Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:hr18

in-biosketch:yes

Total Results:

300


SUN-304 SMALL FIELD OF VIEW DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING (DTI) OF THE KIDNEYS IN PEOPLE WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES AND HEALTHY CONTROLS [Meeting Abstract]

LIM, R; Williams, J; Perchyonok, Y; Churilov, L; McKenna, L; Torkamani, N; Staeb, D; Mikheev, A; Rusinek, H; Ekinci, E
Introduction: Traditional clinical markers of renal function are unreliable in people with early diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has potential to non-invasively measure kidney function in early kidney disease, reflecting changes in tubular microstructure. Changes in cortical fractional anisotropy (cFA), medullary fractional anisotropy (mFA) cortical mean diffusivity (cMD) and medullary mean diffusivity (mMD) have been reported in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), including people with normal renal function. Although promising, renal DTI is challenging due to susceptibility and motion artifacts. We test two technical innovations, small field of view (FOV) imaging and a motion correction algorithm. We assess inter-reader agreement and changes in T2DM of derived cFA, mFA, cMD, mMD.
Method(s): 4 people with T2DM (Table 1) and 9 healthy volunteers (1M, 8F, eGFR >90 ml/min/1.73m2) were recruited as part of a prospective study assessing impact of empagliflozin on functional MRI metrics in T2DM. [Figure presented] Free-breathing small FOV DTI (ZOOMit, Siemens Healthcare), blood oxygen level dependent imaging (BOLD) and conventional sequences were acquired at 3T (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthcare), using b-values of 0, 150 and 500 s/mm2. Motion correction was performed (FireVoxel, NYUMC, NY) prior to creation of FA and MD maps (Fig 1). Two radiologists independently scored FA corticomedullary differentiation (1=poor, 4=excellent) measured cFA, mFA, cMD and mMD. [Figure presented] Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC). Volunteer and patient group differences and concordance with eGFR were assessed with random intercept regression analysis.
Result(s): All subjects successfully completed baseline DTI (Table 2). Lower corticomedullary differentiation scores (Mean+/-SD) were observed for people with T2DM (2.1+/-1.2) versus volunteers (3.0+/-0.8). [Figure presented] There was substantial inter-reader agreement for cFA and mFA (LCCC 0.76 and 0.74), and almost perfect agreement for cMD and mMD (LCCC 0.89 and 0.93). Mean cFA decreased by 0.021 (95% CI 0.011-0.032) and mean mFA decreased by 0.12 (95% CI 0.084-0.163) in people with T2DM (p<0.001), with no significant difference between groups for cMD and mMD. A 0.027 (95%CI 0.002 - 0.053) lower mFA was observed for every 10 ml/min/1.73m2 decrease in eGFR (p<0.001).No significant relationship between eGFR and cFA, cMD or mMD was observed.
Conclusion(s): Small FOV renal DTI is feasible with high inter-reader agreement for FA and MD. In this small pilot study, reduced corticomedullary differentiation and significantly lower medullary FA were demonstrated in people with T2DM compared to volunteers and lower medullary FA associated with lower eGFR, similar to the literature. Lower cortical FA in T2DM was an unexpected finding. Validation of these findings is planned in a larger population. Additional post-empagliflozin DTI and BOLD data will also be presented, which may offer further insight into diabetic kidney disease and management.
Copyright
EMBASE:2002179544
ISSN: 2468-0249
CID: 4024142

Precisely-Measured Hydration Status Correlates with Hippocampal Volume in Healthy Older Adults [Letter]

Butler, Tracy; Deshpande, Anup; Harvey, Patrick; Li, Yi; Rusinek, Henry; Pirraglia, Elizabeth; Osorio, Ricardo S; Glodzik, Lidia; de Leon, Mony J; Madelin, Guillaume; Yu, Wen W; Gallagher, Dympna; Masaeka, John
PMID: 30879941
ISSN: 1545-7214
CID: 3734792

Comparing quantitative measures of global and regional tau binding for 18F-AV-1451 PET scans [Meeting Abstract]

Chen, J; Li, Y; Pirraglia, E; Rusinek, H; De, Leon M
Objectives: Quantitative measurement of tau binding from PET tracers (such as AV-1451) is crucial in the PET-based study of tauopathies (such as Alzheimer's). The traditional standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) method has been challenged by the off-target binding in reference region (Figure 1). Recently, several alternative methods have been proposed for unbiased tau binding quantification, including the Parametric Estimate of Reference Signal Intensity (PERSI) method and standardized uptake value peak-alignment (SUVP) method. In this study, we compared the normal/disease group difference and classification accuracy of SUVR, PERSI and SUVP measures, for both global and regional tau binding, on AV-1451 PET scans.
Method(s): PET and MRI images of 44 subjects were retrieved from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database (ADNI), including 22 normal control (NL) and 22 Alzheimer's disease (AD), matched with age and gender. The MRI images were acquired with standard T1 MPRAGE sequence (240x256x176 matrix; 1.0x1.0 mm pixel; 1.2mm slice thickness). Using Freesurfer (v6.0), regions of interest (ROIs) were defined on MRI images for global and regional binding: cerebral cortex for global binding; and regions affected in Braak Stages (BS) for regional binding (Supplementary Data). The PET acquisition involves an intravenous injection of 370MBq AV-1451 followed by a saline flush. A continuous 30 min brain scan (6 frames, 5 min each) was performed ~75 min after the injection, followed by a CT or transmission scan for attenuation correction. PET scans were reconstructed using a 3-D OSEM algorithm (four iterations, 12 subsets, 5 mm FWHM, 128x128 matrix, 3mm slice thickness). The 80-100 min summed images of PET scan were used to generate the standardized uptake value (SUV) maps, and then co-registered to the MRI images. The SUVR measure was computed by dividing the average SUV of ROI by the average SUV of reference region (cerebellar cortex). The PERSI measure replaced the reference region in SUVR measure by fitting a bimodal gaussian distributionto to the white matter SUV histogram, and using the center and width of the lower-intensity peak to identify the voxels to be included. The SUVP measure involves a transformation on the raw SUV maps: SUVP=(SUV-M)/S, where M and S are the mode and standard deviation of the whole brain SUV distribution. The average positive SUVP (SUVP-AVG) can then be computed by averaging all positive (i.e. >0) SUVP values of an ROI; and positive binding percentage for SUVP (SUVP-PBP) were computed by the ratio of voxel number with SUVP>1.5 over the total voxel number of the ROI. All binding measures were log-transformed, and tested for group differences with two-sample T-tests. The disease classification accuracy was estimated with the area under curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve.
Result(s): As expected, AD subjects showed higher tau binding than NL, both globally and regionally, under all measures (Figure 2). For regional bidding, BS 3-4 regions (including temporal lobe) showed most prominent group difference and highest classification accuracy (AUC=0.85 for SUVP-AVG, SUVP-PBP and PERSI, AUC=0.79 for SUVR). This is consistent with previous reports for AV-1451 scans. For global binding and binding of BS 5-6 regions, SUVP achieved highest classification accuracy (AUC>0.88 for global, AUC>0.81 for BS 5-6 regions), seconded by PERSI (AUC=0.81 for global, AUC=0.76 for BS 5-6 regions), and then SUVR (AUC=0.76 for global, AUC=0.72 for BS 5-6 regions).
Conclusion(s): All three quantification methods detected the group difference of tau binding between AD and NL. Both PERSI and SUVP showed classification improvement over SUVR. SUVP achieved equal or higher classification accuracy than PERSI in global, BS 3-4, and BS 5-6 regional binding. These results have potential value for the quantitative measures of other tau PET scans, as well as Amyloid PET scans
EMBASE:629439852
ISSN: 1535-5667
CID: 4119182

Different Relationship Between Systolic Blood Pressure and Cerebral Perfusion in Subjects With and Without Hypertension

Glodzik, Lidia; Rusinek, Henry; Tsui, Wai; Pirraglia, Elizabeth; Kim, Hee-Jin; Deshpande, Anup; Li, Yi; Storey, Pippa; Randall, Catherine; Chen, Jingyun; Osorio, Ricardo S; Butler, Tracy; Tanzi, Emily; McQuillan, Molly; Harvey, Patrick; Williams, Stephen K; Ogedegbe, Gbenga; Babb, James S; de Leon, Mony J
Although there is an increasing agreement that hypertension is associated with cerebrovascular compromise, relationships between blood pressure (BP) and cerebral blood flow are not fully understood. It is not known what BP level, and consequently what therapeutic goal, is optimal for brain perfusion. Moreover, there is limited data on how BP affects hippocampal perfusion, a structure critically involved in memory. We conducted a cross-sectional (n=445) and longitudinal (n=185) study of adults and elderly without dementia or clinically apparent stroke, who underwent clinical examination and brain perfusion assessment (age 69.2±7.5 years, 62% women, 45% hypertensive). Linear models were used to test baseline BP-blood flow relationship and to examine how changes in BP influence changes in perfusion. In the entire group, systolic BP (SBP) was negatively related to cortical (β=-0.13, P=0.005) and hippocampal blood flow (β=-0.12, P=0.01). Notably, this negative relationship was apparent already in subjects without hypertension. Hypertensive subjects showed a quadratic relationship between SBP and hippocampal blood flow (β=-1.55, P=0.03): Perfusion was the highest in subjects with mid-range SBP around 125 mm Hg. Longitudinally, in hypertensive subjects perfusion increased with increased SBP at low baseline SBP but increased with decreased SBP at high baseline SBP. Cortical and hippocampal perfusion decrease with increasing SBP across the entire BP spectrum. However, in hypertension, there seems to be a window of mid-range SBP which maximizes perfusion.
PMID: 30571554
ISSN: 1524-4563
CID: 3556742

Multimodal Hippocampal Subfield Grading For Alzheimer's Disease Classification

Hett, Kilian; Vinh-Thong Ta; Catheline, Gwenaelle; Tourdias, Thomas; Manjon, Jose V.; Coupe, Pierrick; Weiner, Michael W.; Aisen, Paul; Petersen, Ronald; Jack, Clifford R.; Jagust, William; Trojanowki, John Q.; Toga, Arthur W.; Beckett, Laurel; Green, Robert C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Morris, John; Shaw, Leslie M.; Khachaturian, Zaven; Sorensen, Greg; Carrillo, Maria; Kuller, Lew; Raichle, Marc; Paul, Steven; Davies, Peter; Fillit, Howard; Hefti, Franz; Holtzman, Davie; Mesulam, M. Marcel; Potter, William; Snyder, Peter; Montine, Tom; Thomas, Ronald G.; Donohue, Michael; Walter, Sarah; Sather, Tamie; Jiminez, Gus; Balasubramanian, Archana B.; Mason, Jennifer; Sim, Iris; Harvey, Danielle; Bernstein, Matthew; Fox, Nick; Thompson, Paul; Schuff, Norbert; Decarli, Charles; Borowski, Bret; Gunter, Jeff; Senjem, Matt; Vemuri, Prashanthi; Jones, David; Kantarci, Kejal; Ward, Chad; Koeppe, Robert A.; Foster, Norm; Reiman, Eric M.; Chen, Kewei; Mathis, Chet; Landau, Susan; Cairns, Nigel J.; Householder, Erin; Taylor-Reinwald, Lisa; Lee, Virginia; Korecka, Magdalena; Figurski, Michal; Crawford, Karen; Neu, Scott; Foroud, Tatiana M.; Potkin, Steven; Shen, Li; Faber, Kelley; Kim, Sungeun; Nho, Kwangsik; Thal, Lean; Frank, Richard; Hsiao, John; Kaye, Jeffrey; Quinn, Joseph; Silbert, Lisa; Lind, Betty; Carter, Raina; Dolen, Sara; Ances, Beau; Carroll, Maria; Creech, Mary L.; Franklin, Erin; Mintun, Mark A.; Schneider, Stacy; Oliver, Angela; Schneider, Lon S.; Pawluczyk, Sonia; Beccera, Mauricio; Teodoro, Liberty; Spann, Bryan M.; Brewer, James; Vanderswag, Helen; Fleisher, Adam; Marson, Daniel; Griffith, Randall; Clark, David; Geldmacher, David; Brockington, John; Roberson, Erik; Love, Marissa Natelson; Heidebrink, Judith L.; Lord, Joanne L.; Mason, Sara S.; Albers, Colleen S.; Knopman, David; Johnson, Kris; Grossman, Hillel; Mitsis, Effie; Shah, Raj C.; deToledo-Morrell, Leyla; Doody, Rachelle S.; Villanueva-Meyer, Javier; Chowdhury, Munir; Rountree, Susan; Dang, Mimi; Duara, Ranjan; Varon, Daniel; Greig, Maria T.; Roberts, Peggy; Stern, Yaakov; Honig, Lawrence S.; Bell, Karen L.; Albert, Marilyn; Onyike, Chiadi; D\Agostino, Daniel; Kielb, Stephanie; Galvin, James E.; Cerbone, Brittany; Michel, Christina A.; Pogorelec, Dana M.; Rusinek, Henry; de Leon, Mony J.; Glodzik, Lidia; De Santi, Susan; Womack, Kyle; Mathews, Dana; Quiceno, Mary; Doraiswamy, P. Murali; Petrella, Jeffrey R.; Borges-Neto, Salvador; Wong, Terence Z.; Coleman, Edward; Levey, Allan I.; Lah, James J.; Cella, Janet S.; Burns, Jeffrey M.; Swerdlow, Russell H.; Brooks, William M.; Arnold, Steven E.; Karlawish, Jason H.; Wolk, David; Clark, Christopher M.; Apostolova, Liana; Tingus, Kathleen; Woo, Ellen; Silverman, Daniel H. S.; Lu, Po H.; Bartzokis, George; Smith, Charles D.; Jicha, Greg; Hardy, Peter; Sinha, Partha; Oates, Elizabeth; Conrad, Gary; Graff-Radford, Neill R.; Parfitt, Francine; Kendall, Tracy; Johnson, Heather; Lopez, Oscar L.; Oakley, MaryAnn; Simpson, Donna M.; Farlow, Martin R.; Hake, Ann Marie; Matthews, Brandy R.; Brosch, Jared R.; Herring, Scott; Hunt, Cynthia; Porsteinsson, Anton P.; Goldstein, Bonnie S.; Martin, Kim; Makino, Kelly M.; Ismail, M. Saleem; Brand, Connie; Mulnard, Ruth A.; Thai, Gaby; Mc-Adams-Ortiz, Catherine; van Dyck, Christopher H.; Carson, Richard E.; MacAvoy, Martha G.; Varma, Pradeep; Chertkow, Howard; Bergman, Howard; Hosein, Chris; Black, Sandra; Stefanovic, Bojana; Caldwell, Curtis; Hsiung, Ging-Yuek Robin; Feldman, Howard; Mudge, Benita; Assaly, Michele; Finger, Elizabeth; Pasternack, Stephen; Rachisky, Irina; Trost, Dick; Kertesz, Andrew; Bernick, Charles; Munic, Donna; Lipowski, Kristine; Weintraub, M. A. Sandra; Bonakdarpour, Borna; Kerwin, Diana; Wu, Chuang-Kuo; Johnson, Nancy; Sadowsky, Carl; Villena, Teresa; Turner, Raymond Scott; Johnson, Kathleen; Reynolds, Brigid; Sperling, Reisa A.; Johnson, Keith A.; Marshall, Gad; Yesavage, Jerome; Taylor, Joy L.; Lane, Barton; Rosen, Allyson; Tinklenberg, Jared; Sabbagh, Marwan N.; Belden, Christine M.; Jacobson, Sandra A.; Sirrel, Sherye A.; Kowall, Neil; Killiany, Ronald; Budson, Andrew E.; Norbash, Alexander; Johnson, Patricia Lynn; Obisesan, Thomas O.; Wolday, Saba; Allard, Joanne; Lerner, Alan; Ogrocki, Paula; Tatsuoka, Curtis; Fatica, Parianne; Fletcher, Evan; Maillard, Pauline; Olichney, John; Carmichael, Owen; Kittur, Smita; Borrie, Michael; Lee, T-Y; Bartha, Rob; Johnson, Sterling; Asthana, Sanjay; Carlsson, Cynthia M.; Preda, Adrian; Nguyen, Dana; Tariot, Pierre; Burke, Anna; Trncic, Nadira; Fleisher, Adam; Reeder, Stephanie; Bates, Vernice; Capote, Horacio; Rainka, Michelle; Scharre, Douglas W.; Kataki, Maria; Adeli, Anahita; Zimmerman, Earl A.; Celmins, Dzintra; Brown, Alice D.; Pearlson, Godfrey D.; Blank, Karen; Anderson, Karen; Flashman, Laura A.; Seltzer, Marc; Hynes, Mary L.; Santulli, Robert B.; Sink, Kaycee M.; Gordineer, Leslie; Williamson, Jeff D.; Garg, Pradeep; Watkins, Franklin; Ott, Brian R.; Querfurth, Henry; Tremont, Geoffrey; Salloway, Stephen; Malloy, Paul; Correia, Stephen; Rosen, Howard J.; Miller, Bruce L.; Perry, David; Mintzer, Jacobo; Spicer, Kenneth; Bachman, David; Finger, Elizabether; Pasternak, Stephen; Rachinsky, Irina; Rogers, John; Drost, Dick; Pomara, Nunzio; Hernando, Raymundo; Sarrael, Antero; Schultz, Susan K.; Ponto, Laura L. Boles; Shim, Hyungsub; Smith, Karen Ekstam; Relkin, Norman; Chaing, Gloria; Lin, Michael; Ravdin, Lisa; Smith, Amanda; Raj, Balebail Ashok; Fargher, Kristin
ISI:000487586600036
ISSN: 2045-2322
CID: 4155602

Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?

Wake, Nicole; Chandarana, Hersh; Rusinek, Henry; Fujimoto, Koji; Moy, Linda; Sodickson, Daniel K; Kim, Sungheon Gene
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:-weighted DCE-MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:) and arterial input function (AIF). In addition, the effect of the conversion method on the diagnostic accuracy was evaluated with 36 breast lesions (19 benign and 17 malignant). RESULTS:. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:measurement is not available and a low FA is used for DCE-MRI, the uncertainty in the contrast kinetic parameter estimation can be reduced by using the LC method with pAIF, without compromising the diagnostic accuracy.
PMCID:6102067
PMID: 29777820
ISSN: 1873-5894
CID: 3121612

REnal Flow and Microstructure AnisotroPy (REFMAP) MRI in Normal and Peritumoral Renal Tissue

Liu, Andrea L; Mikheev, Artem; Rusinek, Henry; Huang, William C; Wysock, James S; Babb, James S; Feiweier, Thorsten; Stoffel, David; Chandarana, Hersh; Sigmund, Eric E
BACKGROUND:Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides insight into the pathophysiology underlying renal dysfunction. Variants of DWI include intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), which differentiates between microstructural diffusion and vascular or tubular flow, and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), which quantifies diffusion directionality. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To investigate the reproducibility of joint IVIM-DTI and compare controls to presurgical renal mass patients. STUDY TYPE/METHODS:Prospective cross-sectional. SUBJECTS/METHODS:Thirteen healthy controls and ten presurgical renal mass patients were scanned. Ten controls were scanned twice to investigate reproducibility. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE/UNASSIGNED:Subjects were scanned on a 3T system using 10 b-values and 20 diffusion directions for IVIM-DTI in a study approved by the local Institutional Review Board. ASSESSMENT/RESULTS:Retrospective coregistration and measurement of joint IVIM-DTI parameters were performed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS/METHODS:Parameter reproducibility was defined as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) >0.7 and coefficient of variation (CV) <30%. Patient data were stratified by lesion side (contralateral/ipsilateral) for comparison with controls. Corticomedullary differentiation was evaluated. RESULTS:In controls, the reproducible subset of REnal Flow and Microstructure AnisotroPy (REFMAP) parameters had average ICC = 0.82 and CV = 7.5%. In renal mass patients, medullary fractional anisotropy (FA) was significantly lower than in controls (0.227 ± 0.072 vs. 0.291 ± 0.044, P = 0.016 for the kidney contralateral to the mass and 0.228 ± 0.070 vs. 0.291 ± 0.044, P = 0.018 for the kidney ipsilateral). In the kidney ipsilateral to the mass, cortical Dp,radial was significantly higher than in controls (P = 0.012). Conversely, medullary Dp,axial was significantly lower in contralateral than ipsilateral kidneys (P = 0.027) and normal controls (P = 0.044). DATA CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:REFMAP-MRI parameters provide unique information regarding renal dysfunction. In presurgical renal mass patients, directional flow changes were noted that were not identified with IVIM analysis alone. Both contralateral and ipsilateral kidneys in patients show reductions in structural diffusivities and anisotropy, while flow metrics showed opposing changes in contralateral vs. ipsilateral kidneys. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
PMCID:6030440
PMID: 29331053
ISSN: 1522-2586
CID: 2906262

Quantitative evaluation of tau PET tracers 18F-THK5351 and 18F-AV-1451 in Alzheimer's disease with standardized uptake value peak-alignment (SUVP) normalization

Chen, Jingyun; Li, Yi; Pirraglia, Elizabeth; Okamura, Nobuyuki; Rusinek, Henry; de Leon, Mony J
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:F-THK5351. The conventional standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) method relies on the average uptake from an unaffected tissue sample, and therefore is susceptible to biases from off-target binding as well as variability among individuals in the reference region. We propose a new method, standardized uptake value peak-alignment (SUVP), to reduce the bias of the SUVR, and improve the quantitative assessment of tau deposition. METHODS:F-AV-1451 on two independent cohorts (N = 18 and 32, respectively), each with cognitively normal (NL) subjects and Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects. RESULTS:F-AV-1451). In the cerebellar cortex, an AD-NL group difference with effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.62 was observed for AV-1451, confirming the limitation of the SUVR approach using this region as a reference. A smaller cerebellar effect size (0.09) was observed for THK5351. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The SUVP method reduces the bias of the reference region and improves the NL-AD classification compared to the SUVR approach.
PMID: 29704038
ISSN: 1619-7089
CID: 3149532

IMPAIRED CSF CLEARANCE AND BRAIN AMYLOID IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE: A MULTI-TRACER PET STUDY

Li, Yi; DeLeon, Mony J; Tsui, Wai; Pirraglia, Elizabeth; Glodzik, Lidia; Chen, Jingyun; Osorio, Ricardo S; Rusinek, Henry
ORIGINAL:0013084
ISSN: 1552-5279
CID: 3386632

Comparison between qualitative and quantitative assessment of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI

Pujara, Akshat C; Mikheev, Artem; Rusinek, Henry; Gao, Yiming; Chhor, Chloe; Pysarenko, Kristine; Rallapalli, Harikrishna; Walczyk, Jerzy; Moccaldi, Melanie; Babb, James S; Melsaether, Amy N
BACKGROUND: Potential clinical implications of the level of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast MRI are increasing. Currently, BPE is typically evaluated subjectively. Tests of concordance between subjective BPE assessment and computer-assisted quantified BPE have not been reported. PURPOSE OR HYPOTHESIS: To compare subjective radiologist assessment of BPE with objective quantified parenchymal enhancement (QPE). STUDY TYPE: Cross-sectional observational study. POPULATION: Between 7/24/2015 and 11/27/2015, 104 sequential patients (ages 23 - 81 years, mean 49 years) without breast cancer underwent breast MRI and were included in this study. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T; fat suppressed axial T2, axial T1, and axial fat suppressed T1 before and after intravenous contrast. ASSESSMENT: Four breast imagers graded BPE at 90 and 180 s after contrast injection on a 4-point scale (a-d). Fibroglandular tissue masks were generated using a phantom-validated segmentation algorithm, and were co-registered to pre- and postcontrast fat suppressed images to define the region of interest. QPE was calculated. STATISTICAL TESTS: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses and kappa coefficients (k) were used to compare subjective BPE with QPE. RESULTS: ROC analyses indicated that subjective BPE at 90 s was best predicted by quantified QPE 50.0 = d, and at 180 s by quantified QPE 74.5 = d. Agreement between subjective BPE and QPE was slight to fair at 90 s (k = 0.20-0.36) and 180 s (k = 0.19-0.28). At higher levels of QPE, agreement between subjective BPE and QPE significantly decreased for all four radiologists at 90 s (P
PMID: 29140576
ISSN: 1522-2586
CID: 2785262