Success rate and factors predictive of redo endothermal ablation of small saphenous veins
OBJECTIVE:Endothermal ablation, such as endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), has been increasingly used for treatment of small saphenous vein (SSV) insufficiency. Prior studies have shown recurrence rates of 0% to 10% in incompetent SSVs (ISSVs). The objective of the present study was to determine the efficacy of redo venous ablation for symptomatic recanalized SSVs and to predict the factors related to recanalization. METHODS:A retrospective analysis of 2566 procedures in 1752 patients with chronic venous insufficiency due to ISSVs from 2012 to 2018 was performed, using individual medical record review for data extraction. All 2566 procedures were performed using endothermal ablation for patients in whom initial conservative management had failed. Postoperative duplex ultrasound scans were performed within 3 to 7Â days after treatment. We defined successful obliteration as a lack of color flow using postoperative duplex ultrasound. We defined recanalization as the presence of reflux on duplex ultrasound in the target vessel during follow-up. We conducted follow-up examinations every 3Â months during the first year and every 6Â months subsequently. RESULTS:. The mean age was 62.4Â Â± 15.10Â years. The CEAP (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology) class was C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, and C6 for 0, 0, 29, 43, 1, and 18 patients, respectively. The mean maximum diameter of the targeted veins for the redo procedures was 4.51Â Â± 1.33Â mm. Of the 91 procedures, 40 were performed using EVLA and 51 were performed using RFA. The initial technical success was 98.9%. The redo procedures showed an early closure of 96.7%. At a mean follow-up duration of 24.9Â Â± 14.9Â months, the closure rate was 96.5%. No correlation was found between successful obliteration with the redo procedure and age, gender, CEAP class, laterality, EVLA vs RFA, body mass index, or vein diameter. CONCLUSIONS:The rates of successful closure for ISSVs with initial and redo procedures were comparable. These data have validated the potential usefulness of performing redo SSV ablation.
Correlation of Body Mass Index with Recanalization Risk after Endovenous Thermal Ablation
OBJECTIVE:Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) has an increased prevalence among obese individuals with body mass indices (BMI) over 30. A safe, efficacious, and evidence-based recommended treatment for CVI due to superficial venous reflux (SVR) in great saphenous veins (GSV), small saphenous veins (SSV), accessory saphenous veins (ASV), and reflux in the perforator veins (PV) is endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA). We sought to identify if BMI is an independent risk factor for recanalization following EVTA. METHODS:All patients with CVI were initially managed conservatively, and those with pathologic SVR refractory to compression therapy were offered EVTAs dependent on the site of reflux. Sonographic confirmation of SVR was defined as >500 milliseconds of reflux in the GSV, SSV, and ASV and a diameter >4 millimeters. PV reflux was confirmed as >350 milliseconds of reflux and a diameter >2.5 millimeters. All patients received a follow-up duplex ultrasound 1 week after the procedure, every 3 months for the first year, and every 6 months thereafter. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression was performed regarding patients' age, ablation modality (laser vs radiofrequency ablation), vein location and laterality, BMI, and recanalization. RESULTS:for recanalizations. PVs were statistically more likely to recanalize than any other vein (p=0.0001). A secondary analysis was performed with the exclusion of PVs, due to their 5 times increased risk of recanalization, and showed no significant difference of recanalization across all BMI subgroups (p=0.127). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:BMI does not predict recanalization risk following EVTA, except for ablations performed on PVs.
Outcomes of Cadaveric Veins as Conduits for Lower Extremity Arterial Bypass [Meeting Abstract]
Physician Impact on Use of Fluoroscopy During Endovascular Procedures to Improve Radiation Safety
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine whether differences exist in fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure during lower extremity endovascular procedures performed by fellowship trained vascular surgeons versus general surgeons, to minimize radiation exposure to operating room staff. METHODS:, 2016. The procedures were performed by the surgical department's 4 surgeons with endovascular privileges: 2 vascular surgeons and 2 general surgeons. Only procedures involving lower extremity arterial angiograms with balloon angioplasty, stenting, or atherectomy were included. The operative records were reviewed for each case. The total fluoroscopy time, and total radiation dose for each procedure were recorded. Procedures were grouped according to the number of endovascular interventions as 1-2 interventions, 3-4 and â‰¥5 interventions performed. Statistical analysis was performed with a p-value of <.05 as significant. RESULTS:About 271 lower extremity endovascular procedures were performed during the study period by 4 surgeons. The average age of the patient population was 70 years. The total number of procedures performed over the study period were 112, 45, 91, and 25 for surgeons 1-4 respectively. On average, 3.24 interventions were performed during each procedure. Vascular surgeons were found to have shorter fluoroscopy time for procedures involving 1-2 (7.8 vs. 30.1, p<.01), 3-4 (9.3 vs. 34.2, p<.01), and â‰¥5 (11.5 vs. 51.9, p<.01) interventions. Vascular surgeons were also found to have less radiation exposure compared to general surgeons in procedures with 1-2 (1.69 vs. 3.53, p=.001) and â‰¥5 (2.3 vs. 5.4, p=.003) interventions. There was no significant difference in radiation exposure between vascular and general surgeons for procedures with 3-4 interventions (5.86 vs. 5.59, p=.95). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this small series at our institution, lower extremity endovascular procedures performed by specialty-trained vascular surgeons were associated with both decreased operative fluoroscopy time and decreased radiation exposure when compared to general surgeons.
Partial subclavian artery coverage in TEVAR patients for acute type B aortic dissections: an alternative solution
BACKGROUND:Acute type B aortic dissection with origin of the left subclavian artery (LSA) is generally managed with endovascular therapy for acute coverage of the LSA with (a) no revascularization, (b) revascularization with open methods, or (c) endovascular revascularization. To identify an alternative solution, we critically evaluated a small cohort of patients who had partial coverage of their LSA. METHODS:Three thoracic endovascular repairs were performed from January-March 2015. Patients were deemed eligible for endovascular repair after they had failed conservative management. Indications included acute type B dissection with lower extremity ischemia, ruptured dissection, and persistent symptoms of dissection after medical therapy. RESULTS:Technical success was achieved in all three patients, and all procedures were performed percutaneously. The mean distance between the ostium of the LSA and the entry point of dissection was 11.1 Â± 3.4 mm. Within the 30-day post-operative period, there were no deaths, aortic ruptures, myocardial infarctions, or conversions to open repair. Freedom from re-intervention was noted in all 3 patients. There was no spinal cord ischemia. CONCLUSIONS:There is no strong evidence to support the current optimal approach for treatment of the thoracic aorta. Partial coverage of LSA in patients with <2 cm seal zones may be considered as an alternative. However, due to our small sample size, limited followup, and lack of comparison cohort, further investigation is necessary.
Sphygmomanometer-induced hemostasis following iatrogenic guidewire perforation during lower extremity angioplasty
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Iatrogenic guidewire perforation is a well-known complication of lower extremity angioplasty that is often benign or can be easily treated with endovascular techniques. However, perforations that occur in arterial side branches may be more challenging to manage. If bleeding persists, open surgery and fasciotomy may be required to evacuate the resulting hematoma and prevent compartment syndrome. These subsequent procedures increase morbidity and, if the angioplasty was performed in the outpatient setting, necessitate patient transfer to a hospital. To address these challenges, we describe a non-invasive hemostasis technique involving serial sphygmomanometer cuff inflations over the affected site in a series of five patients who experienced this complication at our office. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients undergoing lower extremity angioplasty that were found to have an arterial guidewire perforation on completion angiogram at our outpatient center between February 2012 and February 2017. Patients found to have iatrogenic guidewire perforations were administered intravenous protamine sulfate and were transferred to the surgical recovery room. Patients received ibuprofen or acetaminophen for pain management. A blood pressure cuff was placed around the site of perforation, and patients received serial cuff inflation cycles with repeated examinations of both limbs until patients reported cessation of pain and there were no signs of a developing hematoma. Patients were observed for two hours before they were discharged home. A follow-up duplex ultrasound examination was completed within one week of the intervention. RESULTS:Over the course of five years, 536 angioplasties were performed at our outpatient office. Five of these patients experienced iatrogenic guidewire perforation (0.93%). Perforations occurred in branches of the anterior or posterior tibial artery. All of these patients were successfully managed with the aforementioned hemostasis technique. None of these patients required transfer to a hospital for further management, and no complications were reported at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS:Complications of iatrogenic guidewire perforations in lower extremity arterial side branches can be safely and effectively managed by applying external compression around the affected site with an automatic blood pressure cuff.
Safety of Vascular Interventions Performed in an Office-Based Lab in Patients with Low/Moderate Procedural Risk
Objective An exponential increase in number of office-based labs (OBLs) has occurred in the United States, since the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services increased reimbursement for outpatient vascular interventions in 2008. This dramatic shift to office based procedures directed to the objective to assess safety of vascular procedures in OBLs. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed to include all procedures performed in a 4-year period at an accredited OBL. The procedures were categorized into groups for analysis; group I: venous procedures, group II: arterial, group III: arterio-venous and group IV included IVC filter placement procedures. Local anesthesia, analgesics and conscious sedation were used in all interventions, individualized to patient and procedure performed. Arterial closures devices were used in all arterial interventions. Patient selection for procedure at OBL was highly selective to include only patients with low/moderate procedural risk. Results Nearly 6201 procedures were performed in 2779 patients from 2011-2015. The mean age of the study population was 66.5 Â± 13.31 years. There were 1852(67%) females and 928 (33%) males. In group I, 5783 venous procedures were performed (3491 vein ablation, 2292 iliac vein stenting); with group-II 238 arterial procedures (125 femoral/popliteal, 71 infra-popliteal, iliac 42); group III-129 arterial-venous accesses and group IV-51 inferior vena cava filter placements. The majority of procedures belonged to ASA II with venous (61%) and arterial (74%). A total of 5% patients were deemed ASA class 4 (all on hemodialysis). There were no OBL mortality, major bleed, acute limb ischemia, MI, stroke or hospital transfer within 72 hours. Minor complications occurred in 14 patients (0.5%). 30-day mortality, unrelated to procedure were noted in 9 patients (0.32%). No statistically significant differences were noted in outcomes between the 4 groups. Conclusion Our data suggests that it is safe to use OBL for minimally invasive, non-complex vascular interventions in patients with low-moderate cardiovascular procedural risk.
Fast-Track Thrombolysis Protocol for Acute Limb Ischemia
OBJECTIVE:Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in the treatment of acute lower-extremity arterial occlusions (ALI) often requires several interventional sessions to generate successful outcomes. CDT is typically an expensive procedure, necessitating extended hospital length of stay (LOS) that may be associated with an increase in both local and systemic hemorrhagic complications. Five years ago, we created the Fast-Track Thrombolysis Protocol for Arteries (FTTP-A) to deal with these concerns. The goal of our protocol is to re-establish patency during the first session of thrombolysis, thus decreasing costs and complications associated with prolonged periods of thrombolytic exposure. METHODS:A retrospective study of 42 patients was performed at our institution who were treated for ALI utilizing FTTP-A from January 2014 to February 2019. FTTP-A includes: peri-adventitial lidocaine injection at the arterial puncture site under ultrasound guidance, contrast arteriography of the entire targeted segment, pharmacomechanicalrheolytic thrombectomy of the occluded arterial segment, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) infusion along the occluded segment, balloon maceration of the thrombus, and if deemed necessary, placing a stent in areas of significant (â‰¥30%) stenosis that is refractory to balloon angioplasty and thrombolysis. After the stenosis or thrombus was cleared, patients were placed on an oral anticoagulant agent. RESULTS:Forty-two primary FTTP-As (50 total interventions) were performed in 42 patients. The median age was 67.2Â±12.2 years (range 41-98), of which 54.8% were male. 59.5% of the procedures were performed on the left lower extremity. Initial arterial access sites as obtained via the common femoral artery (CFA), in 39/42 cases (92.9%), with the remaining three being obtained in a left bypass access site, a right femoral-popliteal graft and a right femoral-femoral graft. The mean operative time was 148.9Â±62.9 minutes (range: 83-313), and the mean volume of tPA infused was 9.7Â±4.0 mg (range: 2-20). The median cost including medications and interventional tools was $4673.19 per procedure. The mean post-operative length of stay was 3.1Â±4.5 days (range: 1-25). Median post-operative length of stay was 1 day. Mean post-operative follow-up was 27Â±19.2 months (range: 0-62). Single-session FTTP-A was successful in 81% (n = 34/42) of patients. The remaining 8 patients (19%) required a single additional session. Thirty-four of the 42 patients (81%) required arterial stenting. Peri-procedural complications consisted of 1 patient with hematuria, which resolved, and 1 patient with thrombocytopenia, which resolved. No patients experienced re-thrombosis within 30-days of FTTP-A. Over the five-year study period, there were no significant local or systemic hemorrhage, limb loss, or mortality related to this protocol. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:FTTP-A, appears to be safe, efficacious and a cost-effective procedure in the resolution of acute lower-extremity arterial occlusions.
Effect of Pre-Procedure Clopidogrel With Iliac Vein Stenting in Non-Thrombotic Vein Lesions
OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:Iliac vein stenting is a relatively new procedure in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. Research has shown that it is a safe and effective form of treatment, however, one of the well-known risks is in-stent thrombosis. We hypothesize that a single 75 mg dose of Clopidogrel the night prior to the procedures along with a 3-month regimen post-op would decrease the 30-day thrombosis rate. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective study was performed on 3,518 patients from September 2012 to August 2018 who received an iliofemoral stent. Patients were broken down into 2 main groups: those given Clopidogrel post-stent and those given Clopidogrel both pre- and post-stent. In our practice, we prescribe a 3-month course of Clopidogrel after iliac vein stenting. Patients were also checked for any anticoagulant medications pre- and/or post-stent. The 30-day thrombosis rates were recorded for each patient. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:1,205 patients received Clopidogrel pre-procedurally and post-procedurally, 1,941 patients received Clopidogrel only post-procedurally. 372 patients were excluded from the study because they were on other anti-coagulant medications. Mean follow-up for this cohort was 17 months. 112 total patients developed some degree of 30 day in-stent thrombosis (3.6%). 74 patients developed a complete thrombosis of the stent and 38 developed a partial (â‰¤60% occlusion) thrombosis. Of the 1,205 patients who were on clopidogrel pre-stenting, 28 had a complete thrombosis and 10 had a partial in-stent thrombosis. Of the 1,941 patients on Clopidogrel only post-stenting, 46 had a complete thrombosis and 28 had a partial in-stent thrombosis. Using the Chi-squared test, there were no statistically significant differences between the group of patients receiving Clopidogrel pre- and post-stent vs. just post-stent with respect to 30-day any degree of thrombosis rates (complete and partial thrombosis) (p = .33). Using the Chi-squared test, there were no statistically significant differences between the group of patients receiving Clopidogrel pre- and post-stent vs. just post-stent with respect to 30-day complete thrombosis rates (p = .93). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:There appears to be no statistical difference in 30-day thrombosis rates between those receiving Clopidogrel the night prior vs. those who do not receive Clopidogrel the night prior. Therefore, we conclude that it is not necessary to give this single dose the night prior to iliac vein stenting procedures.
Resolution times of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis
OBJECTIVE:Lower extremity endovenous ablation has become the primary treatment modality for symptomatic venous reflux disease. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) has been reported as one of the primary complications of these venous ablative procedures. Our aim was to determine how long EHITs take to resolve and the factors affecting this length of time. METHODS:A retrospective analysis was performed of 10,029 consecutive procedures from March 2012 to September 2018 performed on 3218 patients who underwent endovenous ablation for lower extremity venous reflux. There were 6091 procedures performed with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and 3938 with endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). Postprocedural venous duplex ultrasound was performed to evaluate for EHIT and recanalization at 3 to 7Â days, every 3Â months for the first year, and every 6 to 12Â months thereafter. JMP version 14 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all statistical analysis. RESULTS:EHIT was found to have developed in 186 patients; 109 patients had been treated with RFA and 77 with EVLA. The average age of the patients receiving EVLA in whom EHIT developed was 59.97Â Â± 11.61Â years. The patients who received RFA and in whom EHIT developed had an average age of 73.4Â Â± 9.64Â years. The average time of resolution for the EVLA group was 75Â Â± 71.97Â days. The average resolution time for the RFA group was 139.8Â Â± 232.52Â days. There were no statistical differences between EHIT resolution times and age, sex, body mass index, clinical class, laterality, type of vein treated, or whether the patient was taking clopidogrel preoperatively or postoperatively. A statistical difference was found between EHIT resolution time and whether the patient was treated with EVLA or RFA (PÂ = .0332). CONCLUSIONS:Our study seems to suggest that EHIT resolution times may be related to the difference in treatment modality between EVLA and RFA. The data suggest that EHIT resolves more quickly with the use of EVLA than with RFA.