Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:The aim of the study is to evaluate the performance of the ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) score and perform individual MRI feature analysis for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian teratomas. METHODS:In this institutional review board-approved retrospective study, consecutive patients with a pathology-proven fat-containing ovarian mass imaged with contrast-enhanced MRI (1.5T or 3T) from 2013 to 2022 were included. Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated masses per the O-RADS MRI lexicon, including having a "characteristic" or "large" Rokitansky nodule (RN). Additional features analyzed included the following: nodule size/percentage volume relative to total teratoma volume, presence of bulk/intravoxel fat in the nodule, diffusion restriction in the nodule, angular interface, nodule extension through the teratoma border, presence/type of nodule enhancement pattern (solid versus peripheral), and evidence for metastatic disease. An overall O-RADS MRI score was assigned. Patient and lesion features associated with malignancy were evaluated and used to create a malignant teratoma score. χ2, Fisher's exact tests, receiver operating characteristic curve, and κ analysis was performed. RESULTS:One hundred thirty-seven women (median age 34, range 9-84 years) with 123 benign and 14 malignant lesions were included. Mean teratoma size was 7.3 cm (malignant: 14.4 cm, benign: 6.5 cm). 18/123 (14.6%) of benign teratomas were assigned an O-RADS 4 based on the presence of a "large" (11/18) or "noncharacteristic" (12/18) RN. 12/14 malignant nodules occupied >25% of the total teratoma volume (P = 0.09). Features associated with malignancy included the following: age <18 years, an enhancing noncharacteristic RN, teratoma size >12 cm, irregular cystic border, and extralesional extension; these were incorporated into a malignant teratoma score, with a score of 2 or more associated with area under the curve of 0.991 for reviewer 1 and 0.993 for reviewer 2. Peripheral enhancement in a RN was never seen with malignancy (64/123 benign, 0/14 malignant) and would have appropriated downgraded 9/18 overcalled O-RADS 4 benign teratomas. CONCLUSIONS:O-RADS MRI overcalled 15% (18/123) benign teratomas as O-RADS 4 but correctly captured all malignant teratomas. We propose defining a "characteristic" RN as an intravoxel or bulk fat-containing nodule. Observation of a peripheral rim of enhancement in a noncharacteristic RN allowed more accurate prediction of benignity and should be added to the MRI lexicon for improved O-RADS performance.

Cervical cancer is a common gynecological malignancy worldwide. Cervical cancer is staged based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification system, which was revised in 2018 to incorporate radiologic and pathologic data. Imaging plays an important role in pretreatment assessment including initial staging and treatment response assessment of cervical cancer. Accurate determination of tumor size, local extension, and nodal and distant metastases is important for treatment selection and for prognostication. Although local recurrence can be diagnosed by physical examination, imaging plays a critical role in detection and follow-up of local and distant recurrence and subsequent treatment selection. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Severe obstetric hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide. Major hemorrhage in the antepartum period presents potential risks for both the mother and the fetus. Similarly, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) accounts for up to a quarter of maternal deaths worldwide. Potential causes of severe antepartum hemorrhage that radiologists should be familiar with include placental abruption, placenta previa, placenta accreta spectrum disorders, and vasa previa. Common causes of PPH that the authors discuss include uterine atony, puerperal genital hematomas, uterine rupture and dehiscence, retained products of conception, and vascular anomalies. Bleeding complications unique to or most frequently encountered after cesarean delivery are also enumerated, including entities such as bladder flap hematomas, rectus sheath and subfascial hemorrhage, and infectious complications of endometritis and uterine dehiscence. ^©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Javitt and Madrazo in this issue.

In 2021, the American College of Radiology (ACR) Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) MRI Committee developed a risk stratification system and lexicon for assessing adnexal lesions using MRI. Like the BI-RADS classification, O-RADS MRI provides a standardized language for communication between radiologists and clinicians. It is essential for radiologists to be familiar with the O-RADS algorithmic approach to avoid misclassifications. Training, like that offered by International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA), is essential to ensure accurate and consistent application of the O-RADS MRI system. Tools such as the O-RADS MRI calculator aim to ensure an algorithmic approach. This review highlights the key teaching points, pearls, and pitfalls when using the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system.Critical relevance statement This article highlights the pearls and pitfalls of using the O-RADS MRI scoring system in clinical practice.Key points• Solid tissue is described as displaying post- contrast enhancement.• Endosalpingeal folds, fimbriated end of the tube, smooth wall, or septa are not solid tissue.• Low-risk TIC has no shoulder or plateau. An intermediate-risk TIC has a shoulder and plateau, though the shoulder is less steep compared to outer myometrium.

Uterine sarcomas are a group of rare uterine tumors comprised of multiple subtypes with different histologic characteristics, prognoses, and imaging appearances. Identification of uterine sarcomas and their differentiation from benign uterine disease on imaging is of critical importance for treatment planning to guide appropriate management and optimize patient outcomes. Herein, we review the spectrum of uterine sarcomas with a focus on the classification of primary sarcoma subtypes and presenting the typical MR imaging appearances.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Ultrasound (US) is considered a first-line study for painless jaundice. However, in our hospital system, patients with new-onset painless jaundice often have a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) regardless of the sonographic findings. Thus, we investigated the accuracy of US for detection of biliary dilatation in patients with new-onset painless jaundice. METHODS:Our electronic medical record was searched from January 1, 2012, to January 1, 2020, for adult patients with new-onset painless jaundice. Presenting complaint/setting, laboratory values, imaging studies/findings, and final diagnoses were recorded. Patients with pain or known liver disease were excluded. A gastrointestinal physician reviewed the laboratory values/chart to classify the type of suspected obstruction. Two radiologists blindly re-reviewed the US scans, and κ between the radiologists was calculated. Fisher exact test and the 2-sample t test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS:Three hundred sixty patients presented with jaundice (>3 mg/dL), of whom 68 met the inclusion criteria (no pain and no known liver disease). Laboratory values had an overall accuracy of 54%, but were accurate in 87.5% and 85% for obstructing stones/pancreaticobiliary cancer. Ultrasound demonstrated overall accuracy of 78%, but only 69% for pancreaticobiliary cancer and 12.5% for common bile duct stone. Seventy-five percent of the patients underwent follow-up CECT or MRCP regardless of presenting setting. In the emergency department or inpatient setting, 92% of the patients underwent CECT or MRCP regardless of US, and 81% had follow-up CECT or MRCP within 24 hours. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:A US-first strategy in the setting of new-onset painless jaundice is accurate only 78% of the time. In practice, US was almost never a stand-alone imaging examination in patients presenting to the emergency department or inpatient setting with new-onset painless jaundice, no matter the suspected diagnosis based on clinical and laboratory grounds or on the US findings themselves. However, for milder elevations of unconjugated bilirubin (suspicious for Gilbert disease) in the outpatient setting, a US demonstrating lack of biliary dilatation was often a definitive study for exclusion of pathology.

MR imaging plays a key role in the characterization of adnexal lesions of indeterminate malignant potential found at ultrasound. Recently, the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data Systems (O-RADS) MRI lexicon and scoring system was developed to aid in standardization of reporting and interpretation of adnexal lesions, allowing for risk stratification based on MR imaging findings. This in turn can help improve communication between radiologists and referring providers, and potentially aid the selection of optimal treatment options. This article provides a detailed review of the lexicon and the scoring rubric of the O-RADS MRI risk stratification system.

Current disparities in the access to diagnostic imaging for Black patients and the underrepresentation of Black physicians in radiology, relative to their representation in the general U.S. population, reflect contemporary consequences of historical anti-Black discrimination. These disparities have existed within the field of radiology and professional medical organizations since their inception. Explicit and implicit racism against Black patients and physicians was institutional policy in the early 20th century when radiology was being developed as a clinical medical field. Early radiology organizations also embraced this structural discrimination, creating strong barriers to professional Black radiologist involvement. Nevertheless, there were numerous pioneering Black radiologists who advanced scholarship, patient care, and diversity within medicine and radiology during the early 20th century. This work remains important in the present day, as race-based health care disparities persist and continue to decrease the quality of radiology-delivered patient care. There are also structural barriers within radiology affecting workforce diversity that negatively impact marginalized groups. Multiple opportunities exist today for antiracism work to improve quality of care and to apply standards of social justice and health equity to the field of radiology. An initial step is to expand education on the disparities in access to imaging and health care among Black patients. Institutional interventions include implementing community-based outreach and applying antibias methodology in artificial intelligence algorithms, while systemic interventions include identifying national race-based quality measures and ensuring imaging guidelines properly address the unique cancer risks in the Black patient population. These approaches reflect some of the strategies that may mutually serve to address health care disparities in radiology. ^© RSNA, 2023 See the invited commentary by Scott in this issue. Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.