introduction Fetal cardiac disease is strongly associated with maternal anti-SSA/Ro antibodies, but gaps in our knowledge include the influence of antibody specificity and titer, maternal diagnosis, overall non-cardiac adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), optimal surveillance protocols, and efficacy of rapid treatment. Methods The multi-center Surveillance and Treatment To Prevent Fetal AV Block Likely to Occur Quickly (STOP BLOQ) study recruited pregnant women with commercially positive anti-Ro antibodies and stratified them into high and low titers of anti-Ro60 and Ro52 based on a research ELISA, using a cutoff defined by that obtained for 50 mothers with previous AVB offspring. Mothers with anti-Ro60 and/or 52 antibodies at or above 1,000 I.U. were trained to perform FHRM. From 17-25 weeks of gestation, FHRM was completed 3x/day in addition to weekly or biweekly fetal echocardiograms (echo). Mothers texted all audio sounds to the coordinating center. Texts deemed abnormal by mothers were immediately sent to an on call pediatric cardiologist who either reassured if FHRM was normal or referred for emergency fetal echo in < 6 hours if abnormal. Results 250 anti-Ro pregnant women (22% Hispanic, 50% white, 12% Black, 12% Asian, 4% other) have been consented, including 28 whose previous child had AVB. Of mothers tested to date, 153 were provided home monitors given high titer anti-Ro60 and/or 52 antibodies (26 high titer anti-Ro60 alone, 21 high titer anti-Ro52 alone,105 high titer antibodies to both antigens). The 83 patients with low titers were surveilled with echos per local standard of care. Regarding maternal diagnosis, of 161 assessed to date, 39% were asym/UAS, 11% RA, 31% SS, 19% SLE. Antibody titers did not significantly differ by ethnicity, race or diagnosis (table 1). Non-AVB APOs occurred in 18% and were not predicted by Ro60 or 52 titers but rather SLE diagnosis (table 2). In total, 24,759 FHRM audiotexts were received from 131 patients (90 of whom have delivered) during the monitoring period. Of these, 22 were evaluated by the on-call pediatric cardiologist, who prompted an emergency echo (all completed in < 6 hrs). In 11 cases, the emergency echo was normal. In 9, there were premature atrial contractions, confirming the mother's perception. In 2 with 2degree block on urgent echo (both treated per protocol with IVIG and dexamethasone), 1 reverted to normal sinus rhythm and the other progressed to 3degree block. In 2 others, the mother did not perceive abnormal FHRM for > 24 hrs, echo identified 3degree block, and retrospective cardiology review of FHRM audio captures identified an abnormality prior to obtaining the echo. All 4 AVB developed in fetuses of mothers with high titer antibodies to both Ro60 and 52 (mean 32,451 and 34,991 respectively). Of the 18 mothers with a previous AVB child who followed the 400mg hydroxychloroquine PATCH protocol, 1 developed AVB in accord with the results of Step 1 in that study. Conclusion These data support that APOs in this clinically diverse group of mothers are not influenced by anti-Ro titer or specificity, but rather SLE diagnosis. All conduction defects were initially identified by FHRM and in mothers with high titer anti-Ro60 and 52. Hydroxychloroquine continues to show efficacy in reducing the AVB recurrence rate with rapid intervention of emergent block being promising