Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Increasingly complex MRI studies and variable series naming conventions reveal limitations of rule-based image routing, especially in health systems with multiple scanners and sites. Accurate methods to identify series based on image content would aid post-processing and PACS viewing. Recent deep/machine learning efforts classify 5-8 basic brain MR sequences. We present an ensemble model combining a convolutional neural network and a random forest classifier to differentiate 25 brain sequences and image orientation. METHODS:Series were grouped by descriptions into 25 sequences and 4 orientations. Dataset A, obtained from our institution, was divided into training (16,828 studies; 48,512 series; 112,028 images), validation (4746 studies; 16,612 series; 26,222 images) and test sets (6348 studies; 58,705 series; 3,314,018 images). Dataset B, obtained from a separate hospital, was used for out-of-domain external validation (1252 studies; 2150 series; 234,944 images). We developed an ensemble model combining a 2D convolutional neural network with a custom multi-task learning architecture and random forest classifier trained on DICOM metadata to classify sequence and orientation by series. RESULTS:The neural network, random forest, and ensemble achieved 95%, 97%, and 98% overall sequence accuracy on dataset A, and 98%, 99%, and 99% accuracy on dataset B, respectively. All models achieved > 99% orientation accuracy on both datasets. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The ensemble model for series identification accommodates the complexity of brain MRI studies in state-of-the-art clinical practice. Expanding on previous work demonstrating proof-of-concept, our approach is more comprehensive with greater sequence diversity and orientation classification.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:There have been growing concerns around potential risks related to sports-related concussion and contact sport exposure to repetitive head impacts in young athletes. Here we investigate WM microstructural differences between collegiate football players with and without sports-related concussion. MATERIALS AND METHODS:The study included 78 collegiate athletes (24 football players with sports-related concussion, 26 football players with repetitive head impacts, and 28 non-contact-sport control athletes), available through the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research registry. Diffusion metrics of diffusion tensor/kurtosis imaging and WM tract integrity were calculated. Tract-Based Spatial Statistics and post hoc ROI analyses were performed to test group differences. RESULTS:Significantly increased axial kurtosis in those with sports-related concussion compared with controls was observed diffusely across the whole-brain WM, and some focal areas demonstrated significantly higher mean kurtosis and extra-axonal axial diffusivity in sports-related concussion. The extent of significantly different WM regions decreased across time points and remained present primarily in the corpus callosum. Similar differences in axial kurtosis were found between the repetitive head impact and control groups. Other significant differences were seen at unrestricted return-to-play with lower radial kurtosis and intra-axonal diffusivity in those with sports-related concussion compared with the controls, mainly restricted to the posterior callosum. CONCLUSIONS:This study highlights the fact that there are differences in diffusion microstructure measures that are present not only between football players with sports-related injuries and controls, but that there are also measurable differences between football players with repetitive head impacts and controls. This work reinforces previous work showing that the corpus callosum is specifically implicated in sports-related concussion and also suggests this to be true for repetitive head impacts.

Purpose/UNASSIGNED:To present a method that automatically detects, subtypes, and locates acute or subacute intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on noncontrast CT (NCCT) head scans; generates detection confidence scores to identify high-confidence data subsets with higher accuracy; and improves radiology worklist prioritization. Such scores may enable clinicians to better use artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Materials and Methods/UNASSIGNED:764). Internal centers contributed developmental data, whereas external centers did not. Deep neural networks predicted the presence of ICH and subtypes (intraparenchymal, intraventricular, subarachnoid, subdural, and/or epidural hemorrhage) and segmentations per case. Two ICH confidence scores are discussed: a calibrated classifier entropy score and a Dempster-Shafer score. Evaluation was completed by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and report turnaround time (RTAT) modeling on the evaluation set and on confidence score-defined subsets using bootstrapping. Results/UNASSIGNED:< .001). Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:. © RSNA, 2022.

Improving speed and image quality of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) using deep learning reconstruction is an active area of research. The fastMRI dataset contains large volumes of raw MRI data, which has enabled significant advances in this field. While the impact of the fastMRI dataset is unquestioned, the dataset currently lacks clinical expert pathology annotations, critical to addressing clinically relevant reconstruction frameworks and exploring important questions regarding rendering of specific pathology using such novel approaches. This work introduces fastMRI+, which consists of 16154 subspecialist expert bounding box annotations and 13 study-level labels for 22 different pathology categories on the fastMRI knee dataset, and 7570 subspecialist expert bounding box annotations and 643 study-level labels for 30 different pathology categories for the fastMRI brain dataset. The fastMRI+ dataset is open access and aims to support further research and advancement of medical imaging in MRI reconstruction and beyond.

Machine learning is becoming increasingly important in both research and clinical applications in radiology due to recent technological developments, particularly in deep learning. As these technologies are translated toward clinical practice, there is a need for radiologists and radiology trainees to understand the basic principles behind them. This primer provides an accessible introduction to the vocabulary and concepts that are central to machine learning and relevant to the radiologist.

StarVIBE is a 3D gradient-echo sequence with a radial, stack-of-stars acquisition having spatial resolution and tissue contrast. With newer sequences, it is important to be familiar with sequence tissue contrasts and appearance of anatomical variants. We evaluated 450 patients utilizing this sequence; 35 patients demonstrated fluffy "cotton wool" enhancement at the internal auditory canal fundus without clear pathology. We favor this represents anatomic neurovascular enhancement that StarVIBE is sensitive to and is a touch-me-not finding.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Quantitative volumetric segmentation of gliomas has important implications for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. We present a deep-learning model that accommodates automated preoperative and postoperative glioma segmentation with a pipeline for clinical implementation. Developed and engineered in concert, the work seeks to accelerate clinical realization of such tools. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A deep learning model, autoencoder regularization-cascaded anisotropic, was developed, trained, and tested fusing key elements of autoencoder regularization with a cascaded anisotropic convolutional neural network. We constructed a dataset consisting of 437 cases with 40 cases reserved as a held-out test and the remainder split 80:20 for training and validation. We performed data augmentation and hyperparameter optimization and used a mean Dice score to evaluate against baseline models. To facilitate clinical adoption, we developed the model with an end-to-end pipeline including routing, preprocessing, and end-user interaction. RESULTS:The autoencoder regularization-cascaded anisotropic model achieved median and mean Dice scores of 0.88/0.83 (SD, 0.09), 0.89/0.84 (SD, 0.08), and 0.81/0.72 (SD, 0.1) for whole-tumor, tumor core/resection cavity, and enhancing tumor subregions, respectively, including both preoperative and postoperative follow-up cases. The overall total processing time per case was ∼10 minutes, including data routing (∼1 minute), preprocessing (∼6 minute), segmentation (∼1-2 minute), and postprocessing (∼1 minute). Implementation challenges were discussed. CONCLUSIONS:We show the feasibility and advantages of building a coordinated model with a clinical pipeline for the rapid and accurate deep learning segmentation of both preoperative and postoperative gliomas. The ability of the model to accommodate cases of postoperative glioma is clinically important for follow-up. An end-to-end approach, such as used here, may lead us toward successful clinical translation of tools for quantitative volume measures for glioma.

Accelerating MRI scans is one of the principal outstanding problems in the MRI research community. Towards this goal, we hosted the second fastMRI competition targeted towards reconstructing MR images with subsampled k-space data. We provided participants with data from 7,299 clinical brain scans (de-identified via a HIPAA-compliant procedure by NYU Langone Health), holding back the fully-sampled data from 894 of these scans for challenge evaluation purposes. In contrast to the 2019 challenge, we focused our radiologist evaluations on pathological assessment in brain images. We also debuted a new Transfer track that required participants to submit models evaluated on MRI scanners from outside the training set. We received 19 submissions from eight different groups. Results showed one team scoring best in both SSIM scores and qualitative radiologist evaluations. We also performed analysis on alternative metrics to mitigate the effects of background noise and collected feedback from the participants to inform future challenges. Lastly, we identify common failure modes across the submissions, highlighting areas of need for future research in the MRI reconstruction community.