Faculty Bibliography

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Group interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT-G) is effective across diverse populations and adaptable to low-resource settings. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To assess whether shortened 4-session mini IPT-G vs full IPT-G delivered by lay health care workers reduces depression and improves family functioning among perinatal adolescents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This pilot randomized clinical trial of group IPT for depression used a 3-arm longitudinal type 1 implementation-effectiveness design between May 13, 2022, and April 1, 2024, at 2 primary care maternal and child health clinics in Nairobi, Kenya. The study applied a collaborative care approach within the World Health Organization (WHO) Mental Health Gap Action Programme framework for training a nonspecialist workforce, where trained nurses screened participants and supervised group sessions delivered by community health promoters collaboratively with psychologists. Participants included perinatal adolescents, aged 13 to 18 years, in their first to second trimester of pregnancy. INTERVENTION/UNASSIGNED:Participants were randomized to treatment as usual (TAU [n = 44]), mini IPT-G (n = 38), or full IPT-G (n = 40). TAU involved information sheets; mini IPT-G was culturally adapted; and full IPT-G followed the WHO protocol. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Primary outcomes included depression measured by the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and functional impairment within 1 week post intervention and at 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were posttraumatic stress disorder, psychological distress, disability, and self-efficacy. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of the interventions. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among the 122 adolescents included in the analysis (median age, 17 [IQR, 17-18] years), 97 (79.5%) were single, and 91 (74.6%) had at least a secondary education level. Retention included 101 participants (82.8%) at 1 week post intervention and 91 (74.6%) at 6-month follow-up. Both IPT arms demonstrated significantly greater reductions in depression than the TAU arm post intervention. Mean (SD) PHQ-9 score decreased from 12.38 (5.90) at baseline to 2.15 (1.94) in the full IPT-G arm (β vs TAU = -5.79; 95% CI, -7.67 to -3.91; P < .001), from 11.58 (4.93) to 3.94 (2.81) in the mini IPT-G arm (β vs TAU = -3.97; 95% CI -5.83 to -2.10; P < .001), and from 11.00 (4.97) to 7.94 (3.71) in the TAU arm. At 6 months, effects were attenuated. Scores in the full IPT-G arm remained significantly lower than in the TAU arm (β = -2.22; 95% CI, -4.25 to -0.18; P = .03) but not in the mini IPT-G arm (β = -1.38; 95% CI, -3.25 to 0.48; P = .15). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this trial, IPT-G delivered by nonspecialists was feasible, acceptable, and effective. Mini IPT-G improved completion rates, while full IPT-G showed more sustained benefits at follow-up. These findings support task-sharing of mental health interventions for perinatal adolescents in low-resource settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:Pan African Clinical Trial Registry Identification: PACTR202501888041900.

OBJECTIVE:To identify optimal strategies to integrate early relational health (ERH) programs in pediatric primary care (PPC) and to describe the development of a best practices toolkit to provide guidance and useful tools that clinicians can use to navigate this process. METHODS:A two-phased approach to develop, assess, and refine a best practices toolkit for the integration of multiple ERH programs in PPC through a modified Delphi process. Phase One included identification and assessment around barriers to ERH program integration and strategies to address them through surveys and focus groups of PPC clinics nationwide. Phase Two then utilized the identified barriers and strategies from Phase One to create a toolkit of best practices on integrating ERH programs in PPC that included two rounds of revision for a final version. RESULTS:126 PPC personnel from 44 clinics nationwide completed the Phase One survey, with respondents reporting many notable strengths and challenges to ERH program integration. 18 survey participants also participated in follow-up focus groups, which reiterated the strengths and challenges found in the surveys. An initial toolkit was then drafted, and experts provided qualitative, free-response feedback around clarity and presentation. Further improvement was made to create the final toolkit, which was rated highly useful and important, though slightly less feasible, by practitioners using formal feedback questions. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study employed a modified Delphi process to create a consensus-based best practices toolkit for integrating multiple ERH programs in PPC to help meet the heterogeneous needs of families to promote optimal child development.

OBJECTIVE:Pediatric primary care (PPC) offers an ideal platform for integrating evidence-based programs (EBPs) to enhance early relational health (ERH). However, implementing such integration faces several challenges. This study uses quantitative and qualitative data to identify the barriers, facilitators, and strategies for implementing ERH-focused EBPs in PPC. METHODS:Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework, we conducted a survey and focus groups with PPC personnel recruited through nationwide networks. The survey measured clinic readiness (i.e., challenges, resources, and needs) for integration and examined its associations with personnel roles and clinic characteristics using nested ANOVAs and multilevel regressions. Focus groups further probed potential strategies and were coded using thematic analysis. RESULTS:126 PPC personnel from 44 clinics completed the survey, and 18 participated in five focus groups. Clinics had strong leadership support for integrated services and high utilization of program resources and implementation practices, yet notable challenges in structural and human resources existed. Clinic staff perceived higher readiness for integration than other personnel roles. Lower-percent Medicaid eligible patients and urbanicity were associated with higher readiness, while academic affiliation showed both positive and negative associations. Promoting culturally responsive care, fostering team cohesion, utilizing standardized implementation processes, adopting flexible delivery and collaborative models, and partnering with local communities were key strategies for integrating EBPs. CONCLUSIONS:The findings can help PPC clinics more effectively integrate one or multiple EBPs into routine care and can inform ways to sustain such integrated services to optimize population-level reach and positive impacts on child and family well-being.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Young Black children experience poorer sleep health than children from other racial/ethnic groups. Tailored family-centered interventions are needed to improve sleep health among young Black children. Tailoring requires information about parent perceptions, practices and context. The purpose of this study was to (1) understand the contextual definition of sleep health for Black families; (2) bedtime routines and sleep practices among Black families; and (3) parent preferences that may inform intervention design. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We engaged 30 Black parents of 3-8-year-old children with mild sleep problems (e.g., child takes >30 min to fall asleep at bedtime) in this study. Parents completed three ratings scales about sleep health practices and child bedtime behavior and a semi-structured interview. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and correlations. We used an implementation science rapid qualitative analysis approach to analyze qualitative data from the interviews. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The final sample identified as 52% African-American, 14% Jamaican, 10% Haitian, and 26% mixed multi-ethnic groups. Parent mean age was 41 years and child mean age were 5 years old. About 80% of responders were women. About one-third of the sample held a doctoral degree, and half the sample had a bachelor's or Master's degree. Parents answered 56% of sleep knowledge questions accurately (ranging from 32 to 100%) and reported an average of two sleep problems. Parents described healthy sleep as involving flexibility in sleep timing and bedtime routines. More than half of parents reported co-sleeping practices, with reasons ranging from a strategy to address night wakings, to a way to preserve bonding. Later child bedtime (after 9 pm) was associated with bedtime resistance, permissive parenting, and parent stress. Many parents reported that they had poor sleep quality and duration. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Findings elucidate a range of factors to consider in tailoring sleep health interventions for Black families of young children. These include the common practice of co-sleeping, parents' value for flexibility related to bedtime and bedtime routines, and parents' own challenges with getting enough and good quality sleep. Tailored family-centered interventions will benefit from considering these factors.

BACKGROUND:Children from migrant families with absent parents are more likely to have poorer physical and mental health than children from non-migrant families. The impact of labor migration on left-behind family members in South Asian countries is not well-known. This study aimed to examine the patterns of labor migration and its impact on the health and development of children and their caregivers in rural Nepal. METHODS:Baseline family data collected from a school-based violence prevention program were utilized. Parents/caregivers (N = 346) with school-aged children (aged 3 to 15 years attending nursery to primary grades) from the rural Arghakhanchi district of Nepal were included in the study. A series of descriptive and chi-square analyses were carried out to explore the pattern of labor migration and differences between labor-migrant and non-labor-migrant families. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were applied to explore the correlates and moderators involved. RESULTS:Labor migration has been a common practice in rural Nepal, with an estimated 49% of families having parents working overseas, mostly in India (57%) and Gulf countries (39%) on low-skill labor jobs. Labor migration was significantly associated with left-behind caregivers' and children's mental health. Left-behind caregivers in father-only labor-migrant families reported higher levels of depression than did parents in non-labor migrant families and left-behind children from labor-migrant families reported greater anger than did children from non-labor migrant families. The impact of labor migration on families was moderated by social class. For low social-class father migrant families, left-behind children were at greater risk for developmental delay and behavioral problems, but there seems to be a protective effect for high social-class father migrant families (with lower risk of developmental delay and problem behaviors compared to all other groups). CONCLUSIONS:Labor migration has a substantial impact on the mental health of left-behind families and children. The impact of labor migration may vary by living social-cultural context. Understanding the complex dynamics of labor migration has important implications for local and global migration-related health service planning.

BACKGROUND:Adolescents in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face significant mental health challenges, yet their perspectives are often underrepresented in the design of preventive strategies. Co-design approaches, such as human-centered design (HCD), offer a promising way to tailor interventions and implementation strategies to adolescents’ needs and local context. In LMICs, these methods require careful adaptation to address resource constraints, limited design literacy, and cultural norms. This study documents how HCD was adapted to engage adolescents in northern Ghana as co-designers of school-based mental health preventive strategies. METHODS:Guided by the first two phases of HCD, we conducted two workshops with 24 students from 12 public senior high schools in Tamale, Ghana. Workshop 1 (Inspiration) used structured, case-based discussions informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to explore adolescents’ perspectives on mental health. Workshop 2 (Ideation) used interactive choice-based activities to elicit youth-generated strategies. To align with cognitive and sociocultural factors, we incorporated scaffolded facilitation, hands-on activities, and peer-led engagement. Qualitative data from facilitator notes, artifacts, and audio-confirmed summaries were synthesized using structured rapid qualitative analysis. RESULTS:Adolescents identified key mental health concerns, including stigma, peer and family influences, and fears about confidentiality. Gender-specific discussions revealed culturally rooted concerns, such as peer pressure and substance use among boys and limited support-seeking among girls. Adolescents prioritized five school strategies: teacher training, curricular integration, mentorship programs, activities that promote positive thinking and mindfulness, and entertainment-based mental health education. Youth demonstrated a conceptual shift from viewing mental health as an individual problem to a shared responsibility across schools and communities. Formation of an Adolescent Advisory Board reflected youth interest in sustained leadership and co-design. CONCLUSIONS:Contextualized co-design methods can meaningfully engage adolescents in LMIC settings and support the development of culturally grounded, feasible, and youth-prioritized mental health strategies. Structured facilitation enhances both the inclusivity and authenticity of adolescent engagement. This study contributes to implementation science by presenting a replicable co-design framework with policy relevance and providing a foundation for multilevel intervention development in resource-constrained educational systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-025-25012-0.

BACKGROUND:HIV status disclosure remains a major challenge among children living with perinatally acquired HIV with many taking treatment up to adolescence without knowing their serostatus. This non-disclosure is influenced by factors like fear of the negative consequences of disclosure. Since HIV status disclosure has been found to have good effects including improving treatment adherence and better mental health outcomes, there is a need to design interventions aimed at improving disclosure rates among children living with HIV. This study aims at adapting a clinic-based pediatric HIV status disclosure intervention and tasking shifting from healthcare workers to caregiver peer supporters in Eastern Uganda. METHODS:The adaptation process involved consultations with caregivers, healthcare workers involved in the care of children living with HIV, researchers in this field, intervention developers, and other experts and stakeholders. This was done through conducting FGDs with HCWs, caregivers, and peer supporters and consultations with researchers in the field of HIV. The original intervention manual was translated to Lusoga which is the commonly spoken dialect in this region. Collected qualitative data were analyzed using an inductive approach to develop themes and subthemes. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before participation in the study. RESULTS:A total of 28 participants were involved in the FGDs, while two pediatricians and two HIV researchers/specialists were consulted. Six themes were generated in relation to all suggested changes to the original manual which were related to: (1) sociocultural beliefs/norms/perceptions (5 FGDs), (2) boosting caregiver's confidence for disclosure (5FGDs), (3) disclosure mode, environment, and person (4 FGDs), (4) health facility/system related changes (3 FGDs), (5) reorganization/paraphrasing (3FGDs) and (6) age appropriateness (2FGDs). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study emphasized that whereas some aspects of intervention can apply to various contexts, there is a need for cross-cultural adaptation of interventions before being implemented in settings where they were not developed.

We read with interest the paper "Meta-analysis: The Effectiveness of Youth Psychotherapy Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries" by Venturo-Conerly et al. (2023).¹ The paper presents results on the effectiveness of youth psychotherapies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) from a systematic review and meta-analysis using rigorous, highly regarded methods. The authors should be commended for taking on this important subject. However, we feel that the paper needs to be situated in the backdrop of a few concerns that we believe are important for LMIC geographies. In our reply, we mainly focus on the finding that interventions developed in high-income countries (HIC) were more effective if not adapted to local conditions, suggesting that non-culturally adapted interventions had better outcomes than culturally adapted ones. This, as the authors note, seems counterintuitive.