Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:To provide guidance for the management of gout, including indications for and optimal use of urate-lowering therapy (ULT), treatment of gout flares, and lifestyle and other medication recommendations. METHODS:Fifty-seven population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions were developed, followed by a systematic literature review, including network meta-analyses with ratings of the available evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, and patient input. A group consensus process was used to compose the final recommendations and grade their strength as strong or conditional. RESULTS:Forty-two recommendations (including 16 strong recommendations) were generated. Strong recommendations included initiation of ULT for all patients with tophaceous gout, radiographic damage due to gout, or frequent gout flares; allopurinol as the preferred first-line ULT, including for those with moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (CKD; stage >3); using a low starting dose of allopurinol (≤100 mg/day, and lower in CKD) or febuxostat (<40 mg/day); and a treat-to-target management strategy with ULT dose titration guided by serial serum urate (SU) measurements, with an SU target of <6 mg/dl. When initiating ULT, concomitant antiinflammatory prophylaxis therapy for a duration of at least 3-6 months was strongly recommended. For management of gout flares, colchicine, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, or glucocorticoids (oral, intraarticular, or intramuscular) were strongly recommended. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Using GRADE methodology and informed by a consensus process based on evidence from the current literature and patient preferences, this guideline provides direction for clinicians and patients making decisions on the management of gout.

Purpose: Current treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) remain inadequate. Accumulating evidence suggests that OA is an inflammatory disease, with a particular role for interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) a product of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Additionally, both calcium and urate crystals have been suggested to play potential roles in OA and both are recognized to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome to produce IL-1beta. Colchicine is an ancient and well-tolerated anti-inflammatory agent and has recently been shown to inhibit inflammasome activation and IL-1beta generation. Several studies have examined the impact of colchicine on various aspects of OA, with varying Results. We are assessing the potential benefits of colchicine on several short-term features of knee OA.
Method(s): The CLOAK (CoLchicine for treatment of OsteoArthritis of the Knee) study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of colchicine (0.8 mgs daily) for 90 days. (Figure 1). We are identifying patients as they are seen in the rheumatology clinics, as well as calling patients from our knee OA database of prior studies. The recruitment goal is to enroll 120 subjects at least 50 years of age who have symptomatic knee OA with radiographic confirmation (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3), and who are willing to forego other anti-inflammatory therapy (i.e., topical or oral NSAID and/or intraarticular steroids or hyaluronic acid) during the trial. The primary clinical outcome is the difference between treatment and placebo groups in pain improvement by visual analog scale, along with changes in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and mean doses of analgesics used. Inflammatory outcomes between the two groups include changes in plasma inflammatory markers (such as hsCRP, PGE2, and IL-1Ra) and peripheral blood leukocyte genomic studies. All patients are scanned by knee ultrasound pre- and post-treatment, with assessment for synovitis and effusion. We also aspirate synovial fluid when appropriate, and will analyze all available samples together for inflammatory markers.
Result(s): To date, 78 patients have been contacted or approached, 18 screened, and 17 enrolled. Six have completed the study, with a mean BMI of 30.3. All 6 remain blinded as to study group; however, the mean VAS pain score among the group decreased by 1.7 in the index knee (which had greater pain at baseline), while the mean KOOS scores for symptoms, pain, activities of daily living, sports activity, quality of life and KOOS global all improved. Individually, 4 of the 6 completing subjects demonstrated VAS score improvement with 2 of 6 demonstrating worsening, a pattern that was duplicated in most of the KOOS scores.
Conclusion(s): The CLOAK trial is testing the potential benefit of colchicine on pain and inflammation in knee OA, specifically in patients with moderate radiographic disease who are not taking other anti-inflammatory agents. Supported by an investigator-initiated grant from Hikma Pharmaceuticals. [Formula presented]
Copyright

Background/Purpose : Several studies implicate gout and/or xanthine oxidase activity as risk factors for type 2 diabetes. However, no studies have directly evaluated the effect of the xanthine oxidase inhibition on type 2 diabetes development. We therefore assessed the impact of allopurinol use on diabetes incidence in a retrospective cohort study of Veterans' Affairs patients with gout. Methods : The New York Harbor VA Computerized Patient Record System was searched to identify patients with an ICD-9 code for gout also meeting at least 4 1977 American Rheumatology Association gout diagnostic criteria. Pharmacy records were reviewed, and subjects divided into subgroups based on >30 continuous days of allopurinol prescription, versus no allopurinol. Incident diagnoses of diabetes, defined as first hemoglobin A1c <= 6.5% or physician documentation, were identified during an observation period from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2015. Categorical variables, including the primary endpoint, were analyzed utilizing Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were analyzed using binomial regression and the Student's T test. Results : 1032 subjects were allopurinol users, and 485 subjects were allopurinol never-users. The average duration of allopurinol use was 48.4 months. There were significantly more Black subjects in the allopurinol group, whereas there were significantly more Asian subjects and subjects with chronic kidney disease in the non-allopurinol group. Over a mean 94.3 months of follow-up, there was no significant difference in diabetes incidence between the allopurinol and non-allopurinol groups (8.0/1000 person-years versus 11.3/1000 person-years, p=0.64). There was also no significant difference in diabetes incidence when subjects were analyzed by baseline serum urate level, colchicine use, allopurinol dose, extent of urate lowering with allopurinol or achieving target urate level. When stratified into quartiles by duration of allopurinol use, a significant difference was observed between diabetes incidence in the longest and shortest quartiles among subjects in the allopurinol cohort (7.3 per 1000 person-years versus 21.3 per 1000 person-years, p=0.007). Conclusion : In this study, allopurinol use was overall not associated with reduced diabetes incidence, but longer durations of allopurinol use may have been associated with decreased diabetes. Prospective studies may further elucidate the relationship between hyperuricemia, gout, xanthine oxidase activity and diabetes, and the potential impact of gout treatments on diabetes incidence. (Figure Presented )

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Gout patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) accumulate the active allopurinol metabolite oxypurinol, suggesting that allopurinol may promote greater serum urate (sU) lowering in CKD patients. METHODS:We identified all patientswith gout diagnoses on either 100 mg or 300 mg of allopurinol daily, with available pre- and on-treatment sU levels, in our system in a 1-year period. Mean sU decrement by dosing per CKD groups was determined by CKD stage. RESULTS:Of 1,288 subjects with gout, 180 met entry criteria, with 83 subjects receiving 100 mg and 97 receiving 300 mg allopurinol. Subjects with CKD stage 1 experienced less sU lowering with 100 mg than 300 mg of allopurinol. Subjects with stage 4 and 5 CKD had equivalent sU decreases across the 100 mg and 300 mg allopurinol groups. However, the 100 mg group started at a higher pre-treatment sU and ended at a higher final sU than the 300 mg group. CONCLUSIONS:The strategy of titrating allopurinol to sU in patients with kidney impairment may result in greater sU lowering at lower doses than in patients without CKD but may also pose a treatment challenge from a possible drug ceiling effect.

Background/Purpose: Previous studies suggest that patients with gout are at increased risk for developing diabetes.1 One possible explanation for this increased risk is the activation of pathologic pathways common to both diabetes and gout, including IL-1b.2 Among its many mechanisms, colchicine has been found to suppress activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome, inhibiting activation of IL-1b. Colchicine may also activate AMPK, a down regulator of inflammation and gluconeogenesis.3 In the present study, we investigated whether chronic colchicine use reduces diabetes incidence among patients with gout.
Method(s): We reviewed the Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) of the New York Harbor Veterans' Affairs Healthcare System to assess the incidence of diabetes between 2000 and 2015 among 140 randomly selected patients with gout who had taken colchicine daily for some or all of the study period. We compared the diabetes incidence among these patients with 115 randomly selected patients with gout who did not take colchicine during the same time period. At study entry, all subjects met a modified version of 1977 ARA gout classification criteria and had no diabetes diagnosis. Patients were excluded if their duration of colchicine use was <60 contiguous days. Incident diabetes was defined as a new hemoglobin A1c value of >=6.5% during the study period.
Result(s): Among gout patients who had taken colchicine, we observed no difference in diabetes incidence compared to patients not taking colchicine (17.1% versus 17.4%, OR = 0.983, p = 1.0). When patients were analyzed by duration of colchicine use, there was no significant difference in diabetes incidence between patients in the longest (36.5 to 114 months) compared to the shortest tertile (2.3 to 14 months)(27.3% versus 9.1%, p=0.24) of colchicine exposure. Among patients in the colchicine group who experienced incident diabetes during the study period (n=24), 50% (n=12) were actively taking colchicine at the time of their diagnosis and 50% (n=12) had discontinued colchicine use prior to their diabetes diagnosis.
Conclusion(s): We found no significant difference in the 15-year diabetes incidence between patients taking colchicine and those not taking colchicine, suggesting that colchicine is not beneficial to prevent incident diabetes. Larger and prospective studies will be needed to confirm this observation

Gout is characterized by the deposition of monosodium urate crystals and by acute and chronic inflammation in response to crystals so deposited. Multiple case reports and series describe the deposition of monosodium urate in the spine as a rare manifestation of gout, but the actual prevalence of spinal involvement is unknown and likely to be higher than generally anticipated. Here we review the characteristics of 131 previously reported cases of spinal involvement in gout. We focus in particular on the use of imaging modalities and the extent to which they correlate with presenting symptoms and tissue diagnoses. The recent innovation of using dual-energy computerized tomography to identify urate crystal deposition holds promise for reducing the need for surgical intervention and for establishing a true prevalence rate for spinal gout.