Faculty Bibliography

The scope of responsibilities and time commitment required for program directors (PDs) of Neuroradiology fellowship programs has become quite substantial over the past decade. PDs must continually refine and document a robust, effective curriculum that meets growing accreditation requirements while aligning with institution policies and workflow. This article serves as a comprehensive guide for Neuroradiology fellowship PDs, providing direction and resources needed to lead a successful and compliant fellowship program.ABBREVIATIONS: ACGME = Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; ADS = Accreditation Data System; ASNR = American Society of Neuroradiology; CCC = Clinical Competency Committee; ERAS = Electronic Residency Application Service; GMEC = Graduate Medical Education Committee; NRMP = National Residency Match Program; PEC = Program Evaluation Committee; PD = Program Director; SCARD = Society of Chairs of Academic Radiology Departments.

OBJECTIVE:Observe if metal artifact reduction (MAR) techniques applied to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed on patients with cochlear implants (CI) or auditory brainstem implants (ABI) improves image quality. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective review. SETTING/METHODS:Tertiary care center. PATIENTS/METHODS:Patients with auditory implants who underwent clinical MRI before and after the application of MAR techniques previously described. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS:From September 2022 to March 2023, patients who underwent brain or internal auditory canal (IAC) MRI with and without MAR were identified. Sequences included T1 and T2 weighted with turbo-spin-echo (TSE) correction and fluid-attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR). Images were analyzed for visualization of intracranial structures by two neuroradiologists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Visibility of 14 structures graded on a four-point Likert scale. Average scores per structure and sequence were compared using paired two-tailed t-tests and change in mode score. RESULTS:Ten patients underwent pre- and post-MAR MRI. Six had a unilateral CI, three had a unilateral ABI, and one had an ABI and CI. Three patients had four devices with the internal magnet removed for both scans. All structures had significantly improved visibility on post-MAR scan except ipsilateral parietal and occipital lobes and contralateral inner ear. Mode score increased from 2 to 4 for the ipsilateral occipital lobe and from 3 to 4 for the ipsilateral semicircular canals, brainstem, and cerebellar peduncles. Significant improvement was seen in all sequences except for ipsilateral structures on T1w axial precontrast and contralateral structures on T1w coronal postcontrast. ABIs did not improve as much as CIs because they scored better on the pre-MAR scan. CONCLUSIONS:MAR techniques improve image quality for patients with MRI-compatible implants with magnets. Benefits may be more evident in CIs than ABIs.

This document provides evidence-based guidelines for appropriateness of imaging modalities in cases of inflammatory ear disease covering acute and chronic, and uncomplicated and complicated otitis media and otitis externa in adults. Imaging recommendations for initial imaging and postoperative surveillance of cholesteatoma in adults have also been addressed. This document provides guidance for physicians in the choice of imaging while managing cases of complicated or uncomplicated inflammatory conditions of the ear, and managing initial presentation or postoperative cases of cholesteatoma. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:This study aims to analyze the gap between the number of radiologist jobs listed in a single major US job posting center and the number of anticipated graduating general diagnostic radiology and neuroradiology trainees through the National Resident Matching Program as a primary source of radiologists to fulfill radiologist workforce needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Job listings between 2014-2023 from a single large US radiology job listing source were collected for the total number of unique annual job listings, divided between neuroradiology-only, some component of neuroradiology, and no component of neuroradiology. National Resident Matching Program data were collected for PGY-2 Diagnostic Radiology Residency and Neuroradiology Fellowship Match to estimate the number of general radiologists and neuroradiologists in the training pipeline graduating in the corresponding job listing year. The difference between the number of job listings and anticipated graduating trainees was calculated and extrapolated for the future. RESULTS:Between 2014-2023, 31,825 jobs were listed in the ACR Career Center with 10,180 anticipated diagnostic radiology residency graduates during the same time period, for a ten-year cumulative deficit of 21,645 anticipated diagnostic radiology graduates. For neuroradiology-only jobs, the mismatch between job listings and anticipated fellowship trained neuroradiologists was 2,748 jobs to 1,933 graduates. For all jobs, the mismatch between anticipated radiology training graduates and job listings grew over this time-period. CONCLUSIONS:There is a growing mismatch between diagnostic radiology job listings on a major job listing board compared to the anticipated pipeline of general radiologists and neuroradiologists entering training through the NRMP Matching Program. This mismatch between the current growing need for radiologists and the training pipeline may help inform practice and training leaders seeking to mitigate the radiologist shortage. ABBREVIATIONS/BACKGROUND:NRMP = National Resident Matching Program; PGY-2 = Post-Graduate Year-2; ACR = American College of Radiology; PACS = Picture Archival and Communications System; ABR = American Board of Radiology; ACGME = Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To better characterize the cochlear apex in relation to surgically relevant landmarks to guide surgeons and improve procedural success of apical electrode placement. STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective image analysis. SETTING/UNASSIGNED:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/UNASSIGNED:Cochlear implant recipients with available preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging. INTERVENTION/UNASSIGNED:None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE/UNASSIGNED:Cochlear dimensions and cochlear apex distance measures to surgically relevant middle ear landmarks and critical structures. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Eighty-two temporal bone CT scans were analyzed utilizing multiplanar reformats. The average lateral width of promontory bone over the cochlear apex was 1.2 mm (standard deviation [SD], 0.3). The anteroposterior distance from the round window (avg, 4.2 mm; SD, 0.5), oval window (avg, 3.3 mm; SD, 0.3), cochleariform process (avg, 2.3; SD, 0.5), and superior-inferior distance from the cochleariform process (avg, -0.9; SD, 0.8) to the cochlear apex were measured. The relationship of the cochlear apex to critical structures was highly variable.A newly developed stapes vector was created and found to mark the posterior/superior boundary of the apex in 94% of patients. When a vector parallel to the stapes vector was drawn through the round window, it marked the anterior/inferior boundary of the cochlear apex in 89% of patients. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:This study assists in characterizing cochlear apex anatomy and its relation to surrounding structures as a means of improving procedural accuracy and reducing trauma during apical cochleostomy. Understanding both distance relationships and expected boundaries of the apex could help to inform future surgical approaches.

Imaging of head and neck cancer at initial staging and as part of post-treatment surveillance is a key component of patient care as it guides treatment strategy and aids determination of prognosis. Head and neck cancer includes a heterogenous group of malignancies encompassing several anatomic sites and histologies, with squamous cell carcinoma the most common. Together this comprises the seventh most common cancer worldwide. At initial staging comprehensive imaging delineating the anatomic extent of the primary site, while also assessing the nodal involvement of the neck is necessary. The treatment of head and neck cancer often includes a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Post-treatment imaging is tailored for the evaluation of treatment response and early detection of local, locoregional, and distant recurrent tumor. Cross-sectional imaging with CT or MRI is recommended for the detailed anatomic delineation of the primary site. PET/CT provides complementary metabolic information and can map systemic involvement. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Tinnitus is abnormal perception of sound and has many subtypes. Clinical evaluation, audiometry, and otoscopy should be performed before ordering any imaging, as the choice of imaging will depend on various factors. Type of tinnitus (pulsatile or nonpulsatile) and otoscopy findings of a vascular retrotympanic lesion are key determinants to guide the choice of imaging studies. High-resolution CT temporal bone is an excellent tool to detect glomus tumors, abnormal course of vessels, and some other abnormalities when a vascular retrotympanic lesion is seen on otoscopy. CTA or a combination of MR and MRA/MRV are used to evaluate arterial or venous abnormalities like dural arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous malformation, carotid stenosis, dural sinus stenosis, and bony abnormalities like sigmoid sinus wall abnormalities in cases of pulsatile tinnitus without a vascular retrotympanic lesion. MR of the brain is excellent in detecting mass lesions such as vestibular schwannomas in cases of unilateral nonpulsatile tinnitus. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Brown syndrome is the inability to gaze upward beyond the horizontal level while adducting the eye due to an abnormality of the superior oblique tendon sheath complex. It is a rare extraocular muscular disorder, and its imaging is infrequently seen in radiologic practice. This article presents clinical characteristics and imaging of 5 patients with Brown syndrome and reviews the radiologic literature available, to familiarize the readers with its imaging findings.