Faculty Bibliography

We used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to assess the accuracy of manufacturers' stent balloon compliance charts. Many interventional cardiologists rely on manufacturers' compliance charts to select stent size and optimize stent diameters according to inflation pressures during percutaneous procedures. We randomly selected 212 patients who had de novo coronary lesions that had been treated with a single, bare metal, > or =3.0-mm stent (Bx velocity, NIR, TETRA/PENTA, S660/S670/S7) under IVUS guidance. Cases of stent overlap and postdilatation with another balloon were excluded. Predicted stent diameters were derived from each manufacturer's compliance charts, and stent size and final maximal deployment pressures were derived from each physician's report. IVUS-measured minimum stent diameters (range 1.4 to 4.0 mm, mean 2.79 +/- 0.48) were smaller than predicted diameters (range 3.1 to 4.57 mm, mean 3.79 +/- 0.44). The ratio of IVUS to predicted diameters ranged from 44% to 97% (mean 74 +/- 10%). This finding was common to all 3 stent sizes: 74 +/- 12% for 3.0 mm, 73 +/- 9% for 3.5 mm, and 74 +/- 9% for 4.0-mm stents (p = 0.9). This finding was also common to all 4 stent manufacturers, 72 +/- 8% for Boston Scientific, 76 +/- 11% for Guidant, 73 +/- 9% for Cordis, and 74 +/- 11% for Medtronic (p = 0.13), and to different stent lengths. Only 3.8% of the stents achieved 90% of the predicted minimum stent diameters, and only 24.6% achieved 80% of the predicted minimum stent diameters. In conclusion, in human coronary arteries, minimal stent diameter measured by IVUS is significantly smaller than that predicted by in vitro compliance charts. These differences are independent of stent manufacturer, length, diameter, and deployment pressure

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the predictors of stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. BACKGROUND: A number of cases of stent thrombosis have been reported after commercial release of the SES in the 'real world,' such that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a warning. METHODS: Fifteen patients who developed stent thrombosis after successful SES implantation were analyzed and compared with 45 matched control patients who had no evidence of stent thrombosis. RESULTS: Minimum stent cross-sectional area (MSA) (4.3 +/- 1.6 mm(2) vs. 6.2 +/- 1.9 mm(2), p < 0.001) and stent expansion (0.65 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.85 +/- 0.14, p < 0.001) were significantly smaller in the stent thrombosis group than in the matched control patients. There was no significant difference in the rate of SES malapposition between the groups. However, the presence of a significant residual reference segment stenosis was more common in the stent thrombosis group compared with the matched control group (67% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). Independent predictors of stent thrombosis were stent underexpansion (p = 0.03) and a significant residual reference segment stenosis (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are associated with stent thrombosis after successful SES implantation

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) evaluation was performed in 33 lesions with sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) failure: 4 thromboses, 26 in-stent restenoses (including 6 edge stenoses), 4 new stenoses >5 mm proximal to the stent, and 1 patient with no evidence of the implanted SES (presumably because of embolization). A minimum stent area <5.0 mm(2) (stent underexpansion) was observed in 67% of all SES failures (in particular, 67% of intrastent restenosis); negative remodeling was observed in 4 of 6 stent edge restenoses, and new lesions were secondary to an increase in plaque area

Patients with acute coronary syndrome are at increased risk of acute and long-term events after stent implantation. We compared the impact of intravascular ultrasound detected plaque rupture on creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) isoenzyme release and clinical outcomes by comparing 62 patients with ruptured plaques with 62 matched control patients who underwent stent implantation. Two thirds of the patients in each group presented with an acute coronary syndrome. There were no differences in procedural complications between groups, although patients with ruptured plaque had higher CK-MB elevation rates than those without ruptured plaque (1 to 3 times the upper limit of normal CK-MB, 35% vs 10%, p <0.001; >3 times the upper limit, 15% vs 2%, p = 0.02). Independent predictors of CK-MB elevation were presence of ruptured plaque (p = 0.03) and unstable angina (p = 0.04). Patients with ruptured plaque had higher composite rates of late events (target lesion revascularizations/myocardial infarctions/cardiac deaths) than controls (25% vs 9%, p = 0.03). These results were similar when only patients with acute coronary syndrome were studied. Plaque rupture morphology is associated with higher periprocedural CK-MB release and worse 1-year clinical outcome in patients treated with coronary stenting

BACKGROUND: The relationship between low hematocrit and contrast-induced nephropathy has not been investigated. METHODS: Of 6,773 consecutive patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, contrast-induced nephropathy (an increase of >/=25% or >/=0.5 mg/dL in preprocedure serum creatinine, at 48 hours postprocedure) occurred in 942 (13.9%) patients. RESULTS: Rates of contrast-induced nephropathy steadily increased as baseline hematocrit quintile decreased (from 10.3% in the highest quintile to 23.3% in the lowest quintile) (chi(2) for trend, P < 0.0001). Stratification by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and baseline hematocrit showed that the rates of contrast-induced nephropathy were the highest (28.8%) in patients who had the lowest level for both baseline eGFR and hematocrit. Patients with the lowest eGFR but relatively high baseline hematocrit values had remarkably lower rates of contrast-induced nephropathy (15.8%, 12.3%, 17.1%, and 15.4% in 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th quintiles of baseline hematocrit, respectively) (P < 0.0001). The rates of contrast-induced nephropathy increased with increment in change in hematocrit. Patients in the lowest quintile of baseline hematocrit with absolute hematocrit drop >5.9% had almost doubled rates of contrast-induced nephropathy compared with patients with hematocrit change <3.4% (38.1% vs. 18.8%, respectively) (P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, lower baseline hematocrit was an independent predictor of contrast-induced nephropathy; each 3% decrease in baseline hematocrit resulted in a significant increase in the odds of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with and without chronic kidney disease (11% and 23%, respectively). When introduced into the multivariate model instead of baseline hematocrit, change in hematocrit also showed a significant association with contrast-induced nephropathy. CONCLUSION: Lower hematocrit is an important risk factor for contrast-induced nephropathy. Whether correcting the hematocrit prepercutaneous coronary intervention might decrease the rates of contrast-induced nephropathy should be addressed in a prospectively designed trial

The purpose of this study was to report the angiographic findings of the first human evaluation of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) for the treatment of noncomplex coronary lesions. Forty-two patients with de novo coronary lesions (2.75 to 4.00 mm vessels; lesion length, <18 mm) were prospectively randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either the EES (n = 27) or a metallic stent (n = 15). Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar among both groups. At 6-month follow-up, EES had a lower in-stent late lumen loss (0.10 +/- 0.22 vs 0.85 +/- 0.32 mm, p <0.0001) and in-segment diameter stenoses (20.7 +/- 12.3% vs 37.0 +/- 15.8%, p = 0.002). There was no in-stent restenosis with EES; however, 1 focal distal edge restenosis was present. There was 1 in-stent and 1 in-segment (proximal edge) restenosis in the metallic stent group. There was no stent thrombosis or aneurysm formation at follow-up in either group

We previously found that contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) complicating percutaneous coronary intervention adversely affects patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, we further investigated whether the predictors and outcome of CIN after percutaneous coronary intervention differ among patients with versus without CKD. Among 7,230 consecutive patients, CIN (>or=25% or >or=0.5 mg/dl increase in preprocedure serum creatinine 48 hours after the procedure) developed in 381 of 1,980 patients (19.2%) with baseline CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) and in 688 of 5,250 patients (13.1%) without CKD. Decreased eGFRs, periprocedural hypotension, higher contrast media volumes, lower baseline hematocrit, diabetes, pulmonary edema at presentation, intra-aortic balloon pump use, and ejection fraction <40% were the most significant predictors of CIN in patients with CKD. Apart from intra-aortic balloon pump use, predictors of CIN in patients without CKD were the same as mentioned, plus older age and type of contrast media. Regardless of baseline renal function, CIN correlated with longer in-hospital stay and higher rates of in-hospital complications and 1-year mortality compared with patients without CIN. By multivariate analysis, CIN was 1 of the most powerful predictors of 1-year mortality in patients with preexisting CKD (odds ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.63 to 3.44) or preserved eGFR (odds ratio 1.78; 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 2.60). Thus, regardless of the presence of CKD, baseline characteristics and periprocedural hemodynamic parameters predict CIN, and this complication is associated with worse in-hospital and 1-year outcomes

BACKGROUND: Little is known about causes of intimal hyperplasia (IH) after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Intravascular ultrasound was performed in 24 lesions with intra-SES restenosis and a comparison group of 25 nonrestenotic SESs. To assess stent strut distribution, the maximum interstrut angle was measured with a protractor centered on the stent, and the visible struts were counted and normalized for the number of stent cells. In SES restenosis patients, minimum lumen site was compared with image slices 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 mm proximal and distal to this site. The minimum lumen site had a smaller IVUS lumen area at follow-up (2.7+/-0.9 versus 6.2+/-1.9 mm2; P<0.01), larger maximum interstrut angle (135+/-39 degrees versus 72+/-23 degrees; P<0.01), larger IH area (3.4+/-1.5 versus 0.6+/-1.1 mm2; P<0.01) and thickness (0.7+/-0.3 versus 0.1+/-0.2 mm; P<0.01) at maximum interstrut angle, and fewer stent struts (4.9+/-1.0 versus 6.0+/-0.5; P<0.01) even when normalized for the number of stent cells (0.78+/-0.15 versus 0.97+/-0.07; P<0.01). Compared with nonrestenotic SES, the restenosis lesions also had a smaller minimal lumen area, larger IH area, thicker IH at maximum interstrut angle, fewer stent struts, and larger maximum interstrut angle. Multivariate analysis identified the number of visualized stent struts normalized for the number of stent cells and maximum interstrut angle as the only independent IVUS predictor of IH cross-sectional area (P<0.01 and P<0.01), minimum lumen area (P<0.01 and P<0.01), and IH thickness (P<0.01 and P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The number and distribution of stent struts affect the amount of neointima after SES implantation

Coronary remodeling and plaque composition were compared between focal and diffuse coronary lesions. Negative remodeling and fibrous and calcified plaque compositions contribute to stenosis development in diffuse lesions more frequently than in focal lesions

Of 6,929 consecutive patients who were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, 1,708 (24.6%) had anemia according to criteria of the World Health Organization. Compared with patients who did not have anemia, those who did have anemia were older, more frequently women and African-American, had a smaller body mass index, and higher frequencies of cardiovascular risk factors and co-morbid conditions. Patients who had anemia compared with those who did not have anemia had significantly (p <0.0001) higher mortality rates during hospitalization (1.9% vs 0.4%) and at 1 year (12.8% vs 3.5%). After adjustment for potential confounders, baseline hematocrit remained a significant predictor of a 1-year mortality rate (hazard ratio 0.93 per 1% increase in hematocrit, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 0.95)