Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:Rigid multiplanar thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity (ASD) cases are challenging and many require a 3-column osteotomy (3CO), specifically asymmetrical pedicle subtraction osteotomy (APSO). The outcomes and additional risks of performing APSO for the correction of concurrent sagittal-coronal deformity have yet to be adequately studied. METHODS:The authors performed a retrospective review of all ASD patients who underwent 3CO during the period from 2006 to 2019. All cases involved either isolated sagittal deformity (patients underwent standard PSO) or concurrent sagittal-coronal deformity (coronal vertical axis [CVA] ≥ 4.0 cm; patients underwent APSO). Perioperative and 2-year follow-up outcomes were compared between patients with isolated sagittal imbalance who underwent PSO and those with concurrent sagittal-coronal imbalance who underwent APSO. RESULTS:A total of 390 patients were included: 338 who underwent PSO and 52 who underwent APSO. The mean patient age was 64.6 years, and 65.1% of patients were female. APSO patients required significantly more fusions with upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) in the upper thoracic spine (63.5% vs 43.3%, p = 0.007). Radiographically, APSO patients had greater deformity with more severe preoperative sagittal and coronal imbalance: sagittal vertical axis (SVA) 13.0 versus 10.7 cm (p = 0.042) and CVA 6.1 versus 1.2 cm (p < 0.001). In APSO cases, significant correction and normalization were achieved (SVA 13.0-3.1 cm, CVA 6.1-2.0 cm, lumbar lordosis [LL] 26.3°-49.4°, pelvic tilt [PT] 38.0°-20.4°, and scoliosis 25.0°-10.4°, p < 0.001). The overall perioperative complication rate was 34.9%. There were no significant differences between PSO and APSO patients in rates of complications (overall 33.7% vs 42.3%, p = 0.227; neurological 5.9% vs 3.9%, p = 0.547; medical 20.7% vs 25.0%, p = 0.482; and surgical 6.5% vs 11.5%, p = 0.191, respectively). However, the APSO group required significantly longer stays in the ICU (3.1 vs 2.3 days, p = 0.047) and hospital (10.8 vs 8.3 days, p = 0.002). At the 2-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in mechanical complications, including proximal junctional kyphosis (p = 0.352), pseudarthrosis (p = 0.980), rod fracture (p = 0.852), and reoperation (p = 0.600). CONCLUSIONS:ASD patients with significant coronal imbalance often have severe concurrent sagittal deformity. APSO is a powerful and effective technique to achieve multiplanar correction without higher risk of morbidity and complications compared with PSO for sagittal imbalance. However, APSO is associated with slightly longer ICU and hospital stays.

OBJECTIVE:There is an increased recognition of disproportional lumbar lordosis (LL) and artificially high pelvic incidence (PI) as a cause for positive sagittal imbalance and spinal pelvic mismatch. For such cases, a sacral pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) may be indicated, although its morbidity is not well described. In this study, the authors evaluate the specific complication risks associated with S1 PSO. METHODS:A retrospective review of all adult spinal deformity patients who underwent a 3-column osteotomy (3CO) for thoracolumbar deformity from 2006 to 2019 was performed. Demographic, clinical baseline, and radiographic parameters were recorded. The primary outcome of interest was perioperative complications (surgical, neurological, and medical). Secondary outcomes of interest included case length, blood loss, and length of stay. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the risk of S1 PSO compared with 3CO at other levels. RESULTS:A total of 405 patients underwent 3CO in the following locations: thoracic (n = 55), L1 (n = 25), L2 (n = 29), L3 (n = 141), L4 (n = 129), L5 (n = 17), and S1 (n = 9). After S1 PSO, there were significant improvements in the sagittal vertical axis (14.8 cm vs 6.7 cm, p = 0.004) and PI-LL mismatch (31.7° vs 9.6°, p = 0.025) due to decreased PI (80.3° vs 65.9°, p = 0.006). LL remained unchanged (48.7° vs 57.8°, p = 0.360). The overall complication rate was 27.4%; the surgical, neurological, and medical complication rates were 7.7%, 6.2%, and 20.0%, respectively. S1 PSO was associated with significantly higher rates of overall complications: thoracic (29.1%), L1 (32.0%), L2 (31.0%), L3 (19.9%), L4 (32.6%), L5 (11.8%), and S1 (66.7%) (p = 0.018). Similarly, an S1 PSO was associated with significantly higher rates of surgical (thoracic [9.1%], L1 [4.0%], L2 [6.9%], L3 [5.7%], L4 [10.9%], L5 [5.9%], and S1 [44.4%], p = 0.006) and neurological (thoracic [9.1%], L1 [0.0%], L2 [6.9%], L3 [2.8%], L4 [7.0%], L5 [5.9%], and S1 [44.4%], p < 0.001) complications. On multivariate analysis, S1 PSO was independently associated with higher odds of overall (OR 7.93, p = 0.013), surgical (OR 20.66, p = 0.010), and neurological (OR 14.75, p = 0.007) complications. CONCLUSIONS:S1 PSO is a powerful technique for correction of rigid sagittal imbalance due to an artificially elevated PI in patients with rigid high-grade spondylolisthesis and chronic sacral fractures. However, the technique and intraoperative corrective maneuvers are challenging and associated with high surgical and neurological complications. Additional investigations into the learning curve associated with S1 PSO and complication prevention are needed.

OBJECTIVE:The correction of severe cervicothoracic sagittal deformities can be very challenging and can be associated with significant morbidity. Often, soft-tissue releases and osteotomies are warranted to achieve the desired correction. There is a paucity of studies that examine the difference in morbidity and complication profiles for Smith-Petersen osteotomy (SPO) versus 3-column osteotomy (3CO) for cervical deformity correction. METHODS:A retrospective comparison of complication profiles between posterior-based SPO (Ames grade 2 SPO) and 3CO (Ames grade 5 opening wedge osteotomy and Ames grade 6 closing wedge osteotomy) was performed by examining a single-surgeon experience from 2011 to 2018. Patients of interest were individuals who had a cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) > 4 cm and/or cervical kyphosis > 20° and who underwent corrective surgery for cervical deformity. Multivariate analysis was utilized. RESULTS:A total of 95 patients were included: 49 who underwent 3CO and 46 who underwent SPO. Twelve of the SPO patients underwent an anterior release procedure. The patients' mean age was 63.2 years, and 60.0% of the patients were female. All preoperative radiographic parameters showed significant correction postoperatively: cSVA (6.2 cm vs 4.5 cm [preoperative vs postoperative values], p < 0.001), cervical lordosis (6.8° [kyphosis] vs -7.5°, p < 0.001), and T1 slope (40.9° and 35.2°, p = 0.026). The overall complication rate was 37.9%, and postoperative neurological deficits were seen in 16.8% of patients. The surgical and medical complication rates were 17.9% and 23.2%, respectively. Overall, complication rates were higher in patients who underwent 3CO compared to those who underwent SPO, but this was not statistically significant (total complication rate 42.9% vs 32.6%, p = 0.304; surgical complication rate 18.4% vs 10.9%, p = 0.303; and new neurological deficit rate 20.4% vs 13.0%, p = 0.338). Medical complication rates were similar between the two groups (22.4% [3CO] vs 23.9% [SPO], p = 0.866). Independent risk factors for surgical complications included male sex (OR 10.88, p = 0.014), cSVA > 8 cm (OR 10.36, p = 0.037), and kyphosis > 20° (OR 9.48, p = 0.005). Combined anterior-posterior surgery was independently associated with higher odds of medical complications (OR 10.30, p = 0.011), and preoperative kyphosis > 20° was an independent risk factor for neurological deficits (OR 2.08, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS:There was no significant difference in complication rates between 3CO and SPO for cervicothoracic deformity correction, but absolute surgical and neurological complication rates for 3CO were higher. A preoperative cSVA > 8 cm was a risk factor for surgical complications, and kyphosis > 20° was a risk factor for both surgical and neurological complications. Additional studies are warranted on this topic.

OBJECTIVE:The benefits and utility of routine neuromonitoring with motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during lumbar spine surgery remain unclear. This study assesses measures of performance and utility of transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). METHODS:This is a retrospective study of a single-surgeon cohort of consecutive adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients who underwent lumbar PSO from 2006 to 2016. A blinded neurophysiologist reviewed individual cases for MEP changes. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine whether changes correlated with neurological deficits. Measures of performance were calculated. RESULTS:A total of 242 lumbar PSO cases were included. MEP changes occurred in 38 (15.7%) cases; the changes were transient in 21 cases (55.3%) and permanent in 17 (44.7%). Of the patients with permanent changes, 9 (52.9%) had no recovery and 8 (47.1%) had partial recovery of MEP signals. Changes occurred at a mean time of 8.8 minutes following PSO closure (range: during closure to 55 minutes after closure). The mean percentage of MEP signal loss was 72.9%. The overall complication rate was 25.2%, and the incidence of new neurological deficits was 4.1%. On multivariate analysis, MEP signal loss of at least 50% was not associated with complication (p = 0.495) or able to predict postoperative neurological deficits (p = 0.429). Of the 38 cases in which MEP changes were observed, the observation represented a true-positive finding in only 3 cases. Postoperative neurological deficits without MEP changes occurred in 7 cases. Calculated measures of performance were as follows: sensitivity 30.0%, specificity 84.9%, positive predictive value 7.9%, and negative predictive value 96.6%. Regarding the specific characteristics of the MEP changes, only a signal loss of 80% or greater was significantly associated with a higher rate of neurological deficit (23.0% vs 0.0% for loss of less than 80%, p = 0.021); changes of less than 80% were not associated with postoperative deficits. CONCLUSIONS:Neuromonitoring has a low positive predictive value and low sensitivity for detecting new neurological deficits. Even when neuromonitoring is unchanged, patients can still have new neurological deficits. The utility of transcranial MEP monitoring for lumbar PSO remains unclear but there may be advantages to its use.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Neurofibromatosis-1 (NF1) dystrophic scoliosis is a challenging disease to manage surgically, with multiplanar curves progressing rapidly and unpredictably. Conservative management with bracing is often unsuccessful, and many patients necessitate instrumented fusion to halt progression of their curves. In rare cases, patients can present with spontaneous vertebral subluxation, significantly complicating the surgical management of this already complex disease process. The objective here was to describe 2 cases of vertebral subluxation in NF1-associated dystrophic scoliosis along with their surgical corrections and clinical courses. METHODS:A retrospective review of 2 cases at the authors' institution was performed to describe their preoperative symptom complexes, surgical corrections, and postoperative courses. A narrative review of the literature surrounding NF1-associated dystrophic scoliosis and subluxation is also presented. RESULTS:Two cases of vertebral subluxation at T4-5 and C7-T1 are presented. Both patients had significant dystrophic features throughout their spines, and halo-gravity traction was unsuccessful in 1 patient and led to vertebral and subclavian artery injuries in the other. One patient underwent an uncomplicated deformity correction with partial vertebral column resection to facilitate his deformity correction. The other patient, after her vascular injuries, ultimately suffered a spinal cord injury after a fall and underwent emergent instrumentation, decompression, and partial vertebral column resection at the site of subluxation, with improvement in her neurological function afterward. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Dystrophic scoliosis in NF1 remains a difficult disease to treat, and deformity correction in patients with subluxation is particularly complex. These cases here highlight the unpredictability and possible complications of halo-gravity traction, need for good fixation to facilitate subluxation reduction, high chance of hardware complications and proximal or distal failure, and importance of cooperative management of these patients in conjunction with other surgical services.

OBJECTIVE:Cognitive impairment and pain catastrophizing are both associated with worse surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to define the prevalence of cognitive impairment in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and the relationships between cognitive impairment, pain catastrophizing, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and frailty in the preoperative setting. METHODS:This cross-sectional study included patients undergoing evaluation for ASD correction at a single tertiary care center from January 2017 to October 2024. Patients were administered the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Scoliosis Research Society 22-item revised (SRS-22r) questionnaire, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS). Median survey responses were compared between patients with any cognitive impairment (MoCA score < 26) and no cognitive impairment (MoCA score ≥ 26) using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Associations between survey responses were tested using Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of severe pain catastrophizing (PCS score ≥ 30). RESULTS:A total of 210 patients (61.4% female, median age 66.5 years) were included in the study. Of these, 123 (58.6%) had normal cognition and 87 (41.4%) had mild or moderate cognitive impairment. Patients with cognitive impairment had greater median PCS scores compared with patients with normal cognition (total PCS score 25.0 vs 19.0, p = 0.01). Lower MoCA scores were significantly correlated with higher PCS (ρ = -0.23, p = 0.0007) and EFS (ρ = -0.21, p = 0.0074) scores, but not ODI and total SRS-22r scores. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, lower MoCA and SRS-22r scores were associated with greater odds of having severe pain catastrophizing (MoCA: OR 0.82 [95% CI 0.68-0.98], p = 0.03; SRS-22r: OR 0.05 [95% CI 0.01-0.19], p < 0.0001), while ODI score, EFS score, age, and sex were not associated. CONCLUSIONS:There was a high prevalence (41.4%) of cognitive impairment in patients with ASD. In both the correlation and multivariate logistic regression analyses, cognitive impairment was associated with pain catastrophizing and thus might contribute to pain perception and frailty in a way that is not consistently captured by traditional PROMs.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Three-column osteotomy (3CO) offers substantial spinal deformity correction. Thoracic neurovascular bundle sacrifice is often required, and anterior spinal artery (ASA) perfusion can be compromised. Spinal angiography allows localization of variable ASA vascular contribution. This study's objective was to describe a series of patients who underwent preoperative spinal angiography and discuss the impact on surgical planning and execution of thoracic 3CO for deformity correction. METHODS:Patients who underwent preoperative spinal angiograms and thoracic 3CO for deformity correction were reviewed. Preoperative, angiographic, and postoperative information was recorded. A literature review on preoperative spinal angiography in deformity surgery was performed. RESULTS:Eight patients were identified: single-level pedicle subtraction osteotomies (1), single-level vertebral column resections (2), and multilevel vertebral column resections (5). The average age was 40.0 years, and 75.0% were female. Thoracic scoliosis ranged from 0 to 105° preoperatively and 0 to 45.1° postoperatively. Thoracic kyphosis ranged from 29° to 120° preoperatively and 20.6° to 54.9° postoperatively. Twelve ASA supply vessels were identified bilaterally in 6 patients. Four patients had nontraditional ASA supply at T4 (1), T6 (1), and L2 (2), and 4 had multiple ASA feeders. Based on angiographic results, osteotomy site was changed (1), and neurovascular bundles were spared (2), a 37.5% rate of surgical plan alteration. There were no permanent neuromonitoring changes or postoperative neurologic deficits. No articles reported on using spinal angiography specifically for deformity surgery. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Spinal angiography is low risk and provides critical information regarding ASA supply to potentially mitigate ischemic risk during neurovascular bundle takedown during thoracic 3CO. Further case series are warranted to evaluate the benefits in larger populations, but its clinical applications appear practical.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Anterior vertebral body tether (VBT) is a fusionless approach to treat idiopathic scoliosis, and surgeons are beginning to implement the technique into current practice. This study aims to evaluate the learning curve for single and double VBT. METHODS:A retrospective review of 3 surgeons' first 40 single and 20 double VBT was performed. Skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent thoracic (single) or thoracolumbar (double) VBT were included. Thoracic VBT was done via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and lumbar VBT through a mini-open retroperitoneal approach. Primary outcomes of interest were operative time, radiation exposure, and radiographic correction. Pooled and individual-surgeon analyses were performed. RESULTS:A total of 180 patients were included: 120 single and 60 double. Mean age was 12.7 years, and 87.8% were female. Mean segments tethered was 7.8 in single and 11.0 in double. Mean preoperative thoracic scoliosis was 51.5: single 50.5° and double 53.3°. Mean lumbar scoliosis was 36.4°: single 30.0° and double 49.0°. Average operating time was 276.2 minutes; double VBT was significantly longer (217.3 vs 394.0 minutes, P < .001). Mean blood loss was 198.5 mL, and mean fluoroscopy dose was 73.0 mGy. For single VBT, there was a decrease in operative time (283.3-174.8 minutes, P < .001) and fluoroscopy dose (70.1-53.5 mGy, P = .047) over time. Every 10 cases resulted in a 31.4 minute decrease in operative time (P < .001). There were no intraoperative complications. Single VBT resulted in 54.9% thoracic curve correction. Double VBT achieved 53.0% thoracic and 56.7% lumbar correction. There were no differences in curve correction across the learning curve. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:VBT is viable fusionless surgical option for scoliosis. As expected, increased experience resulted in shorter operative time; the threshold for such improvement seems to be 10 cases. Importantly, adequate and consistent curve correction can be achieved at the start of the learning curve while mitigating complications.