Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:There is little data on the relationship between socioeconomic factors and immunotherapy in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (cSCCHN). METHODS:Our study analyzed patients with Stage IV cSCCHN diagnosed between 2018-2026 using the EPIC Cosmos database. Socioeconomic status was measured based on the social vulnerability index (SVI) and corresponding themes. Immunotherapy receipt was evaluated with Robust Poisson models. RESULTS:A total of 1140 patients were identified with Stage IV cSCCHN, with 338 (29.6%) of whom received immunotherapy. Higher SVI was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving immunotherapy (incidence rate ratio = 0.96). Patients in the most vulnerable overall SVI quintile had a 29% lower rate of receiving immunotherapy compared to the least vulnerable quintile (p = 0.018). Participants' race/ethnicity, insurance status, and urbanicity were not significantly associated with immunotherapy receipt. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Increased social vulnerability is associated with reduced likelihood of treatment with immunotherapy among patients with Stage IV cSCCHN.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:This prospective, non-randomized phase II single-arm pilot trial aimed to explore favorable mid-treatment nodal response (FMNR) through CT imaging to guide de-escalated chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with favorable risk, node-positive HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:. At week 4, CT imaging evaluated nodal response: ≥40% reduction warranted de-escalation to 60 Gy, while <40% reduction continued standard CRT. Primary endpoint was 2-year PFS from initiation of dose de-escalated CRT. Tissue tumor modified viral (TTMV) HPV DNA samples and DW-MRI were collected at baseline and week 4. MDADI questionnaires were collected at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS:Of 39 patients, 26 had FMNR and underwent de-escalated treatment. 13 pts had slow mid-treatment nodal shrinkage and received standard dose. At a median follow-up of 47.4 months, the 2-year PFS was 92.1% (95% CI: 0.72-0.98) for the deescalated dose group and 92.3% for the standard dose patients (95% CI: 0.57-0.99), p=0.96. With a median survival follow up of 48.9 months (range: 16.7-77.8 months), there were no deaths or distant failures. FMNR was associated with rapid TTMV HPV DNA clearance, reduced TTMV HPV DNA flare, lower baseline and week 4 MRI diffusivity, and higher baseline and week 4 MRI diffusional kurtosis. No differences in acute or late maximum grade 3-4 toxicity by patient were noted. MDADI composite scores showed minimal clinical important difference (MCID) in the de-escalated group at 1-month post-treatment while the standard group had MCID up to 1-year post-treatment. No patients required feeding tube placement. CONCLUSIONS:De-escalated CRT using CT-based mid-treatment nodal response in favorable risk, node-positive HPV-associated OPC achieved excellent 2-year PFS and OS rates and represents a potential approach in better selecting patients for treatment de-escalation.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Local and distant progression remain common following resection of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) despite adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy. We report a prospective institutional phase I trial incorporating adjuvant GVAX vaccine, low-dose cyclophosphamide (Cy) and SBRT followed by FOLFIRINOX (FFX) among patients who underwent resection of high-risk PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:The study design was a modified 3+3. Cohort 1 received 5-fraction SBRT to 33 Gy to the tumor bed and 25 Gy to elective nodes followed by 6 cycles of full dose FFX. After toxicity review, cohort 2 had SBRT and were switched to modified FFX (mFFX). Cohort 3 had 1 cycle of Cy/GVAX followed by SBRT, mFFX, and 4 cycles of maintenance Cy/GVAX with 6-month Cy/GVAX boosts until progression. RESULTS:19 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 36.2 months. To be eligible, patients were required to have close/positive margins (within ≤1 mm) (71%) and/or lymph node metastasis (79%). Overall, 63% of patients had both. In cohort 1, 67% of patients received 6 cycles of FFX; in cohort 2, 75% received 6 cycles of modified FFX. In cohort 3, 12 patients received the first dose of Cy/GVAX and SBRT with 10 individuals (83%) receiving 6 cycles of mFFX. Cohort 3 had acceptable levels of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and diarrhea after two cycles of mFFX. Median OS/DFS for the overall cohort and cohort 3 was 36.2/18.2 months and 61.3/24.1 months, respectively. 1-year and 2-year OS for cohort 3 was 83%/75%, respectively. At last follow-up (median= x), 5 patients were alive (42%) in cohort 3. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This is the first prospective trial to evaluate adjuvant GVAX, Cy, SBRT, and mFFX in resected PDAC patients with high-risk features. This combination regimen was well tolerated with limited toxicity and promising survival outcomes, warranting future studies to validate this regimen in the adjuvant setting.

The liver is a common site for metastatic disease. In select patients with isolated liver metastases, surgical resection improves survival and may be potentially curative in patients with favorable "tumor biology". However, when surgical resection is not feasible, liver-directed therapies (LDTs) can also improve outcomes, including survival, in the appropriate clinical situations. LDTs, including hepatic artery infusion, radioembolization, radiation, and ablation techniques, such as thermal ablation and histotripsy, offer local control and potential systemic effects, including the abscopal effect. The abscopal effect occurs when nontargeted, nontreated tumors regress following localized therapy to other tumors. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that antigen-induced upregulation of key immune regulators plays a central role in this process. Unfortunately, clinical reports of the abscopal effect following LDT are exceedingly rare. However, histotripsy, a noninvasive, nonionizing, and nonthermal ablation technique, may induce an abscopal effect more frequently and robustly than other LDTs. Histotripsy enhances tumor immunogenicity through precise acoustic cavitation that better preserves the local tissue architecture while increasing antigen release, resulting in a robust local and systemic immune response. Ongoing trials are investigating these immunogenic mechanisms and the ability to generate an abscopal effect more reliably with adjuncts such as checkpoint inhibitors. This work has significant implications regarding the management of patients with liver metastasis.

Survival outcomes for localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains poor. Multimodality therapeutic regimens are critical to maximizing survival outcomes for these patients, which includes the use of systemic therapy, surgery, and radiation. In this review, the evolution of radiation techniques are discussed with a focus on modern techniques such as intensity modulated radiation and stereotactic body radiation therapy. However, the current role of radiation within the most common clinical scenarios for pancreatic cancer in the neoadjuvant, definitive, and adjuvant settings continues to be highly debated. The role of radiation in these settings is reviewed in the context of historical and modern clinical studies. In addition, emerging concepts including dose-escalated radiation, magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, and particle therapy are discussed to promote an understanding of how such concepts may change the role of radiation in the future.

We aimed to evaluate the impact of time from stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to surgery on treatment outcomes and post-operative complications in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (BRPC/LAPC). We conducted a single-institutional retrospective analysis of patients with BRPC/LAPC treated from 2016 to 2021 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by SBRT and surgical resection. Covariates were stratified by time from SBRT to surgery. A Cox regression model was used to identify variables associated with survival outcomes. In 171 patients with BRPC/LAPC, the median time from SBRT to surgery was 6.4 (range: 2.7"“25.3) weeks. Hence, patients were stratified by the timing of surgery: ≥6 and <6 weeks after SBRT. In univariable Cox regression, surgery ≥6 weeks was associated with improved local control (LC, HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30"“0.98; p = 0.042), pathologic node positivity, elevated baseline CA19-9, and inferior LC if of the male sex. In multivariable analysis, surgery ≥6 weeks (p = 0.013; HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.25"“0.85), node positivity (p = 0.019; HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.13"“3.88), and baseline elevated CA19-9 (p = 0.002; HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.44"“5.18) remained independently associated with LC. Clavien"“Dindo Grade ≥3B complications occurred in 4/63 (6.3%) vs. 5/99 (5.5%) patients undergoing surgery <6 weeks and ≥6 weeks after SBRT (p = 0.7). In summary, the timing of surgery ≥6 weeks after SBRT was associated with improved local control and low post-operative complication rates, irrespective of the surgical timing. Further investigation of the influence of surgical timing following radiotherapy is warranted.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:In a prospective multicenter study, gemcitabine monotherapy followed by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was well tolerated with outcomes comparable to chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Recent trials have reported improved survival with multi-agent chemotherapy (MA-CTX) alone. This prospective trial explored whether SBRT could be safely delivered following MA-CTX. Herein, we report the long-term outcomes of adding SBRT after MA-CTX in LAPC patients and evaluate whether genetic profiles of specimens obtained prior to SBRT influence outcomes. METHODS:This prospective non-randomized controlled phase II trial enrolled 44 LAPC and 4 locally recurrent patients after multidisciplinary evaluation between 2012-2015 at a high-volume pancreatic cancer center. For induction CTX, most received modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX), or gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) followed by 5-fraction SBRT for all. During fiducial placement, biopsies were obtained with DNA extracted for targeted sequencing using the MSK-IMPACT platform. RESULTS:Median induction CTX duration was ≥ 4 mos, and 31 patients received mFFX (65%). Among 44 LAPC patients, 17 (39%) were surgically explored, and 12/16 (75%) achieved a R0 resection. Median overall survival (mOS) was 20.2/14.6 mos from diagnosis/SBRT. 1 and 2-year OS from SBRT was 58%/28%. The mOS after resection was 28.6/22.4 mos from diagnosis/SBRT. Median local progression-free survival (LPFS) was 23.9/15.8 mos from diagnosis/SBRT. The mOS for pre-SBRT CA 19-9 ≤180 U/mL vs. >180 was 23.1/11.3 months respectively (HR = 0.53, p=0.04). Only one patient (2.1%) had late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity attributable to SBRT. Despite significant pre-treatment with chemotherapy, 88% of tumor specimens were effectively sequenced; survival outcomes were not significantly associated with specific mutational patterns. Quality of life was prospectively collected pre- and post-SBRT with the EORTC QLQ-C30/PAN26 questionnaire showing no significant change. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:SBRT was safely administered with MA-CTX with minimal toxicity. A high proportion of LAPC patients underwent R0 resection with favorable survival outcomes.

Background/UNASSIGNED:To report on a cohort of radiation-naïve patients with pancreatic cancer who developed isolated local recurrence following surgical resection and were subsequently treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods/UNASSIGNED:Patients with pancreatic cancer who were treated with SBRT for isolated local recurrence after surgical resection were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcomes were calculated from completion of SBRT and included overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate (UVA) analysis was performed to identify variables associated with clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival outcomes. Toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results/UNASSIGNED:80.2%, P<0.009). Median DMFS and PFS were 15.6 months. There was 1 case (5.3 %) of grade 3 gastric perforation. There were no cases of grade 4-5 toxicity events. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:<54.8 Gy was significantly associated with inferior local control. Further studies investigating dose escalation and optimal treatment volumes in the locally recurrent setting are warranted.