Faculty Bibliography

Objective: To compare humoral and T-cell responses to COVID- 19 vaccines in 400 MS patients who were on Ocrelizumab ('OCR') v. other disease-modifying therapies ('non-OCR') at the time of vaccination. Introduction: Peripheral B-cell depletion with anti-CD20 therapies attenuates humoral responses to vaccines. Whether immune responses to COVID-19 vaccines differ between B-cell depleted and non-B cell depleted MS patients is not known.
Method(s): Consecutive MS patients from NYU MS Care Center were invited to participate if they completed COVID-19 vaccination >=6 weeks previously. Immune testing included anti-spike RBD antibody (Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2) (Roche Diagnostics); multiplex bead-based immunoassays of antibody-responses to SARS-COV-2 spike proteins; T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein using IFNgamma enzyme-linked immune-absorbent spot (Invitrogen) and TruCulture (Myriad RBM) assays; high dimensional immunophenotyping; and live virus immunofluorescencebased microneutralization assay.
Result(s): As of 7/15/2021, 105 MS subjects were enrolled (mean age: 40.5 years; 76% female; 41% non-white; 38% on OCR; 12% with prior COVID-19 infection). 95% were fully vaccinated with mRNA vaccines (Pfizer/Moderna); 5% - with adenovirus-based vaccine (Johnson&Johnson). Median time from sample collection to last vaccine was 79 days. Positive Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Ab titers post-vaccine were detected in 11/37 (30%) in OCR (mean level: 702 U/mL among seropositives) and 54/54 (100%) patients in non-OCR (mean level: 2310 U/mL; p<0.0001). Positive response by multiplex assay (threshold of 'positive' defined as 2 SD below the mean for the non-OCR) were detected in 10/27 (37%) OCR and 29/31 (94%) non-OCR (p<0.00001). T-cell activation based on induced IFNgamma secretion (TruCulture) was detected in 20/25 (80%) OCR and 16/19 (84%) non-OCR patients (p=0.71).
Conclusion(s): Preliminary results suggest robust T-cell immune response to SARS-CoV2 vaccines in approximately 80% of both OCR and non-OCR MS patients. Antibody responses were markedly attenuated in OCR compared to non-OCR group. Updated results will be presented

Background: Ocrelizumab (OCR), a humanized, anti-CD20 antibody therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS), is given at 6-month intervals. Some patients on OCR report worsening of MS-related symptoms in the weeks leading up to their infusion ('wearing-off' phenomena), but there are no published reports quantifying symptom variation in relation to the timing of OCR infusions.
Objective(s): We will measure symptom burden using SymptoMScreen, NeuroQol and WPAI:MS at 3 points in each infusion cycle over 2 infusion cycles and also obtain Ocrelizumab concentration (PK), neurofilament light chain (NfL), B-cell subsets, and routine clinical labs prior to each infusion.
Aim(s): To quantitate change in symptom burden throughout the infusion cycle in OCR-treated MS patients and to determine which clinical and paraclinical variables correlate with symptom worsening.
Method(s): Prospective, observational, two-center study enrolled patients with relapsing and progressive forms of MS that are initiating OCR or who have been on OCR for >= 1 year (ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT04855617). All patients receive MS care at NYU MS Care Center (NYU) in New York, NY, or the Elliot Lewis MS Center for MS (ELC) in Wellesley, MA. Patients aged 18-80 and with EDSS scores between 0-7 are eligible for enrollment.
Result(s): 110 participants were enrolled and are actively followed in the study (55 from NYU/55 from ELC). At baseline visit, the mean age was 46.0+/-12.7 years; 64.6% were female; 31.8% were non-White; 20.0% were Hispanic/ Latino; disease duration was 12.6+/-9.6 years; OCR treatment duration was 2.8+/-1.0 years; mean EDSS was 3.3+/-2.1 (EDSS<4, n=69 (62.7%), EDSS>=4, n=41 (37.3%)). Breakdown by disease subtypes was: relapsing-remitting, n=68 (61.8%), secondary progressive, n=24 (21.8%), primary progressive, n=18 (16.4%). Among 58 patients who completed at least 2 questionnaires to date, the symptom burden, as assessed with the SymptoMScreen, was unchanged from week 4 post-infusion to week 12 post-infusion (p-values ranged from 0.2-0.9 for each of the 11 individual domains by Wilcoxon nonparametric test).
Conclusion(s): SymBOLS, designed to assess for the wearing-off effect in OCR-treated patients, has successfully enrolled 110 patients across two US sites. Preliminary data suggest there are no changes to symptom burden during the first half of the infusion cycle. Additional data regarding changes during the second half of the cycle as well as NeuroQoL and work productivity (WPAI) data will be presented

BACKGROUND:Short-term outcomes of optic neuritis (ON) have been well characterized. Limited data exists on longer-term visual outcomes in patients who present with ON. The large MSBase registry allows for characterization of long-term visual outcomes after ON. METHODS:Via the MSBase Registry, data on patients from 41 centers was collected during routine clinical and research visits. Physical and visual disability were measured using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and the visual function score (VFS). Inclusion criteria for this analysis included age ≥ 18 years, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), ON-onset, baseline visit within 6 months of onset, and at least one follow-up visit. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the association of disease-modifying treatment with time to conversion to clinically definite MS or sustained EDSS/VFS progression. RESULTS:Data from 60,933 patients were obtained from the MSBase registry in July 2019. Of these, 1317 patients met inclusion criteria; 935 were treated at some point in disease course, while 382 were never treated. At baseline, mean age was 32.3 ± 8.8 years, 74% were female, median EDSS was 2 (IQR 1-2), and median VFS was 1 (IQR 0-2). Median follow-up time was 5.2 years (IQR 2.4-9.3). Treatment was associated with reduced risk and delayed conversion to clinically definite MS (HR = 0.70, p < 0.001), sustained EDSS progression (HR = 0.46, p < 0.0001) and sustained VFS (HR = 0.41, p < 0.001) progression. CONCLUSIONS:In the MSBase cohort, treatment after ON was associated with better visual and neurological outcomes compared to no treatment. These results support early treatment for patients presenting with ON as the first manifestation of MS.

Objective/UNASSIGNED:Little is known about how symptom severity in the various neurologic domains commonly affected by multiple sclerosis (MS) varies by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Methods/UNASSIGNED:This was a retrospective study of patients with MS attending 2 tertiary centers in the New York City metropolitan area, who self-identified as White, African American (AA), or Hispanic American (HA). Disability was rated with Patient-Determined Disability Steps (PDDS) and symptom severity, with SymptoMScreen (SyMS), a validated battery for assessing symptoms in 12 domains. Analyses comparing race, sex, and age groups were performed using analysis of variance models and Tukey honestly significant difference tests to control the overall type I error. A multivariable model was constructed to predict good self-rated health (SRH) that included demographic variables, PDDS, and SyMS domain scores. Results/UNASSIGNED:= 0.012), but similar total SyMS scores. Women reported higher fatigue and anxiety scores, whereas men had higher walking and dexterity scores. AAs and HAs had higher symptom domain scores than Whites in each of the 12 domains and worse SRH. In a multivariable logistic model, only pain, walking, depression, fatigue, and global disability (PDDS), but not sex or race/ethnicity, predicted good SRH. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:AA and HA race/ethnicity was associated with higher overall disability, higher symptom severity in each of the 12 domains commonly affected by MS, and worse SRH relative to Whites. However, only symptom severity and disability, and not demographic variables, predicted good SRH.

Background and aims: The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire is a patientreported outcome assessing percentage of work time missed, impairment while working, overall work impairment and activity impairment over seven days prior. We report 2-year changes in WPAI, and associations with the 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) and SymptoMScreen (self-reported symptom burden) among patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) in the Phase IIIb CASTING trial (NCT02861014). Method(s): Patients (n=680; Expanded Disability Status Scale score <=4.0) with a suboptimal response to one or two prior disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) received intravenous ocrelizumab 600mg every 24 weeks for 96 weeks. WPAI, MSIS-29 and SymptoMScreen were completed at baseline, Week 24, Year 1 and Year 2. Spearman correlations were assessed between change in WPAI subscores from baseline to Year 2, MSIS-29 subscores, and SymptoMScreen total score. Result(s): WPAI improved from baseline to Year 2, with significant reduction in overall work impairment (-3.08, p=0.020) and activity impairment (-5.69, p<0.001), and consistent trends in work time missed (-2.54, p=0.102) and impairment while working (-1.66, p=0.129). Improvement in SymptoMScreen score correlated with reduction in all WPAI measures: work time missed (rs=0.196), impairment while working (rs=0.387), overall work impairment (rs=0.362) and activity impairment (rs=0.421) over two years (all p<0.01). MSIS-29 improvements correlated with WPAI improvements over two years (Table 1). Table 1 Conclusion(s): Patients with a suboptimal response to one or two prior DMTs who switched to ocrelizumab showed improvement in work productivity (WPAI), which correlated with improvement in physical/psychological impacts of MS (MSIS-29) and decrease in symptom burden (SymptoMScreen) over two years

PURPOSE OF REVIEW:The newer, higher-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS)-orals and monoclonals-have more profound immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive properties than the older, injectable therapies and require risk mitigation strategies to reduce the risk of serious infections. This review will provide a systematic framework for infectious risk mitigation strategies relevant to these therapies. RECENT FINDINGS:We classify risk mitigation strategies according to the following framework: (1) screening and patient selection, (2) vaccinations, (3) antibiotic prophylaxis, (4) laboratory and MRI monitoring, (5) adjusting dose and frequency of DMT, and (6) behavioral modifications to limit the risk of infection. We systematically apply this framework to the infections for which risk mitigations are available: hepatitis B, herpetic infections, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and tuberculosis. We also discuss up-to-date recommendations regarding COVID-19 vaccinations for patients on DMTs. We offer a practical, comprehensive, DMT-specific framework of derisking strategies designed to minimize the risk of infections associated with the newer MS therapies.