Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) causes pain and progressive disability, but pharmacologic treatments are limited. Colchicine inhibits inflammation that might modulate KOA, but efficacy trials have yielded mixed results. We tested whether colchicine, without concurrent NSAIDs, improved KOA pain, function, synovial effusion size, and OA-associated inflammatory serum biomarkers. METHODS:Participants with symptomatic KOA and radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence grades 2/3 were randomized to receive three months of daily colchicine or placebo in a double-blind manner, with no concurrent NSAID use. The primary outcome was between-group change in visual analog score (VAS) for index knee pain. Secondary outcomes included changes in Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS), size (depth in millimeters) of sonographically-identified effusions, acetaminophen use, and changes in OA-related serum biomarkers. RESULTS:, IL-1ra, IL-8, and VEGF (p < 0.16). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This double-blind placebo-controlled trial of colchicine for KOA failed to demonstrate improvement in pain, function, or synovial effusion size in comparison to placebo at three months. Early improvement in OA-associated inflammatory biomarkers suggests a possible longer-term clinical benefit. Clinical Trials Registration No NCT03913442.

Prior research suggests a connection between osteoarthritis and gout at sites commonly affected by gouty attacks. Whether this connection exists at sites with known monosodium urate crystal deposition but less commonly affected by gouty attacks, such as the lumbosacral spine, has not been previously investigated. We assessed whether lumbosacral osteoarthritis is more prevalent and more severe in subjects with gout compared with controls, and whether lumbosacral osteoarthritis is associated with higher levels of spinal monosodium urate deposition. Fifty gout subjects and 25 controls underwent dual-energy computed tomography imaging of the lumbosacral spine. We assessed lumbosacral osteoarthritis using a modification of a validated computed tomography scoring system, incorporating grade of intervertebral disc narrowing and facet joint osteoarthritis, and presence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. We quantified spinal monosodium urate deposition using the default post-processing algorithm, plus a maximally specific algorithm to exclude potential artefacts. Forty-six gout subjects and 25 controls, average age 62 years, were included in the final analysis. Both gout and control subjects exhibited high rates of facet joint osteoarthritis and degenerative disc disease, with no difference in prevalence or severity between groups. Gout subjects did not have differing prevalence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis vs. controls. Subjects with lumbosacral osteoarthritis did not have higher levels of spinal monosodium urate deposition. Overall, lumbosacral osteoarthritis was not more prevalent or more severe in gout patients compared with controls, and spinal monosodium urate crystal deposition did not differ between patients with and without lumbosacral osteoarthritis.

Gout is a disease of hyperuricemia (HU) leading to monosodium urate crystal deposition in the joint, resulting in inflammation and joint damage. Recently, efforts have been made to characterize the intestinal microbiome of patients who suffer from HU and gout, and pre-clinical studies have evaluated the utility of prebiotics and probiotics in alleviating gout. Herein we review recent notable studies addressing these topics. In brief, the "gouty" microbiome is characterized by reduced diversity, an elevated Bacteroides: Firmicutes ratio, and reduced presence of Akkermansia and Bifidobacterium. In anserine models, supplementation with Lactobacillus probiotic strains appears to reduce serum urate (SU) and HU-induced inflammation. Murine models suggest that the chicory-derived prebiotic inulin may reduce SU, and oral supplementation with the anti-inflammatory short-chain fatty acid butyrate may lower SU by enhancing urate excretion and alleviate HU-induced tissue inflammation. Many of these studies are limited by modest numbers of participants and/or incompletely documented experimental controls, and, in the case of animal models, questionable reproducibility in humans. Many studies have been geographically limited. There remains a need for more information regarding the features of the "gouty" microbiome in wider populations, as well as for additional well-controlled probiotic and prebiotic studies in more physiologically relevant animal models prior to clinical trials.

Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis. Treatment of gout includes anti-inflammatory and urate-lowering agents. Robust guidelines by the American College of Rheumatology, the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology and other committees have been released regarding recommendations for urate-lowering therapy, including suggested first- and second-line medications, length of therapy with prophylaxis, and target serum urate concentration to treat patients to. Notably, the American College of Physicians guidelines do not recommend robust urate lowering and are more geared towards treating symptoms without monitoring or lowering urate. Controversies regarding the optimal management of gout patients still exist. In the following, we discuss several of these controversies and some of the most recent literature regarding potential future changes in recommended management of gout. We discuss options for prophylactic therapy and length, treating gout concomitantly with its most common comorbidities, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease, potential debulking therapy for more severe gout, and optimal urate levels.

OBJECTIVE:Controversy persists regarding the optimal management of gout in routine primary care. There is a lack of clarity on whether treating to a target serum urate (TTT-SU) versus treating to avoid symptoms (TTASx) is more effective. METHODS:We designed a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial aimed at patients in primary care who have known gout, have elevated SU levels, and had at least one flare in the previous 12 months. The trial was designed to be pragmatic and incorporated structured input from primary care physicians, rheumatologists, and patients. The TTASx strategy group will receive weeklong courses of typical therapies for gout flares, such as colchicine, naproxen, or an oral glucocorticoid. The TTT-SU strategy group will receive urate-lowering therapy (primarily allopurinol) with dose titration to maintain an SU level <6 mg/dL, colchicine (or naproxen) prophylaxis for the first six months of urate-lowering therapy, and access to the same flare therapies as the TTASx group. Two clinicians (nurses or physicians) per site will be trained in each strategy to manage the patients in each arm without contamination. Gout flares are the primary outcome and are assessed every two weeks by trained study staff masked to treatment assignment using a validated questionnaire. The secondary outcome is quality of life. Blood pressure control, kidney function, glycemic control, and coronary atherosclerosis are exploratory secondary outcomes. RESULTS:Several sites have started prescreening using automated search strategies in their patients' electronic health records. Of the first 1,381 patients found in primary care practices with a history of gout, 691 patients (50%) passed prescreening checks. These potentially eligible participants have a median age of 67 years, 85% are men, median SU levels are 7.2 mg/dL, and 18% are taking low dosages of allopurinol. These patients have been targeted for recruitment efforts that are underway now. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This randomized controlled active comparator strategy trial will answer a key question in the treatment of patients with gout in primary care: the comparative effectiveness of TTT-SU versus TTASx in gout. Secondary and exploratory outcomes will add important information regarding the broader extra-articular and quality-of-life effects of lowering SU levels.

Gout, the most common inflammatory arthritis, affects as many as 5.1% of the adult population. Classically, gout is conceived as four sequential phenotypic states: 1) asymptomatic hyperuricemia 2) acute gout flare 3) inter-critical gout (gout between flares); and 4) tophaceous gout. However, these four states are paralleled by a fifth state, consisting of vascular involvement. The mechanisms and consequences of vascular gout are incompletely elucidated. In vitro and animal models indicate that soluble urate adversely affects vascular endothelium and smooth muscle. The recent discovery that soluble urate can be transported intracellularly to alter cell metabolism and epigenetics (trained innate immunity) suggests additional impacts of urate on leukocytes and endothelium. Once gout has progressed to flares, the vasculature is exposed to inflammatory mediators, both during flares and to a lesser but persistent extent inter-critically, suggesting additional mechanisms of gout's effect. We have reported that patients with gout have diminished endothelial function measured by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation. ACR gout guideline-concordant treatment improves endothelial function but is less effective in patients with cardiometabolic comorbidities. Moreover, treatment of gout patients with the anti-inflammatory colchicine and urate lowering therapy improves endothelial function and reduces the risk of both incident coronary artery disease (CAD), and MACE in patients with established CAD.