Faculty Bibliography

Traditionally, total shoulder arthroplasty is performed through the deltopectoral approach with violation of the subscapularis tendon. In order to reduce the incidence of postoperative subscapularis dysfunction, the subscapularis-sparing approach, performed entirely through the rotator interval, was developed. This technique allows earlier rehabilitation and may potentially prevent subsequent subscapularis insufficiency and clinical failures.

Background: Pectoralis major ruptures are increasing in incidence primarily due to an increase in awareness, activity level among young males between 20 - 40 years of age, and use of anabolic steroids. Although the majority of pectoralis major ruptures are acute injuries, many chronic ruptures are unrecognized and it is imperative to understand proper evaluation of these injuries, as well as the appropriate treatment for acute and chronic ruptures. Purpose: Pectoralis major ruptures can lead to deformity and physical disability if left untreated. This review paper discusses the both acute and chronic ruptures as well as indications for nonoperative treatment and operative treatment to give the reader the best understanding of this diagnosis and proper management. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using a search of electronic databases. Search terms such as pectoralis major rupture, pectoralis major repair, pectoralis major tendon transfer and pectoralis major nonoperative treatment were used. Case reports, systematic reviews, prospective and retrospective studies were included to provide a comprehensive review. The only exclusion criteria consisted of studies not published in English. This review article includes the anatomy and biomechanics of the pectoralis major muscle, proper evaluation of the patient, operative and nonoperative treatment of acute and chronic pectoralis major ruptures, and outcomes of the recommended treatment. Conclusion: Nonoperative treatment is indicated for patients with medical comorbidities, older age, incomplete tears, or irreparable damage. Patients treated non-operatively have been shown to lose strength, but regain full range of motion. Patients with surgery before 6 weeks reported better outcomes than patients with surgery between 6-8 weeks. The chronicity of the rupture (>8 weeks) increases likelihood of reconstruction, involving the use of autografts or allografts. Patients treated with delayed repair had significantly better strength, satisfaction and outcomes than patients with nonoperative treatment. The pectoralis tendon can also be transferred in patients with rotators cuff tears, atrophy, or significant functional limitation. Tendon transfers have been shown to have unpredictable outcomes, but overall satisfactory results.

AIMS/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of preoperative bisphosphonate treatment on the intra- and postoperative outcomes of arthroplasty of the shoulder. The hypothesis was that previous bisphosphonate treatment would adversely affect both intra- and postoperative outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:group, there were 52 female and six male patients, with a mean age of 72.1 years (53 to 88). RESULTS:Previous treatment with bisphosphonates was positively associated with intraoperative complications (fracture; odds ratio (OR) 39.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.42 to 6305.70) and one-year postoperative complications (OR 7.83, 95% CI 1.11 to 128.82), but did not achieve statistical significance for complications two years postoperatively (OR 3.45, 95% CI 0.65 to 25.28). The power was 63% for complications at one year. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients who are treated with bisphosphonates during the three-year period before shoulder arthroplasty have a greater risk of intraoperative and one-year postoperative complications compared with those without this previous treatment.

Although total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is generally associated with good to excellent outcomes in most patients, the integrity and function of the subscapularis tendon (SSC) is of paramount importance because SSC rupture after TSA can lead to inferior outcomes. Therefore, the efficacy of a SSC-sparing TSA procedure was evaluated through a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study. Patients with end-stage osteoarthritis of the shoulder were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 patients were treated with TSA in which the prosthesis was inserted entirely through the rotator interval without violating the SSC tendon (SPARING). Group 2 patients were treated with TSA using the SSC tenotomy approach (STANDARD). Both the patients and the evaluators remained blinded to the surgical approach throughout the study. Outcome data collected included the visual analog scale score for pain and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons outcome score. Complete 2-year outcome data were collected from 32 SPARING and 38 STANDARD patients at a mean follow-up of 31.1 and 33.4 months, respectively. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and visual analog scale scores improved significantly for both groups. Differences between groups did not reach statistical significance. Complication profiles were similar for the 2 groups, with 3 patients in the SPARING group and 2 patients in the STANDARD group requiring revision surgery during the study. At short-term follow-up, the outcome of TSA using the SSC-sparing surgical approach was similar to the outcome of TSA using the standard approach. Studies with longer follow-up are required to document the potential benefits of this surgical technique. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(1):e61-e67.].

Aims The factors that predispose to recurrent instability and revision stabilization procedures after arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior glenohumeral instability remain unclear. We sought to determine the rate and risk factors associated with ongoing instability in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair for instability of the shoulder. Materials and Methods We used the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database to identify patients with a diagnosis of anterior instability of the shoulder undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair between 2003 and 2011. Patients were followed for a minimum of three years. Baseline demographics and subsequent further surgery to the ipsilateral shoulder were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for recurrent instability. Results A total of 5719 patients were analyzed. Their mean age was 24.9 years (sd 9.3); 4013 (70.2%) were male. A total of 461 (8.1%) underwent a further procedure involving the ipsilateral shoulder at a mean of 31.5 months (sd 23.8) postoperatively; 117 (2.1%) had a closed reduction and 344 (6.0%) had further surgery. Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair was the most common subsequent surgical procedure (223; 65.4%). Independent risk factors for recurrent instability were: age < 19 years (odds ratio 1.86), Caucasian ethnicity (hazard ratio 1.42), bilateral instability of the shoulder (hazard ratio 2.17), and a history of closed reduction(s) prior to the initial repair (hazard ratio 2.45). Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair was associated with significantly higher rates of ongoing persistent instability than revision open stabilization (12.4% vs 5.1%, p = 0.041). Conclusion The incidence of a further procedure being required in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior glenohumeral instability was 8.1%. Younger age, Caucasian race, bilateral instability, and closed reduction prior to the initial repair were independent risk factors for recurrent instability, while subsequent revision arthroscopic Bankart repair had significantly higher rates of persistent instability than subsequent open revision procedures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:324-30.

The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes after cryopreserved tri-cortical iliac crest allograft reconstruction for glenoid bone loss in patients with shoulder instability. 10 patients completed the required assessments at a mean follow up of 4.5 years. At final follow up, mean ASES was 92 ± 12, mean WOSI was 315 ± 319, with good range of motion. None of the final radiographs demonstrated graft resorption or failure of hardware. The data demonstrated that patients who were treated with glenoid bone grafting with cryopreserved tri-cortical iliac crest allograft can expect good range of motion and functional capacity.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative anesthetic typically consists of either general anesthesia (GA) or isolated regional anesthesia (RA). METHODS: A retrospective propensity-matched cohort analysis on patients undergoing TSA was performed to determine differences between GA and RA in regard to patient population, complications, LOS and hospital readmission. RESULTS: 4158 patients underwent TSA with GA or isolated RA. Propensity-matching resulted in 912 patients in each cohort. RA had lower overall in-hospital complications and greater homebound discharge disposition with lower 90-day readmission rates than GA. CONCLUSION: After TSA, isolated RA was associated with lower in-hospital complications, readmission rates and odds of hospital readmission than GA.

Arthroscopic SLAP tear repair has become an increasingly used treatment for patients presenting with symptomatic SLAP tears after failed nonoperative management. Debridement, SLAP repair, and open or arthroscopic biceps tenodesis or tenotomy have been used for the treatment of SLAP tears. Various techniques for repair have been described, and furthermore, there is a high incidence of concomitant pathology of the shoulder. Repair remains an excellent option in isolated SLAP tears amenable to repair, with excellent outcomes in well-indicated patients. We present a method for repairing a SLAP tear using standard suture anchor fixation, anterior and posterior portals, and an accessory portal of Wilmington. Adequate labral repair can be achieved with this technique in patients with no concomitant biceps pathology. This report highlights this technique for SLAP repair in patients with isolated symptomatic SLAP tears that have failed conservative management.

Introduction: While total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is generally associated with good to excellent outcomes in majority of patients, the integrity and the function of the subscapularis tendon may be compromised after the procedure and lead to inferior outcomes. Therefore, the efficacy of a subscapularis sparing TSA procedure was evaluated in a prospective, double blinded, randomized study. Methods: With IRB approval, patients with end stage osteoarthritis of the shoulder were enrolled into a prospective clinical trial from 2010 to 2014. These patients were randomized into two groups. Group 1 patients were treated with TSA using the subscapularis sparing surgical approach in which the prosthesis was inserted entirely through the rotator interval without violating the subscapularis tendon (SPARING). Group 2 patients were treated with TSA using the standard surgical approach with subscapularis tenotomy (STANDARD). Both the patient and the evaluators remained "blinded" to the surgical approach throughout the study period. Minimum 2 year outcome data was collected using the visual analog score (VAS) for pain and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) outcome score. Results: A total of 107 shoulders were enrolled (57 SPARING, 50 STANDARD). Of these, 14 TSA procedures could not be completed as initially randomized. In addition, 3 patients expired (unrelated to the procedure), 7 patients withdrew from the study, and 2 moved away. Of the remaining 81 patients, 2 year outcome data could not be collected from another 11. Thus, complete 2 year outcome data was collected from 32 SPARING and 38 STANDARD patients at an average follow up of 31.1 and 34.4 months, respectively. The ASES score and VAS for the SPARING group improved significantly from 29.3 +/- 12.5 and 6.6 +/- 2.1 to 82.6 +/- 18.8 and 1.6 +/- 2.2 (mean +/- standard deviation). Similarly, the ASES score and VAS for the STANDARD group also improved significantly from 32.8 +/- 16.1 and 6.3 +/- 2.4 to 87.1 +/- 14.5 and 1.0 +/- 1.7. In comparison to their pre-operative status, the ASES score for the SPARING and the STANDARD groups improved 53.9 +/- 22.3 and 54.0 +/- 18.7 points, respectively. The VAS for the SPARING and the STANDARD groups also improved 5.1 +/- 3.1 and 5.3 +/- 2.5 points, respectively. Neither of these differences between the SPARING and the STANDARD groups reached statistical significance. Complication profiles were similar in both groups with 3 in the SPARING group and 2 patients in the STANDARD group requiring revision surgery during the study period. Discussion: At a short term follow up, the outcome of TSA using the subscapularis sparing surgical approach was similar to that after TSA using the standard surgical approach. Future studies with longer follow up of these patients will be required to document the potential benefits of this surgical technique