Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To better characterize the cochlear apex in relation to surgically relevant landmarks to guide surgeons and improve procedural success of apical electrode placement. STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective image analysis. SETTING/UNASSIGNED:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/UNASSIGNED:Cochlear implant recipients with available preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging. INTERVENTION/UNASSIGNED:None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE/UNASSIGNED:Cochlear dimensions and cochlear apex distance measures to surgically relevant middle ear landmarks and critical structures. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Eighty-two temporal bone CT scans were analyzed utilizing multiplanar reformats. The average lateral width of promontory bone over the cochlear apex was 1.2 mm (standard deviation [SD], 0.3). The anteroposterior distance from the round window (avg, 4.2 mm; SD, 0.5), oval window (avg, 3.3 mm; SD, 0.3), cochleariform process (avg, 2.3; SD, 0.5), and superior-inferior distance from the cochleariform process (avg, -0.9; SD, 0.8) to the cochlear apex were measured. The relationship of the cochlear apex to critical structures was highly variable.A newly developed stapes vector was created and found to mark the posterior/superior boundary of the apex in 94% of patients. When a vector parallel to the stapes vector was drawn through the round window, it marked the anterior/inferior boundary of the cochlear apex in 89% of patients. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:This study assists in characterizing cochlear apex anatomy and its relation to surrounding structures as a means of improving procedural accuracy and reducing trauma during apical cochleostomy. Understanding both distance relationships and expected boundaries of the apex could help to inform future surgical approaches.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:A method for stimulating the cochlear apex using perimodiolar electrode arrays is described. This method involves implanting an electrode (ECE1) into the helioctrema in addition to standard cochlear implant placement. One objective is to verify a suitable approach for implanting ECE1 in the helicotrema. Another is to determine how placement of ECE1 reshapes electric fields. DESIGN/METHODS:Two cadaveric half-heads were implanted, and electric voltage tomography was measured with ECE1 placed in many positions. RESULTS:An approach for placing ECE1 was identified. Changes in electric fields were only observed when ECE1 was placed into the fluid in the helicotrema. When inside the helicotrema, electric voltage tomography modeling suggests an increased current flow toward the apex. CONCLUSIONS:Placement of ECE1 into the cochlear apex is clinically feasible and has the potential to reshape electric fields to stimulate regions of the cochlea more apical than those represented by the electrode array.

OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of ceiling effects for commonly used speech perception tests in a large population of children who received a cochlear implant (CI) before the age of four. A secondary goal was to determine the demographic factors that were relevant for predicting which children were more likely to reach ceiling level performance. We hypothesize that ceiling effects are highly prevalent for most tests. DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective chart review of children receiving a CI between 2002 and 2014. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:165 children were included. Median scores were above ceiling levels (≥90% correct) for the majority of speech perception tests and all distributions of scores were highly skewed. Children who were implanted earlier, received two implants, and were oral communicators were more likely to reach ceiling-level performance. Age and years of CI listening experience at time of test were negatively correlated with performance, suggesting a non-random assignment of tests. Many children were re-tested on tests for which they had already scored at ceiling. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Commonly used speech perception tests for children with CIs are prone to ceiling effects and may not accurately reflect how a child performs in everyday listening situations.

OBJECTIVE:Children with high-frequency severe-to-profound hearing loss and low-frequency residual hearing who do not derive significant benefit from hearing aids are now being considered for cochlear implantation. Previous research shows that hearing preservation is possible and may be desirable for the use of electroacoustic stimulation (EAS) in adults, but this topic remains underexplored in children. The goal of this study was to explore factors relating to hearing preservation, acceptance, and benefits of EAS for children. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective review. SETTING:Tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS:Forty children (48 ears) with preoperative low-frequency pure-tone averages of 75 dB HL or less at 250 and 500 Hz (n = 48). INTERVENTION:All patients underwent cochlear implantation with a standard-length electrode. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:Low-frequency audiometric thresholds, speech perception, and EAS usage were measured at initial stimulation, and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Outcomes were compared between children with and without hearing preservation, and between EAS users and nonusers. RESULTS:Hearing was preserved at similar rates as adults but worse for children with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Fewer than half of children who qualified to use EAS chose to do so, citing a variety of audiologic and nonaudiologic reasons. No differences were detected in speech perception scores across the groups for words, sentences, or sentences in noise tests. CONCLUSIONS:Neither hearing preservation nor EAS use resulted in superior speech perception in children with preoperative residual hearing; rather, all children performed well after implantation.

OBJECTIVE:To investigate a new surgical and signal processing technique that provides apical stimulation of the cochlea using a cochlear implant without extending the length of the electrode array. PATIENTS/METHODS:Three adult patients who underwent cochlear implantation using this new technique. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS:The patients received a cochlear implant. The surgery differed from the standard approach in that a ground electrode was placed in the cochlear helicotrema via an apical cochleostomy rather than in its typical location underneath the temporalis muscle. Clinical fitting was modified such that low frequencies were represented using the apically placed electrode as a ground. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Pitch scaling and speech recognition. RESULTS:All surgeries were successful with no complications. Pitch scaling demonstrated that use of the apically placed electrode as a ground lowered the perceived pitch of electric stimulation relative to monopolar stimulation. Speech understanding was improved compared with preoperative scores. CONCLUSIONS:The new surgical approach and clinical fitting are feasible. A lower pitch is perceived when using the apically placed electrode as a ground relative to stimulation using an extracochlear ground (i.e., monopolar mode), suggesting that stimulation can be provided more apically without the use of a longer electrode array. Further work is required to determine potential improvements in outcomes and optimal signal processing for the new approach.

Music through a cochlear implant (CI) is described as out-of-tune, suggesting that musical intervals are not accurately provided by a CI. One potential reason is that pitch may be insufficiently conveyed to provide reliable intervals. Another potential reason is that the size of intervals is distorted through a CI as they would be when produced by a mistuned piano. To measure intervals through a CI, listeners selected prerecorded vowels with different fundamental frequencies to represent each note in Happy Birthday. Each listener had contralateral normal hearing (NH); repeating the experiment with their NH ear allowed for a within-subject control. Additionally, the effect of listening simultaneously to both a CI and NH ear was measured. The resulting versions of Happy Birthday were analyzed in terms of their contours, interval sizes, magnitudes, consistency, and direction. Intervals with NH ears ranged from perfect to uncorrelated with target intervals. Chosen interval size with the CI was poorer than with the NH ear for all subjects. Across listeners, chosen intervals with the CI ranged from highly correlated to uncorrelated with target intervals. That CI intervals were highly correlated with target intervals for some listeners suggests that accurate intervals can be provided through a CI. For some listeners, chosen intervals were larger than target intervals, suggesting that intervals may be perceived as too small. Overall, intervals with the combination of the NH and CI ears were similar to those with the NH ear alone, suggesting that the addition of a CI has little-to-no effect on interval perception.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:A software tool (EasyMDT) that measures temporal modulation detection thresholds of a broadband noise carrier is presented. EasyMDT is designed to be both easy and quick to promote the use in environments where testing time is limited, and testers may not have extensive technical expertise to use typical research software. In addition, by providing a standardized stimulus and protocol, data collected by all groups using the software can be compared directly. Details of EasyMDT, including a description of the protocol, stimuli, interface and how to obtain the software, are provided along with representative sample data from both normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant (CI) users. Performance with the EasyMDT is compared with speech understanding metrics as well as a metric of spectral-temporal resolution. DESIGN/METHODS:A "Full Curve" of modulation detection thresholds is measured using a three-interval forced-choice adaptive task in a single block for 7 modulation frequencies (10, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, and 300 Hz). Similarly, the modulation detection thresholds were measured for only one modulation frequency in a block (either 100 Hz or 150 Hz). Modulation detection thresholds and block duration were recorded. In addition, performance on speech recognition tasks (CNC words, consonant identification, vowel identification, and AzBio sentences in noise) and a spectral-temporal resolution task (SMRT; Aronoff and Landsberger) were measured. Modulation detection thresholds were measured for both normal-hearing listeners and CI users. Only CI users participated in the speech and spectral-temporal tests. RESULTS:Modulation detection thresholds measured with EasyMDT were consistent with those previously reported from other laboratories. Modulation detection thresholds at a single modulation frequency (100 Hz or 150 Hz) were predictive of modulation detection thresholds measured as part of the Full Curve consisting of all 7 modulation frequencies. Testing durations for CI users dropped from an average of over 18 minutes for the Full Curve to under 3 minutes for either of the single modulation frequency measures. Modulation detection thresholds at 100 Hz correlated with CNC words, consonant identification, and AzBio sentences in noise, but not vowel identification. No correlations were found between modulation detection and spectral-temporal resolution. CONCLUSIONS:The EasyMDT is designed to be an easy-to-use tool that provides a nonlinguistic measure that can predict speech understanding. The test duration is short enough that it can be incorporated into clinical practice or as part of an experimental battery. The software is available for free download at https://www.ear-lab.org/software-downloads.html. The software is designed to have a minimum barrier of entry as well as provide a standardized protocol allowing direct comparison of modulation detection thresholds across studies and groups.

Nicolelis wrote in his 2003 review on brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) that the design of a successful BMI relies on general physiological principles describing how neuronal signals are encoded. Our study explored whether neural information exchanged between brains of different species is possible, similar to the information exchange between computers. We show for the first time that single words processed by the guinea pig auditory system are intelligible to humans who receive the processed information via a cochlear implant. We recorded the neural response patterns to single-spoken words with multi-channel electrodes from the guinea inferior colliculus. The recordings served as a blueprint for trains of biphasic, charge-balanced electrical pulses, which a cochlear implant delivered to the cochlear implant user's ear. Study participants completed a four-word forced-choice test and identified the correct word in 34.8% of trials. The participants' recognition, defined by the ability to choose the same word twice, whether right or wrong, was 53.6%. For all sessions, the participants received no training and no feedback. The results show that lexical information can be transmitted from an animal to a human auditory system. In the discussion, we will contemplate how learning from the animals might help developing novel coding strategies.

The electric stimulation provided by current cochlear implants (CI) is not power efficient. One underlying problem is the poor efficiency by which information from electric pulses is transformed into auditory nerve responses. A novel stimulation paradigm using ramped pulse shapes has recently been proposed to remedy this inefficiency. The primary motivation is a better biophysical fit to spiral ganglion neurons with ramped pulses compared to the rectangular pulses used in most contemporary CIs. Here, we tested the hypotheses that ramped pulses provide more efficient stimulation compared to rectangular pulses and that a rising ramp is more efficient than a declining ramp. Rectangular, rising ramped and declining ramped pulse shapes were compared in terms of charge efficiency and discriminability, and threshold variability in seven CI listeners. The tasks included single-channel threshold detection, loudness-balancing, discrimination of pulse shapes, and threshold measurement across the electrode array. Results showed that reduced charge, but increased peak current amplitudes, was required at threshold and most comfortable levels with ramped pulses relative to rectangular pulses. Furthermore, only one subject could reliably discriminate between equally-loud ramped and rectangular pulses, suggesting variations in neural activation patterns between pulse shapes in that participant. No significant difference was found between rising and declining ramped pulses across all tests. In summary, the present findings show some benefits of charge efficiency with ramped pulses relative to rectangular pulses, that the direction of a ramped slope is of less importance, and that most participants could not perceive a difference between pulse shapes.

Two notes sounded sequentially elicit melodic intervals and contours that form the basis of melody. Many previous studies have characterized pitch perception in cochlear implant (CI) users to be poor which may be due to the limited spectro-temporal resolution and/or spectral warping with electric hearing compared to acoustic hearing (AH). Poor pitch perception in CIs has been shown to distort melodic interval perception. To characterize this interval distortion, we recruited CI users with either normal (single sided deafness, SSD) or limited (bimodal) AH in the non-implanted ear. The contralateral AH allowed for a stable reference with which to compare melodic interval perception in the CI ear, within the same listener. Melodic interval perception was compared across acoustic and electric hearing in 9 CI listeners (4 bimodal and 5 SSD). Participants were asked to rank the size of a probe interval presented to the CI ear to a reference interval presented to the contralateral AH ear using a method of constant stimuli. Ipsilateral interval ranking was also measured within the AH ear to ensure that listeners understood the task and that interval ranking was stable and accurate within AH. Stimuli were delivered to the AH ear via headphones and to the CI ear via direct audio input (DAI) to participants' clinical processors. During testing, a reference and probe interval was presented and participants indicated which was larger. Ten comparisons for each reference-probe combination were presented. Psychometric functions were fit to the data to determine the probe interval size that matched the reference interval. Across all AH reference intervals, the mean matched CI interval was 1.74 times larger than the AH reference. However, there was great inter-subject variability. For some participants, CI interval distortion varied across different reference AH intervals; for others, CI interval distortion was constant. Within the AH ear, ipsilateral interval ranking was accurate, ensuring that participants understood the task. No significant differences in the patterns of results were observed between bimodal and SSD CI users. The present data show that much larger intervals were needed with the CI to match contralateral AH reference intervals. As such, input melodic patterns are likely to be perceived as frequency compressed and/or warped with electric hearing, with less variation among notes in the pattern. The high inter-subject variability in CI interval distortion suggests that CI signal processing should be optimized for individual CI users.