Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Degeneration of the central autonomic network with relative sparing of peripheral autonomic neurons underlies neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA). Ampreloxetine, a novel, selective, norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitor, allows once-daily dosing to precisely target residual peripheral autonomic neurons. Based on the hypothesis that patients with MSA would be most responsive and the substantial unmet need for symptomatic therapy in this population, an MSA subgroup analysis was prespecified. METHODS:We conducted a run-in 4-week, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (SEQUOIA), followed by a pivotal enriched randomized withdrawal (RW) trial with 16-week open-label treatment and 6 weeks of 1:1 RW (REDWOOD). Inclusion criteria for the MSA subgroup included (1) probable or possible MSA, (2) 3-minute orthostatic blood pressure (BP) fall >20/10 mm Hg, and (3) dizziness or lightheadedness score >4 points. Outcome measures included self-reported symptom burden captured on the 10-item OH Questionnaire (OHQ). Differences were analyzed using logistic regression and mixed-model repeated measures analysis. RESULTS:= 0.015). Standing BP remained unchanged from open-label in the ampreloxetine group (systolic: 5.6 ± 4.1; diastolic: 3.7 ± 2.9 [SE] mm Hg) but fell after placebo withdrawal (systolic: -10.0 ± 4.5; diastolic: -6.0 ± 3.1 mm Hg). The catecholamine profile was consistent with NE transporter inhibition. There were no observed increases in supine BP. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:In a prespecified subgroup analysis of MSA participants in the REDWOOD trial, patients randomized to placebo worsened, whereas those who were randomized to treatment maintained their open-label level of function. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION/UNASSIGNED:REDWOOD trial, NCT03829657; first submitted to registry January 10, 2019; first participant enrolled February 22, 2019. SEQUOIA trial, NCT03750552; first submitted to registry November 20, 2018; first participant enrolled January 24, 2019. See ClinicalTrials.gov for full-protocol and statistical analysis plan. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:This study provides Class III evidence that in patients with MSA who had symptomatic benefit on orthostatic hypotension with ampreloxetine, there was no difference in the odds of treatment failures between those maintained on ampreloxetine and those withdrawn to placebo.

A largely unrecognized feature of the Spanish Inquisition (1478-1834) was the mandatory medical evaluation of all defendants, generating a vast archive of clinical documentation that remains almost entirely unexplored by historians of neurology. The institutional need to distinguish genuine illness from malingering and demonic affliction prompted physicians to evaluate neurologic conditions including convulsions, palsy, and behavioral changes. Drawing on published scholarship and targeted searches of the Spanish national archives, we identified over 80 cases related to neurology and neuropsychiatric content. In this article, we analyze 7 of them, for illustrative purposes, involving convulsions (termed aferecía or gota coral), palsy and paralysis (perlesía), and miscellaneous brain pathology (leso de la cabeza, cerebro débil y flaco), documented between 1562 and 1700. These records reveal a tripartite diagnostic framework (physician, surgeon, and exorcist) that evolved over 2 centuries and often favored naturalistic medical explanations. Cases analyzed include the convulsive episodes of King Carlos II, whose symptoms the Suprema (the supreme governing body of the Inquisition) ruled to be natural disease rather than bewitchment, and the case of Fray Mateo de la Puebla, who was absolved on neurologic grounds after his behavioral changes were attributed to acquired CNS disease. The Inquisition archives merit further investigation as a potential source for the history of clinical neurology in the early modern period.

BACKGROUND:The Movement Disorder Society (MDS) research criteria for possible prodromal multiple system atrophy (PP-MSA) have not been prospectively validated. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the PP-MSA criteria in a longitudinal cohort of patients with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and to assess whether additional clinical features improve their predictive value. METHODS:Seventy-six patients with PAF enrolled across eight centers in the Natural History Study of the Synucleinopathies were followed for ≥6 years or until phenoconversion. Participants were classified according to MDS PP-MSA criteria and followed for development of MSA, Parkinson's disease, or dementia with Lewy bodies. Diagnostic performance was assessed longitudinally. Analyses were repeated using a stricter olfactory threshold (University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test [UPSIT]≤28) as an exclusion criterion. RESULTS:Thirty-eight participants met PP-MSA criteria, of whom 12 phenoconverted to MSA within 6 years. Sensitivity was 100% at year 1 and 92% at year 6, whereas specificity ranged from 56% to 67%. Positive predictive value (PPV) ranged from 21% to 34%. Applying a stricter olfactory threshold improved specificity (90%-97%) and PPV (53%-83%), with a modest reduction in sensitivity (to 83%). Participants who phenoconverted to MSA were younger, had more severe urinary dysfunction, and greater orthostatic heart rate responses. CONCLUSIONS:The PP-MSA criteria demonstrate high sensitivity but limited specificity in patients with PAF. A stricter olfactory threshold improves diagnostic performance and may enhance cohort enrichment for clinical trials. © 2026 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To review the cardiovascular effects of pharmacologic dopamine receptor modulation in humans, organized by receptor subtype. METHODS:Narrative review of human pharmacological, genetic, and clinical evidence linking dopamine receptor agonism and antagonism to blood pressure and heart rate changes in healthy volunteers and in patients with Parkinson disease, autonomic failure, psychiatric disorders, and selected cardiovascular conditions. RESULTS:Dopaminergic receptor agonism generally lowers blood pressure, with the magnitude of hypotension tracking with intrinsic activity: full orthosteric agonists (bromocriptine, ropirinole, apomorphine) carry the highest risk of orthostatic hypotension, and partial agonists (tavapadon) produce attenuated but clinically relevant hypotension. Dopamine D3-preferring agents (PF-592379, mesdopetam, cariprazine) have neutral cardiovascular effects in short-term trials. Levodopa-induced orthostatic hypotension arises from at least five converging mechanisms whose clinical impact is amplified by underlying neurogenic orthostatic hypotension. A notable exception is mevidalen, a centrally acting dopamine D1 positive allosteric modulator that paradoxically raises blood pressure. Despite murine knockout models consistently predicting that dopamine receptor deletion produces hypertension, pharmacological antagonism in humans does not reliably raise blood pressure: dopamine D1, D2, and D3 antagonists show largely neutral cardiovascular profiles, while antipsychotic-associated orthostatic hypotension is driven primarily by α1-adrenergic blockade. CONCLUSIONS:The cardiovascular response to dopaminergic agents depends on receptor selectivity, intrinsic activity, and baroreflex integrity. The discrepancy between murine-knockout-predicted hypertension and human pharmacological neutrality with antagonists, and the hypertensive effects of dopamine D1 positive allosteric modulators, represent key unresolved questions.

Patients with extremely rare pathogenic variants pose unique challenges to current healthcare systems. Nano-rare mutations have been defined as mutations with a known prevalence of <30 patients worldwide, but because of the small fraction of humans who have undergone genetic testing, neither the precise prevalence of individual mutations nor the total prevalence of patients with nano-rare mutations is known. n-Lorem is a non-profit founded in 2020 with the mission of equitably discovering, developing, and providing bespoke experimental antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) for free, for life, to patients with nano-rare mutations that are amenable to ASO treatment. In this perspective, we provide an overview of the n-Lorem processes and systems, the characteristics of the first 329 patients who have applied for treatment for whom initial assessment was completed and suitability for ASO treatment determined, and a summary of the results of ASO treatment for patients treated to date. Detailed data on individual patients and the overall clinical safety and tolerability profiles of the ASOs for which there are clinical data are the subjects of other manuscripts.

We report a 71-year-old woman who developed disabling orthostatic tremor and severe orthostatic hypertension following cosmetic neck lift surgery. Autonomic testing demonstrated exaggerated pressor responses and excessive orthostatic catecholamine release, consistent with sympathoadrenal overactivation due to impaired carotid baroreflex function. This case highlights a potential autonomic complication of aesthetic neck surgery.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) is widely used as an outcome measure in MSA trials, but it has limitations for clinical trial use. To address these, we developed the Multiple System Atrophy Combined Outcome Assessment (MuSyCA), a comprehensive multimodal tool for disease-modifying MSA trials. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the development and validation plan for MuSyCA, with emphasis on its structure, intended use, and assessment of reliability, validity, and sensitivity in tracking disease progression. METHODS:The development of MuSyCA followed a multistep process. Candidate outcome assessments were identified through systematic literature review and analysis of longitudinal data from large MSA cohorts. Content was refined through multiple Delphi-like consensus rounds involving MSA experts, patient advocacy groups representatives, and industry stakeholders. Cognitive interviews conducted in 20  patients with MSA evaluated the clarity and clinical relevance of patient- and clinician-reported outcomes; feedback was incorporated into a subsequent version of the MuSyCA. Validation is ongoing and includes assessment of construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness. Longitudinal analyses to determine sensitivity to change over time are ongoing. RESULTS:MuSyCA combines patient- and clinician-reported outcomes, biomarkers (neurofilament light chain, neuroimaging), and performance-based measures to capture subjective and objective aspects of MSA progression, enhancing its utility  to detect treatment effects in clinical trials. MuSyCa is not intended to be used in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS:MuSyCA offers a multidimensional approach to MSA assessment, supporting precise, disease-relevant evaluations in trials of putative disease-modifying therapies. Its validation will provide a standardized multimodal outcome measure, advancing MSA therapeutic development.