Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Limited contemporary evidence exists on risk prediction by stress imaging and exercise electrocardiography (ECG) among patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). Objectives From the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) study, prognosis was examined by core laboratory-defined stress imaging and exercise ECG findings in CCS patients. METHODS:A total of 5,179 patients (qualifying by stress nuclear imaging [n = 2,567], echocardiography [n = 1,085], cardiac magnetic resonance [CMR] [n = 257], and ECG [n = 1,270]) were randomized. Cox models assessed associations between trial endpoints and the number of scarred and ischemic segments, rest/stress left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and ST-segment depression. HRs and 95% CIs were calculated per millimeter, segment, or 5% of LVEF. We examined prognostic models for the following trial endpoints: 1) the trial's primary endpoint of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure; 2) CV death; 3) spontaneous MI; 4) procedural MI; and 5) type 2 MI. RESULTS:The number of scarred segments (HR: 1.07 [95% CI: 1.02-1.13]; P = 0.0209), rest LVEF (HR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.83-0.93]; P < 0.001), and stress LVEF (HR: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.83-0.91]; P < 0.001) predicted the trial's primary endpoint of CV death, MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure. The extent of scar and rest/stress LVEF on echocardiography and nuclear imaging predicted several trial endpoints. The number of ischemic segments predicted spontaneous (HR: 1.08 [95% CI: 1.03-1.14]; P = 0.0104) and procedural MI (HR: 1.14 [95% CI: 1.03-1.25]; P = 0.0015) but was of borderline significance for the trial's primary endpoint (P = 0.0746). Ischemia extent by CMR predicted the trial's primary endpoint (P = 0.0068) and spontaneous MI (P = 0.0042). CONCLUSIONS:ISCHEMIA trial findings from 320 worldwide centers revealed that stress imaging and exercise ECG measures exhibited a variable association with key trial endpoints delineating risk patterns for ischemia and infarction. Stress CMR ischemia predicted several trial endpoints, supporting an expanded role in the evaluation of patients with CCS (ISCHEMIA [International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches]; NCT01471522).

BACKGROUND:In the ISCHEMIA Trial, 5179 patients with stable coronary disease were randomized to initial invasive or conservative management. METHODS:PCI was recommended with a SYNTAX score 0-22 (low) and CABG with a SYNTAX score ≥33 (high). Either could be recommended for intermediate scores. The composite primary outcome was cardiovascular death, MI, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. There were two cohorts in this analysis. The descriptive cohort included patients who underwent CABG or PCI within 180 days of randomization and had no primary outcome before revascularization. The comparative cohort excluded participants with prior CABG, single vessel disease, SYNTAX score ≥ 45, and without core laboratory assessment. We focused on the intermediate (23-32) SYNTAX comparative group for which either CABG or PCI could be recommended. RESULTS:For 1935 patients in the descriptive cohort (485 CABG, 1450 PCI), the SYNTAX score was 27.3 ± 11.0 in the CABG group and 15.3 ± 8.6 in the PCI group, p<0.0001. Most patients with low SYNTAX scores underwent PCI (87.1%), while most with high SYNTAX scores underwent CABG (72.6%). For the 1203 patients (385 CABG, 818 PCI) in the entire comparative cohort, the adjusted 4-year primary event rate was 14.5% for CABG and 13.2% for PCI (difference 1.3%, 95% CI, -4.9% to 7.7%). For the 346 patients (163 CABG, 183 PCI) in the intermediate SYNTAX group, the adjusted 4-year primary event rate was 10.6% for CABG and 18.3% for PCI (difference -7.6%, 95% CI, -16.1% to 0.9%). CONCLUSIONS:Selection of revascularization method resulted in more PCI in the low SYNTAX group and more CABG in the high SYNTAX group. There was no statistical evidence of a difference between PCI and CABG in the intermediate SYNTAX group but the CIs are broad, reflecting uncertainty. GOV IDENTIFIER/UNASSIGNED:NCT01471522; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01471522.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Therapeutic-dose heparin improves outcomes in noncritically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The effect of antiplatelet exposure in addition to therapeutic-dose heparin is unknown. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:To evaluate the effect of antiplatelet exposure in addition to therapeutic-dose heparin on survival without organ support. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We conducted an observational secondary analysis of a multiplatform randomized controlled trial, analyzing noncritically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19 who received an antiplatelet agent (acetylsalicylic acid or P2Y12 inhibitor) and therapeutic-dose heparin (combination) compared with therapeutic-dose heparin alone (control). We used a 3-level ordinal primary outcome: (1) survival without organ support, (2) survival with organ support, and (3) mortality by day 21. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression. Balanced analytic groups were established using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting. A proportional odds model was used to estimate the effect of antiplatelet exposure. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 1021 patients, 194 (19.0%) were exposed to an antiplatelet (95.4% acetylsalicylic acid) and therapeutic-dose heparin. All patients were used to calculate the propensity scores and stabilized weights. After applying inverse probability of treatment weighting, the effective sample size was 60 in the combination group and 652 in the control group. Means and prevalences of continuous and dichotomous variables were similar between groups, with no evidence of misclassification. Exposure to an antiplatelet was not associated with improved survival without organ support (76.3% vs 80.5%; odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.71-1.64). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:In noncritically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19 receiving therapeutic-dose heparin, exposure to an antiplatelet agent was not associated with improved survival without organ support.

BACKGROUND:Randomized trials of chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization vs medical therapy have yielded inconsistent results. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes with an initial invasive strategy (INV) vs an initial conservative strategy (CON) in patients with coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA)-determined CTO in the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial. METHODS:Participants in ISCHEMIA who underwent CCTA evaluated for CTO by the core laboratory (3,113 of 5,179 randomized patients [60%]) were categorized into subgroups with (100% stenosis) and without (<100% stenosis) CTO. Primary analysis compared outcomes in those randomized to INV vs CON using an intention-to-treat approach. Secondary analyses compared outcomes using inverse probability weighting to model successful CTO revascularization (REV) in all INV participants vs CON participants. RESULTS:Of the 3,113 CCTA-evaluable participants, 1,470 had at least 1 CTO (752 INV and 718 CON). INV did not reduce cardiovascular (CV) death or myocardial infarction (MI) (5-year difference -3.5%; 95% CI: -7.8% to 0.8%) and resulted in more procedural MIs (2.5%; 95% CI: 1.0%-4.0%) but fewer spontaneous MIs (-6.3%; 95% CI: -9.7% to -3.2%) than CON. CTO REV modeled across INV had a high probability (>90%) of any lower CV death or MI, MI, spontaneous MI, unstable angina, and heart failure counterbalanced by a higher rate of procedural MI. CTO REV significantly improved angina-related quality of life (mean difference 4.6 points), Rose Dyspnea Scale score (rescaled) (mean difference 5.3 points), and EQ-5D visual analog scale score (4.6 points). CONCLUSIONS:In the ISCHEMIA trial, the risks and benefits of INV compared with CON were similar among patients with and without CCTA-determined CTO (more frequent procedural MI, less frequent spontaneous MI, and significantly improved angina and dyspnea-related quality of life). In an observational comparison, successful CTO REV was associated with a high probability of lower CV death or MI (driven by lower MI) compared with CON. (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches [ISCHEMIA]; NCT01471522).

BACKGROUND:Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) with multiple risk factor goals is recommended for patients with chronic coronary disease (CCD), yet achieving all GDMT goals is uncommon. The relative importance of these goals and timing of their attainment on cardiovascular events is uncertain. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:This study aims to describe the relationship between achieving specific GDMT goals, when they are achieved, and clinical outcomes. METHODS:This was an observational study of participants with CCD in the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death or myocardial infarction (MI). GDMT goals were systolic blood pressure (SBP) <130 mm Hg, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dL, not smoking, and antiplatelet therapy. Frequency of GDMT goals met at baseline and during follow-up is described. Bayesian joint modeling for longitudinal goal status and time-to-event analyses characterized the relative importance of specific GDMT goal attainment and timing with CV death/MI. RESULTS:All 5,179 ISCHEMIA participants were included. Among 4,914 participants with complete data on all 4 GDMT goals at baseline, 386 (9%), 2,073 (42%), 1,843 (38%), and 612 (12%) met 0-1, 2, 3, and 4 GDMT goals, respectively. The 4-year cumulative event rate for CV death/MI was highest for participants who attained no GDMT goals (24.5%; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 13.5%-42.2%) and lowest for those who attained all goals at baseline and remained at goal during follow-up (8.7%; 95% CrI: 6.7%-10.9%). SBP goal attainment was associated with a significant absolute event reduction in CV death/MI (-5.1%; 95% CrI: -11.3% to -1.0%), followed by antiplatelet therapy (-11.2%; 95% CrI: -29.1% to 0.8%), achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dL (-2.0%; 95% CrI: -6.0% to 2.4%), and not smoking (-1.7%; 95% CrI: -9.3% to 4.2%). Ten millimeters of mercury lower SBP during follow-up was associated with 10% relative risk reduction of CV death/MI (RR [relative risk] = 0.90; 95% CrI: 0.82-0.98), after adjusting for other GDMT goals and baseline characteristics. CONCLUSIONS:Among participants with CCD, early attainment and maintenance of GDMT goals, especially SBP, were associated with fewer cardiovascular events. Compared with no GDMT goals at target, having all 4 GDMT goals at target at baseline was associated with an absolute 16% fewer CV deaths and MIs. (ISCHEMIA [International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches]; NCT01471522).

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment on postherpetic neuralgia is necessary to guide care. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To test the hypothesis that suppressive treatment with 1000 mg/d of oral valacyclovir for 12 months reduces the prevalence, severity, and duration of postherpetic neuralgia compared with placebo at 12 and 18 months in participants with herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:Multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial including 527 immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with history of HZO rash, documented keratitis, or iritis within 1 year and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater. The study was conducted at 95 participating sites (in Canada, New Zealand, and the US) from November 2017 to June 2024 and participant visits occurred every 3 months. INTERVENTION/UNASSIGNED:Treatment with 1000 mg/d of valacyclovir or placebo for 12 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia, severity as determined by pain score (a score of ≥3 on a scale of 1-10), pain duration (≥3 months after HZO onset), and total daily dose of pain medication. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Of the 527 participants (490 completed 12 months of treatment and 460 completed 18 months), 73 (14%) had postherpetic neuralgia and were analyzed by age at HZO onset (<60 years or ≥60 years) and disease duration (recent [<6 months] or chronic [≥6 months]). Of the 73 participants with postherpetic neuralgia (34 in the valacyclovir group and 39 in the placebo group), the mean age was 62.4 years (SD, 13.6 years), 59% were female, 5% were Black or African American, and 10% were Hispanic. The prevalence of postherpetic neuralgia at 12 months was not reduced by valacyclovir (12/32 [38%]) compared with placebo (14/35 [40%]) (between-group difference, 2.5% [95% CI, -20.8% to 25.8%]; P>.99). The participants who were younger than 60 years at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration had lower pain scores in the valacyclovir group (mean score, 0.3 [SD, 0.9]) vs the placebo group (mean score, 0.8 [SD, 1.9]) at 12 months (P = .045) and at 18 months (mean score, 0.2 [SD, 0.9] vs 1.0 [SD, 2.3], respectively; P = .02). There was a decrease in pain duration in the valacyclovir group at 18 months (mean, 13.6 [SD, 11.4] months) vs the placebo group (mean, 18.7 [SD, 29.5] months) (linear mixed-effects model between-group difference, -3.39 months [95% CI, -6.73 to -0.04 months]; P = .046). The total daily dose of neuropathic pain medication was lower in the valacyclovir group (mean, 271.4 [SD, 593.8] mg/d) vs the placebo group (mean, 363.4 [SD, 592.2] mg/d) at 12 months (linear mixed-effects model P = .006) and at 18 months (mean, 209.0 [SD, 412.8] mg/d vs 286.2 [SD, 577.9] mg/d, respectively; linear mixed-effects model P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:One year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir was associated with a lower dosage of neuropathic pain medication. Participants in the valacyclovir group, who were younger at HZO onset and had a chronic disease duration, had lower pain scores. These secondary outcomes support consideration of 1 year of suppressive treatment with valacyclovir to reduce dosage of pain medications and pain due to HZO. TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:High-quality evidence regarding suppressive valacyclovir treatment in herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) is necessary to guide care. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To determine whether suppressive valacyclovir compared with placebo delays the occurrence of new or worsening stromal keratitis (SK), endothelial keratitis (EK), iritis, or dendriform epithelial keratitis (DEK) during 12 months of treatment and if treatment benefit persisted at 18 months (secondary end point). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:The Zoster Eye Disease Study (ZEDS) was a randomized clinical trial conducted in 95 sites from November 2017 to June 2024. Immunocompetent, nonpregnant adults with a history of an HZO rash, documented active keratitis or iritis within 1 year, and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater were eligible. After determined to be eligible, participants were randomized in 4 strata: age at onset (<60 years vs ≥60 years) and disease duration (<6 months vs ≥6 months). INTERVENTIONS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 12 months of double-masked daily valacyclovir, 1000 mg, or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The primary outcome was time to first occurrence within 12 months of new or worsening SK, EK, iritis, or DEK. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 527 participants (median [IQR] age, 60 [50-68] years; 266 female [50.5%]; 266 in the valacyclovir group; 261 in the placebo group) were randomized in 4 strata; 481 completed 12 months, and 460 completed 18 months. Data were analyzed by intention to treat. At 12 months, primary end points occurred in 86 participants (33%) assigned to placebo and 74 (28%) assigned to valacyclovir, and at 18 months in 104 participants (40%) assigned to placebo and 86 (32%) assigned to valacyclovir. The hazard ratio (HR) of the primary end point at 12 months was 0.77 for participants taking valacyclovir vs placebo (HR, 0.77; adjusted 95% CI, 0.56-1.05; P = .09) and 0.73 at the secondary end point at 18 months (HR, 0.73; adjusted 95% CI, 0.55-0.97; P = .03). There was a reduction of multiple other secondary end points at 12 months (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.95; P = .02) and 18 months (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.95; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:Although the primary outcome did not show a benefit of suppressive valacyclovir treatment, secondary study outcomes showed treatment superiority at the 18-month end point and reduced number of multiple episodes of keratitis or iritis at both 12 and 18 months. These results support consideration of 1 year of suppressive valacyclovir treatment for HZO. TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03134196.